300

Posted by Tara Settembre (tara@filmschoolrejects.com) on March 10, 2007

300Maybe it was the vague commercials or bloody logo, but I wasn’t expecting to like 300, yet I did.

From the mind of the creator of Sin City, 300 is also based on a graphic novel and filmed in the same animated style. And like a novel, 300 has a narrator throughout the film and lives up to the graphic part, both sexually and violently. However, that’s what 300 is about—blood, honor and going against-all-odds.

The film’s title refers to the Spartan’s seemingly bad odds, given that their army is comprised of 300 warriors compared to the ruler Xerxes and his massive Persian army with soldiers and slaves from around the globe. However, it’s the will and skill of these 300 that inspire all of Greece to untie against the attacking Persian enemy and is the stuff that myths and legends are made of.

“The Spartans remain a mystery to everybody,” said Frank Miler, who wrote the comic book mini-series which 300 was based upon. “They are arguably unique in that they are completely a battle culture, absolutely dedicated to warfare. They have a code of honor on what it means to be a Spartan, and out of that arises a heroic class like the world has never seen before.”

The tale overall is a spectacle, both mythical and exotic and action packed. I was sucked in from the beginning scene as the narrative’s momentum built a steady climatic anticipation.

The characters, however, are comprised of a relatively unknown cast. King Leonidas, Spartan’s leader, is played by Gerard Butler and his queen is portrayed by Lena Headey. I did recognize cast members, Dominic West from The Forgotten and David Wenham from The Lord of the Rings trilogy, but neither are household names by any means. However, this film didn’t need big names like Brad Pitt in Troy, the story and filming accommodated the lesser known talent as did their own performances. And speaking of LOTR, I couldn’t help but compare 300 to the trilogy in its glorification of battle and folklore.

As for the filming, the sometimes cartoon style, it was easier to separate the blood and gore from the scenes, since the splattering of blood looked more like bright red paint being cast out on the screen in slow motion. Often the speed of the camera would slow on certain motions, creating a surreal and fantastical environment. The scenery at times looked like an artists painting but married with motion.

I was also impressed that a female character, the queen, had a surprisingly strong role in such a male dominated, bare-chested film. However, the female oracle and her simply voyeuristic role negated any true female empowerment.

300 is being shown in IMAX theaters across the country, if you have the chance I definitely recommend seeing it on their huge screen in order to see the true spectacle of it all.


Read more articles by Tara Settembre

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • i think 300 is a darkest point in the making history of historical movies for hollywood. i wasted my time ..... so sorry... . this movie is a huge lie about persian empire. persian is first & biggest civilization empire in the world. first time , kirius (majestic of hakhamenesh) make a international message peace for the people of the world. his sun (khashayarsha) continiue the way of father....
    if you want , you can see the perspolis town (historical place)of khashayarsha in IRAN (city:shiraz). but in this movie khashayarsha is a dangerous badman.
    this is a big lie and history cant accept it
  • Ehsan --

    I think there is plenty who would argue the other way.

    Check this out: The 300 Controversy: Fact v. Fiction

    Cheers.
  • Khashayarsha
    The 300 stinks to high heaven: I don't know of any other film that appears to be serious but descends into spoof-like farce in certain scenes. The movie does a traversty to history, to Greek and Persians alike ( but not the plucky Spartan heroes of course): It glorifies violence and a society that was the most repressive and totalitarian in world history...I mean Sparta by the way. The depiction of the Persian King Xerxes as an androgynous, oversized hermaphrodite of Egyptian complexion was particularly distasteful. Not only that but you could tell the film was made in a warehouse as the computerised graphics are not that good: at times I wanted to cringe they were so bad ( take the wolf at the beginning and the hunchback): overall an orgy of nothingness, cliched to the bone, and revealing little else other than the perversity of the creator's mind.
  • Matthew
    Why is it that some people just can't accept this movie for what it was, great entertaiment. It was never intended to be a documentary. Further, this movie was based on Frank Miller's interpretation. So if you are offended by the movie, blame him instead of Zack Snyder.
  • The film itself was alright, and I actually did enjoy watching it a couple of times... it was to some extent entertaining.. just like the other one, "Sin City".
    Nevertheless, the movie was based on a degrading offensive interpratation that did little in terms of film quality for "some" of the audiance who "do" pay attention to aurthenticity. However, I do not criticise Zack Snyder for his flim, in fact... I admire him for his unique taste in cinemography but I do suggest and recommend to him and other Hollywood directors to challange the international media in making films about the great Persian Empire looking at it from a "different" angle; about Cyrus the Great who freed the Jews and is internationally recognized, about Darious and Xerxes, about Shapour, and Kosrow Parviz and their heroic battles with the Greeks, Romans and Egyptians. I suggest them to read translation of the Epic Masterpiece, Shahname, by the Legendary Ferdowsi who composed the Saga of Rostam with stories full of love, honor, pride, tragedy, trechery, betrayal, hatred and romance... fictional stories full of climax, characterization and elements of surprise and suspense that any director would welcome... give it a try, you won't regret it :)
  • illia
    the 300 is a big lie about old history.
    Khashayarsha with 2645000 soldiers and 2500000 engeeniers and cooks and servants went to greece and kill 3000 soldiers of enemies no 300 soldiers and win this war.
blog comments powered by Disqus