Commentary Track
Setting the Record Straight: Iwo Jima
Posted by Robert Fure (robert@filmschoolrejects.com) on June 8, 2008

While no one expected Spike Lee to ever do the right thing, he has proven once again that he’s not sure when to shut his face, even when such an icon as Clint Eastwood reminds him of it. Lee recently shot back at Eastwood over a spat about the lack of blacks portrayed in the Eastwood’s films Flags of Our Fathers and Letters from Iwo Jima. Lee had this to say:
“First of all, the man is not my father and we’re not on a plantation either… I didn’t personally attack him, and a comment like `a guy like that should shut his face…’ come on Clint, come on. He sounds like an angry old man.
“If he wishes, I could assemble African-American men who fought at Iwo Jima and I’d like him to tell these guys that what they did was insignificant and they did not exist.
“I’m not making this up. I know history. I’m a student of history. And I know the history of Hollywood and its omission of the one million African-American men and women who contributed to World War II.”
While falling a touch short of calling Clint a racist, Lee clearly insinuates a connection between Eastwood and a plantation owner, presumably a slave owner. Add that tidbit to the massive pile of evidence that Spike Lee can’t open his mouth without making it about race.
After that update, let’s take a look at the issue at hand here - black service during the Battle of Iwo Jima. From my research, I’ve discovered that the number of black soldiers on Iwo Jima numbered under 900. We’ll, for the sake of argument and simplicity, round that up to 1,000. A significant portion of these soldiers were members of the Army’s 471st, 473rd and 476th amphibious truck companies, which are, generally, not front line soldiers (Meaning their role in the movie may have been minimized by their proximity to the events). A company can range from 62 to 190 men, meaning that about 600 of our initial number have been accounted for.
Now, the number of American soldiers deployed in Iwo Jima numbered about 110,000. That would give us a 109,000 non-black soldiers and 1,000 black soldiers. That means that under 1% of the total force on Iwo Jima was black. It is understandable, with this ethnic make-up, that in casting a movie as accurately as possible, most cast members chosen would not be black. In a group of 100 men, 1 or none would be black. In a group of 1,000 men, only one would be black.
I do not do this in any way to say that black soldiers did not play any part in Iwo Jima or to minimize their effort in the war. I am proud of every person who serves America during a time of crisis and celebrate the diversity of our Armed Forces. I fully acknowledge and appreciate their efforts during the difficult times black soldiers had in our history and I celebrate their great achievements. Many are familiar with the brave and admirable performance of the Tuskegee Airmen who achieved an amazing protection record while escorting bombers in the European Theater.
I do this simply to tell Spike Lee to shut his face. Clint Eastwood’s film catalog speaks for itself. He has directed with and starred with people of every race and sex. His movies have featured all races in all roles. Clearly, he is not out to short change anyone. I believe Eastwood when he says he reflects his stories and their time periods accurately. In the case of his recent pairing of war movies, there were no black characters. His story did not focus on imaginary characters. He wasn’t making this up. His story focused on a select group of people and he reflected them accurately. If he had made a movie about he Amphibious Truck Drivers, unquestionably they would have all been portrayed accurately. Bear in mind that despite the movie being based around the events that photographer Joel Rosenthal documented, he himself is barely in the film. Not as a slight, but as a casualty of the story.
So in closing, I would encourage Mr. Lee to stop assuming the entire world of “old men” is out to put him down or “in his place” or some other such nonsense and just continue to make movies, rather than drama. And to Mr. Eastwood, I would say to keep portraying the truth and stick to your guns. I have a gut feeling Clint would take that advice while Spike would likely dismiss me and make a veiled reference to me being some sort of slave trader.
Source of Spike Lee Comments: IMDb
Source of Amphibious Truck Company Designations: FOX News
Sound Off: Who’s side are you on? [Please keep comments respectful]
|
| Read more articles by Robert Fure






14 Comments
June 8th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
And what’s up with there being no Japanese people in Letters from Iwo Jima? It’s inexcusable! Eastwood is a racist!
June 8th, 2008 at 6:03 pm
jp are you serious letters from iwo jima has the story from the japanese point of view
June 8th, 2008 at 6:48 pm
Hopefully, United Artists will soon make The Story of Clint Eastwood, and cast Spike Lee in the title role.
Great piece, RF.
June 9th, 2008 at 2:19 am
I think you mean to say that in a group of 1,000 men only 9 would be black instead of 1. A
more interesting test might be to see how many people were actually used in the filming
and decide if Eastwood should have had say 2-3 (though your comment about the frontline
issue might cancel out any math).
June 9th, 2008 at 2:23 am
This is such BS as far as Lee’s racist opinion is concerned, the man is a attention seeking retard.
One of Eastwood’s new films is a film about Nelson Mandela…
When asked about this Eastwood said “well I’m not going to cast a white guy to play Mandela….
