Let’s Talk About Two-Face: Spoilers Ahead!

Posted by Brian C. Gibson (brian@filmschoolrejects.com) on July 22, 2008

Harvey Dent holding a coin

**Warning: This Article Contains Major Spoilers**

I’m sure by now that anyone who ventured into this post has seen the biggest movie of 2008, The Dark Knight. Judging by the box office numbers, rabid comments and critical reception that most of you would like to see a third film. Now everyone made the assumption that TDK would be The Joker’s film, and end by introducing a new villain in Aaron Eckhart’s Harvey “Two-Face” Dent. Now you know what happens when we assume…

I am going to make three assumptions. First, I am going to assume that you have seen The Dark Knight. Secondly, I assume that you might have been surprised about the death of Two-Face. Finally, that you are left wondering to yourself who will be the next film’s villain. Some names that have already come up (with some getting squashed early) are The Riddler, The Penguin, Bane, Deadshot, Two-Face and even The Joker once again. So who is it going to be? I think Harvey Dent will show his faces in the next film.

If Harvey “Two-Face” Dent is to be the next villain, that would have to mean he is alive, right? Did they ever say he was dead? Did you see a casket? All the film showed was a motionless body, and what seemed like a memorial service. Remember, Batman and Gordon are ready to lie about Harvey’s actions in order to preserve his reputation, so why wouldn’t they lie about his death? For all we know, Gordon could have transported Harvey to a maximum security cell in Arkham. Maybe Harvey is brooding in his cell right next to his new pal.

If Gordon and Batman were to conceal his death and lock him up in Arkham, that would give Two-Face even more of a reason to hate Gotham and its officials. Talk about ammunition for revenge, the guy would come out swinging. So go see the film again. If I remember correctly, Batman even said something like “Noone can ever see him like this.” Would you say something like that about a dead man? Everyone knows he is disfigured, but not everyone knows about his newly acquired vengeful and murderous personality.

One of the first things that led me to this conclusion is that Christopher Nolan has some director trademarks that point directly in this direction. First, Nolan has an obsession with pairs or the number two. In Memento, Leonard had two people trying to manipulate him throughout the film. In Batman Begins there were a pair of villains, both with dual identities/personas. In The Prestige there were two main characters which were both two men at sometime within the film (Borden as a twin, and Angier as a copy), and had both romanced two different women within the film. In The Dark Knight you see two good characters Batman/Gordon battling Joker/Two-Face, with Two-Face being a man with obviously two faces. Also Nolan has a repeating theme of fake deaths/coming back from death within his film. Ra’s Al Ghul ends up not being dead in Batman Begins. Borden cheats death in The Prestige. Gordon even faked his own death in The Dark Knight. So would it be too far fetched for a man with two faces to cheat death in Nolan’s newest film?

I guess the next question would be is Two-Face’s story arc complete? In other words, what appeal is left in bringing Two-Face back? I don’t doubt that we may see Harvey Dent again, but to what capacity is left to be seen.


| MovieBlips: vote it up! | Read more articles by Brian C. Gibson

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Alex
    Great points -- you're right, I just assumed Two-Face was dead, but Nolan certainly left the door open for him to come back. I honestly don't know why he chose to include the last part of the movie with Two-Face to begin with. He could've found a way to end the movie multiple times before it got to that point -- just seemed like he had a bit too much film than he knew what to do with.
  • ray
    I agree. I too was thinking that two-face was still alive with those exact points. No casket and no mention of death. If batman survived the fall why not two-face. It would be great to see him come back in the 3rd installment with the riddler or another mobster trying to take over say the penguin maybe.
  • David
    There may be a redemption factor for Two Face.You never know, Harvey is still alive in him somewhere and knows he isnt as dark as he made himself be after Dawes' death.AND i would HATE to see them try and replace Ledger's Joker with someone else.But then again,some said that about Nicholson's Joker.hmm....
  • Mikey
    Wow, never thought of it like that. It would be very interesting to see Two Face again tearing it up, it would be more interesting to see the Joker also(even though I don't want to, but something inside me really does). I'm hoping that there could be extra footage of Ledger's Joker that could be used in the next film if at all possible.
  • Mikey
    Oh yeah! I forgot to mention the scene where Lucius Fox tells Bruce that his suit can defend against cats. Could that be a future villain reference to Catwoman?! Maybe I'm just thinking too hard...
  • This is ridiculous. Dent and Two-Face are dead. When Batman says "No one can see him like this" he means Dent's legacy as a hero tarnished, not his disfigured face. And how is it not implied that Dent is dead. When he falls he's not moving and there's no time for Gordon to hide the body before the cops get there to chase Batman. The character was less interesting as Two-Face anyway. Dent was the more interesting character and he was consumed with revenge, guilt, and became violent. Batman would not have taken the fall for Dent's crimes if he was still alive.

    Furthermore, they need Joker for the next film. I know Ledger is gone, but he would've wanted the story told correctly. He cared about this story, and it's only complete if there's a Joker to tempt and tamper with this Batman. They recast Dumbledore when Richard Harris died. This is about the character, not the actor, and it's unfortunate what happened to Ledger, but the show goes on.

    Now let's address Bale getting arrested because he beat up his mother and sister...
  • I agree with you 100%. I see more reason to believe that two-face is alive then I do that he is dead.
    I think that the ending that they gave him in this film was perfect and much more compelling then Dr. Crane's riding away on the horse ending in Begins.
    Why in the world did everyone assume crane was dead? that didn't make much sense. Where as publicizing the death of Dent will make for a much more powerful re-entry in the next film. If in fact that's the direction they take it.

    Personally though, I am much more excited to see this film in IMAX again and when it is released on bluray over and over and over then I am to see the next sequel.
    This should hold us over for a while.
  • Diego
    To be honest, at this point, I have total faith in Nolan and crew. So whatever they decide to do with the Two-Face character, I'll support it and reserve judgment until I see it. But as far as my preference goes, I would honestly prefer that he stays dead. First of all, I think Harvey's character did all the progression to the story that he really can. I can't see how they could bring him back without reducing him to a simplified, "bitter and out for blood" kind of character. In The Dark Knight, Two-Face was a character who you couldn't help but empathize with. You understood his motives and you felt his pain. Secondly, there's the details about Two-Face's character that nagged me from the start. I remember first hearing that Two-Face would make an appearance and wondering how they would explain his extraordinary survival of such a horrific injury without interrupting my "belief" in what's happening in the movie. His introduction into the film didn't do much to ease that. The man is literally missing half of his face. Bone and muscle visible, tissue rotting. How could he live like that for a prolonged period of time? How could his left eye still function? Anyway, I don't think I'm being unreasonable. I'm just stating my opinion. Like I said, whatever direction they take a potential third film in this franchise, I'm all for it.
  • Jeremy M
    I agree with Josh Radde. 100%
  • Nate
    I think Josh is right too. Something else I would like to point out is the death of Rachel Dawes, which opens the door for Selina Kyle in the third film.
blog comments powered by Disqus