Share submit to reddit

m_bay1.jpgI suppose by now it’s just plain old hat to bash Michael Bay as a film director. So I thought I would dial it up a bit and bash Michael Bay as a human being.

I propose that one views the soul of an artist through his or her art. If this is true, then Michael Bay has no soul. The validity of the argument is obvious.

Ah! But is Transformers art?

No, you might say. It is mindless summer entertainment. And, before we proceed any further, let me say that it is as entertaining as it is dumb.

But you are wrong if you believe it is not art. All film is art, just as all painting is art. If Picasso made art, then the guy who painted “Dogs Playing Poker” did likewise. Bad art doesn’t disqualify itself from the category. It just sucks.

My biggest problem with Transformers is that it was made in the first place. I’m also not happy that Steven Spielberg jumped on board, likely enabling Michael Bay to make his first half way decent movie. The man who defecated on the graves of the soldiers who died at Pearl Harbor just plain doesn’t deserve it. Arrogant, self-obsessed, and as dumb as a well-tanned rock, there is no better candidate for the title “former film director” than Bay.

If you want to get an idea of what an idiot Bay is, rent (God, don’t buy) The Island and listen to his commentary. (You can get a taste of it from The AV Club’s Commentaries of the Damned section here.) If you can listen to that man talk for two hours about how awesome and misunderstood he is, and not come to believe that he is the most non-human being on the face of the planet, then I can recommend Transformers wholeheartedly. Otherwise, at best you’re going to find yourself highly conflicted. Because Transformers is not a horrible movie. I wasn’t bored and I wasn’t so aggravated that I had to leave the theater (thereby helping the film avoid the Unfinished Steamer fate).

mbay2.jpgThe fact is, though, as competent as Transformers may be, all of the crap that makes Michael Bay suck so terribly is present in this film. The dumbass editing, the long lenses shooting militaristic silhouettes against the sunset (it’s always sunset somewhere in Michael Bay’s world), the big explosions followed by the slow motion reaction shots (again with the long lenses and the sunset and please just kill me). Don’t even get me started on the racial stereotypes, the jitter-cam, the fetishistic portrayal of heavy weaponry, the lazy use of close-ups, the ridiculously elaborate sets, and the mindset that the only time less is more is if by “less” you mean “more explosions.” Above all, let’s not forget Bay’s holy sacrament of product placement, product placement, product placement.

So even though I was marginally entertained by this film, I can’t grade it higher than a “D.” That would just be wrong. Michael Bay has wrought too much evil in the world of film. There are actually students of the craft coming up today who are trying to copy the Michael Bay template. We have to stop it. We all have to do our part to put Michael Bay’s ass out of a job.

And if you’re out there clasping your hands, praying this movie makes its money because you want to see a successful Transformers franchise? I mean… really. Get a life. This is a movie based on a bad Saturday morning cartoon that was based on a toy, for crying out loud! There’s just something innately wrong about going to see a film and reading a credit that proclaims, “Based on characters created by Hasbro.”

What the hell is wrong with my generation? Why are we so eager to embrace cynical marketing ploys as beloved symbols of our childhood? Did we learn nothing after George Lucas made fools of us with his prequel craptacular? (“The fact is, Star Wars fans will pretty much pay to see anything I poop up on the screen.” Actual George Lucas quote. I swear.)

Maybe I was too old by the time Transformers came along on Saturday mornings. I remember seeing it and saying to myself, “That’s got to be the worst animation since He-Man.” Do you really care how the Autobots are going to adjust to their new life on planet Earth? I mean–really? If you do, please get laid as soon as possible. Pay a hooker, for Christ’s sake.

Most of all, is this what we want our premier American art form to be? One big commercial for children’s toys? A testament to materialistic consumerism? Yet another way to convince our children that life is all about acquiring stuff?

Let us please stop the madness. Don’t see this film. If you absolutely must see it, steal it from a P2P network or something. Whatever you do, don’t use your dollars to vote Michael Bay into making another movie. If we all stop seeing his garbage, he’ll have to stop making it eventually.

Remember Pearl Harbor, people.


