Comments on: Michael Bay’s Transformers: The Guy Movie of All Guy Movies http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php A Website About Movies Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:16:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Michael Bay's Transformers: The Guy Movie of All Guy Movies | Film ... http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-253028 Michael Bay's Transformers: The Guy Movie of All Guy Movies | Film ... Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:38:07 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-253028 <strong>Michael Bay's Transformers: The Guy Movie of All Guy Movies | Film ......</strong> [...]Once Bumblebee is initially restrained and is carted off by these black-suited bimbos, led by a particularly annoying Agent Simmons played by the oft spastic John Turturro (Secret Window, 2004; O Brother, Where Art Thou?, .... I've said about 25%... Michael Bay's Transformers: The Guy Movie of All Guy Movies | Film ……

[...]Once Bumblebee is initially restrained and is carted off by these black-suited bimbos, led by a particularly annoying Agent Simmons played by the oft spastic John Turturro (Secret Window, 2004; O Brother, Where Art Thou?, …. I’ve said about 25%…

]]> By: Hyperion http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-140680 Hyperion Tue, 19 May 2009 16:08:24 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-140680 My big problem with Bay's Version of Transformers is he didnt bother to try to keep faithful to the source material. I mean WHY change the basic fundamentals of Transformers lore? Allspark instead of Matrix? Sam instead of Spike? A camero instead of something smaller? I know VW wouldnt let them use the bug but come on.. I mean look at Devestator! He looks like a pile of twisted rainbow crap. There was ABSOLUTELY no reason to change the basic design of the character. At least Prime looks sort of like the original. The fact that they MISNAMED a character in the first film (Brawl was named Devastator) and just went.."oh well lets just use the name again who cares" should tell you something about how passionate they are about the franchise. The fact is we fans of the original series and comics are the ones that kept the story of the Transformers alive for 20+ years. I got my first one in 1984 and have been hooked ever since. They crapped on our fond memories of a great toy and comic and said...lets do it again! If someone redid Lord of the rings and made the hobbits blue with giant ears that flopped when they walked, Gandalf a woman and Aragorn a comedian played by Jerry Sienfeld people would have cow. Its the same darn thing here. I'M not trying to compare Transformers to LOTR in regards to the quality of the story but you get the idea. Theres a basic fundamental story and Bay just took what he wanted to make money and disregarded the rest. If they had named the movie "gobots" and changed all references to Autobots/Decepticons and Cybertron then you could watch it and NOT get that it was about the Transfomers but just another robots invade earth film. You should be able to take one look at a film about something like Transformers and immediately say..." hey thats Optimus Prime or Dude look it's Megatron !! Awesome!." With this film they basically wrote thier own movie and slapped the Transformers name onto it it and shoehorned the history into it. Why the hell is Megatron a jet? And soundwave is supposed to be one in the next film too? Thats just lazy writing. Bay said that they couldnt have soundwave a Boombox or music player like in the original history because it didnt fit the role they have for him in the film. Well dude....seriously...why name him soundwave then? Name him something else . Dont use names for robots that have had the same general form for 25 years and make them something different just beacause you want to make money off the plug of thier name into the film. If they had released the movie without the Transformers name it probably wouldnt be so controversial but they tied it to something that alot of people who were kids in the 80'S have fond memories of and they gave it to a directorial team that said F it ima do what I want im a big time hollywood director woot! Lets make some greeeen! $$$ Bay wanted to do his take on the Transformers well who the $%@* cares about your "take" on transformers? You took a great story with interesting characters and absolouly ruined it. Box office be dammed My big problem with Bay’s Version of Transformers is he didnt bother to try to keep faithful to the source material. I mean WHY change the basic fundamentals of Transformers lore? Allspark instead of Matrix? Sam instead of Spike? A camero instead of something smaller? I know VW wouldnt let them use the bug but come on.. I mean look at Devestator! He looks like a pile of twisted rainbow crap. There was ABSOLUTELY no reason to change the basic design of the character. At least Prime looks sort of like the original. The fact that they MISNAMED a character in the first film (Brawl was named Devastator) and just went..”oh well lets just use the name again who cares” should tell you something about how passionate they are about the franchise. The fact is we fans of the original series and comics are the ones that kept the story of the Transformers alive for 20+ years. I got my first one in 1984 and have been hooked ever since. They crapped on our fond memories of a great toy and comic and said…lets do it again!
If someone redid Lord of the rings and made the hobbits blue with giant ears that flopped when they walked, Gandalf a woman and Aragorn a comedian played by Jerry Sienfeld people would have cow. Its the same darn thing here. I’M not trying to compare Transformers to LOTR in regards to the quality of the story but you get the idea. Theres a basic fundamental story and Bay just took what he wanted to make money and disregarded the rest.

