Is Disney Tearing Families Apart?

Posted by Brian C. Gibson (brian@filmschoolrejects.com) on December 6, 2006

The term for a traditional family structure is a “Married Nuclear Family”. This family structure is currently the minority in America. The fastest growing family structure in this country is a non-traditional “Single Parent Family”. I have the utmost respect for any man or woman who is raising a child by themselves. Some consequences are completely out of a person’s control, but why is this trend in America’s families exploding? Disney has been making films for almost a century, and has created some of the most memorable characters that have touched the lives of generation after generation of parents and children. Disney films have had a somewhat disturbing trend or theme that has echoed throughout America’s youth for nearly 70 years. Why have so many single parents appeared over the last 20 years though? Why has it become ok to abandon a woman and leave her to take care of your child? Why has it become acceptable for people to divorce instead of spending time to work on their marriages instead of their golf swings? These things have become acceptable in society because society has allowed it to become the norm. This norm has been stamped into our culture by Disney.

“By not having a complete family, it represents a catalyst or a dramatic turning point that forces the character to grow up. . . . It’s that crossroads where we all have to decide if we’re going to mature or remain a kid forever. And the thing that gets that going in many of our stories is the absence of a parent or the death of a parent.”
– Don Hahn, Disney Producer

This quote is an excellent representation of how Disney places the aspect of single parent families into a state of practicality over a traditional family. Try and think of the last Disney film you have seen that features a protagonist that has both parents throughout the entire feature. There are truly some discrepancies with this trend such as The Incredibles or Hercules, but the numbers that support this idea are alarming. Disney films traditionally highlight three types of family structures:

Parental Death
Bambi: Bambi is told by his father, that his mother was shot by hunters
Lion King: Simba had two parents, his father Mufasa was murdered
The Jungle Book: Mowgli’s parents are gone
Tarzan: Young Tarzan is adopted by Kala after his parents are killed in a leopard attack
Dinosaur: Aladar’s mother is killed in a Carnotaur attack
The Hunchback of Notre Dame: Quasimodo’s parents are ambushed by Judge Frollo
Atlantis: Milo’s father is alone
Finding Nemo: Nemo’s mother is killed before he is born
The Fox and The Hound: Tod is taken in after his mother is killed by a hunter
Pollyanna: Lost both of her parents
Child Abandonment
Peter Pan: Lost boy, a.k.a. Orphan
Oliver & Company: Homeless kitten meets homeless gang of dogs
The Rescuers: Bernard and Bianca venture to rescue a little orphan girl
Lilo & Stitch: Only Lilo and her sister Nani
Single Parent Family
Dumbo: Mrs. Jumbo is all alone
Toy Story: Never saw Andy’s father
Pocahontas: Her single father Powhatan
Beauty & The Beast: Belle’s single father Maurice
The Little Mermaid: King Triton has no Queen
Aladdin: Jasmine’s father, The Sultan, has no wife
Pinnochio: He only has a creepy father
Snow White: Snow White has The Evil Queen as her stepmother
Cinderella: Lady Tremaine is Cinderella’s evil stepmother
Mary Poppins: Nanny to children of a Banker
Chicken Little: Single father Buck Cluck
The Parent Trap: Single Parents are united by their children
The Mighty Ducks: Charlie’s single mom almost hooks up with Coach Bombay who only had a father
Pirates of the Caribbean: Elizabeth Swann and Will Turner only have fathers

I’m sure the list is larger, due to the fact that I haven’t seen every Disney film. I’m not anti-Disney. On the contrary, I love most Disney films but I am alarmed by this trend. If these single parent scenarios are being used as a vehicle to show maturation into adulthood, then wouldn’t most children see that having both parents isn’t exactly required? Not saying that having both parents is required, but that is the ideal situation for growing up. Disney quickly refutes the idea of an ideal family situation by offering a myriad of situations that depict a boy/man or girl/woman who is stronger now without both parents and never longed to have both. This trend is just like any other, experts say abuse in childhood is much more likely to cause abuse during parenthood. If violence breeds violence, abandonment breeds abandonment, and abuse breeds abuse, what is so different to say that the idolization of characters from broken families wouldn’t breed broken families? Children of broken homes are much more likely to lead a broken home. Single parenthood is an exploding trend, and little boys and girls have seen success stories that feature broken families for years. Isn’t the saying ‘Monkey see, Monkey Do’?


Read more articles by Brian C. Gibson

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Wendy
    In Mary Poppins the kids had two parents and a nanny. Many parents that work these days take their children to daycare. If they can afford it, they try to get a nanny, which is better for the children, allowing them a closer relationship to their new caregiver.

    And the point of Mary Poppins was that she wanted the children to have a stronger relationship with their parents, specifically their father. So I don't think you have this one catagorized correctly. If anything when she left, she left them with a stronger, more ideal (seeing as how you're making the argument that traditional is ideal) family unit. That movie supports the ideal of the Western two parent family.

