Why Josh Olson is an Asshole

Posted by Dr. Cole Abaius (cole.abaius@filmschoolrejects.com) on September 14, 2009

Despite your stately pipe, Josh Olson will not be reading your fucking script, sir.

A few years ago, I fell in love with the format of screenplay writing. The craft is understandably intoxicating for anyone who has any inclination toward writing – it’s all action, all dialog, and none of the fluff. So I packed up my bags, moved to the only city in the country where you can be successful at screenwriting and promptly wrote a novel. That’s right. As soon as I got to Los Angeles, I realized that I needed more description in my life (and that I was far, far too egotistical to allow my story to be a group effort), so I wrote a novel. But that doesn’t mean that I didn’t learn a metric ton by working in production.

Above all, I learned that it takes a lot of hard work undertaken with a smile to garner any notice in that world. The reason to get noticed of course is that having a helpful hand pulling you up is infinitely easier than trying to pull yourself into the business on your own. It takes enough sweat as it is just to find that hand up amidst the fog of false hopes, especially after feeling like you’ve already jumped off the cliff.

As some of you may know, Josh Olson is the Academy Award-nominated screenwriter that delivered A History of Violence to the world. He’s a talented writer with what appears to be a bright future, and if he continues on his path, he may very well earn a golden statue of his very own one day for his mantle.

So why is he an asshole?

Because he won’t read your fucking script.

Olson wrote a piece for The Village Voice Blog recently detailing the many professional frustrations of being an in-demand screenwriter whose friends of friends seem to constantly barrage him with amateur scripts that they want him to read. Essentially, his complaint is not outrageous. Asking for professional help in such a sought-after field creates an instant social conundrum – asking for help seems at once both a minor and a grand inconvenience. A pro like Olson either has to decline (which makes him look like an asshole for not helping) or accept (which makes him look like an asshole for giving earnest, brutal advice that takes up precious time to give).

So it’s not necessarily that the reason behind Olson’s complaint makes him an asshole. However, rest assured that he’s an asshole nonetheless because of his general attitude and the delivery of that reason.

First of all, who writes an unsolicited rant piece about how tough it is to do favors for people? In the article, Olson relays a story about how an acquaintance asked for guidance in the form of reading and giving notes on a two-page synopsis. How hard could that be? It’s not even a full script. Olson goes through the same thought process but then agonizes for several weeks over how to delicately tell this wannabe that his work is awful. This agonizing period, of course, is blamed on the social situation and not, you know, Olson’s inability to deliver solid criticism. It should not take several weeks to mull over two pages, especially if they are so clearly terrible.

When he does send his comments, they are greeted with the height of ingratitude. Make no mistake – Olson’s acquaintance is an asshole as well (and presumably a bad writer), but that doesn’t excuse Olson from the general heinous bitterness that a simple social interaction has caused him. One wonders whether Olson gets angry in traffic or vomits whenever his clothing isn’t laid out in alphabetical order.

Second of all, the analogies that Olson throws out are laughable. He likens asking him to read a script to asking a friend who paints houses for a living to come do your house for free. I’d expect more direct comparisons from an award-nominated writer, but this baffles me. It seems obvious that asking for notes on a script is more like asking a house painting friend for advice on how to paint a house. Maybe he can come over and tell you what colors will work best for your lighting over coffee. Maybe he can suggest a few good painters he knows if he doesn’t want the job outright. Maybe you can share your vision of how you want the house to be, and he can help you edit a bit to get that vision. But until a friend asks Olson to write a script for him, his analogy makes little sense.

Olson also tacitly compares himself to Picasso in the piece. Seriously. As if doing my work for me in proving his asshole-esque nature, he compares himself to fucking Picasso.

And speaking of fucking Picasso, injecting the word ‘fuck’ into your title and using it 9 times in 3 paragraphs shows the particular brand of animosity that’s often found amongst those in the asshole community. Plus, it’s plain old weak writing. I should know. I used it earlier because I’m a weak writer who uses curse words as a goddamned crutch.

