Michael Bay’s Transformers: The Guy Movie of All Guy Movies

Posted by Paige MacGregor (paige@filmschoolrejects.com) on July 10, 2007

mfox3.jpgFor a Minute You Thought That Said ‘Gay,’ Didn’t You?

Very little credit can be given to director Michael Bay for the box office success of what is arguably this summer’s biggest movie blockbuster: Transformers. As a whole, the film is nothing more than a mish-mash of elements predetermined for success with male audiences of virtually any age: sweet cars, big guns, massive explosions, widespread physical devastation, smokin’ hot chicks (a.k.a. Megan Fox, Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen, 2004, and Rachael Taylor, See No Evil, 2006), and an animated television show that 90% of our country’s male population grew up watching.

The Transformers production team, including director Michael Bay, cinematographer Mitchell Amundsen, film editors Tom Muldoon, Paul Rubell and Glen Scantlebury, and production designer Jeff Mann, drew directly upon a number of scenes from other memorable movie blockbusters, including Peter Jackson’s 2005 version of the cinema classic King Kong and Paul W.S. Anderson’s 2004 monster-movie showdown AVP: Alien vs. Predator, in assembling some of Transformers‘ most visually impressive and emotionally touching scenes, including the scenes in which the government captures one of the Autobots (short for “Autonomous Robotic Life Form”) and another in which the U.S. government unveils one of its best kept secrets, a frozen transformer hidden in the Hoover Dam.

When Bumblebee—a voiceless Autobot that transforms first into an old and crappy 1974 Chevy Camaro and later into a sleek and sexy 2008 concept Camaro—is captured by “government officials” from the shady Sector Seven intelligence organization (“You see this? This is a ‘do whatever I want and get away with it’ badge.”), the method used to restrain the endearing yellow robot vividly evokes images from Cooper and Schoedsack’s groundbreaking 1933 film, King Kong, as well as from Jackson’s 2005 version of the same. Once Bumblebee is initially restrained and is carted off by these black-suited bimbos, led by a particularly annoying Agent Simmons played by the oft spastic John Turturro (Secret Window, 2004; O Brother, Where Art Thou?, 2000) whose presence manages only to detract from the overall quality of the film (with the exception of one or two extremely brief moments in which he provides some much needed comic relief during particularly tedious and unnecessary information-disseminating scenes), he is subjected to what can only be described as a futuristic version of the electroshock treatments given to Jack Nicholson in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975).

Rachel TaylorWell into Transformers‘ 144-minute running time appears Bay’s most blatant cinematic appropriation: the U.S. government has secretly held Megatron, leader of the evil, trigger-happy Decepticons, hostage, cryogenically frozen in one of the many underground chambers built within the Hoover Dam in an effort to camouflage the location of the high-energy “Allspark” cube sought by both the Autobots and Decepticons. Audience members familiar with the 2004 summer blockbuster AVP: Alien vs. Predator may experience some mild d©j  vu when the frozen Megatron is first unveiled, since the scene directly evokes images of the alien queen in AVP, frozen and chained in an amphitheater deep in the bowels of an ancient temple, waiting to be revived in order to wreak havoc upon the human race (again much like Megatron, who is hell-bent on the eradication of human life from Earth).

Transformers is a film not entirely without merit, however. Aside from an annoyingly unnecessary segment in the middle of the film in which Sector Seven makes its first major appears as agents of this secret government organization storm Sam’s house, take the Witwickys and Mikaela into custody, drive them around a bit, bring them to the Hoover Dam, and then spend an inordinate and incomprehensible amount of time talking strategy and demonstrating the awesome power of the Allspark, and despite its faults and cinematic appropriations, Transformers has produced at the box office as we all knew it would, earning $152.5 million domestically during its first six days alone (including July 2 advance screenings), making it the highest first-week grossing non-sequel film in the history of the motion picture industry.

