Comments on: Let’s Talk About Two-Face: Spoilers Ahead! http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php A Website About Movies Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Matt-hatter http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-169978 Matt-hatter Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:47:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-169978 the reason batman survived the fall is because he was wearing a frigging suit of armor, harvey was wearing normal clothing, so batman was protected from most of the fall, including the fact that he fell into some blanks and stuff which would have slowed him down ever so slightly, so batman had more chance of surviving then harvey did. the reason batman survived the fall is because he was wearing a frigging suit of armor, harvey was wearing normal clothing, so batman was protected from most of the fall, including the fact that he fell into some blanks and stuff which would have slowed him down ever so slightly, so batman had more chance of surviving then harvey did.

]]> By: Princein http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-107293 Princein Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:21:08 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-107293 As much as I'd like to believe Harvey two face is coming back, I know he's dead. I will admit his death scene was rather ambigous but I don't think that was the film makers' intention. The culprit? The editing room floor. They had to make a PG-13 movie that was already two and a half hours long. Cuts had to be made. They couldn't show Dent's neck breaking in half like a pencil nor could they have all this superflous dialouge "is he dead?" *checks pulse "yeah, he's dead!" So they put their faith in the audience's intelligence. I don't blame anyone for coming to this conclusion though. If you watch what happens after he falls Commisioner Gordon and Batman act as though Dent isn't even there, it's very bizzare and very anti climatic. Hopefully a Director's cut edition will come out this December showing the scene as the film maker's had intended it. As much as I’d like to believe Harvey two face is coming back, I know he’s dead. I will admit his death scene was rather ambigous but I don’t think that was the film makers’ intention.

The culprit? The editing room floor. They had to make a PG-13 movie that was already two and a half hours long. Cuts had to be made.

They couldn’t show Dent’s neck breaking in half like a pencil nor could they have all this superflous dialouge “is he dead?” *checks pulse “yeah, he’s dead!” So they put their faith in the audience’s intelligence.

I don’t blame anyone for coming to this conclusion though. If you watch what happens after he falls Commisioner Gordon and Batman act as though Dent isn’t even there, it’s very bizzare and very anti climatic.

Hopefully a Director’s cut edition will come out this December showing the scene as the film maker’s had intended it.

]]> By: Princein http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-197418 Princein Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:21:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-197418 As much as I'd like to believe Harvey two face is coming back, I know he's dead. I will admit his death scene was rather ambigous but I don't think that was the film makers' intention. The culprit? The editing room floor. They had to make a PG-13 movie that was already two and a half hours long. Cuts had to be made. They couldn't show Dent's neck breaking in half like a pencil nor could they have all this superflous dialouge "is he dead?" *checks pulse "yeah, he's dead!" So they put their faith in the audience's intelligence. I don't blame anyone for coming to this conclusion though. If you watch what happens after he falls Commisioner Gordon and Batman act as though Dent isn't even there, it's very bizzare and very anti climatic. Hopefully a Director's cut edition will come out this December showing the scene as the film maker's had intended it. As much as I’d like to believe Harvey two face is coming back, I know he’s dead. I will admit his death scene was rather ambigous but I don’t think that was the film makers’ intention.

The culprit? The editing room floor. They had to make a PG-13 movie that was already two and a half hours long. Cuts had to be made.

They couldn’t show Dent’s neck breaking in half like a pencil nor could they have all this superflous dialouge “is he dead?” *checks pulse “yeah, he’s dead!” So they put their faith in the audience’s intelligence.

I don’t blame anyone for coming to this conclusion though. If you watch what happens after he falls Commisioner Gordon and Batman act as though Dent isn’t even there, it’s very bizzare and very anti climatic.

Hopefully a Director’s cut edition will come out this December showing the scene as the film maker’s had intended it.

