Review: Orphan

Posted by Rob Hunter (rob@filmschoolrejects.com) on July 24, 2009

orphan-review1

There’s a twenty-minute stretch towards the end of Orphan that may just knock you out of your seat.  Unfortunately it will probably be due to gigantic waves of laughter rolling up from your gut in reaction to what you’re hearing and seeing onscreen.  This is probably not the effect the filmmakers were hoping for because of course… Orphan is supposed to be a horror movie.  The real shame is that up until that point the movie manages to be a mildly effective shocker.

John (Peter Sarsgaard) and Kate Coleman (Vera Farmiga) are in the market for a new child but are willing to settle for a moderately used one.  They already have two kids (three if you count the one fertilizing flowers in the greenhouse), but have decided to adopt an older child in need to add to the Coleman clan.  Wanting to move beyond the memory of a recent pregnancy that ended in still-birth they visit an orphanage open house, and in defiance of both common sense and the horror film ‘duh’ factor they pick the creepiest girl they can find.  Esther (Isabelle Fuhrman) wears antique dresses and ribbons around her neck and wrists, she avoids the other children, and her previous family died in a house fire.  And I already mentioned her name is Esther right?  Well just like the movie poster says there’s something wrong with Esther, and soon bad things start happening to good people all around her.  Kate seems to be the only one who can see the truth, but will she be able to convince anyone else of the evil behind Esther’s nine-year old eyes before it’s too late?

Orphan is a long movie.  At just over two hours it’s probably too long for a horror movie and definitely too long for a mediocre one.  The only positive aspect to that length is that it gives the movie time to introduce and explore the characters more naturally than most genre films can afford.  The main couple share a handful of severe character flaws that are slowly doled out in the first hour, and they help explain the mistrust and doubts to come.  Infidelity, alcoholism, and a past near-tragedy involving their deaf daughter all come into play, and Esther expertly plays the couple against each other with surgical precision.  This slow build is refreshing but as Esther’s outbursts escalate the horror movie cliches start flying fast.  Mirrors open then close with a loud musical cue to reveal nothing!  Or sometimes something!  Or sometimes it’s a shower curtain!  Or a camera shot that creeps up behind someone!  Then there’s the plain idiocy of doctors who keep sedative-filled syringes on-hand at all times, an absurdly strong wine at a very convenient time, a vice-grip strong enough to break an arm but that leaves no mark…

orphan-review2

The acting on display is above par for the genre with strong performances from Sarsgaard and Farmiga, but it’s two of the children that truly impress.  Fuhrman makes a strong entrance into the creepy-as-hell cinematic kid club.  Esther is sickeningly sweet when necessary and an absolute bad ass the rest of the time.  Her glares and threats, including one towards a young boy’s “hairless prick” and another aimed at a bullying classmate, will make you cringe with nervous laughter.  Aryana Engineer (awesome name!) plays Max, the Coleman’s deaf daughter, and she gives one of the most natural and annoyance-free performances I’ve seen in years from a child actor.

Orphan isn’t a terrible movie… it’s better than The Unborn anyway.  It does squander a strong setup though with an increasing amount of camp that culminates with the scenes I spoke of at the very beginning of this review.  As one character is hearing the big reveal behind Esther’s attitude problem the other is experiencing it firsthand, and it quickly moves from somewhat disturbing to absolute hilarity in under a minute.  There’s no recovering after that as you’ll probably still be laughing as the drawn-out finale works towards the welcome end credits.

Grade: C-


Read more articles by Rob Hunter

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • A movie classified under the horror genre should be, well, horrific. Scary, if you want to put it in simpler terms. The trailer doesn't leave behind an ounce of unease or dread, even the slightest sign of a good horror film. Esther, quite frankly, looks blank and boring. Besides humor, does this movie evoke any emotion?
  • Short answer is "no."

    Slightly longer answer is "not really." There were a couple scenes where I didn't quite know where it would go in regards to the survival of certain characters. But I don't recall any sense of dread or uneasiness, and there were definitely no real scares. Esther is boring in the sense that her evil is predictable, but the actress does a good job with the role and there's some mild satisfaction to be had with the inevitable ending.
  • rpaine
    I thought it was a great movie for many reasons. 1.) The Build-up- it starts with small and slightly disturbed moments and gradually becomes fully insane and crazy, yes the scene towards the end is awkward, but when everything is revealed, it makes sense and it's not done poorly. 2.) The acting- there is not a single bad performance in this movie, you care about what happens to these characters. 3.) Suspense- Don't even get me started, I was on the edge of my seat for the whole movie, mainly because you actually care what happens to the characters and you don't want harm brought to them. Anyway, I could go on, but this movie was deserving of a lot more than a C-, I think it's one of the best horror/suspence/thriller movies to come around in quite some time.
  • This movie looks terrible and so generic. No reason to see this, doesn't look fun or scary at all.
  • Children can be hella scary. I won't see this but the poster will keep me awake for a while.
  • tower
    What happens at the end that's so funny?
  • smokefan
    I thought the movie was good. The ending is something you never saw coming! Maybe it shouldn't be billed as a Horror movie more of a suspense film.
  • josegarcia
    anny 1 kno where i can download tha dvd i kno it just came out but some times they leek it like taken i had tha dvd rip 2 months before it went in theators
  • josegarcia
    can any one tell me where i can download this movie i know it just came out in theaters but some times they leek it like Taken i got that movie downloaded 2 months before it was in theaters and it was DVD RIP
    PS i use torrents
  • Rob, I live in another country so couldn't find a chance to see it yet. But trailer reminded me Ian McEwan's novel adaptation "The Good Son". Esther looks like the female version of Macaulay Culkin's Henry. Is her portrayal of an evil kid similar to Culkin's (in the case you watched the movie)? Again, Vera Farmiga was terrorized by her child in "Joshua". I think I've seen enough creepy kids in horror/thriller movies. So, I suppose the movie doesn't present nothing new, does it?
blog comments powered by Disqus