Editorial: Is the Iraq War Propelling the Superhero Film Phenomenon?

Posted by Dr. Cole Abaius (cole.abaius@filmschoolrejects.com) on September 11, 2008

Without stating directly that the Iraq War is the sole cause for a boon in superhero films, based on our American cultural history, box office numbers, and the self-evident explosion of superhero films that took place after the war began, it seems clear that it’s a major factor in one of the largest business trends in recent Hollywood history.

In 1938, a man was sent from a distant planet in order to protect the people of this earth against the waves of evil that were crashing down all around us. His now-legendary red and blue tights sparked a revolution in story-telling that’s only intensified over seventy years. It’s no secret that while Shuster and Siegel’s character impacted popular culture, it’s also been noted that the historical environment – especially those of organized crime and World War II – had a strong impact on Superman as well. It’s no surprise that at a time of economic distress, black market violence and the looming, inevitable war people needed a hero.

Two things seem clear in our current age: 1) With economic distress, a popular culture that instills the fear of crime in us, and two wars with no end in sight, we still need a hero and 2) Thanks to the movie industry, we have plenty.

The cultural catalyst of Superman sparked a movement that has become a massive, billion-dollar empire that stretches beyond the box-lined pages of comics. Comic Superheroes launched into films almost immediately with The Adventures of Captain Marvel in 1941 and serials featuring fan favorites like Batman, The Phantom, and the Man of Steel himself. The trend limped along into the 60s with the theatrical Batman adaptation of the television show, and then grew in the 1980s (alongside the comic book re-invigoration) with Tim Burton’s Batman movies, the Superman franchise which spun off a Supergirl movie, and darker characters like Dick Tracy and The Shadow.

However, the true explosion of comic-book superhero movies has only come recently. Beginning with X-Men in 2000, whose success was a strong incentive to other movie studios, we’ve had the pleasure of seeing twenty-one comic book-based, superhero movies with twelve more slated within the next three years. This summer alone saw the release of three major superhero films – one of which quickly broke a fistful of records to become the 2nd highest grossing film of all time. Basically, even if Howard the Duck is considered a comic-based, superhero movie, more superhero movies have been made and released since the start of the Iraq War in early 2003 than in all the years prior combined.

Whether that’s due to the popularity of the medium or the age range of adults who grew up with comic books lending itself to higher ticket sales is difficult to tell. Both factors, as well as many others, have a hand in creating this phenomenon. However, I would argue that our being at war (two of them currently) is one of those major factors.

There are two ways of viewing the trend of superhero films over the past 67 years. One – as a sporadic fad, fading in and out of popularity every few years. Two – as a slowly growing trend that has gained in momentum since the beginning with drought years from time to time. Either way, one can’t deny the explosive rate at which their popularity has grown since 2003. This may be a coincidence, but at the very least, there is a noticeable correlation between the trend and the start of the Iraq War.

It’s no surprise that the main factor in the superhero film phenomenon has been sales, but one has to question why sales have been so high. Why have these types of movies been so popular? Early films like X-Men and Spiderman were released or already in production before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the lead up to the start of the Iraq War in 2003. Clearly, the groundwork had already been laid, but it seems reasonable to assume – especially in light of the historical correlation of Superman in World War II – that war and terrorism have given audiences a new reason to fall in love with the Saviors with Super Powers.

In the 1990s, there were 6 superhero films released. There were 2-per-year in 2000, 2001, and 2002. Then, in 2003, correlating with the beginning of the war, that number jumped to 4-per-year. It then held steadily at 3 or 4 per year until this year’s 8 superhero movies scheduled for release.

Add to that the box office numbers – well over $3 billion in supercash domestically since 2003 – and its clear that a grand cultural shift took place in the United States after realizing it was going to war. As that war has continued, so has the trend. That equates to an average of $176.4 million in domestic gross per movie (with outliers on both ends) versus an average of $137 million from 1992 through the massive outlier of Spider-Man in 2002. If the date is shifted to compare releases after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the average then becomes $182.6 million vs. only $107 million during an equal time span in favor of post-9/11 superhero films. That’s a $75.6 million difference in average alone – a sign that audiences are heading in droves to superhero films, gas prices be damned.

