<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sundance Review: &#8216;Toe to Toe&#8217; Shoots and Misses Wide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/sundance-review-toe-to-toe-shoots-and-misses-wide.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/sundance-review-toe-to-toe-shoots-and-misses-wide.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie_obe</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/sundance-review-toe-to-toe-shoots-and-misses-wide.php/comment-page-1#comment-167617</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie_obe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=29061#comment-167617</guid>
		<description>How would a film, even a short, that is as bad as you say, ever get past the first level of screening in the entry process?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would a film, even a short, that is as bad as you say, ever get past the first level of screening in the entry process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silencio</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/sundance-review-toe-to-toe-shoots-and-misses-wide.php/comment-page-1#comment-127161</link>
		<dc:creator>Silencio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=29061#comment-127161</guid>
		<description>I walked out of &quot;Lunch Break.&quot; I tried my damndest to make it through, but I could finally take no more and looked at my watch only to discover I was only 25 minutes into the 2 hour film. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I walked out of &quot;Lunch Break.&quot; I tried my damndest to make it through, but I could finally take no more and looked at my watch only to discover I was only 25 minutes into the 2 hour film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silencio</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/sundance-review-toe-to-toe-shoots-and-misses-wide.php/comment-page-1#comment-215767</link>
		<dc:creator>Silencio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=29061#comment-215767</guid>
		<description>I walked out of &quot;Lunch Break.&quot; I tried my damndest to make it through, but I could finally take no more and looked at my watch only to discover I was only 25 minutes into the 2 hour film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I walked out of &quot;Lunch Break.&quot; I tried my damndest to make it through, but I could finally take no more and looked at my watch only to discover I was only 25 minutes into the 2 hour film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelJM</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/sundance-review-toe-to-toe-shoots-and-misses-wide.php/comment-page-1#comment-126879</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=29061#comment-126879</guid>
		<description>The fact that anyone could give a Sundance film a D, just scares me.  What does this say about the quality of films being shown? What does this say about the decision process?  For a festival that is so sought after, and so tough to get into, it saddens me that a potentially better film than this was denied the opportunity to screen. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that anyone could give a Sundance film a D, just scares me.  What does this say about the quality of films being shown? What does this say about the decision process?  For a festival that is so sought after, and so tough to get into, it saddens me that a potentially better film than this was denied the opportunity to screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelJM</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/sundance-review-toe-to-toe-shoots-and-misses-wide.php/comment-page-1#comment-215766</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=29061#comment-215766</guid>
		<description>The fact that anyone could give a Sundance film a D, just scares me.  What does this say about the quality of films being shown? What does this say about the decision process?  For a festival that is so sought after, and so tough to get into, it saddens me that a potentially better film than this was denied the opportunity to screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that anyone could give a Sundance film a D, just scares me.  What does this say about the quality of films being shown? What does this say about the decision process?  For a festival that is so sought after, and so tough to get into, it saddens me that a potentially better film than this was denied the opportunity to screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 279/285 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-14 01:56:26 -->