]]> By: destruct26 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-106760 destruct26 Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:59:31 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-106760 Nolan would have ruined Batman and his no killing rule if Batman, accident or not, pushed him off a freakin roof. Maroni survived a higher fall and still survived it. Nolan always wants you to see things exactly the way he shoots them, like his other movies. You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villian. Um, didnt Harvey die a hero, as Gordon and Batman covered up his mess, making that speech to the city? Didnt he live long enough to become the villian Two Face? A broken neck doesnt necessarily mean you die. Hurt, in pain, comatose- sure. And whoever made the comment that Ras was ninja-asassin trained AND trained Bruce/Batman- Yes, theres always a possibility he survived. Nothing was ever said in either movie about Ras, further, that they found a body, etc. And if Harvey was dead, it wasnt said by Bats or Gordon in that scene. No pulse check, nothing. Besides- Up until the memoriam/speech, NO ONE knew where Harvey was- the public and cops thought he was originally at the hospital, then inside the other building with the Joker. And when it the hospital incinerated, it could have been said that his ass burned down with it. A perfect cover-up. Alot is and has been left open to Two Face coming back, and it would be cool to flesh him out a bit, with another major villian. And yeah, i think the next logical love interest WOULD be Catwoman, or Talia. Lets give Brucie both of em, because thats a pile of hotness. Talia would be good, taking over the Leauge and screwing Batman royally. Remember JLA: Tower of Babel? She can destroy Gotham with technology that scrambles verbal communication and language neurologically & have the city crash that way, even BETTER than her fathers previous plan. Just an idea. Catwoman- mob boss Carmine Falcones (speculated) daughter, expert thief, straight from the pages of The Long Halloween, Dark Victory, and When In Rome. She can be the anti-heroine, steal, AND help Batman take down the rest of the mob, or Talia. okay screw it- BATMAN REALLY NEEDS TO GET LAID. Nolan would have ruined Batman and his no killing rule if Batman, accident or not, pushed him off a freakin roof. Maroni survived a higher fall and still survived it. Nolan always wants you to see things exactly the way he shoots them, like his other movies. You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villian. Um, didnt Harvey die a hero, as Gordon and Batman covered up his mess, making that speech to the city? Didnt he live long enough to become the villian Two Face? A broken neck doesnt necessarily mean you die. Hurt, in pain, comatose- sure. And whoever made the comment that Ras was ninja-asassin trained AND trained Bruce/Batman- Yes, theres always a possibility he survived. Nothing was ever said in either movie about Ras, further, that they found a body, etc. And if Harvey was dead, it wasnt said by Bats or Gordon in that scene. No pulse check, nothing. Besides- Up until the memoriam/speech, NO ONE knew where Harvey was- the public and cops thought he was originally at the hospital, then inside the other building with the Joker. And when it the hospital incinerated, it could have been said that his ass burned down with it. A perfect cover-up. Alot is and has been left open to Two Face coming back, and it would be cool to flesh him out a bit, with another major villian. And yeah, i think the next logical love interest WOULD be Catwoman, or Talia. Lets give Brucie both of em, because thats a pile of hotness. Talia would be good, taking over the Leauge and screwing Batman royally. Remember JLA: Tower of Babel? She can destroy Gotham with technology that scrambles verbal communication and language neurologically & have the city crash that way, even BETTER than her fathers previous plan. Just an idea. Catwoman- mob boss Carmine Falcones (speculated) daughter, expert thief, straight from the pages of The Long Halloween, Dark Victory, and When In Rome. She can be the anti-heroine, steal, AND help Batman take down the rest of the mob, or Talia. okay screw it- BATMAN REALLY NEEDS TO GET LAID.

