<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lions For Lambs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: travel is the best teacher</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-2#comment-251935</link>
		<dc:creator>travel is the best teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 14:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-251935</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Best Family Vacation Ideas - For Family Vocations...&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;m an email subscriber. Credit!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Best Family Vacation Ideas &#8211; For Family Vocations&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m an email subscriber. Credit!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: detox diet plan</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-2#comment-241608</link>
		<dc:creator>detox diet plan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-241608</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Healthy diet plan...&lt;/strong&gt;

nice list..really helpful....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Healthy diet plan&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>nice list..really helpful&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: low fat diet</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-2#comment-236349</link>
		<dc:creator>low fat diet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-236349</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Thank you......&lt;/strong&gt;

I really appreciate what you post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Thank you&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I really appreciate what you post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-2#comment-176151</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-176151</guid>
		<description>I must say, I thought this was a pretty interesting read when it comes to this topic. Liked the material. . . . .
Greetings, I enjoy your blog. This is a nice site and I wanted to post a note to let you know, good job! Thanks 
I hope you have a nice day! Very good article, well written and very thought out. I am looking forward to reading more of your posts in the future.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say, I thought this was a pretty interesting read when it comes to this topic. Liked the material. . . . .<br />
Greetings, I enjoy your blog. This is a nice site and I wanted to post a note to let you know, good job! Thanks<br />
I hope you have a nice day! Very good article, well written and very thought out. I am looking forward to reading more of your posts in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolex watches</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-2#comment-164942</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolex watches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 14:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-164942</guid>
		<description>This looked so yummy, I knew I had to make some. Just finished some for lunch today. Thanks for posting this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looked so yummy, I knew I had to make some. Just finished some for lunch today. Thanks for posting this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buy r4</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-2#comment-159648</link>
		<dc:creator>buy r4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-159648</guid>
		<description>It means to use the Cruise-Redford-Streep star power to get us talking about things we ought to be talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It means to use the Cruise-Redford-Streep star power to get us talking about things we ought to be talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-159649</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-159649</guid>
		<description>wow i watched the movie and only heard the preachy part and figured, i missed something important. but after checking multiple websites analysis, i found very similar things everywhere. this is just a boring film, and yet another stab to the republicans. i was not impressed in any fashion. i dont like films that tell you what to think or tell you your a bad person for thinking that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow i watched the movie and only heard the preachy part and figured, i missed something important. but after checking multiple websites analysis, i found very similar things everywhere. this is just a boring film, and yet another stab to the republicans. i was not impressed in any fashion. i dont like films that tell you what to think or tell you your a bad person for thinking that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Kors</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-95690</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Kors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-95690</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but I found the movie to be quite inspirational and relelvant to the times. My view is that if you found this movie to be so borring that you&#039;d rather watch MTV, then you probably take no interest in the direction of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place, and should have seen a new Will Farell movie. Don&#039;t watch movies that you have no interest in to begin with, because you&#039;re not going to like it. However, if you&#039;re one who actively seeks current information on the direction of the war on terrorism, which is REAL, then you&#039;d appreciate this movie. It had both pro-war and anti-war views, i.e, tom cruise and the students vs. the reporter lady. If you knew current events on the middle eastern conflicts. then you&#039;d know that, surprisingly, a lot of what Tom Cruise said in the movie was based on pure fact. Anyone who says this movie is the snoozer of the century would seem to be the person who takes abosolutely no interest in the direction of the war and his or her time would be better spent pretending like they can unilaterally solve global warming by using an energy star approved peice of electronics, which you can&#039;t, so do everyone a favor and quit criticizing the efforts of people who care about the future of this country, which includes everone on this website, by attacking pro-war views because you most likely don&#039;t do enough research to come to an authoratative assertion in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I found the movie to be quite inspirational and relelvant to the times. My view is that if you found this movie to be so borring that you&#8217;d rather