Review: District 9

Posted by Robert Fure (robert@filmschoolrejects.com) on August 14, 2009

district-9-review1

It seems to be my lot in life to never be fully in line with anyone.  If you’ve searched for other reviews or have just been breezing around the world wide web of film, you’ve most likely come across piles and piles of praise for District 9, with several critics willing to label it the best film of the year.  Unfortunately, I do not share my colleagues uncontrollable love for the film – but I did enjoy it quite a bit.  While I readily acknowledge and happily recommend District 9 to everyone, I just don’t feel the same excitement that has lit a fire beneath the asses of so many critics.

District 9 takes place in a contemporary South Africa that is much like our own South Africa, with one important difference – an alien mothership descended over Johannesburg 28 years ago and promptly broke down, stranding more than a million crustacean like aliens on Earth.  As the years passed and Earth was without a massive invasion or quantum leaps forward in technology, excitement and apprehension turned to distrust and impatience.  Multi-National United (MNU) was contracted to control the alien situation, which resulted in the visitors being sequestered in District 9, a shanty-town where the only humans are gangsters and the aliens live in relative squalor.  The human gangsters prey upon the aliens, trading them cat food for weapons and other items, though the alien weaponry is useless to a human as its been coded to their DNA.  The story begins when our focal character, Wikus van der Merwe is tasked with organizing the transfer of nearly 2 million aliens to District 10 under the guise of an improvement of their conditions.  Through him and a particularly clever alien named Christopher we come to understand the darker side of MNU and gain an insight into interspecial relations.

In his feature directorial debut, South African Neill Blomkamp has made a very dynamic entry onto the stage.  His name was previously touted as being attached to direct Halo, seemingly out of nowhere, but now we can see why someone would entrust millions of dollars to this young director.  Visually, District 9 is consistently stunning whether we’re following Wikus through the district or in the midst of a frantic gun battle in the slums.  Blomkamp even manages to take my most hated of shots, one where the camera is attached to the actor but facing him (see Pi or Apocalyptco) and make it interesting by mounting the camera to the end of the gun in the middle of a firefight.  Bravo.  Blomkamp gets great performances out of a cast of people most of us have never seen, including first time actor Sharlto Copley, who absolutely owns every minute he’s on screen.  The digital effects have been the object of much adulation and with great reason – they’re absolutely fantastic.  Surely, any person who knows computers exist realizes and can see the aliens and their ships are CGI, but as for as CGI goes, this is near perfect stuff.

If I had a problem with the film or if I were to point a finger at a cause for my lesser excitement, it would be story.  Perhaps in a generation of people 15 years removed from apartheid the story could be considered deeper than what it is – but it shouldn’t be, if history classes are still in session.  You see, the aliens represent black South Africaners while everyone else represents white South Africaners, representative of a time that ended in 1994 when segregation, or apartheid, was not just accepted but enforced as law.  Certainly much of the film draws inspiration directly from tales of survivors, of which there are millions, and adds the requisite amount of evil white-scientist testing to make you root for the right team.  The film isn’t necessarily smart, or any smarter than any other apartheid movie, but it is capable and emotional.  Within moments, while some laughed at the plight of the prawns, as they’re derogatorily called, I felt shame for being a human not even of that world.  Surely we could muster some greater response than forced containment if we were visited by beings from the sky?

district-9-review2

While it’s apartheid base didn’t wow me on that basis (make no mistake the film can be heartbreakingly emotional, if not totally original when replacing humans for aliens) it didn’t kill the film either.  No, my problem was with characterizations.  This may get slightly spoilery for a bit.  You may have noticed I described Wikus as our “central character,” but not as our hero because he is anything but.  Wikus is, at first, a pawn of a large corporation willing to forcefully evict the aliens from their homes without the slightest pause.  Later, he is shown to be irrationally selfish, a trait he maintains even after he forms what is almost a bond of friendship with the alien Christopher.  That bond is easily broken, however, and Wikus’ motivations remain clearly in his self-serving camp where he is more important than two million sentient aliens.  It is this selfishness that disconnected me from the film.  I felt like I didn’t totally care about Wikus -he was kind of a prick.  Just that one character flaw in him and it dampened my entire movie going experience.  Strange how the mind works.

All of that being said, District 9 is among the best films of the year.  I have trouble declaring it tops of the year as it is fairly different from what else has come out already.  It splits itself between being en emotional drama and a balls out action flick.  The first half of the film is very emotional as we connect with the aliens and the last half is alarmingly exciting as the shit hits the fan and the bodies hit the floor, ceiling, and everything else nearby.  Yes, the last part of the film is full of amazing action and some of the coolest battle scenes of the year and some of the best gunfights of the last several.  The cool factor explodes with alien weaprony, thousands of rounds of ammunition, and the mechanized fighting suit which kicks tons of ass.  For a few moments you forget about the emotion you felt earlier as you bounce up and down in your chair to the gallons of blood sprayed around – there are several deaths that are worthy of applause.

By now you’re no doubt as confused as I am – I say almost nothing bad about the movie but preface the review by saying I didn’t love it like everyone else.  But therein is the rub – I didn’t love it like everyone else. But I did love it.  District 9 is a great film that had room to be better, but ultimately was more than satisfying and lived up to all of my expectations and managed to surprise me at several turns.  I applauded the splattergore moments and felt oddly touched by the emotional connection created to the prawns.  Go see this movie.

