Setting the Record Straight: Iwo Jima

Posted by Robert Fure (robert@filmschoolrejects.com) on June 8, 2008

Clint Eastwood and Spike Lee

While no one expected Spike Lee to ever do the right thing, he has proven once again that he’s not sure when to shut his face, even when such an icon as Clint Eastwood reminds him of it. Lee recently shot back at Eastwood over a spat about the lack of blacks portrayed in the Eastwood’s films Flags of Our Fathers and Letters from Iwo Jima. Lee had this to say:

“First of all, the man is not my father and we’re not on a plantation either… I didn’t personally attack him, and a comment like `a guy like that should shut his face…’ come on Clint, come on. He sounds like an angry old man.

“If he wishes, I could assemble African-American men who fought at Iwo Jima and I’d like him to tell these guys that what they did was insignificant and they did not exist.

“I’m not making this up. I know history. I’m a student of history. And I know the history of Hollywood and its omission of the one million African-American men and women who contributed to World War II.”

While falling a touch short of calling Clint a racist, Lee clearly insinuates a connection between Eastwood and a plantation owner, presumably a slave owner. Add that tidbit to the massive pile of evidence that Spike Lee can’t open his mouth without making it about race.

After that update, let’s take a look at the issue at hand here – black service during the Battle of Iwo Jima. From my research, I’ve discovered that the number of black soldiers on Iwo Jima numbered under 900. We’ll, for the sake of argument and simplicity, round that up to 1,000. A significant portion of these soldiers were members of the Army’s 471st, 473rd and 476th amphibious truck companies, which are, generally, not front line soldiers (Meaning their role in the movie may have been minimized by their proximity to the events). A company can range from 62 to 190 men, meaning that about 600 of our initial number have been accounted for.

Now, the number of American soldiers deployed in Iwo Jima numbered about 110,000. That would give us a 109,000 non-black soldiers and 1,000 black soldiers. That means that under 1% of the total force on Iwo Jima was black. It is understandable, with this ethnic make-up, that in casting a movie as accurately as possible, most cast members chosen would not be black. In a group of 100 men, 1 or none would be black. In a group of 1,000 men, only one would be black.

I do not do this in any way to say that black soldiers did not play any part in Iwo Jima or to minimize their effort in the war. I am proud of every person who serves America during a time of crisis and celebrate the diversity of our Armed Forces. I fully acknowledge and appreciate their efforts during the difficult times black soldiers had in our history and I celebrate their great achievements. Many are familiar with the brave and admirable performance of the Tuskegee Airmen who achieved an amazing protection record while escorting bombers in the European Theater.

I do this simply to tell Spike Lee to shut his face. Clint Eastwood’s film catalog speaks for itself. He has directed with and starred with people of every race and sex. His movies have featured all races in all roles. Clearly, he is not out to short change anyone. I believe Eastwood when he says he reflects his stories and their time periods accurately. In the case of his recent pairing of war movies, there were no black characters. His story did not focus on imaginary characters. He wasn’t making this up. His story focused on a select group of people and he reflected them accurately. If he had made a movie about he Amphibious Truck Drivers, unquestionably they would have all been portrayed accurately. Bear in mind that despite the movie being based around the events that photographer Joel Rosenthal documented, he himself is barely in the film. Not as a slight, but as a casualty of the story.

So in closing, I would encourage Mr. Lee to stop assuming the entire world of “old men” is out to put him down or “in his place” or some other such nonsense and just continue to make movies, rather than drama. And to Mr. Eastwood, I would say to keep portraying the truth and stick to your guns. I have a gut feeling Clint would take that advice while Spike would likely dismiss me and make a veiled reference to me being some sort of slave trader.

Source of Spike Lee Comments: IMDb

Source of Amphibious Truck Company Designations: FOX News

Sound Off: Who’s side are you on? [Please keep comments respectful]


Read more articles by Robert Fure

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • JP
    And what's up with there being no Japanese people in Letters from Iwo Jima? It's inexcusable! Eastwood is a racist!
  • david
    jp are you serious letters from iwo jima has the story from the japanese point of view
  • Hopefully, United Artists will soon make The Story of Clint Eastwood, and cast Spike Lee in the title role.

    Great piece, RF.
  • Solomon
    I think you mean to say that in a group of 1,000 men only 9 would be black instead of 1. A
    more interesting test might be to see how many people were actually used in the filming
    and decide if Eastwood should have had say 2-3 (though your comment about the frontline
    issue might cancel out any math).
  • 790
    This is such BS as far as Lee's racist opinion is concerned, the man is a attention seeking retard.

    One of Eastwood's new films is a film about Nelson Mandela...
    When asked about this Eastwood said "well I'm not going to cast a white guy to play Mandela....
    Get with reality Lee!
  • @Solomon

    You're correct on my typo. The actual percentage was .9% and in a group of 1,000, that would be 9 black soldiers. Thanks for catching that and I apologize for my typo. =(

    I guess Spike Lee had me riled up just a touch! Or I was trying to type too fast for my own good.
  • Bill Brasky
    Well done Robert ... you should subimt this article directly to Spike's email or as a retraction to any news medium that printed his comments.
  • Rich
    Robert and Bil:

    I don't follow your math. You said that of the 900, 600 were in transportation jobs, and not on the front lines, that would leave .4% or 4 per 1,000.

    I spent 30 years in the military, all of it after President Truman signed the integration bill in 1948. As a result, I served with people of all races, and would not for a minute diminish anyones contribution.

    My Father served in the army, starting in 1936, according to him, the majority of black soldiers were indeed relegated to transportation and other jobs not involving the front lines. From talking to him and his brothers, they only saw whites at the front. This discussion came up in response to another movie back in the fifties which only showed blacks assigned to rear eschelon positions. Sidney Potier was in that one.

    Bottom line, I believe Mr Eastwood was fairly and accurately representing the troops in the field.
  • JMoney
    although i havn't seen many of Spike Lee's films, i always thought him to be an intelligent film maker, but this entire story has lowered my opinion of him. To me it smells like a publicity stunt. Attack the most recent WWII movie for having no black people just so you can trumpet your own WWII movie about a group of black soldiers. From my understanding of the plot, the soldiers' story being portrayed in Lee's film is remarkable and should be able to stand on its own. This stupid stunt is going to tarnish his own movie, not help it.
  • boniface50
    This is the only way Spike Lee gets any press. He attacks and screams racism. Flags of Our Fathers has been out for about a year and he is just now getting around to this? I guess he wanted to wait until his WWII movie was about to be released. He also criticized Clint for "Bird". Complaining 'why a white man is making a movie about a great jazz musician?'
blog comments powered by Disqus