RELATED ARTICLES
  • No Related Post
ARTICLE TAGS
  Previous Article
Next Article  
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!
  • vichy
    "Most of all, is this what we want our premier American art form to be? One big commercial for children’s toys? A testament to materialistic consumerism? Yet another way to convince our children that life is all about acquiring stuff?"
    Living in the real world of material reality, where people have to work for a living? OMG, how scary for 'artistic' people.
  • well. i don`t know how anyone can say that he did this movie ``well``, considering it`s basically a movie about cars, with little to no dialogue from the actual transformers (mostly none from the decepticons). i`m not the most fanatic fan. but i don`t just hate bay. i hate the writers, i hate the execs that let this happen, i hate everyone that had a hand in this movie, it makes me even more upset that peter cullen actually voiced optimus prime. and you know what, transformers wasn`t the worst movie, i was mildly entertained. enough to stay awake, but looking back on it, was probably the fucking explosions. this movie was nothing more than a money grab.

    the movie wasn`t transformers, it was dumb-ass fucking robots fighting for a planet, it hardly made sense. i don`t know. i`m older now, so why would i just abandon nostalgia that i actually still enjoy, it wasn`t just a toy line, sure people bought the toys, but they didn`t just sit around. kids played with them and made up their own stories, it basically was an imagination excercise for most. so the toy line defense is bullshit, transformers rocked 100X balls. but the 2007 movie licked my right and left testicle in terms of being a transformers movie. the 86 animated was way awesome. at least way more than this movie. fuck, they should have called it. ``changing robots that can be killed by humans``. then i would not be mad at all. i just would`ve laughed. the old characters had heart, and when autobots died they were genuinely sad. kids cried when optimus died in the animated movie VERY early on. and was still bad-ass to the fucking core. the humor was ridiculous but at the same time fresh and original. when ironhide died (was it ironhide). the characters couldn`t have had less emotion. it was pathetic. i read somewhere some kid readied a slip-knot when optimus said ``my bad``. i think. i`ll go do that. talk about killing a franchise. no transformers fan in their right mind would ever willingly hope michael bay would direct a movie about their favourite cartoon. and the writers my sweet fuck, we can`t forget them, half of this was their doing..

    so, to the reviewer of michael bay. before you berate a ``marketing ploy`` from hasbro. you should probably watch it. i mean come on even if was a big marketing ploy, you don`t seriously think that hasbro was watching the writing process thinking, OHHH optimus HAS to die RIGHT NOW. yeah, unlikely. FUCK I HATE SO MANY PEOPLE
  • "His movies make about 1.8 their budget."

    Sorry, but your studio perspective falls short. Movies need to make back triple their budget to be profitable. You left out advertising and distribution costs, which occur in post production, and in an unusual accounting move, studios charge themselves interest on the money spent, so it takes a long while for money to be recouped.

    At one time the vast majority of people thought the world was flat, so that's not necessarily a plus for Bay. His movies are always poorly put together visually and the stories are flawed, but if loud noises and shiny objects entertain you, good for you. I don't understand it, but then I don't understand why some people enjoy being used as a toilet during sex. You guys should like the video I put on YouTube. It's a clip of my car keys being shook while pots and pans are dropped on the floor.

    Fight the good fight, Mr. Hand, and don't listen to whiners like Brent and the rest.
  • Mister Hand
    *sigh*

    Agreed, JKT. It's not fair to judge a film solely on the fact that the director is an asshole. I will say, however, that the best parts of TRANSFORMERS all occur within the first ten minutes of the movie. After that, things go downhill. It's still entertaining, but, as I said, it still contains all the crap that makes the rest of Bay's movies suck.

    As for you, Mr. Miller... for God's sakes, please don't unleash any little gay spawn of Michael Bay on the world! Mercy!
  • JKT
    As a critic Mister Hand, you should judge the movie by its individualness, not on what the director did in the past. You say its a decent movie but then give it a 'd' due to the director's past films. Your quote "So even though I was marginally entertained by this film, I can't grade it higher than a “D.” That would just be wrong. Michael Bay has wrought too much evil in the world of film."
    That is just not right. It just seems people are angry cause Bay made a good movie. I have saw maybe one or two of his films and Transformer would be the second one, and it was good. You can't tell people that is was a decent movie but don't see it, they will just want to see it more.
  • "I'm actually part of the Bay fanbase. So is Neil Miller. His movies are always exciting and entertaining."

    Scratch that... Brian is a fan. I would have Michael Bay's babies if he would let me.

