In Response to Spike’s 10 Most Overrated Directors List

Posted by Dr. Cole Abaius (cole.abaius@filmschoolrejects.com) on November 21, 2008

The Ten Most Overrated Directors?

Apparently, the fine folks over at Spike had nothing better to do this week, what with the election over and having already read all major scholarly works their local community college library had to loan out, so they decided to hash together a list of the Ten Most Overrated Directors. Unfortunately, there’s no link for it, because as of this point, it appears to have either 1) Been removed from the site or B) Never existed at all outside the drug-addled mind of the author of this piece. The link’s presence on Digg points toward the former. The talking totem pole to my left and my full sheet of acid tabs suddenly being half-full points toward the latter.

However, despite an intense psychotropic disadvantage, I’d like to take the FSR faithful, true movie geeks all, through Spike’s ill-conceived list – a list that might has well have been called Spike’s List of the Ten Directors That Spike Has Heard Of.

And here we….go:

10. Kevin Smith

Claiming that Kevin Smith is overrated is like saying that comic books are overrated. In fact, just like most directors on this list, Kevin Smith is completely accurately rated. The people that love his films are obsessed with them in the cult way, whenever he tries to take a serious turn people end up hating it, and a decent amount of the public are either unaware of him or find him too raunchy to care about. The more I think about the analogy, the more I think Smith is exactly like comic books. Loving his films makes you geeky, slightly smarter than those around you but no more popular, and gives you the urge to rip your shirt off and go fight crime. Or at least complain about working on a day you weren’t scheduled to work. And, yes, the correct response to seeing Smith on this list is, “He’s not even supposed to be here!”

9. M. Night Shyamalan

Now this is impressive. Had Spike’s list come out in 2001, it would have been the most prescient statement of the decade. People would have scoffed originally, claiming that Shyamalan had created two genuinely strong films, but by Lady in the Water people would have been applauding how correct Spike had been back in the day. Currently, Shyamalan is viewed as a director that had two to three great films and has steadily dropped off so badly that The Happening is considered the Funniest Comedy of 2008. He’s gone from visionary to hack within a decade – how is that overrated?

8. Quentin Tarantino

Oh, Spike, I bet you thought you were being really ballsy with this choice, especially considering that your core audience is men who still relive throwing that game-winning touchdown pass twenty years ago and frat boys who think Kurosawa is the sauce they put on their moo shoo. They worship QT, so putting him on the list was guaranteed to produce some angry responses and increased pageviews. Oddly enough, I think QT is a hack, but he’s definitely not overrated. I’m starting to see your pattern – cult directors that have intensely strong followings but are virtually unrecognized by the public at large. There are a few on the fringe that worship at the Idol of Cinema of Cool, but for the most part people see him as a talented man who borrows heavily from influences and has had his fair share of missteps. Crazy as a cartoon rabbit? Yes. Overrated? No, sir.

7. Wes Anderson

I get it. Anderson is the type of director where fans use the tried and untrue line that, “if you didn’t like it, you must not have gotten it.” And that sucks. Anderson’s fans suck. But Anderson doesn’t. Rushmore is fantastic. Bottle Rocket is a solid indie. The rest of his films have settled into similar themes and patterns, but the guy’s design eye is incredible and his ear for unconventional dialog is strong. Like the others, some people think he’s the Cinematic Second Coming and others think he’s a hack extraordinaire. So tell us, Spike, how can someone be both loved and reviled and also be overrated? Does that mean he’s also underrated? You are blowing my mind.

6. Judd Apatow

Wow. I could almost give you credit for this entry if it was an Overrated Producer’s list. But it’s not. He’s overexposed as a producer and has given the world a borderline-annoying troupe of comedic actors that are equally overexposed, but outside of some brilliant television work, Apatow has only directed two movies: Knocked Up and The 40-Year Old Virgin. I’m glad your list was on the internet, because there’s no way you could say those movies were bad with a straight face. He’s competent, has a unique take on R-rated humor, and his films (the one’s he actually directed) were liked by people both critically and commercially. You wishing you were funnier does not make Judd Apatow overrated.

5. Bryan Singer

So your argument is that Superman Returns was bad? Hell yeah, it was bad. It was so bad that it might as well have been directed by a blindfolded Ang Lee. Sidenote: Lee actually does some of his best work blindfolded. It’s a zen thing. Digressions aside, Singer gave us The Usual Suspects – a movie that most of your audience has posters of in their dorm room – and the first two X-Men films. Did you accidentally drop his name on this list while trying to place him at #5 on your Talented and Well-Liked Directors List? Speaking of which – what a lame title for a list. I could have pretended you came up with something better than The 10 Talented and Well-Liked Directors, couldn’t I? Maybe it’s because my mind is numb from trying to figure out how Singer made it on here. Or, you know, all the other entries.

4. The Coppolas

Francis Ford Coppola gave us two of the greatest films ever made. Ever. Therefore, he, by definition, cannot be overrated. Since no words of praise will ever quite encapsulate how incredibly talented or mind-bendingly fantastic those films are, it is quite literally impossible to rate him above how awesomely bad ass he is as a director. Plus, it is agreed by everyone that those films are two of the best films in the history of film. Since this is correct, he’s accurately rated. Sophia Coppola, on the other hand, you can put on the list without any argument from me – except she’s sort of the female Wes Anderson, and I don’t think there’s a huge swath of the population that thinks she’s brilliant. In fact, it’s probably closer to the truth that the exact right amount of people who should like her work, like her work and the exact right amount of people that find it boring, wandering and pretentious find it a lot like they find your list.