Obviously, the numbers can be skewed a bit and only serve to further bolster the intense popularity of the re-emerging superhero film trend since 2000. It goes without saying that, as cultural trends go, it’s difficult to understand exactly why they take place or what facilitates them. However, the correlation in timing between the Iraq War and the superhero trend coupled with the knowledge that war was one of the primary causes of the popularity of the comic medium to begin with, make a strong case that our current military exercise is at least partially – if not mainly – responsible for the resurgence of movies with tights-wearing, super-powered heroes.

What do you think? Is the Iraq War helping to propel the popularity of Superhero films?


Read more articles by Dr. Cole Abaius

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Correlation does not equal causation. Movies in general serve as escapism from any situation. I would say the Iraq War has no more or less an effect on movies in general than any other external stimulus. In regards directly to superhero movies, I see no real connection between them, especially with comic movies like Watchmen, Hellboy, Batman, etc. The argument for Spider-Man, with all its out of place New York love and patriotism, is a stronger one.
  • JMoney
    You make a strong point, but i think technology is the real catalyst for this surge, 15 years ago we couldn't see spiderman swinging from his webs or nightcrawler disappearing into thin air, or iron man flying around kicking ass. well we could se it but it wouldn't have looked realistic.

    So your argument may hold some value, but i think the technological advancement is the main reason these films have been successful
  • Carl Lee
    I'm going to disagree with the previous two commentators, but I'm not going to agree with you completely.

    Like you said, superhero movies had been in motion since the late 90's and I attribute their "surge" to the same reasons why comics sell wildly in times of crises, they remain relevant. This is the case with any good film, so long as its what everyone else is saying (under their breath), it will sell at the box office. Our current situation lends itself to comics and superheros very easily. In act of terrorism is comparable to the villains that splash chaos all over our favorite pages, and any good comic book character should responds to those events. Do you remember how much the Black Cover of Spider-man sold after 9-11? We related to Spider-man because we were helpless, just as he; he/we couldn't do anything but join forces and pick up the pieces of a broken city. The 8 superhero movies have a number of factors contributing their success, but their duty is the same as any good media, their meant to inspire, resonant, and even provide a little shelter from a world we sometimes choose to escape. The themes of comic books have successfully carried over to another medium; just as they opened-up to us then, they're opening-up to everyone else now.
  • Sam
    I'm in the middle on this one. I can see your points, and I know where they're coming from but you're taking out of factors to make your argument. The fiscal success alone is a perfect reason for why there are more superhero movies. The XMen & Spiderman had successful cartoon franchises through out the 90s (and before, sure), and, as you said the movies were in production before the war / 9/11. What this means is that pretty much anyone born in the 80s and into the nineteens grew up with these cartoons, even if they didn't necessarily read the comics. All this leads up to the financial success of those two movies.

    Now I'll probably catch some shit for this, but I didn't really think either of them were amazing movies. Xmen was enjoyable, and it may be my bias of never liking cyclops but I thought James Marsden overacted (throughout the series). I really don't like Tobey Maguire. That's a little of topic, but my point is that neither of these movies where as good as their sequels (in my opinion) but they were still the culmination of the kids who are now young adults who are the target audience with disposable income's desire to see their childhood heros from comics and/or tv coming to the big screen. And they did well. So the studios in Hollywood did what any semi-conscious business man would have done, and saw the developing trend and started cranking out superhero movies.

    I think it might have been here that I was reading someone talk about how in the late 80s before batman came out, everyone was batshit (no pun intended) insane wearing batman paraphernalia everywhere leading up to the opening night. You can probably make comparisons there to the sociopoliticaleconomic environment.

    We all know why people love superheros, especially evident in early comic heroes, it's a classic struggle of good versus evil. The creation of the antihero is only really an association thing. People feel more jaded now and find it hard to relate to someone that isn't (at least, I think so). But this theme is not unique to superhero movies. People doing retardedly exceptional things is a common theme. If you're going on the whole impossible odds / saving the city/world, etc themes present in comics (ignoring the social outcast theme in xmen), you might as well call the Die Hard series superhero movies. The terminator series, as well.

    The only difference in my mind is the trend that is supporting it. We have superheros now, the 90s had different heroes, and the 80s too. For some reason the 80s loved teens and little boys. I don't know what the hell is up with that, but whatever.
  • I agree that it's a correlation, but it's a strong enough correlation that I think it merits at least a decent impact on what's happening. Money is the main factor, but there's a reason behind the money. That reason, I believe, is the state of the world propelling us to hit not just to the movie theaters, but to certain types of shows.