watch MTV, then you probably take no interest in the direction of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place, and should have seen a new Will Farell movie. Don&#8217;t watch movies that you have no interest in to begin with, because you&#8217;re not going to like it. However, if you&#8217;re one who actively seeks current information on the direction of the war on terrorism, which is REAL, then you&#8217;d appreciate this movie. It had both pro-war and anti-war views, i.e, tom cruise and the students vs. the reporter lady. If you knew current events on the middle eastern conflicts. then you&#8217;d know that, surprisingly, a lot of what Tom Cruise said in the movie was based on pure fact. Anyone who says this movie is the snoozer of the century would seem to be the person who takes abosolutely no interest in the direction of the war and his or her time would be better spent pretending like they can unilaterally solve global warming by using an energy star approved peice of electronics, which you can&#8217;t, so do everyone a favor and quit criticizing the efforts of people who care about the future of this country, which includes everone on this website, by attacking pro-war views because you most likely don&#8217;t do enough research to come to an authoratative assertion in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Kors</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-182511</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Kors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-182511</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but I found the movie to be quite inspirational and relelvant to the times. My view is that if you found this movie to be so borring that you&#039;d rather watch MTV, then you probably take no interest in the direction of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place, and should have seen a new Will Farell movie. Don&#039;t watch movies that you have no interest in to begin with, because you&#039;re not going to like it. However, if you&#039;re one who actively seeks current information on the direction of the war on terrorism, which is REAL, then you&#039;d appreciate this movie. It had both pro-war and anti-war views, i.e, tom cruise and the students vs. the reporter lady. If you knew current events on the middle eastern conflicts. then you&#039;d know that, surprisingly, a lot of what Tom Cruise said in the movie was based on pure fact. Anyone who says this movie is the snoozer of the century would seem to be the person who takes abosolutely no interest in the direction of the war and his or her time would be better spent pretending like they can unilaterally solve global warming by using an energy star approved peice of electronics, which you can&#039;t, so do everyone a favor and quit criticizing the efforts of people who care about the future of this country, which includes everone on this website, by attacking pro-war views because you most likely don&#039;t do enough research to come to an authoratative assertion in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I found the movie to be quite inspirational and relelvant to the times. My view is that if you found this movie to be so borring that you&#8217;d rather watch MTV, then you probably take no interest in the direction of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place, and should have seen a new Will Farell movie. Don&#8217;t watch movies that you have no interest in to begin with, because you&#8217;re not going to like it. However, if you&#8217;re one who actively seeks current information on the direction of the war on terrorism, which is REAL, then you&#8217;d appreciate this movie. It had both pro-war and anti-war views, i.e, tom cruise and the students vs. the reporter lady. If you knew current events on the middle eastern conflicts. then you&#8217;d know that, surprisingly, a lot of what Tom Cruise said in the movie was based on pure fact. Anyone who says this movie is the snoozer of the century would seem to be the person who takes abosolutely no interest in the direction of the war and his or her time would be better spent pretending like they can unilaterally solve global warming by using an energy star approved peice of electronics, which you can&#8217;t, so do everyone a favor and quit criticizing the efforts of people who care about the future of this country, which includes everone on this website, by attacking pro-war views because you most likely don&#8217;t do enough research to come to an authoratative assertion in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gamble</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-91606</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-91606</guid>
		<description>Sorry my mistake, I was wrong... it was Afghanistan, not Iraq. Sorry for the mistake (and the double... no triple post... maybe someone can delete my posts where necessary?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry my mistake, I was wrong&#8230; it was Afghanistan, not Iraq. Sorry for the mistake (and the double&#8230; no triple post&#8230; maybe someone can delete my posts where necessary?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gamble</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-182510</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-182510</guid>
		<description>Sorry my mistake, I was wrong... it was Afghanistan, not Iraq. Sorry for the mistake (and the double... no triple post... maybe someone can delete my posts where necessary?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry my mistake, I was wrong&#8230; it was Afghanistan, not Iraq. Sorry for the mistake (and the double&#8230; no triple post&#8230; maybe someone can delete my posts where necessary?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gamble</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-91605</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-91605</guid>
		<description>Man he got it all wrong, there is no chance this is an anti-US,?Liberal film.

It&#039;s more a right-wing piece of propaganda that tries to convince us that nobody wants to support the war in Iraq. In all of the political debates at the University the right-wingers shoot down the the left-wing majority and right at the end the most intelligent guy decides to sign up for the army because seemingly nobody else cares.

To top this off the war in Iraq isn&#039;t what the news&#039; biggest focus is on right at the end... the war just gets a little tiny mention although the Americans have succeeded in gaining the high ground... showing oh how superior they are and how oh-so-right McCain (played by Tom Cruise) will be as the next president.