If they had named the movie “gobots” and changed all references to Autobots/Decepticons and Cybertron then you could watch it and NOT get that it was about the Transfomers but just another robots invade earth film. You should be able to take one look at a film about something like Transformers and immediately say…” hey thats Optimus Prime or Dude look it’s Megatron !! Awesome!.” With this film they basically wrote thier own movie and slapped the Transformers name onto it it and shoehorned the history into it.
Why the hell is Megatron a jet? And soundwave is supposed to be one in the next film too? Thats just lazy writing. Bay said that they couldnt have soundwave a Boombox or music player like in the original history because it didnt fit the role they have for him in the film. Well dude….seriously…why name him soundwave then? Name him something else . Dont use names for robots that have had the same general form for 25 years and make them something different just beacause you want to make money off the plug of thier name into the film.

If they had released the movie without the Transformers name it probably wouldnt be so controversial but they tied it to something that alot of people who were kids in the 80′S have fond memories of and they gave it to a directorial team that said F it ima do what I want im a big time hollywood director woot! Lets make some greeeen! $$$

Bay wanted to do his take on the Transformers well who the $%@* cares about your “take” on transformers? You took a great story with interesting characters and absolouly ruined it. Box office be dammed

]]> By: Hyperion http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-180860 Hyperion Tue, 19 May 2009 16:08:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-180860 My big problem with Bay's Version of Transformers is he didnt bother to try to keep faithful to the source material. I mean WHY change the basic fundamentals of Transformers lore? Allspark instead of Matrix? Sam instead of Spike? A camero instead of something smaller? I know VW wouldnt let them use the bug but come on.. I mean look at Devestator! He looks like a pile of twisted rainbow crap. There was ABSOLUTELY no reason to change the basic design of the character. At least Prime looks sort of like the original. The fact that they MISNAMED a character in the first film (Brawl was named Devastator) and just went.."oh well lets just use the name again who cares" should tell you something about how passionate they are about the franchise. The fact is we fans of the original series and comics are the ones that kept the story of the Transformers alive for 20+ years. I got my first one in 1984 and have been hooked ever since. They crapped on our fond memories of a great toy and comic and said...lets do it again! If someone redid Lord of the rings and made the hobbits blue with giant ears that flopped when they walked, Gandalf a woman and Aragorn a comedian played by Jerry Sienfeld people would have cow. Its the same darn thing here. I'M not trying to compare Transformers to LOTR in regards to the quality of the story but you get the idea. Theres a basic fundamental story and Bay just took what he wanted to make money and disregarded the rest. If they had named the movie "gobots" and changed all references to Autobots/Decepticons and Cybertron then you could watch it and NOT get that it was about the Transfomers but just another robots invade earth film. You should be able to take one look at a film about something like Transformers and immediately say..." hey thats Optimus Prime or Dude look it's Megatron !! Awesome!." With this film they basically wrote thier own movie and slapped the Transformers name onto it it and shoehorned the history into it. Why the hell is Megatron a jet? And soundwave is supposed to be one in the next film too? Thats just lazy writing. Bay said that they couldnt have soundwave a Boombox or music player like in the original history because it didnt fit the role they have for him in the film. Well dude....seriously...why name him soundwave then? Name him something else . Dont use names for robots that have had the same general form for 25 years and make them something different just beacause you want to make money off the plug of thier name into the film. If they had released the movie without the Transformers name it probably wouldnt be so controversial but they tied it to something that alot of people who were kids in the 80'S have fond memories of and they gave it to a directorial team that said F it ima do what I want im a big time hollywood director woot! Lets make some greeeen! $$$ Bay wanted to do his take on the Transformers well who the $%@* cares about your "take" on transformers? You took a great story with interesting characters and absolouly ruined it. Box office be dammed My big problem with Bay’s Version of Transformers is he didnt bother to try to keep faithful to the source material. I mean WHY change the basic fundamentals of Transformers lore? Allspark instead of Matrix? Sam instead of Spike? A camero instead of something smaller? I know VW wouldnt let them use the bug but come on.. I mean look at Devestator! He looks like a pile of twisted rainbow crap. There was ABSOLUTELY no reason to change the basic design of the character. At least Prime looks sort of like the original. The fact that they MISNAMED a character in the first film (Brawl was named Devastator) and just went..”oh well lets just use the name again who cares” should tell you something about how passionate they are about the franchise. The fact is we fans of the original series and comics are the ones that kept the story of the Transformers alive for 20+ years. I got my first one in 1984 and have been hooked ever since. They crapped on our fond memories of a great toy and comic and said…lets do it again!
If someone redid Lord of the rings and made the hobbits blue with giant ears that flopped when they walked, Gandalf a woman and Aragorn a comedian played by Jerry Sienfeld people would have cow. Its the same darn thing here. I’M not trying to compare Transformers to LOTR in regards to the quality of the story but you get the idea. Theres a basic fundamental story and Bay just took what he wanted to make money and disregarded the rest.

