Kevin Carr’s Weekly Report Card for 09.18.09

Posted by Kevin Carr (kevin@filmschoolrejects.com) on September 18, 2009

kevin-reportcard-header

CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF MEATBALLS

Studio: Sony Animation Studios

Rated: PG for brief mild language.

Starring: Anna Faris, Bill Hader, Andy Samberg, Bruce Campbell and James Caan

Directed by: Christopher Miller & Phil Lord

What it’s about: Based on the beloved children’s book, this film tells the story of a would-be inventor named Flint Lockwood. After years of failed inventions, Flint finally develops his masterpiece: a machine that converts water into food. After an experimental test goes horribly awry, the invention is launched into the stratosphere where it starts to convert clouds into food, which rains upon the town. However, soon the inventions starts to become uncontrollable, and Flint is the only guy who can stop it.

What I liked: Growing up, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs was one of my favorite children’s books, so I approached this movie cautiously. However, I found myself noticeably impressed by the film’s story, which was expanded greatly from the original picture book.

This movie is waaaaaay out there, but in a good way. It’s unlike any other film – live-action or CGI – that you’ve seen before. The story is simple, but it has enough unique elements to make it pop, and there’s humor for both the kids and adults in the audience.

Finally, the voice acting is great, with recognizable people like Mr. T but also solid B-list performances in the leading roles. The producers didn’t just get big names for this movie. They got people who could sell the characters to the audience.

What I didn’t: Not much, to be honest. There are a few cliches in the plot, and the characters aren’t completely original. However, for a kids’ movie, this one really hits it out of the park.

Who is gonna like this movie: Kids and their families.

Grade: A

THE INFORMANT!

Studio: Warner Bros.

Rated: R for language.

Starring: Matt Damon, Scott Bakula, Joel McHale, Melanie Lynskey and Tony Hale

Directed by: Steven Soderbergh

What it’s about: Mark Whitacre (Matt Damon) is in middle management at a company that is involved in a price-fixing scheme. To help better position himself for the future, Mark begins to work with the FBI in an investigation of that scheme. However, in the process, he commits his own series of crimes and throws his life and his career into turmoil.

What I liked: When it comes to Steven Soderbergh, you can expect something unique, and he delivers this with The Informant!. The movie is very funny with a dry wit put on a slow burn. It’s not a knee-slapper, but the misadventures of Mark Whitacre should make you chuckle at least a few times.

In addition to the dry deliver, it’s the acting that makes the film shine. Matt Damon (who reportedly gained weight so he could look more like me) does a great job in his role, and he’s supported by an excellent cast including Scott Bakula, Melanie Lynskey and Tony Hale.

What I didn’t: While Soderbergh strives to give the film its own unique look, the movie does seem to exist out of its own time. It takes place in the early 1990s, but the look and feel of the film feels more like it’s out of the 70s, or the early 80s, at least.

Also, the film is a slow started, throwing a lot of detail about corn products and lysine, which is really extraneous information. It takes a while to get into this movie, but it is worth the wait.

Who is gonna like this movie: Soderbergh fans and people who want to see a light-hearted comedy about corporate greed.

Grade: B-

JENNIFER’S BODY

Studio: Fox Atomic

Rated: R for sexuality, bloody violence, language and brief drug use.

Starring: Megan Fox, Amanda Seyfried, Johnny Simmons, Adam Brody and J.K. Simmons

Directed by: Karyn Kusama

What it’s about: Needy (Amanda Seyfried) is best friends with Jennifer (Megan Fox), the hottest cheerleader at the school. However, after a tragedy strikes a local bar, Jennifer comes home possessed by a demon. Jennifer starts killing the boys at her school, and it seems that Needy is the only person who realizes this or cares to stop it.

What I liked: Considering I thought this movie was a cinematic turd (sorry, Rob Hunter), there’s not a lot of nice things I can say about it beyond the basic hormonal trigger points. Yes, Megan Fox is hot. Yes, Amanda Seyfried has a rack the size of a medieval torture chamber. Yes, you get to see Megan Fox in various stages of undress (with any money shot sorely lacking, though). And yes, there is a make-out scene between Fox and Seyfried (which makes no sense in the context of the movie, but who really cares?).