]]> By: destruct26 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-197417 destruct26 Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:59:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-197417 Nolan would have ruined Batman and his no killing rule if Batman, accident or not, pushed him off a freakin roof. Maroni survived a higher fall and still survived it. Nolan always wants you to see things exactly the way he shoots them, like his other movies. You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villian. Um, didnt Harvey die a hero, as Gordon and Batman covered up his mess, making that speech to the city? Didnt he live long enough to become the villian Two Face? A broken neck doesnt necessarily mean you die. Hurt, in pain, comatose- sure. And whoever made the comment that Ras was ninja-asassin trained AND trained Bruce/Batman- Yes, theres always a possibility he survived. Nothing was ever said in either movie about Ras, further, that they found a body, etc. And if Harvey was dead, it wasnt said by Bats or Gordon in that scene. No pulse check, nothing. Besides- Up until the memoriam/speech, NO ONE knew where Harvey was- the public and cops thought he was originally at the hospital, then inside the other building with the Joker. And when it the hospital incinerated, it could have been said that his ass burned down with it. A perfect cover-up. Alot is and has been left open to Two Face coming back, and it would be cool to flesh him out a bit, with another major villian. And yeah, i think the next logical love interest WOULD be Catwoman, or Talia. Lets give Brucie both of em, because thats a pile of hotness. Talia would be good, taking over the Leauge and screwing Batman royally. Remember JLA: Tower of Babel? She can destroy Gotham with technology that scrambles verbal communication and language neurologically & have the city crash that way, even BETTER than her fathers previous plan. Just an idea. Catwoman- mob boss Carmine Falcones (speculated) daughter, expert thief, straight from the pages of The Long Halloween, Dark Victory, and When In Rome. She can be the anti-heroine, steal, AND help Batman take down the rest of the mob, or Talia. okay screw it- BATMAN REALLY NEEDS TO GET LAID. Nolan would have ruined Batman and his no killing rule if Batman, accident or not, pushed him off a freakin roof. Maroni survived a higher fall and still survived it. Nolan always wants you to see things exactly the way he shoots them, like his other movies. You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villian. Um, didnt Harvey die a hero, as Gordon and Batman covered up his mess, making that speech to the city? Didnt he live long enough to become the villian Two Face? A broken neck doesnt necessarily mean you die. Hurt, in pain, comatose- sure. And whoever made the comment that Ras was ninja-asassin trained AND trained Bruce/Batman- Yes, theres always a possibility he survived. Nothing was ever said in either movie about Ras, further, that they found a body, etc. And if Harvey was dead, it wasnt said by Bats or Gordon in that scene. No pulse check, nothing. Besides- Up until the memoriam/speech, NO ONE knew where Harvey was- the public and cops thought he was originally at the hospital, then inside the other building with the Joker. And when it the hospital incinerated, it could have been said that his ass burned down with it. A perfect cover-up. Alot is and has been left open to Two Face coming back, and it would be cool to flesh him out a bit, with another major villian. And yeah, i think the next logical love interest WOULD be Catwoman, or Talia. Lets give Brucie both of em, because thats a pile of hotness. Talia would be good, taking over the Leauge and screwing Batman royally. Remember JLA: Tower of Babel? She can destroy Gotham with technology that scrambles verbal communication and language neurologically & have the city crash that way, even BETTER than her fathers previous plan. Just an idea. Catwoman- mob boss Carmine Falcones (speculated) daughter, expert thief, straight from the pages of The Long Halloween, Dark Victory, and When In Rome. She can be the anti-heroine, steal, AND help Batman take down the rest of the mob, or Talia. okay screw it- BATMAN REALLY NEEDS TO GET LAID.

]]> By: Brandon Butler http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-105879 Brandon Butler Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:07:05 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-105879 I agree with this notion: in fact the basis of it is the only compelling sequel I can think of. The only thing I think I disagree with is the notion that Batman would be "in on" such a thing. I think that ends up firstly putting Batman up as too questionable too early in a sequel, and robs us of an oppertunity to have Batman looking into a conspiracy of what happened to Harvey Dent. It would probably be best that in the early next film it is stated that Harvey Dent died in hospital after suffering a fall, and Batman at first has no reason not to believe that this is true. But then a year or so later he comes to question this and finds out there was a conspiracy between the Mayor, a Governor, and even Gordon and some cops were in on it all. Knowing how Batman idolizes Dent he would disapprove, and of course Gordon would say that this was just the logical end of everything they had agreed to do concerning Harvey. Harvey, meanwhile, has other plans. I agree with this notion: in fact the basis of it is the only compelling sequel I can think of.

The only thing I think I disagree with is the notion that Batman would be “in on” such a thing. I think that ends up firstly putting Batman up as too questionable too early in a sequel, and robs us of an oppertunity to have Batman looking into a conspiracy of what happened to Harvey Dent.

It would probably be best that in the early next film it is stated that Harvey Dent died in hospital after suffering a fall, and Batman at first has no reason not to believe that this is true. But then a year or so later he comes to question this and finds out there was a conspiracy between the Mayor, a Governor, and even Gordon and some cops were in on it all. Knowing how Batman idolizes Dent he would disapprove, and of course Gordon would say that this was just the logical end of everything they had agreed to do concerning Harvey.

Harvey, meanwhile, has other plans.

