Comments on: Review: Star Trek

By: kamagra soft

kamagra soft — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:43:00 +0000

You had me until you compared it to Independence Day. EEK! Was such a derivative, uninspired, lame-brained, infantile piece of tripe really one of your golden movie moments growing up? Clearly, you were young and hadn’t developed more discerning sensibilities, but come on, hadn’t you seen Jurassic Park or something equally superior to ID4 by that point?

Independence Day is a terrible, terrible movie. If Star Trek reminds me of the experience of seeing that in any way, it will be a profound disappointment.

By: Jesse McCann

Jesse McCann — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:31:06 +0000

Not at all. Leonard Nimoy's presence in the film keeps the old alternate reality very much alive.

By: Jesse McCann

Jesse McCann — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:31:00 +0000

Not at all. Leonard Nimoy's presence in the film keeps the old alternate reality very much alive.

By: Joe505

Joe505 — Sat, 09 May 2009 06:57:47 +0000

So I think J.J. Abrams was sitting at home writing LOST, and asked himself the question…"How can I further explain the time travel theories in this show? Oh I got it, I'll remake Star Trek and confuse the fuck out of people!" I bet he got a big audience of just LOST fans and they were the only people who completley understood. Good movie in all. But I love me some LOST.

By: Joe505

Joe505 — Sat, 09 May 2009 06:57:00 +0000

By: BillBrasky

BillBrasky — Wed, 06 May 2009 17:46:44 +0000

I rescind the "Cole (I hate fun movies) Abaius" Your affection for ID4 tells me that you just hate Transformers and not all things fun.

By: BillBrasky

BillBrasky — Wed, 06 May 2009 17:46:00 +0000

I rescind the "Cole (I hate fun movies) Abaius" Your affection for ID4 tells me that you just hate Transformers and not all things fun.

By: Cookie_Garris

Cookie_Garris — Wed, 06 May 2009 05:36:00 +0000

Independence Day was the first movie in years that people stood at the end and cheered.(The original Star Wars trilogy were the first I'd seen people do that) Seeing it a second time yes it had it's flaws but the first time you watched it the movie caught your emotions and held on till the end. 99% of people don't go to movies to be a critic. We want our emotions pulled in every different direction. We can be a critic later so maybe people need to lighten up before they get a hernia. And I know Trek front and back and the writers have let the series get stale like three day old bread. Maybe we need a new time line.

By: Cookie_Garris

Cookie_Garris — Wed, 06 May 2009 05:36:00 +0000

By: RobertFure

RobertFure — Tue, 05 May 2009 23:42:34 +0000

I wasn't a Star Trek fan. Thought it was pretty lame for the most part, but I loved this. I though ID4 was cool at the time, but not great, and has since become pretty lame. This Star Trek movie kicked some serious ass. It was a very fast moving 2 hours. All in all it was probably a little light on plot, but that's to be expected considering the entire film is basically a chase executed at Warp Speed.

By: RobertFure

RobertFure — Tue, 05 May 2009 23:42:00 +0000

By: Josh_Radde

Josh_Radde — Tue, 05 May 2009 17:55:34 +0000

Agreed. I reserve all my A's for stuff like Slumdog Millionaire and Paul Blart. Can't just give an A to everything like Neil does. And Neil even gives out some A+ grades. No movie is an A+. Not even Blart.

By: Josh_Radde

Josh_Radde — Tue, 05 May 2009 17:55:00 +0000

By: Nerd

Nerd — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:29:00 +0000

I'm not a virgin when it comes to Star Trek, but I am a virgin when it comes to sex.

By: Nerd

Nerd — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:29:00 +0000

I'm not a virgin when it comes to Star Trek, but I am a virgin when it comes to sex.

By: Aleric

Aleric — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:50:34 +0000

I would have to agree that ID4 was a simplistic film in most parts, namly character developement and a plausible story line, and lets not forget it gave Will Smith his first chance to save the world, but it wasn't terrible. It was simply over hyped and meant for people who don't know one thing about SciFi. So it was the Budweiser of the SciFi market.

By: Aleric

Aleric — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:50:00 +0000

By: Rob_Hunter

Rob_Hunter — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:45:53 +0000

Is that the reason they give you?

By: Rob_Hunter

Rob_Hunter — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:45:20 +0000

Also… since when is a 'B+' "only" anything? It's just shy of an 'A' which should be reserved for almost perfect movies.

By: Rob_Hunter

Rob_Hunter — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:45:00 +0000

Also… since when is a 'B+' "only" anything? It's just shy of an 'A' which should be reserved for almost perfect movies.