Review: ‘Crossing Over’ Delayed for a Reason

Posted by Robert Levin (rlevin@filmschoolrejects.com) on February 27, 2009

crossing-over-header1

Crossing Over gets so wrapped up in its quest for topical resonance that it forgets some of the basic rules of narrative filmmaking. Writer-director Wayne Kramer shortchanges each of the storylines he interweaves into the loose limbed narrative by keeping them consistently focused on pounding home his one basic theme: it’s hard out there for an immigrant to the United States. Every moment of the film underscores that point.

This offers little room for character development and even less for dramatic nuance. Significant portions of the movie unfold in the over the top style of a low grade soap opera, intent on providing big dramatic payoffs whatever the cost. Throughout the picture’s 112 minutes Kramer’s schema remains the same.

Start with a helicopter shot panning high above the freeways, downtown skyline and/or industrial areas of Los Angeles, set to a pounding orchestral score. Cut to characters played by Harrison Ford, Ray Liotta, Ashley Judd, Cliff Curtis or another of the many fine actors being wasted here. Develop a scene that in some way stresses the challenges immigrants face and very often features dialogue spelling things out in that vein. Lather, rinse and repeat.

The repetitive, tenuously constructed storylines have been crammed with some significant contrivances. Crossing Over suggests immigration officers consider the notoriously unreliable IMDb suitable evidence, implies that Curtis would have time to deliver a soul searing monologue while thwarting a convenience store hold up gone wrong and that a beautiful Australian actress played by Alice Eve would have to resort to sleeping with Liotta’s applications adjudicator for a green card. Things converge for an obscenely jingoistic climax spurred by a plot thread onetime cast member Sean Penn reportedly found offensive enough to get himself cut out of the film.

Criticizing Crash has become a popular sport since its shocking Best Picture win at the 2006 Academy Awards. Yet that multistory L.A. set immigration drama looks like a masterpiece of tasteful restraint when compared to the histrionics of Crossing Over. Though I consider Running Scared, his previous film, one of the worst movies ever made I will admit that Kramer is a talented filmmaker. He knows how to make scenes move and bring rhythm to a movie. He does not, however, grasp of the need for subtlety in telling a story or the importance of finding some sort of realistic grounding for one that so clearly aims to comment on current events.

Grade: D+


Read more articles by Robert Levin

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • I'd like to hear more about the Sean Penn thing. Is there more info on what happened?
  • I don't understand Sean Penn's stance here. Did he not read the script before he signed on? Also, I heard that Harvey Weinstein edited this picture with a blunt instrument.
  • Sean Penn cares about one thing, Sean Penn. He basically looked at this porject and asked himself can he win an oscar with it. With all the other talent he knew he stood a snowballs chance in hell, hence why he pulled a Jeremy Piven.
  • TJL
    This is one of those movies you hear they are making, then complete silence until they sneak it into the theater with little or no fanfare.
    Judging by the reviews in the papers today it should have stayed hidden for a while longer.
  • Resident Alien
    I have a green card and am in the entertainment industry and on a couple of occasions when I've entered the country, the immigration officer has literally checked my information on IMDB in front of me and confirmed my credits. So Kramer gets it right and the reviewer is wrong. The reviewer is also completely unsympathetic to the plight of immigrants and how proud they are to become Americans as portrayed in the film. A guy like Cliff Curtis would stop down and give that monologue. Only through the eyes of someone born here and who has never had to fight for residency or citizenship, could you write that scene and many others off so casually. And, yes, from the many, many reports I've read, Weinstein took an axe to the film and cut out a lot of additional scenes and character development, as well as the Sean Penn storyline, which elaborates a lot more on the Alice Braga story and culminates (from what I've read) as a ghost story. I want to see that version, dammit!!! Can't wait for the director's cut on DVD - I hear it runs about 20 minutes longer (if they release Kramer's original cut). And if you think Running Scared is the worst film of all time, you've blown all credibility with this reader. On the contrary, I consider it one of the best action films of the last ten years.
  • Not that I have a real strong opinion of Running Scared, but I do tend to agree that I always find it suspect anytime anyone ever talks about a popular movie as being one of or the worst movie ever made. Honestly its just ridiculous. There are so many movies out there that are so terrible they aren't even included on 'worst of' lists because they're not even good enough to reach the bottom line. To declare a movie that has even one element of quality as the worst ever just seems silly.
  • patriot12345657890
    I loved when they sent the sympethizer back to her country. If you don't support this country you shouldn't have the privilege to live in it.
  • If you want a simple review on whether a movie was good or not then just watch siskel and roeper or entertainment tonight otherwise you're missing the point of a reviewer. You can't just expect a yes/no, good/bad, linear opinion. If a review goes into technical details and is longer than "four short scrolls" that means they're analyzing everything and doing what they're supposed to- even if it is a hobby for some of them. There's a lot that goes into making a good movie- director, cast, crew, synergy. Even timing is important. So when people like Ed tackle these issues it's necessary in order to come up with the main reason for the critique: was the movie good or bad...
blog comments powered by Disqus