]]> By: Brandon Butler http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-197416 Brandon Butler Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:07:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-197416 I agree with this notion: in fact the basis of it is the only compelling sequel I can think of. The only thing I think I disagree with is the notion that Batman would be "in on" such a thing. I think that ends up firstly putting Batman up as too questionable too early in a sequel, and robs us of an oppertunity to have Batman looking into a conspiracy of what happened to Harvey Dent. It would probably be best that in the early next film it is stated that Harvey Dent died in hospital after suffering a fall, and Batman at first has no reason not to believe that this is true. But then a year or so later he comes to question this and finds out there was a conspiracy between the Mayor, a Governor, and even Gordon and some cops were in on it all. Knowing how Batman idolizes Dent he would disapprove, and of course Gordon would say that this was just the logical end of everything they had agreed to do concerning Harvey. Harvey, meanwhile, has other plans. I agree with this notion: in fact the basis of it is the only compelling sequel I can think of.

The only thing I think I disagree with is the notion that Batman would be “in on” such a thing. I think that ends up firstly putting Batman up as too questionable too early in a sequel, and robs us of an oppertunity to have Batman looking into a conspiracy of what happened to Harvey Dent.

It would probably be best that in the early next film it is stated that Harvey Dent died in hospital after suffering a fall, and Batman at first has no reason not to believe that this is true. But then a year or so later he comes to question this and finds out there was a conspiracy between the Mayor, a Governor, and even Gordon and some cops were in on it all. Knowing how Batman idolizes Dent he would disapprove, and of course Gordon would say that this was just the logical end of everything they had agreed to do concerning Harvey.

Harvey, meanwhile, has other plans.

]]> By: Gramscist http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-104740 Gramscist Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:38:09 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-104740 I was amazed by how in-depth the discussions in here are. Inasmuch as I simply began immersing myself in the world of Batman after watching "The Dark Knight," I wonder if you would indulge me if I wold propose a somewhat prototype plot line for the next film, which would tie up the villains in the past two films: Let us presume that Ra's al Ghul (Liam Neeson), being the master ninja that he is, was still able to escape the crashing train, albeit highly injured. This is where the Lazarus Pit would enter. Then, having recovered, he now tracks on Batman, planning to take his revenge again or trying to convince him once more to rejoin the League of Shadows. Well for some weird reason concocted by my brain, he was passing by and saw Rachel Dawes tied up just before the explosion, then he rescues her to no one's knowledge. Or, she could have been in the explosion but for some weird reason again, survived yet highly injured and with amnesia. Either way, he might take care of her until she recovers, still not remembering who she really is. Ra's, having said his family was already gone in "Batman Begins", might take her in as her daughter and train her himself, transforming her into what would be Talia al Ghul. And then when he confronts Batman again, he'll be pitting her on him. And moral / romantic dillemma occurring, now how would it end I don't know. Or if she did survive without Ra's interfering, she still has amnesia and then adopted by a family (namely the Kyle family) to live as a street urchin, or a prostitute if you would. With that background, she'll become Catwoman. Now as to who will be casted for that role I'll leave it to them, but she has to be at least of the same ability as Pfeiffer's, maybe even superior. Well, I don't really know if that made sense, but what do you think? I was amazed by how in-depth the discussions in here are. Inasmuch as I simply began immersing myself in the world of Batman after watching “The Dark Knight,” I wonder if you would indulge me if I wold propose a somewhat prototype plot line for the next film, which would tie up the villains in the past two films:

Let us presume that Ra’s al Ghul (Liam Neeson), being the master ninja that he is, was still able to escape the crashing train, albeit highly injured. This is where the Lazarus Pit would enter. Then, having recovered, he now tracks on Batman, planning to take his revenge again or trying to convince him once more to rejoin the League of Shadows. Well for some weird reason concocted by my brain, he was passing by and saw Rachel Dawes tied up just before the explosion, then he rescues her to no one’s knowledge. Or, she could have been in the explosion but for some weird reason again, survived yet highly injured and with amnesia. Either way, he might take care of her until she recovers, still not remembering who she really is. Ra’s, having said his family was already gone in “Batman Begins”, might take her in as her daughter and train her himself, transforming her into what would be Talia al Ghul. And then when he confronts Batman again, he’ll be pitting her on him. And moral / romantic dillemma occurring, now how would it end I don’t know.