Grade: A

Click Below to Watch the Trailer


Read more articles by Robert Fure

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Jack
    I thought that Wikus' flaws made him much more realistic as a character. After all, if you were in his position, would you have felt any different?
  • I agree with you for the most part, Fure, but I think you missed a bit about Wikus' characterization and development over the course of the film. Don't want to get all spoilerific, so I won't go into details, but the dynamic between Wikus and Christopher (and the many, many questions that it raises throughout and after the film) is what made this movie for me.
  • I thought Christopher was a great character (odd, considering he is completely CGI with no human voice). Sure, Wikus does change at basically the last possible moment, but for me it was basically too little too late. The relationship between the two is good, but mostly because (again, this is so strange) of how understanding Christopher is. He is almost the anti-Wikus at times. After more people have seen the film and we can talk specifics I'm sure we'd have a better conversation on Wikus and Christopher and find out exactly what his actions in each scene made us feel.
  • Cole_Abaius
    SPOILERS AHEAD:

    I actually think that Wikus's character works really well because he gets what's coming to him. He's a desperate man - acting out in an impossible situation. He uses Christopher (who is the ultimate sympathetic character), which is awful. But...he also has to deal with the intensity of becoming something new and waiting 3 years before being helped. Basically, Wikus gets his comeuppance for being a terrible person even if we do root for him in the last ten minutes. If his ending had tied up more neatly, it wouldn't have been deserved, but it's not exactly like Wikus got a happy ending.
  • SPOILERS:

    What I think makes Christopher so interesting is how do we really know Christopher plans or is even able to help Wikus? Chris could have been playing Wikus just as much as Wikus was trying to play him. By saying that Wikus' transformation could be fixed, Chris was able to convince Wikus into helping *him* get the liquid back.

    I do think he will return in three years to help his people, but will he (or can he) help Wikus? I'm not sure.
  • If Christopher wasn't sincere he would have told Wikus help was waiting on the ship. He wouldn't have told him it was three years away. The point to me was that unlike Wikus, Christopher didn't know how to lie. When he saw what was being done to his people he told Wilkus they had to come first.
    Wikus doesn't deserve the happy ending. The happy ending belongs to Christopher and his son.
  • True, he doesn't get a happy ending and thats part of the problem. Wikus is clearly supposed to be the heart of the film. He is the only character who goes through change, though that change is too fast and too late to win me over. He is also shown at several points to be an ideal husband, very much in love with his wife, even after his transformation - which sets us up to root for him very much. So basically, to me, Wikus is a prick through most of the film, then the director reminds us how awesome of a husband he is, how sweet he is, how much his wife misses him, and we get this forlorn shot of him transformed so now, despite him being a prick, we want him (and Christopher and the other aliens) to have a happy ending which we don't get.

    The movie is good, no doubt. Sharlto is awesome, no doubt. The ambiguous ending as to whether Christopher is coming back (I think 99% of us assume he will come back and rescue the prawns and fix Wikus) is good, no doubt. There is just some disconnect between me and Wikus and how I'm supposed to feel. When I'm supposed to root for him I don't want to then when I decide to support him he kind of gets shafted.

    Damn you for toying with my heart.
  • robinruinsky
    And that is what makes District 9 so damn good. They don't take the easy way. It's remarkable to me that a film about buglike Aliens comes closer to examining humanity than so many "serious" films.
    Wikus is the dumb as a post everyman bureaucratic boob. He's the fool, the last guy in the world who will be a hero. But when do the heroics kick in? When he gets closer to the endgame of his transformation into an alien. The less human he becomes the more humane he becomes. He's the Cowardly Lion finding his roar as his shape loses its human form.
  • Rohith
    I watched the movie today and I liked it very much. I would put it in top 2 of all the highly anticipated movies released this summer so far. The first 15 minutes was kind of odd as it gave me the feeling of a documentary and I thought this movie was going to suck like Cloverfield but I was totally wrong. There has been no movie like District 9 before and I recommend every one to watch it (Note: It is rated R for violence) It was sometimes funny to see people blowup though :P

    I would rate this movie 8/10

    Based on the collection this movie makes at the box office, I think it would be nice if the producers consider having a sequel to this as this movie ended off making way for a sequel. The Alien should return in 3 years and convert this infected person beck to a human and possibly have a war with the MNU for the things they have done to them. Also, the 2 million + aliens need to be picked up and taken back to the planet. So, I hope there is a sequel for this movie and this time they should work a bit more on the graphics and try to keep the shaking of the camera to minimal although I know that it was done purposely. The graphics for this movie are really good considering the small budget of $30 million.

    30 million box office estimation for the weekend seems too little but its reasonable considering that there are no popular actors in the movie and the director is new too. In fact, other than Peter Jackson (Producer) there is nothing popular about this movie.

    btw ... top one movie this summer in my opinion is UP. Let's see if I change my mind after watch Avatar :)
  • MarkMushakian
    I don't know if I've ever agreed more with a review on this site. I loved it, it was a great movie... but it wasn't, at the same time. My reaction to the central character's selfishness was the same as yours - it took away from the movie, instead of adding to his character. Although I didn't like the intermixing of in-camera footage and regular narrative filming once the movie got underway, I was able to look beyond it unlike the "prick"ish traits of the lead. Christopher was absolutely amazing, though. There was a moment of true camaraderie near the end, and it, ironically, was the performance by Christopher that made the scene very emotional. (running robot, metal plate shield, "3 years"... for those who've seen and care to know what I speak of)
blog comments powered by Disqus