If they had named the movie “gobots” and changed all references to Autobots/Decepticons and Cybertron then you could watch it and NOT get that it was about the Transfomers but just another robots invade earth film. You should be able to take one look at a film about something like Transformers and immediately say…” hey thats Optimus Prime or Dude look it’s Megatron !! Awesome!.” With this film they basically wrote thier own movie and slapped the Transformers name onto it it and shoehorned the history into it.
Why the hell is Megatron a jet? And soundwave is supposed to be one in the next film too? Thats just lazy writing. Bay said that they couldnt have soundwave a Boombox or music player like in the original history because it didnt fit the role they have for him in the film. Well dude….seriously…why name him soundwave then? Name him something else . Dont use names for robots that have had the same general form for 25 years and make them something different just beacause you want to make money off the plug of thier name into the film.

If they had released the movie without the Transformers name it probably wouldnt be so controversial but they tied it to something that alot of people who were kids in the 80′S have fond memories of and they gave it to a directorial team that said F it ima do what I want im a big time hollywood director woot! Lets make some greeeen! $$$

Bay wanted to do his take on the Transformers well who the $%@* cares about your “take” on transformers? You took a great story with interesting characters and absolouly ruined it. Box office be dammed

]]> By: Michael Bay's Transformers: The Guy Movie of All Guy Movies (For a Minute You Thought That Said 'Gay,' Didn't You?) « Film Critiq http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-42756 Michael Bay's Transformers: The Guy Movie of All Guy Movies (For a Minute You Thought That Said 'Gay,' Didn't You?) « Film Critiq Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:43:15 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-42756 [...] little credit can be given to director Michael Bay for the box office success of what is arguably this summer's biggest movie blockbuster: [...] [...] little credit can be given to director Michael Bay for the box office success of what is arguably this summer’s biggest movie blockbuster: [...]

