Share submit to reddit

brothers_movie_review1

If there were ever a milieu made for Jim Sheridan, a military town amid the current war in Iraq is it. Throughout his prestigious career, in movies as different as In the Name of the Father and In America, the Irish filmmaker has specialized in portraits of families under siege and the male psychology pushed to the brink. In Brothers, the David Benioff scripted remake of the 2004 Susanne Bier film, the two elements blend with such natural precision it’s a wonder Sheridan hadn’t set out to chronicle a small sliver of the American home front before.

In a narrative rife with emotions both heightened and subtle, Sheridan and Benioff zero in on an everyday military family facing an all too common burden. Sam Cahill (Tobey Maguire) leaves his wife Grace (Natalie Portman) and his daughters behind when he’s sent to Iraq. His body disappears after a terrible helicopter crash, leading to the dreaded sight of somber officers approaching the front door of the Cahill home. As Grace tries to rebuild her life, she grows closer to her brother-in-law Tommy (Jake Gyllenhaal), a former deadbeat recently released from prison and struggling to find his path in life.

Fans of the original know that’s only half the story. Here, Sam survives the crash and faces a harrowing ordeal after being kidnapped by terrorists. Rather awkwardly, the picture cuts between the debasement he endures and the healing process undergone by his family at home. It’s a jarring amalgamation of tones and styles — Sam’s journey has a gritty documentary feel while the domestic scenes are rendered in subdued, classical emotional tones. Yet there’s enough compelling content in both narratives for the movie to maintain momentum as it hurls towards a third act rife with high drama.

Sheridan casts Maguire in a distant, rigid tough guy loner part that has more in common with Peter Parker than one might think. The actor never completely gets away from his tendency to overdo things with his face, contorting it wildly and opening his eyes so wide they seem ready to pop out, but he navigates the character’s eventual mental disintegration with aplomb. Portman and Gyllenhaal are best, however, and that they develop such easy, loving chemistry in their scenes together is a major coup for the filmmakers, the emotional engine that drives the story.

The connection they share is formed out of sincere, quiet moments that eroticize the stabilizing presence Tommy provides and Grace’s appreciation for the bond that develops between him and the kids. She’s drawn to his gentleness. While Sam was a stiff, distant taskmaster with everything figured out, his brother’s a childlike soul still searching for his direction in life. He’s refused to do his part to uphold the Cahill military legacy, much to the chagrin of his father Hank (Sam Shepard), and the film opens with Sam picking him up after he’s completed a prison sentence for robbing a bank. As Tommy starts spending more time with the family, a transformation takes place. “It gets you thinking,” he says of the time he’s spent with his nieces and sister-in-law and Gyllenhaal, with his big eyes, expressive face and earnest, emphatic demeanor makes it clear that Tommy’s found his purpose.

The film turns on the jarring realization that Sam’s return threatens this domestic bliss and thwarts the formation of this new, more natural family unit. Yet the final act of the picture is handled gracefully, far from the lurid love triangle melodrama the ads seem to promise. The screenplay reconstitutes Sam’s suspicions of Tommy and Grace as a symptom of the broader, deeper mental anguish of a man driven mad by questioning his sense of self and the moral code he values. Sheridan captures the domestic discord with an eye towards the internal tensions brewing in his three protagonists, unfurling their layered relations with patience and a keen perception of the weight of what’s left unsaid. As those submerged emotions pour out during the film’s volatile climax, it’s hard to be anything less than completely riveted.

The Upside: Director Jim Sheridan fills the movie with compelling drama, both heightened and subtle. Jake Gyllenhaal and Natalie Portman are great.

The Downside: The cross-cutting between the two major storylines is often jarring and far from seamless.

On the Side: The film is a remake of Danish director Susanne Bier’s 2004 film, which starred Connie Nielsen in the Natalie Portman role.

Grade: B+

Related Posts with Thumbnails

RELATED ARTICLES
ARTICLE TAGS
  Previous Article
Next Article  
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

Leave a Reply

  1. Cole_Abaius says:

    I was blown away by the directions this took. Never exactly where you thought it would head, and yet it usually ended up in a place with far more tension and drama. Acting was amazing. Although, I think there was a chance for brilliance at the end that wasn't taken. Still, a strong movie.