Get with reality Lee!
June 9th, 2008 at 2:29 am
@Solomon
You’re correct on my typo. The actual percentage was .9% and in a group of 1,000, that would be 9 black soldiers. Thanks for catching that and I apologize for my typo. =(
I guess Spike Lee had me riled up just a touch! Or I was trying to type too fast for my own good.
June 9th, 2008 at 10:46 am
Well done Robert … you should subimt this article directly to Spike’s email or as a retraction to any news medium that printed his comments.
June 9th, 2008 at 5:25 pm
Robert and Bil:
I don’t follow your math. You said that of the 900, 600 were in transportation jobs, and not on the front lines, that would leave .4% or 4 per 1,000.
I spent 30 years in the military, all of it after President Truman signed the integration bill in 1948. As a result, I served with people of all races, and would not for a minute diminish anyones contribution.
My Father served in the army, starting in 1936, according to him, the majority of black soldiers were indeed relegated to transportation and other jobs not involving the front lines. From talking to him and his brothers, they only saw whites at the front. This discussion came up in response to another movie back in the fifties which only showed blacks assigned to rear eschelon positions. Sidney Potier was in that one.
Bottom line, I believe Mr Eastwood was fairly and accurately representing the troops in the field.
June 9th, 2008 at 8:42 pm
although i havn’t seen many of Spike Lee’s films, i always thought him to be an intelligent film maker, but this entire story has lowered my opinion of him. To me it smells like a publicity stunt. Attack the most recent WWII movie for having no black people just so you can trumpet your own WWII movie about a group of black soldiers. From my understanding of the plot, the soldiers’ story being portrayed in Lee’s film is remarkable and should be able to stand on its own. This stupid stunt is going to tarnish his own movie, not help it.
June 10th, 2008 at 11:21 am
This is the only way Spike Lee gets any press. He attacks and screams racism. Flags of Our Fathers has been out for about a year and he is just now getting around to this? I guess he wanted to wait until his WWII movie was about to be released. He also criticized Clint for “Bird”. Complaining ‘why a white man is making a movie about a great jazz musician?’
June 10th, 2008 at 6:22 pm
An excellent rebuttal Mr Fure. One small correction if I may. Spike Lee claimed that there was not one black face in ‘Flags.’ Flatly untrue. Approx 15 mins in there is a scene on a troop ship where the Captain (Neal McDonagh) lectures his men about the imminent invasion of Iwo Jima. The Captain makes reference to an ammo company resupplying the troops & as he says that the camera singles out a group of black marines listening intently. Here’s a screenshot of the scene in question;
http://img244.imageshack.us/my.php?image=flagsstillzo8.png
You’ll note that the Captain’s line is historically correct as that’s what black troops were used for & that Eastwood’s concern at singling out black faces in a story that is otherwise entirely about the men who raised the flag & what happened to them when they returned home, flatly refutes Spike Lee’s disgraceful implication that Eastwood is racist & that ‘there was not one black face in either of those movies.’ But of course Lee has his own movie to promote which is why he said those things. That he feels free to make factually untrue statements about another filmmakers movie & smear its director with an implication of racism no doubt troubles him not at all. After all, he got what he wanted. Sadly, Spike Lee will probably get away with this just as he has similar behaviour in the past.
June 11th, 2008 at 6:09 am
Spike Lee detonated his own credibility when he went after Clint Eastwood on this topic. I’ve never read or heard anything to make me think Mr. Eastwood was a bigot, least of all toward Blacks. Mr. Lee might want to revisit his rant and extend a much deserved mea culpa to Clint.
June 11th, 2008 at 9:39 am
Lets do a special on the Iwo black soldiers,the flak will come showing them led by white officers,being used in a primarily work role etc.
Consider the 332nd fighter group,”Tuskg. airmen” ,more publicity then the entire 15th air force has received in history,the other 12 fighter groups not only received token recognition, but included many aces with victories over jets etc,the 332nd had no aces credited until recently by an act of the Air force most consider manipulation as opposed to “deliberately done for racial reasons”,
The “never lost a bomber” they escorted saying ,has also been disputed by veterans who flew with the 15th groups as my father,48 missions,B17. Pretty much debunked. While those veterens state they were always happy to see the red tails of the 332 as an escort it was no more then the sight of any other escorting fighter group. Thanks to my father I was well aware of the 332nd and their pilots as a kid in the 50s,college educated,fine pilots and segregated as things were at the time.
June 11th, 2008 at 10:21 pm
Mr. Eastwood simply made a movie from an extraordinary book written by the son of one of the flag raisers. Having read the book, seen the movie and being a little bit of a WWII buff, there was nothing wrong or dishonest with the movie. The statistics bare out the elements of the movie and the circumstances of where all those combatants were. Perhaps, Mr. Lee’s history is revisionist at best, racist at worst and I’m quite certain he didn’t read the book.