What I didn’t: There were three main problems with this film… the writer, the director and the lead actress.

First, the writer. Diablo Cody gave us a fantastic script for Juno, but she’s not a very versatile writer. Cody’s script force feeds us the ersatz teen-speak that was endearing in her Oscar winner. However, here, it’s just one failed feminine hygiene joke after another. This film lacks the warmth and heart of Juno, making it as soul-less as the character of Jennifer.

Second, the director. Karyn Kusama may have directed Girlfight, but I simply won’t forgive her for Aeon Flux. She seems clueless in her delivery, taking herself way too seriously and constructing a movie that wants to be both artistic and exploitative at the same time. I honestly don’t think she got the memo that this was supposed to be a comedy.

Finally, the lead actress. I will conceded that Megan Fox is sizzling hot, but she is the worst actor on the planet. She’s the Steven Seagal of hot chicks, and she can’t even deliver basic dialogue. Watching her in this movie is like watching Shannen Doherty in Mallrats. Yeah, she’s easy on the eyes, but you’ll have a better time with her as a fantasy girlfriend if you just pick up the latest issue of Maxim.

Who is gonna like this movie: Die-hard Diablo Cody fans, die-hard Megan Fox fans and goth kids..

Grade: D


Read more articles by Kevin Carr

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Christopher_M
    I don't remember the last horror film that had the combo of warmth and heart..lol it's a horror film it's meant to be fun not high art...Carr I love how you praise films that you can watch with you're children but everything else can be put through the wood chipper...I really do feel sometimes you're out of touch when it comes to genre films or films geared to adults
  • Kangaroo Be Stoned
    Perception of a film can be influenced by outside forces, including wife/husband and kids. I know many people who like films because their kids do. It brings them joy to see their spouse or kids enjoying themselves.
  • Christopher_M
    It can also make you jaded or make it hard to enjoy a non-family film...too much Spongebob and ICarly can effect parents as well
  • KevinCarr
    Check out some of my other reviews, and you'll find that I like horror films (like The Collector earlier this year and even last week's Sorority Row). I can appreciate them, but Jennifer's Body was just awful.

    Same goes for family films, though there are plenty that I don't like. But Kangaroo is right that I tend to like movies better if they're geared towards my kids and they like them (e.g., Alvin and the Chipmunks & G-Force).

    Funny though... I didn't even take my kids to Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs and still loved it.

    and PS - iCarly's a hell of a show... :-P
  • Christopher_M
    just busting your balls Kevin...I agreed with your review on Informant just got back from seeing it...it felt average for Steven Soderbergh standards

    although I don't agree with allowing your children to be poisoned by viewing trash like Alvin & The Chipmunks...I miss the higher level of quality of family films that were shown to us growing up...Jurassic Park, E.T. , Goonies...ect
  • What you have to realize, though, is that the "higher quality" films you mentioned are the best of the best. A lot of crap was around when you were little, it just got forgotten. Plus, some of the stuff you liked as a kid was probably crap. Was TMNT or Power Rangers really that great? And the new generation has Pixar, who are making some of the best movies of all time, kids or otherwise. I'm not necessarily completely disregarding what you're saying, but just taking it with a grain of salt.
  • tylerdurden1681
    I kind of figured Jennifer's Body would be getting a C or lower from most critics. It doesn't really give us anything knew and I am not a fan of Megan Fox's acting so I am sure we are on the same page there.
    I just hope when you review Zombie Land next month you'll be pleasantly surprised and we'll have a good horror movie in the cinemas for once.
  • I really love the report card. It's a hell of a way to get a slew of movie reviews quickly. But yeah, this week is a bit of a slum. I just can't get excited about Cloudy With A Chance of Meatballs. Trailer didn't draw me in, I guess. The Informant! looks interesting though, so I'm optimistic about that.

    P.S. Megan Fox isn't that hot. Marisa Tomei & Christina Hendricks are way hotter. Just sayin'.
  • KevinCarr
    Thanks for the kudos on the Report Card.

    I do absolutely agree with you on Marisa Tomei & Christina Hendricks.
  • Christopher_M
    I'm not one to point out flaws...but Fox's thumbs do creep me out
blog comments powered by Disqus