Or if she did survive without Ra’s interfering, she still has amnesia and then adopted by a family (namely the Kyle family) to live as a street urchin, or a prostitute if you would. With that background, she’ll become Catwoman. Now as to who will be casted for that role I’ll leave it to them, but she has to be at least of the same ability as Pfeiffer’s, maybe even superior.

Well, I don’t really know if that made sense, but what do you think?

]]> By: Gramscist http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-197415 Gramscist Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:38:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-197415 I was amazed by how in-depth the discussions in here are. Inasmuch as I simply began immersing myself in the world of Batman after watching "The Dark Knight," I wonder if you would indulge me if I wold propose a somewhat prototype plot line for the next film, which would tie up the villains in the past two films: Let us presume that Ra's al Ghul (Liam Neeson), being the master ninja that he is, was still able to escape the crashing train, albeit highly injured. This is where the Lazarus Pit would enter. Then, having recovered, he now tracks on Batman, planning to take his revenge again or trying to convince him once more to rejoin the League of Shadows. Well for some weird reason concocted by my brain, he was passing by and saw Rachel Dawes tied up just before the explosion, then he rescues her to no one's knowledge. Or, she could have been in the explosion but for some weird reason again, survived yet highly injured and with amnesia. Either way, he might take care of her until she recovers, still not remembering who she really is. Ra's, having said his family was already gone in "Batman Begins", might take her in as her daughter and train her himself, transforming her into what would be Talia al Ghul. And then when he confronts Batman again, he'll be pitting her on him. And moral / romantic dillemma occurring, now how would it end I don't know. Or if she did survive without Ra's interfering, she still has amnesia and then adopted by a family (namely the Kyle family) to live as a street urchin, or a prostitute if you would. With that background, she'll become Catwoman. Now as to who will be casted for that role I'll leave it to them, but she has to be at least of the same ability as Pfeiffer's, maybe even superior. Well, I don't really know if that made sense, but what do you think? I was amazed by how in-depth the discussions in here are. Inasmuch as I simply began immersing myself in the world of Batman after watching “The Dark Knight,” I wonder if you would indulge me if I wold propose a somewhat prototype plot line for the next film, which would tie up the villains in the past two films:

Let us presume that Ra’s al Ghul (Liam Neeson), being the master ninja that he is, was still able to escape the crashing train, albeit highly injured. This is where the Lazarus Pit would enter. Then, having recovered, he now tracks on Batman, planning to take his revenge again or trying to convince him once more to rejoin the League of Shadows. Well for some weird reason concocted by my brain, he was passing by and saw Rachel Dawes tied up just before the explosion, then he rescues her to no one’s knowledge. Or, she could have been in the explosion but for some weird reason again, survived yet highly injured and with amnesia. Either way, he might take care of her until she recovers, still not remembering who she really is. Ra’s, having said his family was already gone in “Batman Begins”, might take her in as her daughter and train her himself, transforming her into what would be Talia al Ghul. And then when he confronts Batman again, he’ll be pitting her on him. And moral / romantic dillemma occurring, now how would it end I don’t know.

Or if she did survive without Ra’s interfering, she still has amnesia and then adopted by a family (namely the Kyle family) to live as a street urchin, or a prostitute if you would. With that background, she’ll become Catwoman. Now as to who will be casted for that role I’ll leave it to them, but she has to be at least of the same ability as Pfeiffer’s, maybe even superior.

Well, I don’t really know if that made sense, but what do you think?

]]> By: Jimbob http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-102970 Jimbob Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:37:47 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-102970 After seeing TDK, I wasn't sure if Harvey was dead or not, so maybe he's still alive, but I think if they make another Batman movie, they definitely need one more villain, and a villain that would make the movie as powerful as TDK, plus Christopher Nolan said that he wants the movie to still be realistic, so no villains with powers Because of how insane TDK was, i hope there isn't a third movie, it would be impossible or really hard to make a batman movie better than TDK. The sequel was so good that it could have been the third movie of a trilogy, what would be cool is if they made TDK even longer and just split it in half, like Kill Bill Good observations on Christopher Nolan's work, I never noticed his tradmarks After seeing TDK, I wasn’t sure if Harvey was dead or not, so maybe he’s still alive, but I think if they make another Batman movie, they definitely need one more villain, and a villain that would make the movie as powerful as TDK, plus Christopher Nolan said that he wants the movie to still be realistic, so no villains with powers

