Ten Epic Superhero Movie Mistakes

Posted by Kevin Carr (kevin@filmschoolrejects.com) on July 16, 2008

Ten Superhero Movie Mistakes

The Hollywood studios have been making movies based on comic book superheroes since the Golden Age. For the most part, I’ll give a pass to the old 1940s serials and George Reeves on TV as Superman, considering these were primarily geared toward kids.

Still, it took Hollywood until the 21st century to actually figure out how to make a decent superhero movie. Starting with X-Men in 2000 (and bolstered by Spider-Man in 2002), Hollywood started to get it right. While they don’t make as many of the same mistakes they used to in the dark days of the 70s, 80s and 90s, they will occasionally stumble.

With this summer being a powerhouse season of superhero movies, featuring Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk and The Dark Knight, we thought it would be fun to take a look back at earlier superhero movies and the biggest mistakes that Hollywood kept making over the years.

Flame on!

Set from Batman & Robin

10. Overblown set design (e.g., Batman & Robin)

It’s one thing to strive to give a unique look to a film, and it’s also acceptable to emulate a comic book quality to the sets. However, when the film becomes more about the background than the characters, it becomes a problem.

A digital Superman

9. Overblown special effects (e.g., Spider-Man 3 and Superman Returns)

Sure, digital effects have opened the world of superheroes to the silver screen like never before. They’ve also given filmmakers too much control. If the title character exists more often as a digital effect than an actor in a suit, it just won’t look right.

Nipples on the Batsuit

8. Fake rubber muscles (e.g., all the old Batman films)

I understand that it is more realistic for Batman to have body armor rather than gray spandex, but the bulky rubber suit was too much. And don’t get me started on the nipples!

Vickie Vale in the Batcave

7. Not-so-secret identities (e.g., Batman and Superman II)

What is the point of a secret identity for Batman if Alfred’s going to escort Vicki Vale into the Batcave? And why does Superman have to lose his powers just to get into Lois Lane’s pants? How can these heroes have secret identities for more than half a century in the comic books, but filmmakers want to blurt it out by the second act of a feature film?

Richard Pryor in Superman III

6. Misplaced star power (e.g., Superman III)

Whose brilliant idea was it to wrap a Man of Steel story around Richard Pryor? And why was it necessary to get Marlon Brando to play Jor-El? Isn’t Superman enough of a name to get people’s attention?

Joel Schumacher, the bane of Batman

5. Idiot directors (e.g., Joel Schumacher)

If Joel Schumacher is going to have a legacy, it will be how he drove the Batman franchise into the ground. Likewise, Tim Burton may have been too trendy to really make a perfect film. At least we’ve kept the films out of the hands of the likes of McG.

Hulk gets mad

4. Unnecessary origin stories (e.g., Ang Lee’s Hulk, Superman and pretty much everything else)

I understand the need for an origin story for a lesser-known hero like the Punisher, or even Iron Man. But seriously, who doesn’t know how Spider-Man, Superman, Batman and the Hulk came about?

Trains explode in Gotham

3. Penis envy (e.g., Batman Begins and Superman Returns)

I know it’s Hollywood, but bigger isn’t always better. Did Superman Returns deserve its reported $270 million budget to develop? And why did Batman Begins – a well-crafted character study of Bruce Wayne – have to climax with a train exploding in downtown Gotham?

Catwoman has nothing to do with comic books

2. Ignoring the comic book mythos (e.g., Catwoman and Batman & Robin)

Sometimes a change can be good when adapting to the big screen. The organic webbing for Spider-Man worked very well, and I’ll even admit that Doctor Doom in the Fantastic Four films was easier to digest than his complex story from the comics. But Catwoman can barely even be considered a comic book movie, and the treatment of Bane in Batman & Robin was a total travesty.