Do not ask him to teach you how to make coffee at your house for free.

Do not ask him to teach you how to make coffee at your house for free.

Thirdly, (we’re on three, right?) I understand that the craft of writing takes years and years to develop and that writers (and screenwriters in particular) are not as praised as they should be. They’re usually overlooked in the film world and in the production process itself. This coupled with the fact that everyone on the planet seems to want to be a screenwriter can be understandably frustrating. The problem that Olson clearly demonstrates is that he doesn’t understand how to be polite. You know who else doesn’t understand how to be polite? Assholes and people who use too many rhetorical questions in essays.

But mostly just assholes.

His situation reminds me of a friend (let’s call him Delbert) that frequently goes to movies with me. My friend pops a nerve in his neck whenever anyone talks during a film. I get it. I hate talking just as much as the next moviegoer, but I could never understand his responses. He only had two settings: 1) quietly stew and allow his experience to be ruined while his anger rose, or 2) yell something intense like, “Would you shut the fuck up?!” to the sinner in question. Delbert was astonished beyond measure when, at a screening two weeks ago, I turned around calmly and asked if the talker would please be quiet, saying thank you after my request. Mostly he was astonished because it worked in a way that yelling didn’t seem to. I think there’s an expression here about vinegar and honey, but it escapes me at the moment.

So, as a public service to Olson and assholes like him, I offer these three statements for use whenever the big, scary situation of someone asking a favor arises:

  1. “I’m really sorry. I realize that it seems like a small request, but it would take me considerable time to give it the attention it deserves, and I have stacks and stacks of scripts to read for work and another giant stack for friends. How about I give you a call if my schedule clears up?”
  2. “Sure. I’ll take a look at your synopsis/script, but I have to warn you that I won’t hold back in my notes. If I think it sucks, I’ll tell you so, but I’ll do it constructively no matter what.” NOTE: This only works if you understand how to give constructive criticism.
  3. “Oh! You think I’m that Josh Olson? No, no. I’m actually international hockey player Josh Olson who was formerly of the Florida Panthers.” NOTE: This only works if you’re Josh Olson.

Here’s where I could go on a rant about how society at large has lost a sense of politeness, but the real point is that if you’re polite and genuine, you’ll never seem like or be an asshole. It just doesn’t work that way. And if someone does feel like you’re an asshole when you’re being considerate and polite, you can still sleep at night knowing that you aren’t. Basically, there are ways to handle the situation that don’t seem to enter into Olson’s mind (or at least don’t enter into his essay).

Fourthly, I don’t think that most screenwriters feel so trapped by the whole thing. I’m speculating here, but I use John August, Craig Mazin and Ted Elliott as living counter-arguments to Olson’s vitriol. All three take their personal time to answer questions from total strangers and run incredibly good websites (August’s Blog and The Artful Writer) that offer tips on writing. They are living, breathing arguments as to why Olson is, in fact, an asshole. Perhaps they still have some perspective on those hands in the fog that helped them get their first foothold in an impossible business. Perhaps they just realize that helping others isn’t such a bad thing. And that leads directly into my final and most important point.

I have to wonder if Josh Olson circa 2002 (fresh off of writing and directing the direct-to-video masterpiece Infested)would have written this same piece. I doubt it. I also highly doubt that Josh Olson got to where he is on his own. I’m not saying that it’s impossible to jump from schlock horror into a tuxedo at the Academy Awards on your own merit, but it seems far more likely that Olson had a few friends reading his stuff and giving him harsh notes. Because that’s how it works.

Maybe a few more struggling writers should display their seriousness and willingness to learn so that pros offer to read for them, maybe pros should realize that there are worse fates in the world than reading a bad script for a friend of a friend. Either way, violently crying into your soup as a representative of your trade while wondering why some don’t respect the artistic integrity of your trade is an asshole move.