    If you read the Mary Poppins books that the movie was based on, the reunion of the family is not a goal nor is it a story line used. Mary Poppins as a character is vain, quick tempered, and not very loving toward the children. She takes-in the world with disdain, happens to have these unusual magical powers that she'll never admit to, allowing the childen, almost vicariously, to enjoy strange adventures merely due to their proximity to her. The movie actually improved upon the character in making her more of an affable person and by using a strong story line about strengthening the family unit.

    I think this movie is an exception to your argument. You probably could include Darby O'Gill and the Little People on the list though. Even though the daughter is grown up, she only has a father. In the books Darby was younger and had a wife and many children. In the movie they chose to make him an old man and widower. Why would they make that choice? Why would they chose to portray him as such? The plot had nothing to do with Darby's marital status. They could just as easily had him still married without endangering the conflict.

    Disney is not only to blame in this...
    They don't tend to write most of their stories from thin air, the stories are based on pre-existing stories that they have built upon and/or obtained the rights to. Warner Brothers (Harry Potter) and other companies may be just as liable. It may be interesting to expand your argument to encompass a larger representation of our surrounding media influences.

    Thanks for bringing up an interesting point with this article.

    Wendy Winger
  • Broken
    WOW! You really need to do some research before you gripe! Yes an interesting point but a lot was false. You really do not need to know all the details of the main character's FAMILY to know the story.
    I noticed you are griping about
    Beauty and the Beast
    Little Mermaid
    Pinnochio
    Hunch Back
    Bambi
    Tarzan
    these weren't even originally Disney stories! Though Disney took them as their own. They did tinker a lot with the story as well. Tarzan is perhaps one they messed with most...
    Lilo and Nani were NOT abandon... unless the parents killed themselves

    I agree with Wendy. It is very interesting. I've never seen Mary popins before though.
    If you want to complain about movies, go do it to the violent ones... the blood guts sex murder all that people like these days.
    I am glad there are some good clean movies around.
  • K'
    'Monkey see, Monkey Do'

    But we aren't monkeys, are we? :)
  • I don't know if I'd call it quite alarming, but it is puzzling. I too had often wondered why they featured so many single-parent families. In fact, I found this article by searching Google for Disney +"single parent".

    Your theory is something that should definitely be considered. Disney need not completely trash their time-honored tradition of using single-parent families, but they could be more balanced.

    As for Broken's comment, you are right in saying that those stories were not originally Disney's, but Disney did choose them. They could have chosen other stories. The point remains valid.
  • Holden caulfield
    Everything in Disney is seriously suspect. The whole company is represented by a 60 year old mouse in short pants who has a dog for a pet (pluto) which can´t speak and just acts like a dog......and a dog for a friend (Goofy) who speaks, wears clothes and acts like a human. Personally I find all this behaviour to be totally insane and a bad example to the fragile, developing minds of young children.
    Walt Disney himself was a wife-beating, puritan, who fraternised with the mafia to fund his ailing empire when the Disney corporation was struggling financially. Good ol Uncle Walt.
  • To Holden Caulfield: Where did you get the idea that "Walt Disney himself was a wife-beating, puritan, who fraternised with the mafia to fund his ailing empire when the Disney corporation was struggling financially. Good ol Uncle Walt."

    I'd appreciate it if you'd tell us your source for this slander.
  • Holden caulfield
    Disney has always made me flinch. They sure chose some wierd tales to tell....from that bone chilling story about the wooden puppet that comes to life and starts walkin around all by itself an´ all (yeaugghh! gives me the heebee-jeebees!!), to that nightmarish tale about the young woman who lives in a forest with 7 ugly midget freaks and ends up gettin´poisoned. Or what about that horror story about the black magic warlock who makes all the brooms come to life and they´re dancin´all around his castle with all that creepy music and stuff?? Not to mention all those trippy hippos and pink elephants. Goddamit, that Disney guy was doin´hard drugs. No sir, Disney frightened the ba-jesus outta me.

    Apart from all that though, it turns out Ol´Uncle Walt had a few skeletons on the closet. Like being a wife beating, paedo, puritan hypocrite, who turned to the mafia for financial support when his empire was ailing financially.

    When you wish upon a star, eh?
  • Holden caulfield
    Maggie,

    It´s not slander. That´s like saying it´s slander for me to call Milli Vanilli a pair of phonies who used people with more talent than they had to shamelessly promote themselves. I suggest you do a little research on Uncle Walt before you go jumpin´to his defence. It´s all fairly common knowledge now if you care to check for yourself.
  • Holden caulfield
    Maggie,

    Re: Uncle walt.....

    Look here

    http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-80464200.html
  • Kylie
    What is your source for that Don Hahn quote? I really like it, but I need an actual source.
blog comments powered by Disqus