The message of this movie is to vote for McCain because the war in Iraq is nearly over and is only looking bad because the media are against it. No chance this was a Liberal movie.

How did the reviewer get it sooooo wrong and think that it was left-wing propaganda. Go watch Michael Moore if you want that (he is just as boring and preachy... actually no he&#039;s sorta funny because he plays a few good pranks and gets people angry).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man he got it all wrong, there is no chance this is an anti-US,?Liberal film.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s more a right-wing piece of propaganda that tries to convince us that nobody wants to support the war in Iraq. In all of the political debates at the University the right-wingers shoot down the the left-wing majority and right at the end the most intelligent guy decides to sign up for the army because seemingly nobody else cares.</p>
<p>To top this off the war in Iraq isn&#8217;t what the news&#8217; biggest focus is on right at the end&#8230; the war just gets a little tiny mention although the Americans have succeeded in gaining the high ground&#8230; showing oh how superior they are and how oh-so-right McCain (played by Tom Cruise) will be as the next president.</p>
<p>The message of this movie is to vote for McCain because the war in Iraq is nearly over and is only looking bad because the media are against it. No chance this was a Liberal movie.</p>
<p>How did the reviewer get it sooooo wrong and think that it was left-wing propaganda. Go watch Michael Moore if you want that (he is just as boring and preachy&#8230; actually no he&#8217;s sorta funny because he plays a few good pranks and gets people angry).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gamble</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-182509</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-182509</guid>
		<description>Man he got it all wrong, there is no chance this is an anti-US,?Liberal film.

It&#039;s more a right-wing piece of propaganda that tries to convince us that nobody wants to support the war in Iraq. In all of the political debates at the University the right-wingers shoot down the the left-wing majority and right at the end the most intelligent guy decides to sign up for the army because seemingly nobody else cares.

To top this off the war in Iraq isn&#039;t what the news&#039; biggest focus is on right at the end... the war just gets a little tiny mention although the Americans have succeeded in gaining the high ground... showing oh how superior they are and how oh-so-right McCain (played by Tom Cruise) will be as the next president.

The message of this movie is to vote for McCain because the war in Iraq is nearly over and is only looking bad because the media are against it. No chance this was a Liberal movie.

How did the reviewer get it sooooo wrong and think that it was left-wing propaganda. Go watch Michael Moore if you want that (he is just as boring and preachy... actually no he&#039;s sorta funny because he plays a few good pranks and gets people angry).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man he got it all wrong, there is no chance this is an anti-US,?Liberal film.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s more a right-wing piece of propaganda that tries to convince us that nobody wants to support the war in Iraq. In all of the political debates at the University the right-wingers shoot down the the left-wing majority and right at the end the most intelligent guy decides to sign up for the army because seemingly nobody else cares.</p>
<p>To top this off the war in Iraq isn&#8217;t what the news&#8217; biggest focus is on right at the end&#8230; the war just gets a little tiny mention although the Americans have succeeded in gaining the high ground&#8230; showing oh how superior they are and how oh-so-right McCain (played by Tom Cruise) will be as the next president.</p>
<p>The message of this movie is to vote for McCain because the war in Iraq is nearly over and is only looking bad because the media are against it. No chance this was a Liberal movie.</p>
<p>How did the reviewer get it sooooo wrong and think that it was left-wing propaganda. Go watch Michael Moore if you want that (he is just as boring and preachy&#8230; actually no he&#8217;s sorta funny because he plays a few good pranks and gets people angry).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gamble</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-91604</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-91604</guid>
		<description>Man he got it all wrong, there is no chance this is an anti-US,?Liberal film.

It&#039;s more a right-wing piece of propaganda that tries to convince us that nobody wants to support the war in Iraq. In all of the political debates at the University the right-wingers shoot down the the left-wing majority and right at the end the most intelligent guy decides to sign up for the army because seemingly nobody else cares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man he got it all wrong, there is no chance this is an anti-US,?Liberal film.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s more a right-wing piece of propaganda that tries to convince us that nobody wants to support the war in Iraq. In all of the political debates at the University the right-wingers shoot down the the left-wing majority and right at the end the most intelligent guy decides to sign up for the army because seemingly nobody else cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gamble</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-182508</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-182508</guid>
		<description>Man he got it all wrong, there is no chance this is an anti-US,?Liberal film.

