Ten Epic Superhero Movie Mistakes

Posted by Kevin Carr (kevin@filmschoolrejects.com) on July 16, 2008 Share

Ten Superhero Movie Mistakes

The Hollywood studios have been making movies based on comic book superheroes since the Golden Age. For the most part, I’ll give a pass to the old 1940s serials and George Reeves on TV as Superman, considering these were primarily geared toward kids.

Still, it took Hollywood until the 21st century to actually figure out how to make a decent superhero movie. Starting with X-Men in 2000 (and bolstered by Spider-Man in 2002), Hollywood started to get it right. While they don’t make as many of the same mistakes they used to in the dark days of the 70s, 80s and 90s, they will occasionally stumble.

With this summer being a powerhouse season of superhero movies, featuring Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk and The Dark Knight, we thought it would be fun to take a look back at earlier superhero movies and the biggest mistakes that Hollywood kept making over the years.

Flame on!

Set from Batman & Robin

10. Overblown set design (e.g., Batman & Robin)

It’s one thing to strive to give a unique look to a film, and it’s also acceptable to emulate a comic book quality to the sets. However, when the film becomes more about the background than the characters, it becomes a problem.

A digital Superman

9. Overblown special effects (e.g., Spider-Man 3 and Superman Returns)

Sure, digital effects have opened the world of superheroes to the silver screen like never before. They’ve also given filmmakers too much control. If the title character exists more often as a digital effect than an actor in a suit, it just won’t look right.

Nipples on the Batsuit

8. Fake rubber muscles (e.g., all the old Batman films)

I understand that it is more realistic for Batman to have body armor rather than gray spandex, but the bulky rubber suit was too much. And don’t get me started on the nipples!

Vickie Vale in the Batcave

7. Not-so-secret identities (e.g., Batman and Superman II)

What is the point of a secret identity for Batman if Alfred’s going to escort Vicki Vale into the Batcave? And why does Superman have to lose his powers just to get into Lois Lane’s pants? How can these heroes have secret identities for more than half a century in the comic books, but filmmakers want to blurt it out by the second act of a feature film?

Richard Pryor in Superman III

6. Misplaced star power (e.g., Superman III)

Whose brilliant idea was it to wrap a Man of Steel story around Richard Pryor? And why was it necessary to get Marlon Brando to play Jor-El? Isn’t Superman enough of a name to get people’s attention?

Joel Schumacher, the bane of Batman

5. Idiot directors (e.g., Joel Schumacher)

If Joel Schumacher is going to have a legacy, it will be how he drove the Batman franchise into the ground. Likewise, Tim Burton may have been too trendy to really make a perfect film. At least we’ve kept the films out of the hands of the likes of McG.

Hulk gets mad

4. Unnecessary origin stories (e.g., Ang Lee’s Hulk, Superman and pretty much everything else)

I understand the need for an origin story for a lesser-known hero like the Punisher, or even Iron Man. But seriously, who doesn’t know how Spider-Man, Superman, Batman and the Hulk came about?

Trains explode in Gotham

3. Penis envy (e.g., Batman Begins and Superman Returns)

I know it’s Hollywood, but bigger isn’t always better. Did Superman Returns deserve its reported $270 million budget to develop? And why did Batman Begins – a well-crafted character study of Bruce Wayne – have to climax with a train exploding in downtown Gotham?

Catwoman has nothing to do with comic books

2. Ignoring the comic book mythos (e.g., Catwoman and Batman & Robin)

Sometimes a change can be good when adapting to the big screen. The organic webbing for Spider-Man worked very well, and I’ll even admit that Doctor Doom in the Fantastic Four films was easier to digest than his complex story from the comics. But Catwoman can barely even be considered a comic book movie, and the treatment of Bane in Batman & Robin was a total travesty.

Scrat from Ice Age

1. Too many villains (e.g., Batman Forever, Batman & Robin and Spider-Man 3)

Why can’t Hollywood understand that too many characters clutter a plot? The Joker was the only villain in Tim Burton’s Batman, but by the time Joel Schumacher got his hands on the franchise, there were too many villains and heroes to fit on the poster. Ditto goes to Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3, which really should have either been about Venom or the Sandman, but not both.

Related Posts with Thumbnails


Read more articles by Kevin Carr

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • ohgoshdirector
    the problem with sexism is a catch 22 situation. surveys and polls show that the cinema going masses prefer a male lead. so that's what they write for us. if people stopped going to male dominated movies then they wouldn't make so many.
  • Luis
    Val Kilmer's rubber butt looked very hot in batman forever as he was going to save his girl, but rubber nipples are such a big turn off...
  • Andy_Exile
    you're right on all of these.

    i really love Spider-man, but after Spider-man 3 i would rather pretend like it didnt happen.
    i wish that Venom would have been more like he was in the comic book ... at least.
  • Taiya
    Yup nipple suites can ruin a costume design, and so do over buldging fake muscles. I like some of the backgrounds though. So i dont agree with you there, whats a story without a set, and a proper set at that? and uh....Penis envy????? not sure how you got that conclusion but meh. but alas, BURY THE HULK AND CATWOMAN franchise now while we have a chance. Spiderman let me down so i dumped that series like a bad french fry. I think only Nolan can get the duo villain thing straight. It seems too comical from Burton. nice summery btw
  • The Next Batman villian is Megan Fox http://www.ekhichdi.com/gallery/some-unseen-pic...

    Tina
  • I disagree with the Marlon Brando choice in #6. Brando was a big name back then, especially in comparison to Christopher Reeve, Margot Kidder and even Gene Hackman. I wouldn't say the star power was misplaced, but the Salkinds paid too high a price for the ten minutes they got out of Brando.

    #2 should also have Tank Girl listed. Granted, Tank Girl isn't a superhero, but the film Tank Girl is almost a pragmatic adaptation of the gun-and-Smiths-loving original. Tank Girl also fits with #4 - in the comic it really isn't necessary to explain how Tank Girl came to be, since comic Tank Girl wasn't huge on things like plot and conventional narrative.
  • @Josh Raddle

    I can't. Because that would require me watching them again. And, frankly I want to have
    Batman Begins and Dark Knight and pretend the others don't exist. I have always loved
    Batman's complexity and the fact that no one could figure that out until a few years ago
    astounds me.

    Oh! And the original animated series and new animation shorts "Batman: Gotham Knight"
    Those are also good portrayals of the detective.
  • I agree with #'s 9,5, & 2. Your #1 spot bothers me however. Multi-character villain use is appropriate if done correctly, which shows better character development and an overall more intricate story. Backing up your idea based on an aging Batman film is okay, but I think you're jumping the shark.. Joel knows how bad the film was already.
  • webb
    McG to direct Terminator Salvation.
  • "I'm Batgirl"
    "That's not very PC. How about BatPerson?"

    Can someone put together a list of the 10 worst bits of dialogue from Batman and Robin?
blog comments powered by Disqus