In the end I have to thank Olson. Usually I have to talk to people for several minutes before figuring out whether they are assholes or not, and Olson has done a service by simply publicly identifying himself as one. I have no desire to write screenplays, no desire to become a working screenwriter in any way, so I don’t count myself among the ranks of bitter wannabes who feel slighted by the very idea he’s propelling into the world. On the other hand, I’m not a professional screenwriter so I see no need to justify what must be a very real, very irritating reality in their world. Still, it’s a good thing that he doesn’t want to read my fucking script because, if I had one, I have a feeling that I wouldn’t want him to.


Read more articles by Dr. Cole Abaius

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • I completely agree. I actually spent this evening writing a similar diatribe in my own blog about why Olson's rant came off as...elitist pretentious BS for lack of a better term.

    No one makes it in Hollywood or the film business without finding one kind soul who is already in the business to take a chance on them and read their script or watch their film. How did Spielberg make it? By showing his short films to anybody that would stand still. That's how it's DONE. Yes, it means he has to budget his time and say if he has time or not. But if he doesn't have time, he doesn't have time. 90% of aspiring screenwriters know and understand what the life is like enough to be fine with that.

    And if he can't find a way to give good constructive criticism quickly...well, as you say, that's his own failing. I have a professor who never hesitates to tell me what is fundamentally wrong with my writing, in detail. And she can do so after a quick cold read of the pages in class, with no time to prep or debate. But she does it in a way that I can understand, that I can use, and that in the end doesn't hurt my feelings or discourage me but instead convinces me to try harder and be better.

    And, for the record, she's a working screenwriter and filmmaker.

    Olson comes off as a whiny, petulant child in his piece. One of the first things every single speaker we have in film school says to us when it comes time for advice on how to make it is "show your work to anybody who will look at it."
  • MoisesChiu
    Well, your professor is employed to teach you, whether they're a working writer and filmmaker or not. In her role as a professor, she just happens to also work in the business. Just because someone is a well-known screenwriter doesn't automatically put them under contract to answer every stupid question or coddle every aspiring writer into their "big break".

    And yes, it's important to show work to anyone who'll look at it, but the key here is they have to be WILLING to look at it. Under your logic, anyone who has a broken computer should ask me to look at it for free and then fix it for free because I have the professional skill set to do that. Believe it or not, I have casual acquaintances who foist free work on me with the expectation I'll do it, and they treat me like I'm an asshole for not "giving it a quick look."

    This is the failing of many amateurs (and I use that term in contrast to "veteran," not as a pejorative): they have no concept for how much time it takes to "just look at something" and produce the response (or type of response) the asker wants. Olson is really getting at how rude and untoward it is to ask and feel entitled to the royal treatment.
  • BrendonConnelly
    That would have been funnier if you'd said "goddamned wanking crutch" or similar.

    There are some serious legal ramifications for working scriptwriters in situations like this. I think David Gerrold's response to Olson covered those better.
  • Gerrold's response was idiotic. There are a hundred safeguards in place against that type of thing. It's very very hard for someone to prove that their material was stolen. In Gerrold's example the writer had been working on the project for months. One would assume then he had a long chain of ownership of the ideas, via emails, meetings, drafts, etc. One email after 6 months of work would not hold up in court or arbitration. There was never any danger in that situation.

    If you want to protect yourself from that, say you'd love to read their work or whatever but they have to sign a release. Anytime you submit a script to a studio you sign a paper that says, roughly "You acknowledge that the studio may already have an idea similar to this in production." Because there are lots of similar movies. Out there.

    Gerrold goes on to basically say that you should never ask a writer for anything because a writer's time is too important. He joined the asshole list, in my opinion. If you don't want to read someones work, just say No. Say you don't have time. Don't agonize and lose sleep over it or come up with some bullshit "legal ramifications" excuse.
  • Gerrold’s post was by no means idiotic, and calling it so is naïve.

