The Reject Report
Speed Racer Crashes and Burns
Posted by John Cairns (jcairns@filmschoolrejects.com) on May 11, 2008

It’s only been two weeks, but the first major train wreck of the summer movie season is in the books. Or maybe I ought to say “car wreck”, because Speed Racer crashed in spectacular fashion and was killed at the box office. No other way to describe it.
Am I ever glad, in retrospect, that I didn’t pick this movie to finish in the Top Ten in my Summer Preview predictions. I knew this flick would lose the weekend to Iron Man but I figured they would have one weekend of respectability, at least. I overestimated how badly Speed Racer was going to tank. Not only did it not hit $40 million — it didn’t even hit $30 million!
It didn’t even hit $25 million! It didn’t even hit $21 million! That’s right, $20 million (!!!) is all this cinematic roadkill got. Iron Man dominated for a second incredible week, taking the checkered flag by so wide margin that it was a joke. It hauled in $50 million, down from last week but better than what most experts predicted.
Adding insult to injury, that Ashton Kutcher piece of junk What Happens in Vegas (Rotten Tomatoes: 28%) also made $20 million, and it was in a lot fewer theaters. In fact, Speed Racer did such poor business it would have also lost out to several movies released over the past number of weeks as well. These include 21, 10,000 B.C., The Forbidden Kingdom, Prom Night, Vantage Point, Jumper, Fool’s Gold, and on and on and on.
Talk about dismal. I was reading Nikki Finke’s website all weekend, and it seemed like every time I checked in for an update the estimates for Speed Racer were going down, and down, and down!! It really was like watching a slow-motion video of a flaming wreck in progress. Finke was also going on about how Speed Racer was doing even worse in the overseas markets, finishing in something like ninth place in Germany. Keep this in mind: they made this movie in Germany. When you make a movie in Germany of all places, land of the autobahn and Michael Schumacher, and not even these speed-obsessed Germans will see it… now, that is sad.
Holy cow, what a big bomb this is for Warner Brothers. The cost was rumored to be upwards of $180 million!! Frankly, I am surprised at how badly this flick did. This flick got a heap of publicity everywhere and I would have thought it would have made much more money, based on the hype. This is the type of box office one would expect for a movie that rolls out in early spring or the fall, not May. I guess that goes to show you that the audience testing does say a lot about a movie’s prospects. I remember reading Tom Green’s book Hollywood Causes Cancer, and he talked about how audience testing was done for Freddy Got Fingered. After the test screenings, the audience filled in their cards and the movie received the worst, most hostile responses ever. So these folks in charge knew they had a bomb on their hands before the movie was even released.
Maybe, just maybe, the people who made this flick marketed Speed Racer to the wrong audience — kids. Maybe they should have made this movie with an eye towards the fanboys and the aging baby boomers who remember the cartoon TV show. Or maybe they should have picked a different date to roll out this movie. Couldn’t the folks at Warners have waited until AFTER the Indianapolis 500 and the Coca-Cola 600 to release this flick? Then they could have littered the TV broadcasts of those two events with Speed Racer ads and promotional tie-ins!! That’s what they did with Cars and with Talladega Nights!
Or maybe, just maybe, they shouldn’t have made this freaking flick to begin with. What an idea.
Forgive me for not coming up with any half-decent analysis of what happened with this movie. I don’t know why the movie flopped so badly. I’m just throwing out some theories for your edification and to fill space. (Maybe it was because of the RECESSION. Hey, now I’m thinking! Times are tight, and the price of gas is through the roof, so that encourages a lot of people to stay home.)
Suffice it to say it’s likely we’ll be spared a Speed Racer sequel, which is just as well. Maybe this will finally encourage studios to quit making retreaded movies based on TV shows, especially live-action retreads of cartoons. I don’t know of any movie based on a TV cartoon show that was ever a success with the critics, whether it’s Scooby-Doo or The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle, or Josie and the Pussycats, or Underdog, or fill in the blanks. They weren’t big hits, either. The only recent one I can think of that really raked in the cash was Alvin and the Chipmunks, and I’m convinced that was a total fluke. I guess there was The Flintstones before that, but that was a while ago. And neither flick was very good, either.