    But…my dislike of children on screen hurt this film for me. Sometimes those kids are used fantastically – right in the middle of the family firefights – but there are more than a handful of moments where they sound like kids trying to act as kids. It seems craven to critique the acting of children, but they pulled me right out of the moment many times they were on screen.

    Beyond that, great, great drama. Edge of your seat stuff.

  2. Arou says:

    I agree with the children thing. Although I have to say, the parts where they needed to deliver, they delivered big. The birthday party scene? The older girl acted her ass off!

    And honestly, I've never been a huge fan of Toby until now-in Spider-Man he delivers soft performances and I hated Sea Biscuit-but this movie changed how I think about him as an actor. Having read the review prior to watching the flick I looked out his bug-eyedness, but it was never as bad as the reviewer implied, if anything his eyes added more to the story than the dialogue.

    I'm still trying to figure out if they missed a chance to do something powerful at the end, or if the audience is just emotionally drained by the end. It still affected me, it was brilliance, but it did feel flat.

  3. Aleric says:

    Oh look, another hollywood interpretation of soldiers with post tramatic stress disorder. Gee that is so original. They couldn't have made a movie about a troubled kid who goes into the service as a bad person and comes out a good or better person, its always the reverse in Hollywood.

  4. Anonymous says:

    This movie is more than just a “hollywood interpretation of post traumatic stress disorder”, and it's more than just a drama. A friend of mine thought that the film's trailer gave away too much. Totally wrong. This movie takes surprising twists that the trailer can't prepare the viewer for. This is an oscar caliber film for sure.

  5. Anonymous says:

    This movie is more than just a “hollywood interpretation of post traumatic stress disorder”, and it's more than just a drama. A friend of mine thought that the film's trailer gave away too much. Totally wrong. This movie takes surprising twists that the trailer can't prepare the viewer for. This is an oscar caliber film for sure.

  6. Yea, I saw the original Danish version as well. It had a good beginning, a good middle but a terrible ending. Nothing really happens. It just sort of fizzles out like a 4th of July sparkler. Vey unsatisying. If these producers/director don't punch up the ending this will get some negative “word of mouth” reviews from the viewing public and fade away into obscurity which would be a shame since the talent is obviously there and it looks like they put in some great performances from the trailer.

  7. Critic_Veteran says:

    I thought this movie was had phenomenal potential but failed big. First, why did Sam (Tobey) have to kill his Marine comrade? Second, the war took place in Afghanistan not Iraq and was being held by Afghani locals possibly Taliban but not necessarily terrorists. Third, they played up Sam's PTSD to a point where it no longer felt believable. Fourth, the daughter's dialogue during the birthday scene was over-the-top. Why & where would someone feel the need to create such a scene based upon false accusations and kids aren't that evil. Recommendations: Instead of Sam killing his Marine copatriot have him just witness his copatriot be killed. Instead of Sam being a crazy vet play down the PTSD a smidge. Keep his insecurities about his wife and his brother and alter dialogue to say something to the effect of “Mommy would rather be with Uncle Tommy….”

blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow FILM SCHOOL REJECTS...


MOVIE NEWS | MOVIE TRAILERS | MOVIE REVIEWS | TV REVIEWS | FEATURES | INTERVIEWS | CONTESTS | ABOUT
Film School Rejects is the movie blog you've been waiting for. The ultimate commentary track on what's happening in Hollywood, FSR combines the freshest voices on the web and a swagger all its own to provide the best reviews, interviews and industry news coverage to millions of unique visitors from around the world every month.
FSR Team
Got a Tip? Send it here:
editors@filmschoolrejects.com
Publisher:
Neil Miller | Email
Managing Editor:
Cole Abaius | Email
Associate Editors:
Robert Fure | Email
Rob Hunter | Email
Contributors:
Adam Charles | Email
Amber Humphrey | Email
Brian Gibson | Email
Brian Salisbury | Email
Dustin Hucks | Email
Genevieve Blaber | Email
Contributors:
J.L. Sosa | Email
Jack Giroux | Email
Jeremy Kirk | Email
Jim Rohner | Email
Jorge Del Pinal | Email
Josh Radde | Email
Kevin Carr | Email
Contributors:
Landon Palmer | Email
Lauren Flanagan | Email
Paul Sileo | Email
Robert Levin | Email
Robin Ruinsky | Email
Advertising:
sales@craveonline.com
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2010 Reject Media, LLC | Site Credits | Privacy Policy
Design & Development by Face3