No Country for Old Men

Posted by H. Stewart (hstewart@filmschoolrejects.com) on November 19, 2007

The Bros. Coen’s No Country For Old Men opens with a series of shots of the West Texas landscape. Cinematographer Roger Deakins fills the screen, primarily, with the land, leaving very little visible sky, signaling to the audience that the story you’re about to see is not one of heavenly redemption but one of earthly sin, a story set in a violence-ridden world devoid of any divine interaction, let alone intervention. From frame one, the directors make it clear that whatever’s about to happen, it’s not going to end well.

The bloodletting begins moments into the very first reel, in which we see the film’s supervillian, Javier Bardem, kill the film’s first victim, a sheriff’s deputy—the first thing to go in this depraved world is, of course, the order of law—in a strangling struggle with, brushed across his face, the terrifying look of a clown having a perverse orgasm. Bardem, a merciless killer or, as the film calls him, “the ultimate bad-ass”, plays every one of his scenes with a sense of unflappable menace, countered by a watery-eyed gaze of profound feeling that elevates his assassin extraordinaire beyond a stiff Frankenstein of a sociopath.

In the scene following the handcuffed garroting, Bardem kills a motorist with his preferred method of murder: a jolt from an air gun, ordinarily used to slaughter cattle, to the forehead. (Conveniently, he also uses it to open locks.) Bardem the manhunter is then paralleled to Josh Brolin the antelope hunter; introduced setting up a shot on the desert plains, the Coens foreshadow the bloodshed and role reversal (hunter to hunted) about to befall him. The catalyst in this disastrous transformation is the suitcase full of hundred dollar bills in $10,000 stacks that Brolin stumbles across, while hunting, in a gory milieu of dead men and dead dogs (and a trunk full of brown heroin that Brolin wisely lets be.) But by taking the cash, he gets bounty-hunter Bardem on his trail and spends the rest of the film running across Texas trying to lose him, with hangdog sheriff Tommy Lee Jones, with a wit as dry as the surrounding desert brush, one step behind them at all times, bearing witness to the destruction they’ve produced.

No Country for Old Men works as a perfectly-executed piece of genre fiction, suspenseful and frightening, just like its source novel by Cormac McCarthy, which it smartly follows almost to the letter, excising only some extraneous characters to maintain the script’s disciplined focus. The film’s greatest asset, though, is that the Coens have thankfully dropped their propensity for eccentricity, which has always been their Achilles’ Heel as filmmakers. No Country for Old Men has no goofy central or ancillary characters; front and center, there are only serious actors at the top of their games while the film’s margins are filled-in by authentic Texans. (Beth Grant’s turn as Brolin’s mother-in-law is the only exception, but her appearance is so brief that it’s easily forgiveable.) The Coens mercifully, by and large, don’t portray the film’s Texans as quirky and exotic goofballs as they did to the Midwesterners in Fargo or the Southerners in O Brother, Where Art Thou?

No Country for Old Men is an action film both measured and grave, opening as a Jim Thompson-esque crime saga set on the Texan sands, but as it moves along the film acquires an allegorical depth, raising questions about the state of American culture and morality as it follows a steady stream of blood that’s all been spilled over a few million dollars. “It’s all goddam money,” an El Paso sheriff notes. The Coens take McCarthy’s grumpy red-state gripes, like the one about kids with green hair, with a grain of salt, but nevertheless stay to true to his overarching theme: the violence that Jones is seeing, that causes him to declare, “I feel overwhelmed”, isn’t novel—it may be a bit gruesome, as Bardem kills people as though they’re cows, for Pete’s sake, but certainly not moreso than the violence of Blood Meridian—just another iteration of the frontier violence that harkens back to the old days of Indian battles. (And, if you follow the logic, all the way back to the American revolution.) “What you got ain’t nothing new,” Jones’ uncle, Barry Corbin, tells him. “This country’s hard on people.” America is a country founded on violence that has never stopped fighting, whether against the elements or, as is more common, one another.

Grade: A

Lions for Lambs Poster Release Date: November 21, 2007
Rated: R for strong graphic violence and some language.
Running Time: 122 min.
Cast: Tommy Lee Jones, Javier Bardem, Josh Brolin, Woody Harrelson
Director: Ethan Coen, Joel Coen
Screenplay: Ethan Coen, Joel Coen, Cormac McCarthy (novel)
Studio: Miramax
Official Website: Click Here


Read more articles by H. Stewart

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Hardy Campbell
    I am frustrated at all the reviews of this movie that I have read on the web, including this one. It seems that most of the reviewers need to see this flick multiple times, as I have (3), in order to "get it." The author/directors have sprinkled clues throughout, in a phrase here and there, in an odd scene here and there, that link what appear to be disparate scenes together into a metaphyscial poem. This movie is not about drugs, or money, or even violence. It is about the bifurcation of the human soul, in an old man who has been tormented by the evil he has buried within himself for many years. Chigurh is Bell's avatar, a vengeful wraith that can do the things a tired lawman who has given up on himself and humanity cannot do. Note the scene where Chigurh is waiting for Bell in the motel room. When Bell enters, he's gone, not because he physically left but because Bell cannot see the kind of evil he has unleashed. Note also that Chigurh does not kill Moss, because Moss was Bell's ward. The last scene, where Bell talks about his Dad providing him refuge, lets us know that Bell was dreaming, dreaming of the justice he has created in a harsh country with no room for old men like him. The metaphors sprinkled throughout tell us about the death wish of Moss (inexplicably returning to the drug sale site, his desire to tell his dead mom personally he loved her, crossing the "River Styx" pursued by the hound Cerebrus) and Bell's equality with Chigurgh when we see both of them drinking milk on the sofa and staring into the blank TV screen. Indeed, all three of these men are dead in one sense or the other. Chigurh cannot die while Bell lives, of course, but his injuries in a car crash represent the permanent damage done to Bell's soul.
  • 243456yearstogo
    This movie was absolutely terrible. How anyone can enjoy this film will forever remain a mystery to me.
blog comments powered by Disqus