Because of how insane TDK was, i hope there isn’t a third movie, it would be impossible or really hard to make a batman movie better than TDK. The sequel was so good that it could have been the third movie of a trilogy, what would be cool is if they made TDK even longer and just split it in half, like Kill Bill

Good observations on Christopher Nolan’s work, I never noticed his tradmarks

]]> By: Jimbob http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-197414 Jimbob Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:37:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-197414 After seeing TDK, I wasn't sure if Harvey was dead or not, so maybe he's still alive, but I think if they make another Batman movie, they definitely need one more villain, and a villain that would make the movie as powerful as TDK, plus Christopher Nolan said that he wants the movie to still be realistic, so no villains with powers Because of how insane TDK was, i hope there isn't a third movie, it would be impossible or really hard to make a batman movie better than TDK. The sequel was so good that it could have been the third movie of a trilogy, what would be cool is if they made TDK even longer and just split it in half, like Kill Bill Good observations on Christopher Nolan's work, I never noticed his tradmarks After seeing TDK, I wasn’t sure if Harvey was dead or not, so maybe he’s still alive, but I think if they make another Batman movie, they definitely need one more villain, and a villain that would make the movie as powerful as TDK, plus Christopher Nolan said that he wants the movie to still be realistic, so no villains with powers

Because of how insane TDK was, i hope there isn’t a third movie, it would be impossible or really hard to make a batman movie better than TDK. The sequel was so good that it could have been the third movie of a trilogy, what would be cool is if they made TDK even longer and just split it in half, like Kill Bill

Good observations on Christopher Nolan’s work, I never noticed his tradmarks

]]> By: B Dogg http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-102895 B Dogg Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:27:52 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-102895 Killer Croc is a possibility if he was just some strong man, surgically altered like this guy: http://growabrain.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/lizard_man.jpg If that guy's for real, they could make Killer Croc a possibility. Croc's character could be a pro fighter, that's his gimmick. Killer Croc is a possibility if he was just some strong man, surgically altered like this guy:
http://growabrain.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/lizard_man.jpg
If that guy’s for real, they could make Killer Croc a possibility. Croc’s character could be a pro fighter, that’s his gimmick.

]]> By: B Dogg http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-197413 B Dogg Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:27:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-197413 Killer Croc is a possibility if he was just some strong man, surgically altered like this guy: http://growabrain.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/lizard_man.jpg If that guy's for real, they could make Killer Croc a possibility. Croc's character could be a pro fighter, that's his gimmick. Killer Croc is a possibility if he was just some strong man, surgically altered like this guy:
http://growabrain.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/lizard_man.jpg
If that guy’s for real, they could make Killer Croc a possibility. Croc’s character could be a pro fighter, that’s his gimmick.

]]> By: Heath http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-102859 Heath Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:23:26 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-102859 I think Poison Ivy or Deadshot would be perfect for Nolans directing style. I think Poison Ivy or Deadshot would be perfect for Nolans directing style.

]]> By: Heath http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-197412 Heath Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:23:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-197412 I think Poison Ivy or Deadshot would be perfect for Nolans directing style. I think Poison Ivy or Deadshot would be perfect for Nolans directing style.

]]> By: Jack Sutt http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-102833 Jack Sutt Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:34:13 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-102833 I Believe Two Face, Joker and Scarecrow may be in the next film. If Two Face is still alive and Joker and Scarecrow have been caught by the police I think the next film will centre around Arkham Asylum. How cool would that be! Obviously Scarecrow would take a back seat in the film and Joker would have to be recast. So the real question is who will be the new villain to spring the previous villains out of the Asylum? I know that is a lot of villains but i think Nolan could handle it and that could make for yet another highly anticipated film. I Believe Two Face, Joker and Scarecrow may be in the next film. If Two Face is still alive
and Joker and Scarecrow have been caught by the police I think the next film will centre
around Arkham Asylum. How cool would that be! Obviously Scarecrow would take a back
seat in the film and Joker would have to be recast. So the real question is who will be the
new villain to spring the previous villains out of the Asylum? I know that is a lot of villains
but i think Nolan could handle it and that could make for yet another highly anticipated
film.