3. Steven Spielberg

Now we’re just getting ridiculous. Do I even have to write a rebuttal paragraph for this or can we all just agree on how moronic his inclusion on the list is? Oh, we rhetorically can? Sweet. Moving on.

2. Tim Burton

You’ve finally given me something of a challenge, although I have to assume you’re the type of people that think Burton directed The Nightmare Before Christmas because you don’t know any better. Burton could be said to have driven himself into a thematic rut – the subdued colors, the continual casting of the same actors, the Gothic romance angles – and there are some who are starting to lose faith in the guy. However, it would take someone with a What-Have-You-Done-For-Me-Lately attitude to consider him overrated. Over a 37-year career, the man has given us some average flicks and a few that completely blew our minds. He’s earned the status of a visionary, and even though he’s knee-deep in passion projects that appeal to a much narrower audience, he’s still delivering for their (and subsequently our) expectations. It’s difficult to overrate an artist when you know exactly what to expect from him – and sometimes, just sometimes, he delivers more creatively than you thought possible.

1. George Lucas

Either you’re attacking a sacred cow or hopping on the bandwagon who find Lucas to be easy prey nowadays. Also, kudos for getting me to use the word ‘nowadays’ in an article. But no kudos for topping your list with Lucas. At this point in his career, the guy is thoroughly scorned by those who were his strongest fans for what he’s done to their favorite franchises. How can a guy so hated be overrated? Loyal Fanboys aside, the average person hasn’t even heard of him (to the gasps of Star Wars geeks) and loathed by former geeks who feel betrayed. His street cred is in the gutter. By this point in your list, I shouldn’t be surprised that your logic is completely unsound.

Seriously?

Congratulations to you, Spike, for grabbing some Diggness and for further proving that you have almost zero cinematic knowledge. If you were going to make a list of overrated directors, why not make a list that creates a conversation? Choose directors like Orson Welles – best known for the most overrated movie of all time – Ron Howard – who remains more average than outstanding – Hitchcock – who had a huge amount of flops amongst the few classics he’s remembered for – Clint Eastwood – who studios think should have every film he helms up as Oscar Bait – Kurosawa himself – who some feel had no ear for dialog or concept of editing skill – Pasolini – who is either a genius or the worst filmmaker ever – Wolfgang Petersen, Gus Van Sant, Kubrick.

I’m not saying that all these directors are overrated, but at least there are arguments on both sides of the fence for them. There’s no way to realistically argue that the directors you chose are overrated. So thanks for a great laugh over here at the FSR offices. I needed something to lift my spirits after watching Big Fish on DVD tonight. That flick always makes me cry.


Read more articles by Dr. Cole Abaius

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • It's all so very remote... It's a very ambitious list. More like something you'd find on a personal blog than a site like Spike. I guess that's what makes it so special. And why they took it down quick-smart. Dumbasses.
  • I would never consider Speilberg overrated. He's over-exposed, but his films are judged fairly. He's always been a consistently good story-teller and engaging director, granted his films are always 30 minutes too long. So he may have a bloated ego, but over-rated he is not. Great article Cole. You nailed it, especially with Apatow.
  • David G
    EVERYONE of these guys, but LUCAS, belongs on this list. They've given us one great movies and then a couple of good ones... and then some decent ones...and the some very very bad ones that seemed like they were just playing around with their money to throw it in our faces.
  • MacEachaidh
    I consider Spielberg well overrated, but I guess it depends on what you're looking for from a movie.

    He's clever with set-pieces, has a great feel for the visual and the timing within a sequence, but I would say he quite specifically *isn't* a good storyteller because he consistently sacrifices narrative logic and consistency in his characters to set up his "wow!" moments. It's a huge flaw that, for my subjective tastes, has crippled every one of his movies.

    That said, I'd have to acknowledge that any list of the most memorable screen moments in American film really should include a fair proportion of Spielberg sequences. But as to whether you rate his films highly overall, I think it depends on whether you see a flick as simply a container for moments of spectacle, or whether you want some congruence in the plot to justify the "wow!". It's the latter that I reckon Spielberg stumbles on, pretty much every time.
  • Drew
    I LOVED THIS ARTICLE.
    Thank you for that.
    I have lost any (and future) respect that i might have for spike......Go FU** yourself spike.
    Having coppola on the list is a serious mistake.
    Thanks for those rebuttals. Very Good.
  • You can't call George Lucas an overrated director. He's made six or so films. One is just downright weird but had some interesting stuff. One was very deservedly praised. Star Wars changed film as we know it on multiple levels.

    Then he didn't direct again until Phantom Menace. People act like he's directed all this stuff but he HASN'T and his efforts at directing the prequel trilogy are universally mocked. So you just can't call him an overrrated director at all. As you've said, he's very accurately rated.

    My vote is for Hitchcock.
  • blackmanjew
    i think steven speilburg should be #1 on the list i hope he never makes a sci fi alien movie again
  • I can see that there is an argument for Hitchcock being overrated but I just feel that even the not-so-good films he directed are worthy of note and if Francis Ford Coppolla can be defended because he made the first two Godfathers (Which he can) Then I feel that the many masterpieces of Hitchcock outweigh the weaker films.
  • This may be the best article I've read all week. Major kudos to you, Cole. Smart, witty, and so damn right on the money. I applaud you.
  • Mathieu Lalonde
    I agree, Speilberg is overated. He makes good movies but his "direction" is nowhere close to groundbreaking.

    As for the rest, 8 of the other 9 don't belong on this list -- and George Lucas, although overated, isn't much of a director to begin with... Overated movie mogul perhaps?
blog comments powered by Disqus