Review: Fame

Posted by Robert Levin (rlevin@filmschoolrejects.com) on September 26, 2009

Fame

Before it became a veritable cottage industry – having spawned a six season TV series, an Off-Broadway production, multiple imitators and the current big screen remake – Fame meant one thing only: the 1980 Alan Parker film. And that’s as it should be, as Parker imbued his depiction of the struggles of students trying to make it at Manhattan’s grueling School of Performing Arts with an inimitable combination of poignant nostalgia and hard edged realism.

In the current reworking, first time filmmaker Kevin Tancharoen goes, as the famous ballad sung by Irene Cara in the original says, “Out here on my own.” Let it never be said that he attempted to duplicate Parker’s work. Instead, he and screenwriter Allison Burnett reduce Christopher Gore’s original screenplay to shambles, turning it into a heavily stylized over-produced mess. This is not, in any sense, an accurate depiction of life at an arts school. It’s a giant MTV VMA performance that would be more at home on the Radio City Music Hall stage.

Gone are such memorable characters as Leroy, the street thug who couldn’t read, Angelo, who struggled with drugs and the troubled legacy of his icon Freddie Prinze and Doris, who longed to be seen as more than a nice girl. In their stead Tancharoen and Burnett give us such clunkers as Jenny Garrison (Kay Panabaker), whose defining trait seems to be that she gets nervous in front of the class, and Malik Washburn (Collins Pennie) who wants to be a rapper and is constantly angry. The actors – also including boy band artist Asher Book and Naturi Naughton – share the nice bland complexion of archetypes sent straight from central casting. The new creative team deserves credit for trying to rework things for a modern setting, but they prove themselves unable to think in anything but trite clichés.

The premise remains the same – the students enter as green freshmen and leave as seasoned seniors – but the journey never feels complete. There’s no sense of an arc in any of the individual storylines and the drama consists of subdued confrontations that are easily dealt with and overcome. The material demands a powerful nostalgic sensibility, the feel of an almost faraway time capsule look at the excitement of the period in which everything seems possible and the promises of tomorrow have not yet gone unfulfilled. The best high school movies project that, inspiring the audience to care enough to wonder about the people the graduating seniors will become. Anytime Tancharoen makes an overture in that direction he submerges it beneath some heightened, kinetic musical performance, usually complete with overbearing sound effects, stagey lighting and frenzied dancing, or by raising and quickly dismissing the rote interpersonal dramatics.

This new Fame grates so profoundly for another key reason, a symptom of the profound cultural shifts that have subsumed Hollywood over the past three decades. It’s too squeaky clean, scrubbed free of any of the grittiness of real life, robbed of any hint that things might not turn out well for the characters. The High School Musical imprint can be felt throughout, as the studious avoidance of sex, drugs, or other button-pushing dilemmas starts to feel like a copout.

Unfortunately, these days conventional wisdom holds that only R rated action movies and comedies have any chance to make money, so Tancharoen probably couldn’t have avoided the obsessive family friendliness. Still, it robs the material of its soul. In fact, only one scene transcends the façade and evokes genuine feeling: Naughton’s terrific rendition of “Out Here on My Own,” which gets closer to evoking the emotions swelling in an artist struggling to find her place in the world than a thousand heavily choreographed hip-hop dance numbers ever could.

The Upside: Naturi Naughton can sing; the filmmakers didn’t deep-six the Oscar winning theme song

The Downside: The material’s been scrubbed so clean it might as well by High School Musical 4

On the Side: This is Tancharoen’s first movie though he’s done a lot of directing for MTV and for live performances.

Grade: D+


Read more articles by Robert Levin

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • kwoo1
    The movie had such a good vibe in the early stages before we actually started to shoot it. In fact, it had such good energy going on, that it was a pity it ended up being cut-up/chop-chopped and as you said, 'sanitized'. There were a lot of scenes that unfortunately did not make the final cut. These scenes showed stories about true friendship, love, passion, relationships, sexuality, disappointments and successes in detail thru character development. Though the locked version was 'tamed down' because of the PG rating, a DVD directors cut would probably show the actual stories of the 10 different characters.

    It seemed that Mr. Tancharoen forgot (maybe intentionally?) that he had 10 characters to develop. It appeared that there was concentration on one, Ms. Panabaker (and how could her character pass such a rigid audition?), Mr. Book, Mr. Pennie, Ms. Naughton (who sang very well) and Ms. Payne. Whatever happened to Mr. Iacono, Mr. McGill, Ms. Perez de Tagle, Ms. Flores (what character did she portray?) and Mr. Perez? What are their life stories or experiences?

    Being part of the crew, I witnessed a number of scenes where Joy (Anna Maria), Kevin (Paul McG, who plays a gay dancer...did you notice?) and Neil (Paul I, obsessed film maker) developed and established their friendship. There was a dramatic/touching scene where Joy and Kevin made the whole crew shed tears and I thought that would have been a clincher in the film. But sad to say, it ended up in the editors bin. Ms. Perez de Tagle should have been given more substantial scenes. She really is a "Joy" to watch. If I may add, Mr. McGill as handsome as he is, should have been given the same opportunity. In my opinion, these three characters would have been able to show the true color of FAME.

    Needless to say, Mr. Tancharoen should have captured the true essence of the "New York PA youth" by utilizing and developing all of his characters evenly. In my opinion, he could have done that, if he had chosen to do so. However, it seems that Mr. Tancharoen concentrated on just one character's development..........Jenny (Ms. Panabaker)....whom he had 'captured' and "captivated" way before the filming was over. Sad, utterly sad, but true.

    Give it a chance, view it in it's entirety. Maybe a PG-13 rating would have made the FAME re-invention..........'live forever'

    Thank you.

    KW, Beverly Hills, CA
  • baroy
    There was no character in the original named Angelo. It was Raoul or "Ralph." Though the review was pretty right on. the reviewer should get the facts straight.
  • witza
  • Sadie
    Awesome points, I hate the remake..... but there was no one named "Angelo" in the 1980 version. I think you're talking about Ralph Garci.... :)
  • Amazing Review. Nail on head. I came back from this film pissed for what it had done with the name of the original. Speaking from a more personal perspective I am most pissed about its portrayal of GLBT peoples. The original (1980 mind you) had a main character that was struggling with his sexuality, and a full on coming out story for him. 30 years later, and the gay character is nothing more than in the background, and the audience is left only to assume he is gay based on flamboyant stereotypes. Honestly is this how far we've come in 30 years? A school of the performing arts and there is ONE GUY who MIGHT be gay? give me a break.
blog comments powered by Disqus