Review: Amelia

Posted by Bethany Perryman (bethany@filmschoolrejects.com) on October 23, 2009

amelia-header

Amelia Earhart’s accomplishments include:

  • Woman’s world altitude record: 14,000 ft (1922)
  • First woman to fly the Atlantic (1928)
  • Speed records for 100 km (and with 500 lb (230 kg) cargo) (1931)
  • First woman to fly an autogyro (1931)
  • Altitude record for autogyros: 15,000 ft (1931)
  • First person to cross the U.S. in an autogyro (1932)
  • First woman to fly the Atlantic solo (1932)
  • First person to fly the Atlantic twice (1932)
  • First woman to receive the Distinguished Flying Cross (1932)
  • First woman to fly non-stop, coast-to-coast across the U.S. (1933)
  • Woman’s speed transcontinental record (1933)
  • First person to fly solo between Honolulu, Hawaii and Oakland, California (1935)
  • First person to fly solo from Los Angeles, California to Mexico City, Mexico (1935)
  • First person to fly solo nonstop from Mexico City, Mexico to Newark, New Jersey (1935)
  • Speed record for east-to-west flight from Oakland, California to Honolulu, Hawaii (1937)

And now, 72 years later, we can add to this litany of acheivement:

  • Terrible Biopic (2009)

All of the elements of a good film are there: money, accomplished director (Mira Nair, The Namesake), one of the great American stories, Academy Award winning principal cast (Hillary Swank, Richard Gere), the unmistakable styles of roaring ’20s (and early ’30s), and several scenes with a child version of Gore Vidal. What could possibly go wrong? Plenty, as it turns out.

I’m not sure who to blame here. Is it the screenwriters, the producers, or director Mira Nair herself? No matter. Whomever decided which elements of Earhart’s life to feature in this Oscar-grab-of-a-biopic should find work at Lifetime Movie Network. Instead of exposing to us Earhart’s motivations for flying, we’re given a one-dimensional love story about an open marriage, and a flat tale of celebrity. We learn nothing about why she must fly, how she got interested in aviation, why exactly Earhart is a pioneer. We aren’t left with a message about women breaking boundaries, or even with a renewed appreciation for aviation. The relationship between aviation and Earhart is severely lacking — and that’s the only reason that anyone cares about her today. We came to the theater to fly, but Amelia never gets off the ground.

The dialogue, adapted from two separate Earhart biographies, is overly calculated and unworthy of its subject or its deliverers. Swank, Gere, and Ewan McGregor (whose character spends most of his screen time being seen and not heard — and not in a good way) do well with what they are given, but it’s just not much. Gere’s accent is a bit cartoony, but Swank clearly studied and practiced Earhart’s accent. She lands both her tenor and the timing of the era. It’s too bad that the dialogue she’s given to work with is dry as dirt.

With flat characters, unclear motivations, and blank words, you’d expect the score to be memorable or the movie itself to be beautiful. Not so. While there are sparse few moments of hope — a tickertape parade for Earhart that’s particularly well-shot, some magnificient roving landscape shots of blue whale families in the ocean, a cool thunderstorm in the clouds, Victoria Falls, and the Masai Mara — most of the scenes are just bland, with the obvious, clamoring score only serving to make things worse.

Most offensive is the insult to our intelligence, and the lack of any lesson learned by or about Ms. Earhart. I want a story to take home from this movie, but I’m fed a tacky montage of newspaper headlines that quickly coast through Earhart’s celebrity and career. Throughout the film, I couldn’t help but think Wow, I want to see what I just read in that fake newspaper actually happening on-screen, and Why am I reading about The New Deal? Instead, I’m given Earhart cheating on her husband, hanging out with a young Gore Vidal (I’m sorry, that was just stupid, historically inaccurate, and weird), and inappropriately having a “let them eat cake” moment concerning The Great Depression. We want inspiring, we’ll take beautiful. What we get is aggressively schmaltzy.

The Upside: Two standout performances: A convincingly tragic Christopher Eccleston as Earhart’s navigator Fred Noonan, and Earhart’s Lockheed Electra. It’s a damn shame that beautiful bird was never found.

The Downside: 89% of the movie.

On The Side: Joining the Film School Rejects crew at the screening were the Austin, Texas chapter of the Ninety-Nines, an organization for female pilots whose founder and first president was Amelia Earhart.

Grade: D

Watch the Amelia trailer:


Read more articles by Bethany Perryman

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • ladyofthelake
    I was worried about this film the minute I heard who was directing it. I still wanna see it to judge for myself, but no theater is playing it near where I live, and I live in New Jersey.
  • amoviefan
    Consider yourself lucky. This is a dreadfully boring movie that may lead you to hate anyone and anything even remotely involved with it, from the cast and crew through your local cinema.
  • Sammie
    Actually, it is mentioned in at least one of Earhart's biographies that she was linked romantically to Gene (Eugene) Vidal, Gore Vidal's father. Ewan McGregor is playing Gene Vidal, not Gore Vidal.

    I'm so delighted to hear about Eccleston's performance being so good, though. I'm looking forward to watching him, even if the rest of the movie's lousy.
  • I know that, and it's made clear in the movie. I hope I didn't muddy it in my review. There is a *child* version of Gore Vidal in the film. My issue is the scene about the wallpaper, between Amelia and child Gore. It's clear from her biographies that she was closer to one of Putnam's children, but neither one of them (Putnam's kids, he had 2 from a previous marriage), ever make an appearance. It's just odd, and it seems like they just do it for the name recognition of Gore Vidal.

    Her affair with Gene is in the movie, as well as a hint to some of the work that she does in DC. It's just a mess. Eccleston is fantastic. He and the radio operator at the end? Only convincing performances of the film.
  • Did you read Ebert's review? He gave it three stars.
  • Cole_Abaius
    As much as I hate agreeing with Bethany, she's pretty much dead on here. This is the kind of tripe that is an all-too-obvious Oscar bait, and like the kid who is too desperate for attention, it should be avoided.

    I have no doubt that this film will find an audience, but personally, it was slow, flatly acted and terribly written. I imagine it would be difficult to make a movie about her because her personal life seems fairly dull (an affair and some commercials), but even the flying lays flat.

    I'm surprised that the same director that did Monsoon Wedding did this because it just goes nowhere. I'm also surprised that an Oscar-grab film worse than Changeling could have been made.
  • Barbara Ganson, Ph.D
    As an aviation historian, I have to agree that the real Amelia Earhart was far more fascinating than the character in the new film Amelia. It is a shame that Hollywood does not take the time to get it right when it comes to reconstructing the historical past.
    Most of Amelia's flying friends did not approve of her marriage to George Palmer Putnam.
    He came across as somewhat likeable, when in reality aviators, both men and women feared him because of his influence with the press. Amelia, as a child, was not interested in airplanes. She learned to fly in her early twenties. She did not fly much, given that she had less than 1800 hours in 1937. She began in flying in 1921. Although the film was inspiring at times, the characters laced depth.
blog comments powered by Disqus