It doesn’t even matter if the original cartoon series was any good to begin with. Just because the cartoons were cool doesn’t mean the big-screen version will be as good or even make money.
Here’s a rundown of the Top Ten.
| 1. Iron Man | $50.5 million |
| 2. Speed Racer | $20 million |
| 3. What Happens in Vegas | $20 million |
| 4. Made of Honor | $7.6 million |
| 5. Baby Mama | $5.7 million |
| 6. Forgetting Sarah Marshall | $3.7 million |
| 7. Harold and Kumar Escape Guantanamo Bay | $3.1 million |
| 8. The Forbidden Kingdom | $1.9 million |
| 9. Nim’s Island | $1.3 million |
| 10. Redbelt | $1.1 million |
By the way, it sure seems as if it’s the blockbusters are doing all the business right now. It only took $1.1 million dollars in business for Redbelt to make the Top Ten this weekend. Usually it takes $2 or $3 million. But that’s what happens when everyone in the whole United States of America wants to go see Robert Downey Jr. fly around in a metal suit. The Iron Man phenomenon is quite something right now.
That’s that for this weekend. Back later this week to preview more movies here at The Reject Report, as summer blockbuster season continues!
Read more articles by John Cairns







14 Comments
May 12th, 2008 at 12:09 am
The film looks great in DLP. I saw it opening night with about 30+ people in the theatre in downtown Toronto. The theatre set up an area for people to line up for Speed Racer, but there was no one in them before and after the movie.
I remember every time Speed Racer previewed at every movie I saw this year, the audience scoffed several times. People went as far as saying, “Remind me not to watch this.”
Spoilers:
‘
‘
‘
‘
I really thought the movie was abysmal. It seemed like a mix of Speed Racer, Wacky Races and Need For Speed Underground. The backdrops seemed to be forced to be complimented with the live actors instead of the other way around. The dynamic acting really ruined the scene cuts with Spritle and the chimp. Spritle’s acting was on a weird and massive-over-acting high and really took me out of the movie. The only thing I found great from the movie was the editing. I liked how the beginning switched back and fourth between present and past making sure the back story didn’t drone on. The use of actors heads and cars for swipes really made the visuals flow well.
On a technical stand point A+
Story wise: no grade
May 12th, 2008 at 12:29 am
Hah! And they were trying to sell twilight fans the idea the trailer could only be seen on this movie…Thank God Lexicon cleared up the rumors or i had gone to the theaters and watch it.. just for Twilight.. the movie just looked so fake to me.. i saw some footage and it seemed like it had been all shot using the green screen.. for me.. pretty lame.
May 12th, 2008 at 1:14 am
I AM IRON MAN. And I’m so money I shit cash.
May 12th, 2008 at 2:05 am
Not considering the quality of the film which I haven’t seen yet, there’s a bunch of reasons. Bad timing. No way Speed Racer was more popular than Iron Man. It’ll take more than the Wachowski’s name on it.
Bad marketing, I’m serious. The intent I got from the trailers was that this was a cartoon with live actors. Not the way that comic adaptations have gone where they try to go for a realistic look/plot. It should have appealed more to the anime aspects than a general audience action film. A blown chance to get the otaku away from their VHS tape marathons. Let me guess when Akira comes out it will debut the same weekend as The Avengers. Smart. Very Smart.
My other reasons also extend to every other release this month except Sex and the City which is like Iron Woman. Is it me or is Hollywood overreacting to the whole “recession” “gas crisis” fears and releasing their big guns all at once? School is still in session and I think May only has room for 2 major releases not 4 or 5. These big budget films are going to make less money I predict than if they wait until school lets out.
I don’t think GTA is a factor seeing how well Iron Man did. May is all Iron Man. Speed Racer couldn’t have beat that colossus.