Record-breaking box office numbers are good news for actor Shia LaBeouf, whose impressive performance, coupled with the massive popularity of the film, will inevitably boost him from the lower echelons of up-and-coming twentysomething actors (LaBeouf turned 21 on June 11th of this year) to the realm of his more prestigious (or at least notorious) peers, including Lindsay Lohan, (finally) 21, whose latest film, I Know Who Killed Me, is set for national release on July 27; Elisha Cuthbert, 25, whose next film, Captivity, is scheduled to open August 17; and Justin Long, 29, of this summer’s Bruce Willis blockbuster hit Live Free or Die Hard.

Megan FoxShia LaBeouf delivers a surprisingly outstanding performance as Transformers‘ protagonist, Sam Witwicky, managing to transition successfully from the stereotypically sad but cute high school dork longing for acceptance into a believable diamond-in-the-rough hero not with ease—ease wouldn’t be believable—but with an obvious degree of difficulty that is most apparent when he hesitates, Allspark in hand, momentarily overwhelmed by the task laid out before him. “You’re a soldier now!” yells Captain Lennox, played by Josh Duhamel (Win a Date with Tad Hamilton!, 2004; Turistas, 2006), snapping Sam back to reality and pushing him to deliver the alien cube to the U.S. government as fast as possible, despite imminent risk of death.

One aspect of the Transformers plot… if you can call it a plot… that is particularly interesting is the fact that this is now the second major motion picture released this summer to present a less than positive view of U.S. military forces. Director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo’s May 11 release 28 Weeks Later, sequel to the popular post-apocalyptic thrill ride turned cult classic known as 28 Days Later (2002), also touts the inability of U.S. military forces to overcome an adversary, this time a race of Autonomous Robotic Life Forms rather than a deadly virus that turns even the most mild mannered individual into a bloodthirsty killer. This aspect of the Transformers plot remains largely uncommented upon, indicating that perhaps U.S. citizens have finally come to the realization that our military forces are not invincible.

Overall, Transformers is what a summer movie blockbuster should be, by Hollywood’s standards: a profitable, entertaining film with excellent special effects that will ultimately remain popular enough with audiences to draw them back for more robots, guns, and girls when the inevitable Transformers sequel is released.


Read more articles by Paige MacGregor

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • I'm no apologist, but I wouldn't necessarily say that either Transformers nor 28 Weeks Later cast the US military in a negative light, and least not specifically. Both show a military struggling to overcome a stronger (and/or much more rapib) adversary, but not necessarily through any fault of their own. Sure, there are some questionable choices made by the officers in Weeks, but I hardly think those are meant to show the US military as particularly weak or imbecilic. Instead, it's just demonstrating how chaotic and out of hand the situation had gotten. In Transformers, some might say that the forces did an admirable job against a much stronger opponent.
  • I'd say that Transformers is very PRO military, anti Government. So anti-government that the hot blonde is the only smart person and Anthony Anderson, with his desktop computer no less, can crack the "alien code" (just like how Jeff Goldblum did in ID4, another borrowed concept you missed).
  • Are you fvcking kidding me? If just one person can give me a single, good reason to hate Michael Bay, I'll cut everyone some slack. But why does everyone just automatically hate Michael Bay? Very little credit can be given to Michael Bay? Are you serious? That's like saying very little credit can be given to Spielberg for Schindler's List or to Snyder for 300 or Kurosawa for Seven Samurai.

    He is the director. He had creative control. He oversaw design changes. There is no one more responsible for this movie than he. The population (excluding stuff critics), loves this movie. Why? It's fun. Action packed. Beautiful. Exciting. Hot chicks framed by sunset. Who made it that way? Bay.

    As for the thin comparison between Megatron and the Queen Alien in AvP, you're really reaching out of hatred of Bay. AvP sucked. I'm a huge Alien / Predator fan, but AvP is crap. That said, I've still seen it 4 times and I didn't draw the comparison between Megatron and the Queen Bitch. But granted, they were frozen. So I guess that means they're the same. But I guess really those movies are just rip offs of Demolition Man were criminals are frozen which is actually a rip off of The Thing From Outer Space in which the spaceship was stuck in ice.