    I also have a thing for Steve Jobs, but any fan of Fat Guys at the Movies would already know that...
  • Hey Brent, I'm actually part of the Bay fanbase. So is Neil Miller. His movies are always exciting and entertaining.
  • Brent
    the sheer amount of michael bay haters that contribute to this site is beginning to annoy me.
  • Mister Hand
    Salieri's operas were far more popular in their day than Mozart's. Today, no one listens to Salieri, but everybody has heard Mozart.

    In the "good" versus "entertaining" debate, I would argue that I personally have not found a single Michael Bay movie (aside from TRANSFORMERS) to be in the least bit entertaining. I never saw BAD BOYS II but I did see the original and can honestly say I hated every minute of it. I saw PEARL HARBOR and the only reason I didn't leave the theater is because I wanted to see just how much worse it could get. Just when I thought the damn thing couldn't possibly get any worse, the horrible ending came along. The whole thing was like rubbernecking while passing a car wreck.
  • Michael Bay is awesome. It really comes down to one simple reason. He gives the people what they want. Lots of "critics" pan him and attempt to destroy him, even on personal levels -ahem-

    However, none of that stops the vast majority of the movie going public wanting to see hot women, fast cars, lots of gun fights, and big explosions. Add in some comedy and you've got yourself a string of 100 million dollar movies, like Mr. Bay, The Island excluded.

    I'll readily admit to being a 23 year old man-child who is refusing to grow up and say that Schindler's List is my favorite movie when I'd much rather be watching Transformers. I'd say that 95% of people would choose to watch Transformers 95% of the time over Schindler's List. Which is the better movie? Obvious question. Which is better entertainment? Equally obvious.

    Also, from a studio perspective, let's take a look at Mr. Bay economically. His movie will be broken down as follows: Title, Cost of Production, Domestic Gross, World Gross, Total Gross, Net Profit/Loss.

    Bad Boys: 19 Million : 65.8 Million : 75.6 Million : 141 Million : 122 Million
    The Rock: 75 Million: 134 Million : 200.9 Million : 335 Million : 260 Million
    Armageddon: 140 Million : 201.6 Million : 352 Million : 553.7 Million : 414 Million
    Pearl Harbor: 140 Million : 198.5 Million : 250.7 Million : 449 Million : 309 Million
    Bad Boys II : 130 Million : 138.6 Million : 134.7 Million : 273 Million : 143 Million
    The Island: 126 Million : 35.8 Million : 127 Million : 162.9 Million : 37 Million
    *Transformers: 150 Million : 152.5 Million : 97 Million : 250 Million : 100 Million
    * - In Progress

    Total Money Spent: 780 Million
    Total Money Made: 1.4 Billion
    His movies make about 1.8 their budget. If you would remove the Island bomb, it'd be much sweeter. So in conclusion, Bay is a godsend to theaters and audiences, giving both what they want - Money and Fun.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow FILM SCHOOL REJECTS...


MOVIE NEWS | MOVIE TRAILERS | MOVIE REVIEWS | TV REVIEWS | FEATURES | INTERVIEWS | CONTESTS | ARCHIVES | ABOUT
Film School Rejects is the movie blog you've been waiting for. The ultimate commentary track on what's happening in Hollywood, FSR combines the freshest voices on the web and a swagger all its own to provide the best reviews, interviews and industry news coverage to millions of unique visitors from around the world every month.
FSR Team
Got a Tip? Send it here:
editors@filmschoolrejects.com
Publisher:
Neil Miller | Email
Managing Editor:
Cole Abaius | Email
Associate Editors:
Robert Fure | Email
Rob Hunter | Email
Contributors:
Adam Charles | Email
Amber Humphrey | Email
Brian Gibson | Email
Brian Salisbury | Email
Dustin Hucks | Email
Genevieve Blaber | Email
Contributors:
J.L. Sosa | Email
Jack Giroux | Email
Jeremy Kirk | Email
Jim Rohner | Email
Jorge Del Pinal | Email
Josh Radde | Email
Kevin Carr | Email
Contributors:
Landon Palmer | Email
Lauren Flanagan | Email
Paul Sileo | Email
Robert Levin | Email
Robin Ruinski | Email
Advertising:
sales@craveonline.com
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2010 Reject Media, LLC | Site Credits | Privacy Policy
Design & Development by Face3