]]> By: El Bicho http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-42113 El Bicho Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:32:15 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-42113 "If just one person can give me a single, good reason to hate Michael Bay, I'll cut everyone some slack." He sucks as a director. He doesn't know how to tell a story visually. To be fair, I don't hate Michael Bay as much as I do the people that go see and enjoy his movies. They are the ones to blame. Leave Bush out of this because he doesn't make your case. "More than 50% of the voters voted Bush." Yeah, 50.7%, but "it was, percentage-wise, the closest popular margin ever for a sitting President." A better candidate than Kerry would have won and the Republicans lost control of Congress, in large part, because the voters attitudes towards Bush. “If just one person can give me a single, good reason to hate Michael Bay, I’ll cut everyone some slack.”

He sucks as a director. He doesn’t know how to tell a story visually. To be fair, I don’t hate Michael Bay as much as I do the people that go see and enjoy his movies. They are the ones to blame.

Leave Bush out of this because he doesn’t make your case. “More than 50% of the voters voted Bush.” Yeah, 50.7%, but “it was, percentage-wise, the closest popular margin ever for a sitting President.” A better candidate than Kerry would have won and the Republicans lost control of Congress, in large part, because the voters attitudes towards Bush.

]]> By: El Bicho http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-180859 El Bicho Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:32:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-180859 "If just one person can give me a single, good reason to hate Michael Bay, I'll cut everyone some slack." He sucks as a director. He doesn't know how to tell a story visually. To be fair, I don't hate Michael Bay as much as I do the people that go see and enjoy his movies. They are the ones to blame. Leave Bush out of this because he doesn't make your case. "More than 50% of the voters voted Bush." Yeah, 50.7%, but "it was, percentage-wise, the closest popular margin ever for a sitting President." A better candidate than Kerry would have won and the Republicans lost control of Congress, in large part, because the voters attitudes towards Bush. “If just one person can give me a single, good reason to hate Michael Bay, I’ll cut everyone some slack.”

He sucks as a director. He doesn’t know how to tell a story visually. To be fair, I don’t hate Michael Bay as much as I do the people that go see and enjoy his movies. They are the ones to blame.

Leave Bush out of this because he doesn’t make your case. “More than 50% of the voters voted Bush.” Yeah, 50.7%, but “it was, percentage-wise, the closest popular margin ever for a sitting President.” A better candidate than Kerry would have won and the Republicans lost control of Congress, in large part, because the voters attitudes towards Bush.

]]> By: I hate michael bay club http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-42106 I hate michael bay club Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:38:55 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-42106 Okay, I may not know a lot about transformers but I did watch it as a kid and my questions is why oh why would they make this movie? It really could have been a great and fun movie but Michael Bay had to go and ruin it. The stupid thing didn't make any sense. I'm all about a movie that has explosions and cool cars but there still needs to be a good story line. What's the deal with the guy "Sam" who should actually be named Spike byt the way, looking for glasses for like 30 minutes? That scene jsut dragged on and on. In the end the glasses were pretty useless. There was no character development with the transformers at all. I mean I realize that this is fantasy but it needs to at least be belivable. I didn't buy the movie at all. I had to stop watching it becasue it was so ridiculous. Movies are meant to entertain, I was not entertained. It's bad enough that Michael Bay ruined Pearl Harbor why oh why did Hollywood let him ruin transformers. Someing that so many people of my generation love. He should be banned from ever making another movie ever again. The least he could have done is watch the cartoon before he made a movie and ruined it. Okay, I may not know a lot about transformers but I did watch it as a kid and my questions is why oh why would they make this movie? It really could have been a great and fun movie but Michael Bay had to go and ruin it. The stupid thing didn’t make any sense. I’m all about a movie that has explosions and cool cars but there still needs to be a good story line. What’s the deal with the guy “Sam” who should actually be named Spike byt the way, looking for glasses for like 30 minutes? That scene jsut dragged on and on. In the end the glasses were pretty useless. There was no character development with the transformers at all. I mean I realize that this is fantasy but it needs to at least be belivable. I didn’t buy the movie at all. I had to stop watching it becasue it was so ridiculous. Movies are meant to entertain, I was not entertained.