    The movie shows the Military in a good light, I feel. They're shown in small numbers and are waaaay outnumbered and out gunned. Yet do they stop? No. They fight on. They figure out the SABOT round is effective and equip people with them and march back into the fight. You can't show the military much better in a movie that revolves around robots killing robots, because if the military killed all the robots, you don't need the other robots, dig it?

    28 Weeks Later shows a more negative view of the US in that when the lose control they decide to kill everyone. Government wise, I think Transformers is fairly pro-Government (Secretary of Defense is good guy) but anti-shady government operations (Sector Seven are douches).

    I've said about 25% of my piece, but will save the rest for some other day when Michael Bay is attacked. I'm not a Bay apologist - there is nothing to apologize for. He's merely one of the most commercially successful directors of all time.
  • Mister Hand
    Wow! Honestly, when you commented on my piece about Bay, I sort of thought you were kidding.

    You seem to equate success with quality. This is not necessarily the case. Just because a movie makes money doesn't mean it's good. And, of course, the reverse is true.

    I disliked Michael Bay after BAD BOYS. I thought that thing was horrible. And then I saw THE ROCK and my opinion didn't change. But I didn't yet HATE Michael Bay.

    The best reason to hate Michael Bay is for PEARL HARBOR, which is not only a terrible movie, but also craps all over the graves of the people who died in that attack, while at the same time hocking a loogie all over one of the most important and tragic events in our nation's history.

    Personally, if you want some good reasons to hate Bay, as I've suggested before, take a listen to some of his commentaries. The man is not a human being. The reason his movies are nothing more than glorified commercials is because the man himself is nothing more than a walking billboard for himself.

    Twenty years from now, when we are looking back on classic movies, Bay will not be making any lists. You will be showing TRANSFORMERS to your kids and saying to yourself, "Whoa, shit! What was I thinking when I thought this crap was good?"
  • I would like to submit my new term to the discussion: "Michael Baygasm"

    It is defined as every slick rotating, sunset infused action shot in which someone is rising up off th ground with the wind in their face. We first saw this in Bad Boys and were delighted to multiple Baygasms during Transformers...

    I know it is not relevant, but that's how I roll.
  • Mister Hand
    One man's Michael Baygasms are another man's Michael Bayexplosivediarrheagasms.
  • I'm not equating success with quality, however in a capitalistic society monetary success is often an accurate measuring stick of how a population perceives a film.

    If people like/enjoy a movie, it will make more money.

    People liked Knocked Up. It made lots of money. People enjoy Pirates of the Caribbean. It made lots of money. People enjoy Michael Bay. He makes lots of money.

    Michael Bay is like George W. Bush I guess. It's really easy for people to pick on him and it seems to be the thing to do these days. His approval rating seems to be low. However when a Bay movie comes out or an election year comes around, the majority of America still votes for him.

    Michael Bay - America's director. = P
  • Mister Hand
    Robert Fure said:

    "Michael Bay is like George W. Bush I guess... His approval rating seems to be low. However when a Bay movie comes out or an election year comes around, the majority of America still votes for him."

    Not to be overly argumentative, but George W. Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 and squeaked by with an extremely narrow margin in 2004.

    Merely pointint out a flaw in your analagy. No mas.

    I think it would be interesting to see the George W. Bush biopic one day, as directed by the Baymeister. He could detail how Bush has made stuff "blow up real good" for the last seven years, doing no one a lick of good with it.
  • I dont want to get way into politics, but in 2004 Bush won by a fairly significant margin in the largest turn out for an election ever. More than 50% of the voters voted Bush.

    I do, however, want to see Michael Bay direct a George Bush movie complete with Air National Guard hijinx and raucus drunk nudie parties.
  • Michael Bays new movie looks amazing, it is a breath of fresh air towards the animated series which has seen so many changes over the past years. i am waiting for the movie to come out, im dying to c it, it looks amazing, the visualz of the movie blew me away, fantastic recreations of robotic characters etc. heres a big fan wishing all the best to the crew nd producers and directors of Transformers the movie 2007
blog comments powered by Disqus