Scrat from Ice Age

1. Too many villains (e.g., Batman Forever, Batman & Robin and Spider-Man 3)

Why can’t Hollywood understand that too many characters clutter a plot? The Joker was the only villain in Tim Burton’s Batman, but by the time Joel Schumacher got his hands on the franchise, there were too many villains and heroes to fit on the poster. Ditto goes to Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3, which really should have either been about Venom or the Sandman, but not both.


Read more articles by Kevin Carr

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Adam Sweeney
    Nice work, Kevin. I agree with all 10. The efficient explanation in the opening credits of The Hulk's origin in this year's version was a perfect example. (Ang Lee, taking notes?)
    And I can't scream it enough: STOP HAVING MULTIPLE VILLAINS IN A MOVIE! Less is more.
  • Bill Brasky
    To #7 ...

    because he would of killed her with his indestructible, bullet speed load
  • In regards to #4: They took an origin in Batman Begins that most people weren't familiar with. It had to be developed with care and took its time, so why wasn't it necessary? And then you contradict it with "penis envy" by calling it a well-crafted character study. How can an elaborate origin story be both well-crafted and unnecessary. I'm not trying to David Denby you here, Kevin, but can you explain what you mean?
  • Terrence
    one thing you missed out on (esp regarding the Xmen) was the attention and lack of power given to the female characters. All the females in superhero movies are generally there for T & A or to bring sensitivity to the males, don't even get me started on the horrendous treatment of Rogue in the X men films.

    Storm is one of the most beloved characters in Marvel and she was relegated to secondary status.

    Also explain this...... The Punisher, Iron Man, The Hulk, Hellboy, Ghost Rider all were given movies. One of the most iconic heroes of all time WONDER WOMAN still has yet to receive the film treatment?????

    SEXISM SEXISM SEXISM

    and this is from a dude.................................
  • Ok, let me see if I understand, or I have to take englsih lessons... #6 is complaining about big name actors in movies?Am I crazy or some of the most acclaimed comic movies have big stars in every role? (like Batman Begins, the Dark Knight, Iron Man).
    WTF is wrong with that? How come the big names hurt the movie?
  • Shane
    if you wanna talk about not so secret identities, don't forget two of the worst offenders. Daredevil, where he loses his secret to the big vilalin , in the first movie no less, and Spider man 2 where a whole bunch of (unimportant) people see him without his mask on, not to mention Mary Jane. They didn't even really play around much with the problems associated with his dating her and being spider man at the same time.
  • TomB
    #6 is complaining about *misplaced* star power. Specifically, giving Richard Prior (a brilliant comedian) a Superman film as a film vehicle. That would be like making Jerry Lewis (in his prime, of course) the Joker in a Batman film, turning the end result into a modern-day Martin/Lewis gag fest (emphasis on "gag").

    Just because a comic book has the word "comic" in it doesn't mean it's supposed to be *funny*! A lot of people in the movie business don't understand that, and the result is trash like the 60's Batman movie and TV show, Superman 3, and undoubtedly half the titles on Hollywood's current "to do" list.

    Oh, I'd like to add #11 to the list: Hiring the wrong writers (Mario Puzo and Superman-1 comes to mind, as does the yahoo who penned the Xmen-3 travesty).
  • @ Josh

    I did like Batman Begins, but I am just tired of origin stories. What they do with TDK is so much cooler, but there was too much studio meddling I think to give it a big explosion ending. Sure, it was a good story, but why do franchises always have to start at the beginning?...

    As for Penis envy... I thought BB had a relatively well crafted story, but it seemed that Nolan was told to have it end with a giant explosion and Jim Gordon driving the Batmobile... where it seemed it would have been better to have a more intimate, intense confrontation.

    @ Shane

    ditto on Spider-Man 2 and Daredevil
  • Spencer
    Kanon, big names are great if the actor is there for his acting, not for his name.
  • jacck
    "Tim Burton may have been to trendy to really make a perfect film."

    It's 'too' not 'to', but nice try slick.
blog comments powered by Disqus