<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WALL-E is Good, But Not One of Pixar&#8217;s Best</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php/comment-page-1#comment-101633</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7858#comment-101633</guid>
		<description>Wall-E totally looks like the robot from &quot;Short Circuit&quot;... minus the cheesy 80&#039;s style of course</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wall-E totally looks like the robot from &#8220;Short Circuit&#8221;&#8230; minus the cheesy 80&#8242;s style of course</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php/comment-page-1#comment-195847</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7858#comment-195847</guid>
		<description>Wall-E totally looks like the robot from &quot;Short Circuit&quot;... minus the cheesy 80&#039;s style of course</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wall-E totally looks like the robot from &#8220;Short Circuit&#8221;&#8230; minus the cheesy 80&#8242;s style of course</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php/comment-page-1#comment-100373</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7858#comment-100373</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with everything said. Good film, but certainly not great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with everything said. Good film, but certainly not great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php/comment-page-1#comment-195846</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7858#comment-195846</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with everything said. Good film, but certainly not great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with everything said. Good film, but certainly not great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supremejred</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php/comment-page-1#comment-100372</link>
		<dc:creator>supremejred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7858#comment-100372</guid>
		<description>Your review is a shock good sir. It&#039;s simply amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your review is a shock good sir. It&#8217;s simply amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supremejred</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php/comment-page-1#comment-195845</link>
		<dc:creator>supremejred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7858#comment-195845</guid>
		<description>Your review is a shock good sir. It&#039;s simply amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your review is a shock good sir. It&#8217;s simply amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php/comment-page-1#comment-100303</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7858#comment-100303</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a reasonable, well thoughtout counterpoint. Well done. Maybe I&#039;ll have to see it again with that in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a reasonable, well thoughtout counterpoint. Well done. Maybe I&#8217;ll have to see it again with that in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php/comment-page-1#comment-195844</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7858#comment-195844</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a reasonable, well thoughtout counterpoint. Well done. Maybe I&#039;ll have to see it again with that in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a reasonable, well thoughtout counterpoint. Well done. Maybe I&#8217;ll have to see it again with that in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php/comment-page-1#comment-100293</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7858#comment-100293</guid>
		<description>In response to your question, it&#039;s important to remember that the message to cancel 
operation Re-colonize was only sent to the auto pilots. And since the Axiom was the jewel 
crown of the fleet, in order to keep that image that Buy-N-Large was still in the interests if 
the people the EVE probes were probably continued to be sent out to look for vegetation to 
keep the early crew members and passengers in the dark with false hopes. However, after 
being kept out of the loop for 700 years, I&#039;m sure the descendants of the early  passengers 
eventually lost all knowledge that they were supposed to return to earth at some point. Such 
as the Captain, who knew the EVE probes were sent out but never expected anything to 
come of it. It became a tradition/ritual more than an actual search for a way back home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to your question, it&#8217;s important to remember that the message to cancel<br />
operation Re-colonize was only sent to the auto pilots. And since the Axiom was the jewel<br />
crown of the fleet, in order to keep that image that Buy-N-Large was still in the interests if<br />
the people the EVE probes were probably continued to be sent out to look for vegetation to<br />
keep the early crew members and passengers in the dark with false hopes. However, after<br />
being kept out of the loop for 700 years, I&#8217;m sure the descendants of the early  passengers<br />
eventually lost all knowledge that they were supposed to return to earth at some point. Such<br />
as the Captain, who knew the EVE probes were sent out but never expected anything to<br />
come of it. It became a tradition/ritual more than an actual search for a way back home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/wall-e-is-good-but-not-one-of-pixars-best.php/comment-page-1#comment-195843</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7858#comment-195843</guid>
		<description>In response to your question, it&#039;s important to remember that the message to cancel 
operation Re-colonize was only sent to the auto pilots. And since the Axiom was the jewel 
crown of the fleet, in order to keep that image that Buy-N-Large was still in the interests if 
the people the EVE probes were probably continued to be sent out to look for vegetation to 
keep the early crew members and passengers in the dark with false hopes. However, after 
being kept out of the loop for 700 years, I&#039;m sure the descendants of the early  passengers 
eventually lost all knowledge that they were supposed to return to earth at some point. Such 
as the Captain, who knew the EVE probes were sent out but never expected anything to 
come of it. It became a tradition/ritual more than an actual search for a way back home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to your question, it&#8217;s important to remember that the message to cancel<br />
operation Re-colonize was only sent to the auto pilots. And since the Axiom was the jewel<br />
crown of the fleet, in order to keep that image that Buy-N-Large was still in the interests if<br />
the people the EVE probes were probably continued to be sent out to look for vegetation to<br />
keep the early crew members and passengers in the dark with false hopes. However, after<br />
being kept out of the loop for 700 years, I&#8217;m sure the descendants of the early  passengers<br />
eventually lost all knowledge that they were supposed to return to earth at some point. Such<br />
as the Captain, who knew the EVE probes were sent out but never expected anything to<br />
come of it. It became a tradition/ritual more than an actual search for a way back home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 382/388 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 21:23:02 -->