It&#039;s more a right-wing piece of propaganda that tries to convince us that nobody wants to support the war in Iraq. In all of the political debates at the University the right-wingers shoot down the the left-wing majority and right at the end the most intelligent guy decides to sign up for the army because seemingly nobody else cares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man he got it all wrong, there is no chance this is an anti-US,?Liberal film.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s more a right-wing piece of propaganda that tries to convince us that nobody wants to support the war in Iraq. In all of the political debates at the University the right-wingers shoot down the the left-wing majority and right at the end the most intelligent guy decides to sign up for the army because seemingly nobody else cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-182507</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-182507</guid>
		<description>Good comment by Bruce Puddle, I don&#039;t think the film is anti-american at all. I think the many people who bash the movie do so by thinking that anybody who is not a republican is anti-american.  It&#039;s the same political strategy that got Bush re-elected and of course nobody wants to be labeled anti-american.

It&#039;s amazing how despite everything that&#039;s happened so far some republicans will simply not accept the facts nor admit that war in Iraq was not justified. The lack of intellectual integrity from some of our leaders and americans in general is a major problem in this country.

It&#039;s a shame that such a great movie did not get good reviews from the press. In America we care more about Angelina Jolie&#039;s pregancy than the issues that are really important like the war, ecomony, foreign policy, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comment by Bruce Puddle, I don&#8217;t think the film is anti-american at all. I think the many people who bash the movie do so by thinking that anybody who is not a republican is anti-american.  It&#8217;s the same political strategy that got Bush re-elected and of course nobody wants to be labeled anti-american.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how despite everything that&#8217;s happened so far some republicans will simply not accept the facts nor admit that war in Iraq was not justified. The lack of intellectual integrity from some of our leaders and americans in general is a major problem in this country.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that such a great movie did not get good reviews from the press. In America we care more about Angelina Jolie&#8217;s pregancy than the issues that are really important like the war, ecomony, foreign policy, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-90875</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-90875</guid>
		<description>Good comment by Bruce Puddle, I don&#039;t think the film is anti-american at all. I think the many people who bash the movie do so by thinking that anybody who is not a republican is anti-american.  It&#039;s the same political strategy that got Bush re-elected and of course nobody wants to be labeled anti-american.

It&#039;s amazing how despite everything that&#039;s happened so far some republicans will simply not accept the facts nor admit that war in Iraq was not justified. The lack of intellectual integrity from some of our leaders and americans in general is a major problem in this country.

It&#039;s a shame that such a great movie did not get good reviews from the press. In America we care more about Angelina Jolie&#039;s pregancy than the issues that are really important like the war, ecomony, foreign policy, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comment by Bruce Puddle, I don&#8217;t think the film is anti-american at all. I think the many people who bash the movie do so by thinking that anybody who is not a republican is anti-american.  It&#8217;s the same political strategy that got Bush re-elected and of course nobody wants to be labeled anti-american.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how despite everything that&#8217;s happened so far some republicans will simply not accept the facts nor admit that war in Iraq was not justified. The lack of intellectual integrity from some of our leaders and americans in general is a major problem in this country.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that such a great movie did not get good reviews from the press. In America we care more about Angelina Jolie&#8217;s pregancy than the issues that are really important like the war, ecomony, foreign policy, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-90025</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cassidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-90025</guid>
		<description>As an Australian I have to say, &quot;Bruce, why are sheep always mentioned around Kiwis?&quot;  Pings made this page worth reading, if just for the hole dam truth about retards.

I thought the movie was boring, but could not see it as left wing propaganda.   Come on, two guys dying bravely in the snow, with a baby faced kid thinking about heading over there after taking to his left wing mentor??  

What&#039;s new about portraying a polititian as self serving and journalists looking toward the editor/publishers view.  Personally I thought it made a case for fighting this war in Afganistan not Iraq, even if past mistakes are to be repeated.  

Best wishes to all coalition troups overseas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Australian I have to say, &#8220;Bruce, why are sheep always mentioned around Kiwis?&#8221;  Pings made this page worth reading, if just for the hole dam truth about retards.</p>
<p>I thought the movie was boring, but could not see it as left wing propaganda.   Come on, two guys dying bravely in the snow, with a baby faced kid thinking about heading over there after taking to his left wing mentor??  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s new about portraying a polititian as self serving and journalists looking toward the editor/publishers view.  Personally I thought it made a case for fighting this war in Afganistan not Iraq, even if past mistakes are to be repeated.  </p>
<p>Best wishes to all coalition troups overseas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-182506</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cassidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-182506</guid>
		<description>As an Australian I have to say, &quot;Bruce, why are sheep always mentioned around Kiwis?&quot;  Pings made this page worth reading, if just for the hole dam truth about retards.