    First of all the material was sent unsolicited in an email to his friend’s personal inbox. As he points out, even responding with a “no thanks, don’t have time” would’ve been an admission of receipt. And the chain of evidence you refer to may have existed, but probably not. Writers generally don’t send emails back and forth with the studio executives saying “hey, what do you think of this idea?” They turn in a draft, then get notes -- often over the phone or face-to-face. You argument rests on a speculative paper trail you imagine exists, even though nothing in the piece would lead you to believe it does. Fallacy. Fail.

    Anytime you submit a script to a studio you sign a paper that says, roughly "You acknowledge that the studio may already have an idea similar to this in production."

    Actually that never happens. Because any time you submit a script to a studio you are doing so through your agent, manager, or via a producer the studio has a relationship with. The informality is a professional courtesy – because they know if the script is coming from an established familiar entity they are dealing with professionals. The waivers go to the writers whose work goes straight to the shredder. Because these are desperate amateurs who are clearly dangerous.

    Gerrold goes on to basically say that you should never ask a writer for anything because a writer's time is too important.

    No, he goes on to say if you’d like a professional’s opinion, you should be willing to pay a professional’s fee for that opinion. And neither Olson’s piece nor Gerrold’s anecdote refer to close friends, by the way. They refer to intrusive daydreamers on the fringes of their social circles.

    I mean my dentist is a friend or sorts; we attend some of the same social functions, I’ve been to her house for gatherings. But I’d never leverage that relationship for free work because it’s in poor taste. If it was an emergency, and she offered, I probably wouldn’t refuse, but I wouldn’t expect it or demand it -- because I’m not a dick. But if I were such a lout, would it really be all that unreasonable for my dentist to get upset about it? Would she really owe me a “polite” answer, in the hopes that I’d get the hint? WHY?
  • Well, I know my 3 years of professional experience working in Hollywood and in those 3 years I can assure that unless this guy is working on a typewriter there is a 99% chance there is a history to the project. Multiple saved drafts - each one is dated on the computer. I'm not sure what version of Hollywood you're talking about, but the form is pretty standard that you acknowledge they may already be working on something. Unsolicited scripts go right in the trash without being opened. But solicited scripts are read.

    You can contact a studio and ask if they're interested. You can contact an individual. If they are, you sign the form, send the script, and there you go. Your counter-argument to mine is basically "You say this exists, I say it does not therefore you are wrong." If you want, I could send you just one of many waivers that one would sign in sending out a solicited script. Or I could go into detail about how involved producers can be and how many drafts something will go through in 6 months. Remember, this article was referencing a commissioned script, not a speculative one. 6 months is a long time, longer than they would give for a first draft. Longer than they would give for a first draft and a second and a polish. I would be dumbfounded if emails hadn't been exchanged, each one time-stamped.

    Bear in mind, if you ignore all of these things which, in my experience I'm certain were most likely in place, the first draft of the script should have been registered with the WGA, establishing an exact date of that material. If the other party would have liked to say he stole something, first up is arbitration with the WGA, which would have almost certainly gone with the writer.

    And Gerrold does state, towards the end, that you should never impose on a writer's time. He doesn't specify whether he's talking about friends, relatives, aliens, or dogs needing to go to the bathroom. He just says that a writer's time is too important.

    Also, your example has already been rebuked by Cole above. Asking your dentist to do WORK for free is one thing, asking him to give ADVICE is another. Would you ask your friend for advice on a toothache? Maybe just take a quick peek at a dot that could be a cavity? All you're doing is asking for a moment of time.
  • francislscurvy
    Three years in Hollywood. Wow! Look out, Bert Schneider!
  • 3 years working production in Hollywood. How many years do the rest of you have? ;)

    I'm not some long-term UPM or anything, but I've been around the block a handful of times.
  • francislscurvy
    Personally, I have 12. I know that pales next to your glorified internship.
  • Cole_Abaius
    You should ask him what he means by "been around the block a handful of times."

    The key there is the handful.

    Zing.
blog comments powered by Disqus