May 12th, 2008 at 2:21 am
The Wachowski “Brothers” is something that turns me away these days.
May 12th, 2008 at 2:38 am
They made Natalie Portman shave her head. I totally agree with you there.
May 12th, 2008 at 2:53 am
Speed Racer kicked Ass I don’t know what film you guys were watching. This was a masterpiece.!!!
May 12th, 2008 at 7:30 am
The feed has switched from being a full text feed to just teaser. Is this a permanent thing?
May 12th, 2008 at 7:33 am
@Ryan
Not sure why you are getting that. It should still be full text…
May 12th, 2008 at 10:18 am
I watched it, I enjoyed it, but I wasnt blown away as i was expecting to be. All the hype said that this was going to be visually revolutionary, and unlike anything we had seen before But you know what, it wasn’t. It was cool to look at, but it didnt knock my socks off. I enjoyed the film, but will admit it wasnt great. BUT, i took my kids, the group this film was marketed towards, and they wanted to leave early. They said it was boring. Only the ralley race sequence really kept their interest. The other races were too hard to follow and there was “too much talking for a race movie”, or so said my son!
May 12th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
@Kevin,
Natalie Portman is just as beautiful bald as she is haired, or un-bald, or with-hair… In fact she was doubly fine in ‘V’ because I was reminded of my long ago love for Sinead O’Connor.
May 13th, 2008 at 1:53 am
I’m sorry you can’t turn every child hood comic book or tv show into a movie. Some things should be left well enough alone. If it’s not done with an adult flair to appeal to the audeince who can relate to it it should not be done at all. I hated speed racer growing up. Being the youngest and a girl I was forced to watch. I loved Johnny Socko, Godzilla, The Goul, Rod Sterling. All that scarry stuff and the pre-anemie stuff. I also prefer Tim Burton’s Batman, sorry guys. Robert Downey has the balls to pull off Tony Stark. I don’t see how they thought Speed Racer would translate into a movie. The special effects was to glitzy to me. Where is Neo when you need him!!!!
May 31st, 2008 at 4:17 pm
One thing that I haven’t seen mentioned in write-up about this film is the idea that a different type of ‘Speed Racer’ film COULD have fared far better. Now, I grew up with this cartoon in perpetual reruns during my childhood. When a group of my friends heard that there would be a ‘Speed racer’ film, we all had a great laugh over it. We reminisced about how bad it generally was (the animation, the choppy voice edits), but we also ALL remembered the characters’ names . We all remembered the oblique sense of morality the show always had (or tried to have).
I then saw the preview with a few friends who are my age - just over 40. We all started laughing again … but this time following our laughter with lines like “Wow, remind me to miss THIS piece of junk!”. My exact comment was “Well, if I want to go to the movies to throw up I’ll be first in line for this”. The problem; it looked like it was more of a VIDEO GAME than a movie. People my age … the age of many kids’ parents … don’t all play video games.
I would have loved a cute, fun ‘parody’ of this weird little show. I would have appreciated a ‘cartoonish’ element to it. But this looked to be 90+minutes of major, headache-inducing, severe sensory over-stimulation. No thanks.
After watching the trailer a second time, I asked my girlfriend if she thought even kids wanted this type of stimulation. Her answer to me was “You see kids every day … what do you think?” As a media librarian in a large suburban area, I see what videos kids take out of the library every day. The answer to the question then, with regards to whether they would want to see this type of visual gimmickry in a movie as opposed to a videogame was, in my mind, a resounding “No”.
A week after the movie came out, I polled the few kids who had seen it. Yep … I was right. Even they thought it was overstimulating. Nice try, guys. Next time, let Mike Myers do it. He probably would have brought the film in for over 100k less, too.
May 31st, 2008 at 8:28 pm
I loved it.
Totally got what the Whachowsskis were doing.
I’m 40, and loved the cartoon.
I think this film was ahead of it time…..
Can’t wait for the dvd.