It’s bad enough that Michael Bay ruined Pearl Harbor why oh why did Hollywood let him ruin transformers. Someing that so many people of my generation love. He should be banned from ever making another movie ever again. The least he could have done is watch the cartoon before he made a movie and ruined it.

]]> By: I hate michael bay club http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-180858 I hate michael bay club Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:38:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-180858 Okay, I may not know a lot about transformers but I did watch it as a kid and my questions is why oh why would they make this movie? It really could have been a great and fun movie but Michael Bay had to go and ruin it. The stupid thing didn't make any sense. I'm all about a movie that has explosions and cool cars but there still needs to be a good story line. What's the deal with the guy "Sam" who should actually be named Spike byt the way, looking for glasses for like 30 minutes? That scene jsut dragged on and on. In the end the glasses were pretty useless. There was no character development with the transformers at all. I mean I realize that this is fantasy but it needs to at least be belivable. I didn't buy the movie at all. I had to stop watching it becasue it was so ridiculous. Movies are meant to entertain, I was not entertained. It's bad enough that Michael Bay ruined Pearl Harbor why oh why did Hollywood let him ruin transformers. Someing that so many people of my generation love. He should be banned from ever making another movie ever again. The least he could have done is watch the cartoon before he made a movie and ruined it. Okay, I may not know a lot about transformers but I did watch it as a kid and my questions is why oh why would they make this movie? It really could have been a great and fun movie but Michael Bay had to go and ruin it. The stupid thing didn’t make any sense. I’m all about a movie that has explosions and cool cars but there still needs to be a good story line. What’s the deal with the guy “Sam” who should actually be named Spike byt the way, looking for glasses for like 30 minutes? That scene jsut dragged on and on. In the end the glasses were pretty useless. There was no character development with the transformers at all. I mean I realize that this is fantasy but it needs to at least be belivable. I didn’t buy the movie at all. I had to stop watching it becasue it was so ridiculous. Movies are meant to entertain, I was not entertained.

It’s bad enough that Michael Bay ruined Pearl Harbor why oh why did Hollywood let him ruin transformers. Someing that so many people of my generation love. He should be banned from ever making another movie ever again. The least he could have done is watch the cartoon before he made a movie and ruined it.

]]> By: Comments on Vacation Spots » Blog Archive » Hoover Dam http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-42006 Comments on Vacation Spots » Blog Archive » Hoover Dam Sun, 05 Aug 2007 04:23:20 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-42006 [...] the various scenes and mistakes that the movie makes with the dam. Read more about the movie here and [...] [...] the various scenes and mistakes that the movie makes with the dam. Read more about the movie here and [...]

]]> By: shane http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-39844 shane Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:33:33 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-39844 One reason to hate Bay. He knew the script sucked big time. He didn't even wanted to do the movie. He caved in to the big money, he did what he could with the garbage. But the movie still sucked, no cure for bad script. He has gone over to the dark side. Only reason Spielberg didn't directed the movie himself was he knew the script sucked, but he wanted a share of the money. Greedy, but smart. One reason to hate Bay. He knew the script sucked big time. He didn’t even wanted to do the movie. He caved in to the big money, he did what he could with the garbage. But the movie still sucked, no cure for bad script.
He has gone over to the dark side.
Only reason Spielberg didn’t directed the movie himself was he knew the script sucked, but he wanted a share of the money. Greedy, but smart.

]]> By: shane http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-180857 shane Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:33:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-180857 One reason to hate Bay. He knew the script sucked big time. He didn't even wanted to do the movie. He caved in to the big money, he did what he could with the garbage. But the movie still sucked, no cure for bad script. He has gone over to the dark side. Only reason Spielberg didn't directed the movie himself was he knew the script sucked, but he wanted a share of the money. Greedy, but smart. One reason to hate Bay. He knew the script sucked big time. He didn’t even wanted to do the movie. He caved in to the big money, he did what he could with the garbage. But the movie still sucked, no cure for bad script.
He has gone over to the dark side.
Only reason Spielberg didn’t directed the movie himself was he knew the script sucked, but he wanted a share of the money. Greedy, but smart.

