Comments on: TV Review: ‘Chuck’ Goes 3D, But Loses a Dimension

By: Jim Dorey

Jim Dorey — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:31:24 +0000

Neil – please don't forget that the modern 3D in the theaters AND what will soon be readily available for home entertainment WILL NOT be anaglyph (old style red/blue glasses) as you used for CHUCK. It will be polarized or shutter glasses which gives a VASTLY better experience. When Dreamworks Animation announced they would be doing this I shook my head in disbelief as I knew audiences would assume that these cardboard, red blue glasses are indeed the new 3D technology and fully represents technology. Not even close!

You can have 3D in the home right now through TDVision, Sensio, iZ3D and NVIDIA, but there is no standard yet. When the standard comes, then you will see 3D the way it is meant to be seen at home.

By: Jim Dorey

Jim Dorey — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:31:00 +0000

You can have 3D in the home right now through TDVision, Sensio, iZ3D and NVIDIA, but there is no standard yet. When the standard comes, then you will see 3D the way it is meant to be seen at home.

By: blckmanjew

blckmanjew — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:55:16 +0000

It surprised me and everyone else I watched the super bowl with that Chuck was still on tv. Its just one of those shows you just don't think is going to make it.

By: blckmanjew

blckmanjew — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:55:00 +0000

It surprised me and everyone else I watched the super bowl with that Chuck was still on tv. Its just one of those shows you just don't think is going to make it.

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:07:46 +0000

Did anyone else jump up and down when Buster shouted out "NO TOUCHING!"

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:07:00 +0000

Did anyone else jump up and down when Buster shouted out "NO TOUCHING!"