Review: Valkyrie

Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.com) on December 24, 2008

valkyrie_review1

Valkyrie (2008)
Directed by Brian Singer
Written by Christopher McQuarrie and Nathan Alexander
Starring Tom Cruise, Tom Wilkinson, Bill Nighy and Kenneth Branagh
Rated PG-13 for violence and brief strong language.

Story: Enlightened to the evil of Adolf Hitler, a battle tested German Colonel named Clause von Stauffenberg (Tom Cruise), joins a group of fellow dissenters in an intricate plot to assassinate their Fuhrer.

Review: What is it that we’ve loved so much about the work of Brian Singer and Christopher McQuarrie? Well, together they’ve shown the ability to create interesting characters and weave a story that is both engaging and surprising. These tools, found most prominently in 1994’s The Usual Suspects, were enough to propel the careers of both director and scribe. Since then they’ve gone different directions — Singer to the ups (X-Men) and downs (Superman Returns) of the superhero genre and McQuarrie to what can only be described as a long vacation. Now they are back with Valkyrie, perhaps the most straightforward drama that either man has ever delivered. And while Singer has stepped up his visual game as a director, it would appear that both men have lost a step where it counts most — in their ability to tell us a story that makes us want to pay attention.

The film’s problems begin somewhere around the 20 minute mark, right after Singer inundates his audience with a very impressive bout of action. The action, which takes place on the Nazi African battle front, serves as motive for Colonel Stauffenberg (Cruise) and his ultimate quest to kill that Hitler. Shot in digital, the opening action sequence is easily the film’s highlight. It proves that maybe Brian Singer does have a knack for delivering some solid action beats. Unfortunately he allows his story to unravel from there.

Normally I would be defensive about the “we all know what’s going to happen, so why bother” factor. Because sure, we all know how Hitler’s fate is ultimately dealt. But there are still ways to get the audience invested in the characters and build some sort of tension. In this film, McQuarrie and Singer do their best to bring about said tension, but it still doesn’t feel like enough. The final act of their film is drawn out and incredibly anticlimactic, muddled by countless inconsequential scenes, many of which only extrapolate key plot points that have already been delivered. Do we really need to see five different conversations that just reiterate the same plan over and over again? Not really. And while there are certain repetitive elements, including one involving Germany’s national guard, it is clear that they are done for dramatic effect. And if you are an incredibly patient person, you might just be able to keep yourself entertained long enough to make it to the payoff, which isn’t much to write home about either.

Story aside, there is another issue with the German accents in the film. As you may remember, there have been countless discussions about the mostly British and American cast and their lack of German accents. Because after all, they are supposed to be Nazis. The film doesn’t completely dispense with the German dialect. In fact, it opens with Tom Cruise narrating in German, a narration that slowly morphs into English. From there we meet characters with all sorts of accents. The likes of Tom Wilkinson, Terrence Stamp and Bill Nighy choose to roll with their standard British accents. Carice van Houten, who actually speaks German, and a few others speak with a German accent. And Tom Cruise, well, he sounds like Tom Cruise. Though, he’s not the odd man out — the odd man is Eddie Izzard, who drops his British accent and lays down an American dialect, despite his role as a German officer. It’s all very confusing. My best guess is that since Tom Cruise couldn’t pull off the German accent, they decided to just go with whatever. You wouldn’t try to recast the head of the studio that’s making your film, would you?

Speaking of Cruise, while many might think that Cruise’s ego would be the downfall of this film, he is not. In fact, it is clear in his performance as Col. Stauggenberg, the man who leads the attempt against Hitler’s life, that Cruise is still very much a great action star. His performance alone lends to some of the success of film’s few truly dramatic moments. But as you may have guessed, it isn’t quite enough to give the story life down the stretch. It also isn’t enough to draw the audience into the mission against Hitler. While McQuarrie and Singer do their best to convince their audience that “these are the good Nazis,” there is still a disconnect that cannot be bridged. In the end Valkyrie is less a thriller and more a historical melodrama. But who knows, some of you may be into wasting two hours for twenty minutes of solid action and intrigue. If that’s the case, be my guest and go check out Valkyrie.

Grade: C-


Read more articles by Neil Miller

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • 790
    I'll watch the History Channel' version.
    Thanks...
  • peter wolf
    I just saw this movie 2 hours ago and I cannot believe the negative comments about it. I thought it was very, very good. The supporting cast is excellent. The production is excellent. Who cares if Cruise ( who no one believes is Olivier or Hopkins) is not perfect. The movie itself works very well.
  • joshin
    I agree with peter wolf. I believe this review was pretty brutal. The movie was very climactic from beginning to end. In fact, the ending was so shocking to the audience that the moment the movie finished, no one spoke a word. Everyone proceeded out of theater quietly and when they got outside people were in awe at the fact that the movie was really good.

    Maybe I speak for myself, but I thought it was fantastic.
  • I completely agree. I thought the movie was superb and great story telling.
  • adam
    I just had to comment on the part about the ending being so shocking to the audience...REALLY?!?! How did you think this was gonna end??? Did you actually think they were gonna kill Hitler??? I mean what did you think was gonna happen, that they'd just slap Cruise on the hand and say "Don't try that again!" I'm sorry but the audience must not have been very smart...or they thought "big movie star" Tom Cruise was gonna save the world, thus changing history!!!! LOL
  • adam
    Yeah joshin i think you do speak for yourself (and peter wolf apparently) cuz this movie wasn't one of Cruise's better ones (i.e. A Few Good Men)...didn't the fact that almost NONE of the actors (asides from the guy playing Hitler - he was creepy good) have German accents bother you??? Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't this a film about Nazis in Germany during WWII?!?! Instead Cruise sounded like, well Cruise, and others had a mixture of British accents, maybe Irish accents, etc...what was that about???
  • It seemed more like an artistic approach if you ask me. Since they were going to tell the story in an English language, why contain the accent? Sometimes that bothered me when I was watching a movie about foreign affairs and everyone spoke English with an accent. Some, not all. I wasn't bothered by the different accents because it seemed like a negligible detail. I got the feel for the movie better I think because of it. I was drawn more into the characterization.
  • adam
    Artistic? You call that artistic??? Okay whatever I guess everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Obviously the multiple accents REALLY bothered me (if you couldn't tell), it's like you had to stop for a minute to think is this guy a German or an ally or what??? And w/Cruise having his regular old American accent, it made it seem like nothing more than another one of his average (at best) Mission Impossible movies...
  • adam
    It left me wondering what Singer was trying to accomplish by not having them ALL speak w/German accents since they were, after all, portraying German Nazis. Maybe Cruise wasn't making enough to learn a German accent (I highly doubt that) or he was just too arrogant as "the big movie star" to learn one, who knows. And if it was simply Singer's decision, well it was a bad one b/c for me it took away from the film's overall authenticity. I had a hard time buying into the characters and their believabilty as Nazis, esp w/Cruise as the lead guy . He started out speaking German when writing the letter in the beginning, then all of a sudden he had his regular American accent for the rest of the movie...HUH?!?! Didn't make any sense and completely ruined the movie for me...save your money!!!
  • It does and it doesn't. It's mentioned why they want to remove him, and it's not because of the Holocaust.(Most German Soldiers were unaware of those events.)
blog comments powered by Disqus