]]> By: Jack Sutt http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-197411 Jack Sutt Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:34:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-197411 I Believe Two Face, Joker and Scarecrow may be in the next film. If Two Face is still alive and Joker and Scarecrow have been caught by the police I think the next film will centre around Arkham Asylum. How cool would that be! Obviously Scarecrow would take a back seat in the film and Joker would have to be recast. So the real question is who will be the new villain to spring the previous villains out of the Asylum? I know that is a lot of villains but i think Nolan could handle it and that could make for yet another highly anticipated film. I Believe Two Face, Joker and Scarecrow may be in the next film. If Two Face is still alive
and Joker and Scarecrow have been caught by the police I think the next film will centre
around Arkham Asylum. How cool would that be! Obviously Scarecrow would take a back
seat in the film and Joker would have to be recast. So the real question is who will be the
new villain to spring the previous villains out of the Asylum? I know that is a lot of villains
but i think Nolan could handle it and that could make for yet another highly anticipated
film.

]]> By: B Dogg http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-102796 B Dogg Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:43:23 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-102796 Harvey Dent is dead. Two Face will live on. That is why they held the memorial. It was simbolic because they knew Harvey was now another person. Two Face should definitely be in Arkham. He doesn't necessarily need to be a simplified character after only revenge in the next film. He could also start to crave power. We know he's got some dough from Wayne's fund raiser, and perhaps he hires an army of thugs to help him take revenge on basically everyone (Batman, the cops, the crime families) and becames greedy and power hunger. We already know he is corruptible. Perhaps he becomes more corrupt with help of next introduced villian (Penguin, Riddler?) I don't think the arc is complete, and there is still development for his character. Also, if he escapes Arkham and ends up taking revenge on the city, they could clear Batman's name. Harvey Dent is dead. Two Face will live on.
That is why they held the memorial. It was simbolic because they knew Harvey was now another person. Two Face should definitely be in Arkham. He doesn’t necessarily need to be a simplified character after only revenge in the next film. He could also start to crave power. We know he’s got some dough from Wayne’s fund raiser, and perhaps he hires an army of thugs to help him take revenge on basically everyone (Batman, the cops, the crime families) and becames greedy and power hunger. We already know he is corruptible. Perhaps he becomes more corrupt with help of next introduced villian (Penguin, Riddler?) I don’t think the arc is complete, and there is still development for his character. Also, if he escapes Arkham and ends up taking revenge on the city, they could clear Batman’s name.

]]> By: B Dogg http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-197410 B Dogg Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:43:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-197410 Harvey Dent is dead. Two Face will live on. That is why they held the memorial. It was simbolic because they knew Harvey was now another person. Two Face should definitely be in Arkham. He doesn't necessarily need to be a simplified character after only revenge in the next film. He could also start to crave power. We know he's got some dough from Wayne's fund raiser, and perhaps he hires an army of thugs to help him take revenge on basically everyone (Batman, the cops, the crime families) and becames greedy and power hunger. We already know he is corruptible. Perhaps he becomes more corrupt with help of next introduced villian (Penguin, Riddler?) I don't think the arc is complete, and there is still development for his character. Also, if he escapes Arkham and ends up taking revenge on the city, they could clear Batman's name. Harvey Dent is dead. Two Face will live on.
That is why they held the memorial. It was simbolic because they knew Harvey was now another person. Two Face should definitely be in Arkham. He doesn’t necessarily need to be a simplified character after only revenge in the next film. He could also start to crave power. We know he’s got some dough from Wayne’s fund raiser, and perhaps he hires an army of thugs to help him take revenge on basically everyone (Batman, the cops, the crime families) and becames greedy and power hunger. We already know he is corruptible. Perhaps he becomes more corrupt with help of next introduced villian (Penguin, Riddler?) I don’t think the arc is complete, and there is still development for his character. Also, if he escapes Arkham and ends up taking revenge on the city, they could clear Batman’s name.

]]> By: Adam Sweeney http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/lets-talk-about-two-face-spoliers-ahead.php/comment-page-2#comment-102700 Adam Sweeney Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:45:34 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=8653#comment-102700 Didn't Gary Oldman give a hint in an interview that they're using the Riddler for the next film? Didn’t Gary Oldman give a hint in an interview that they’re using the Riddler for the next film?

]]>