]]> By: Lawrence Lewis http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-39666 Lawrence Lewis Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:50:30 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-39666 Michael Bays new movie looks amazing, it is a breath of fresh air towards the animated series which has seen so many changes over the past years. i am waiting for the movie to come out, im dying to c it, it looks amazing, the visualz of the movie blew me away, fantastic recreations of robotic characters etc. heres a big fan wishing all the best to the crew nd producers and directors of Transformers the movie 2007 Michael Bays new movie looks amazing, it is a breath of fresh air towards the animated series which has seen so many changes over the past years. i am waiting for the movie to come out, im dying to c it, it looks amazing, the visualz of the movie blew me away, fantastic recreations of robotic characters etc. heres a big fan wishing all the best to the crew nd producers and directors of Transformers the movie 2007

]]> By: Lawrence Lewis http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-180856 Lawrence Lewis Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:50:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-180856 Michael Bays new movie looks amazing, it is a breath of fresh air towards the animated series which has seen so many changes over the past years. i am waiting for the movie to come out, im dying to c it, it looks amazing, the visualz of the movie blew me away, fantastic recreations of robotic characters etc. heres a big fan wishing all the best to the crew nd producers and directors of Transformers the movie 2007 Michael Bays new movie looks amazing, it is a breath of fresh air towards the animated series which has seen so many changes over the past years. i am waiting for the movie to come out, im dying to c it, it looks amazing, the visualz of the movie blew me away, fantastic recreations of robotic characters etc. heres a big fan wishing all the best to the crew nd producers and directors of Transformers the movie 2007

]]> By: Robert Fure http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-38544 Robert Fure Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:22:37 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-38544 I dont want to get way into politics, but in 2004 Bush won by a fairly significant margin in the largest turn out for an election ever. More than 50% of the voters voted Bush. I do, however, want to see Michael Bay direct a George Bush movie complete with Air National Guard hijinx and raucus drunk nudie parties. I dont want to get way into politics, but in 2004 Bush won by a fairly significant margin in the largest turn out for an election ever. More than 50% of the voters voted Bush.

I do, however, want to see Michael Bay direct a George Bush movie complete with Air National Guard hijinx and raucus drunk nudie parties.

]]> By: Robert Fure http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-180855 Robert Fure Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:22:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-180855 I dont want to get way into politics, but in 2004 Bush won by a fairly significant margin in the largest turn out for an election ever. More than 50% of the voters voted Bush. I do, however, want to see Michael Bay direct a George Bush movie complete with Air National Guard hijinx and raucus drunk nudie parties. I dont want to get way into politics, but in 2004 Bush won by a fairly significant margin in the largest turn out for an election ever. More than 50% of the voters voted Bush.

I do, however, want to see Michael Bay direct a George Bush movie complete with Air National Guard hijinx and raucus drunk nudie parties.

]]> By: Mister Hand http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-38508 Mister Hand Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:35:51 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-38508 Robert Fure said: "Michael Bay is like George W. Bush I guess... His approval rating seems to be low. However when a Bay movie comes out or an election year comes around, the majority of America still votes for him." Not to be overly argumentative, but George W. Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 and squeaked by with an extremely narrow margin in 2004. Merely pointint out a flaw in your analagy. <i>No mas.</i> I think it would be interesting to see the George W. Bush biopic one day, as directed by the Baymeister. He could detail how Bush has made stuff "blow up real good" for the last seven years, doing no one a lick of good with it. Robert Fure said:

“Michael Bay is like George W. Bush I guess… His approval rating seems to be low. However when a Bay movie comes out or an election year comes around, the majority of America still votes for him.”

Not to be overly argumentative, but George W. Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 and squeaked by with an extremely narrow margin in 2004.

Merely pointint out a flaw in your analagy. No mas.

I think it would be interesting to see the George W. Bush biopic one day, as directed by the Baymeister. He could detail how Bush has made stuff “blow up real good” for the last seven years, doing no one a lick of good with it.