I thought the movie was boring, but could not see it as left wing propaganda.   Come on, two guys dying bravely in the snow, with a baby faced kid thinking about heading over there after taking to his left wing mentor??  

What&#039;s new about portraying a polititian as self serving and journalists looking toward the editor/publishers view.  Personally I thought it made a case for fighting this war in Afganistan not Iraq, even if past mistakes are to be repeated.  

Best wishes to all coalition troups overseas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Australian I have to say, &#8220;Bruce, why are sheep always mentioned around Kiwis?&#8221;  Pings made this page worth reading, if just for the hole dam truth about retards.</p>
<p>I thought the movie was boring, but could not see it as left wing propaganda.   Come on, two guys dying bravely in the snow, with a baby faced kid thinking about heading over there after taking to his left wing mentor??  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s new about portraying a polititian as self serving and journalists looking toward the editor/publishers view.  Personally I thought it made a case for fighting this war in Afganistan not Iraq, even if past mistakes are to be repeated.  </p>
<p>Best wishes to all coalition troups overseas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pings</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-81411</link>
		<dc:creator>Pings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/lions-for-lambs-2.php#comment-81411</guid>
		<description>All you guys are blind sheep being led by a false shepherd/s.  This movie is full of propaganda. Dam near every review of this movie has the word propaganda in the review. Hollywood does not make pro USA movies like they did in the 1980&#039;s and early 1990&#039;s even though most of them made lots of money. Lets compare Saving Private Ryan to Jar Head or even more recent The Kingdom vs Lions For Lambs. 

World wide Saving Private Ryan has made 481,840,909 dollars vs Jarhead @ 96,889,998.

World wide The Kingdom has made 84,872,996 vs Lions For Lambs @ 46,313,556.

People Like PRO-US movies there is the proof. Its not about money its propaganda. They don&#039;t care if lose money. As long as they get people like the retards above me ^ to believe in what they believe in. Its worth losing hundreds of millions of dollars.

If Hollywood does not make propaganda films then explain An Inconvenient Truth. That hole movie is a lie. Thing that bothers me the most is that global warming is a theory. That movie hides theory the and states it as a fact. When Its not. What ever happened to scientific procedure? I&#039;ll tell you what happened, propaganda is what happened. O yea world wide it made $49,103,16. Know one wants to watch crap... did I say that I meant to say propaganda.

All these stats are TOTAL LIFETIME GROSSES WORLD WIDE thanks to 
http://www.boxofficemojo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you guys are blind sheep being led by a false shepherd/s.  This movie is full of propaganda. Dam near every review of this movie has the word propaganda in the review. Hollywood does not make pro USA movies like they did in the 1980&#8242;s and early 1990&#8242;s even though most of them made lots of money. Lets compare Saving Private Ryan to Jar Head or even more recent The Kingdom vs Lions For Lambs. </p>
<p>World wide Saving Private Ryan has made 481,840,909 dollars vs Jarhead @ 96,889,998.</p>
<p>World wide The Kingdom has made 84,872,996 vs Lions For Lambs @ 46,313,556.</p>
<p>People Like PRO-US movies there is the proof. Its not about money its propaganda. They don&#8217;t care if lose money. As long as they get people like the retards above me ^ to believe in what they believe in. Its worth losing hundreds of millions of dollars.</p>
<p>If Hollywood does not make propaganda films then explain An Inconvenient Truth. That hole movie is a lie. Thing that bothers me the most is that global warming is a theory. That movie hides theory the and states it as a fact. When Its not. What ever happened to scientific procedure? I&#8217;ll tell you what happened, propaganda is what happened. O yea world wide it made $49,103,16. Know one wants to watch crap&#8230; did I say that I meant to say propaganda.</p>
<p>All these stats are TOTAL LIFETIME GROSSES WORLD WIDE thanks to<br />
<a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.boxofficemojo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 592/598 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 18:26:22 -->