]]> By: Mister Hand http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-180854 Mister Hand Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:35:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-180854 Robert Fure said: "Michael Bay is like George W. Bush I guess... His approval rating seems to be low. However when a Bay movie comes out or an election year comes around, the majority of America still votes for him." Not to be overly argumentative, but George W. Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 and squeaked by with an extremely narrow margin in 2004. Merely pointint out a flaw in your analagy. <i>No mas.</i> I think it would be interesting to see the George W. Bush biopic one day, as directed by the Baymeister. He could detail how Bush has made stuff "blow up real good" for the last seven years, doing no one a lick of good with it. Robert Fure said:

“Michael Bay is like George W. Bush I guess… His approval rating seems to be low. However when a Bay movie comes out or an election year comes around, the majority of America still votes for him.”

Not to be overly argumentative, but George W. Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 and squeaked by with an extremely narrow margin in 2004.

Merely pointint out a flaw in your analagy. No mas.

I think it would be interesting to see the George W. Bush biopic one day, as directed by the Baymeister. He could detail how Bush has made stuff “blow up real good” for the last seven years, doing no one a lick of good with it.

]]> By: Robert Fure http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-38370 Robert Fure Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:33:16 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-38370 I'm not equating success with quality, however in a capitalistic society monetary success is often an accurate measuring stick of how a population perceives a film. If people like/enjoy a movie, it will make more money. People liked Knocked Up. It made lots of money. People enjoy Pirates of the Caribbean. It made lots of money. People enjoy Michael Bay. He makes lots of money. Michael Bay is like George W. Bush I guess. It's really easy for people to pick on him and it seems to be the thing to do these days. His approval rating seems to be low. However when a Bay movie comes out or an election year comes around, the majority of America still votes for him. Michael Bay - America's director. = P I’m not equating success with quality, however in a capitalistic society monetary success is often an accurate measuring stick of how a population perceives a film.

If people like/enjoy a movie, it will make more money.

People liked Knocked Up. It made lots of money. People enjoy Pirates of the Caribbean. It made lots of money. People enjoy Michael Bay. He makes lots of money.

Michael Bay is like George W. Bush I guess. It’s really easy for people to pick on him and it seems to be the thing to do these days. His approval rating seems to be low. However when a Bay movie comes out or an election year comes around, the majority of America still votes for him.

Michael Bay – America’s director. = P

]]> By: Robert Fure http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-180853 Robert Fure Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:33:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-180853 I'm not equating success with quality, however in a capitalistic society monetary success is often an accurate measuring stick of how a population perceives a film. If people like/enjoy a movie, it will make more money. People liked Knocked Up. It made lots of money. People enjoy Pirates of the Caribbean. It made lots of money. People enjoy Michael Bay. He makes lots of money. Michael Bay is like George W. Bush I guess. It's really easy for people to pick on him and it seems to be the thing to do these days. His approval rating seems to be low. However when a Bay movie comes out or an election year comes around, the majority of America still votes for him. Michael Bay - America's director. = P I’m not equating success with quality, however in a capitalistic society monetary success is often an accurate measuring stick of how a population perceives a film.

If people like/enjoy a movie, it will make more money.

People liked Knocked Up. It made lots of money. People enjoy Pirates of the Caribbean. It made lots of money. People enjoy Michael Bay. He makes lots of money.

Michael Bay is like George W. Bush I guess. It’s really easy for people to pick on him and it seems to be the thing to do these days. His approval rating seems to be low. However when a Bay movie comes out or an election year comes around, the majority of America still votes for him.

Michael Bay – America’s director. = P

]]> By: Mister Hand http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php/comment-page-1#comment-38337 Mister Hand Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:22:03 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/michael-bay%e2%80%99s-transformers-the-guy-movie-of-all-guy-movies.php#comment-38337 One man's Michael Baygasms are another man's Michael Bayexplosivediarrheagasms. One man’s Michael Baygasms are another man’s Michael Bayexplosivediarrheagasms.

]]>