    Perhaps the strongest argument that superhero films are specifically seeing that impact - and not just escapism in general - is that the industry is seeing a downturn in profits while superhero films are seeing a massive upswing. People are going to the movies less, but going to superhero movies more.

    It's understandable that the trend could be more of the same from Hollywood, but for all realistic trend-tracking, most have strength for a few years and fade away. Superhero films, by contract, exploded right at the point when they should have been waning. By all counts, we're in the 8th year of the trend and it's reaching incredible new heights. This might not even be the crest, especially with 12 more flicks coming out by 2012.

    However, I really can't argue the other points. Technology really is a predominant factor. One could easily say that we are proportionally blown away by whatever technology is presented to us (the children of the 50s were in awe of film then, too) but technology has jumped forward so quickly recently that it has to have had an effect on the industry, specifically with the FX-heavy films of superheros.

    I also think that the coming-of-age of comic book fans is a major factor.

    Still, as the Iraq War has changed the national mood significantly, I think it's clear that it, at least by way of shifting culture, has had a strong impact on what we look for in art - and what we're looking for, based on the numbers, is more superheroes.
  • JMoney
    But how do you explain the international success?

    For example, Canada is not at war with Iraq, has not been attacked by terrorists and yet these movies are just as successful up here. We are in Afganistan but that really hasn't gripped the country's attention like Iraq has in the US. Not to mention all the other countries where these movies are huge hits as well.
  • Sam
    I would be very interested to see the number of people downloading bootlegs of the movies and see the comparison on the interest in film. One of the things I hear about superhero movies constantly is that they are a movie 'you have to see in theaters' because of the action / explosions / jessica alba. Action movies get/got this treatment to a pretty large extent as well. Other movie genres which the average film goer / watcher wouldn't mind on the big or small screen may suffer from (as much as I hate to say it) piracy, because people don't think it's worth spending the 11-13$ to watch it in a theater.

    I don't know the numbers, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a large number of the less-successful box office movies that were heavily downloaded. Don't get me wrong, there are also a huge number of people bootlegging the superhero movies too, but I think you see my point.

    That being said, who knows, the less 'popular' genres may be suffering in all aspects of consumerism.

    What I find interesting over the last x number of years is the slump in the number of large release science fiction movies. This may also be a factor in the sense that people are either too 'jaded' for scifi, they want something that holds little to no ground in 'reality' and thus the similarily thematic superhero genre has young adult/teens flock to it. Obviously BSG and the star wars movies sort of disagree with that point, but if you look to the 70s and 80s, and probably into the early 90s, there were a shit ton of scifi movies, ranging from the kid-conquers-evil Last Starfigher to the woman-conquers-evil Alien trilogy. Maybe the comparison I'm making is unfair since both sci-fi and comic literature borrow a lot from each other, thematically / stylistically / etc. The Space Race died out and so the interest in sci fi crashed, where as comics were still culturally relevant. Who Knows. I just don't see that these kind of genres (sci fi, superhero, super-action hero) really being all that different, and all of them have been highly successful over the years. But maybe I'm just looking at it wrong.

    Anyway, I would agree with you that the war(s) probably do play a factor into all of it, I'm just not sure that it's THE factor.
  • JMoney, you bring up a really good point about international success. My only response to that is that Canada copies everything the US does. Not really. It's a good point, a solid one that definitely draws into question the level of impact the war is having. I'd be interested to see how well these films are doing compared to the average in Canada and other countries.
  • ¿uoods
    I must say I mostly disagree with this. Aside from the general escapism which might hold some water there are several other factors to consider;

    The technology needed to realistically portray several of these figures. Special effects have exploded in the past 10-15 years, to the point where they can be believable on the screen. Many people have stated wanting to make these characters for years before hand, and were just waiting for the technology to catch up to them.

    Lets not forget marvel and dc have in recent years started producing films themselves, hell marvel even has its own studio branch now. That's made a huge impact.

    It is also noteworthy worthy that many helmers now are/were actual fans of the source material. Taking the films much more seriously then guys trying to make a buck. And in general much more truer to the source material. (Lets all ignore catwoman.)

    So the war is IMO only a minor factor in this.
  • PlanBFromOuterSpace
    While I see what the author is trying to say, his points are just a little too broad. For instance, if you substitute "Superhero movie" with "Tyler Perry movie", a lot of the same points hold true, to a lesser extent, but still very true...

    "Either way, one can’t deny the explosive rate at which their popularity has grown since 2003. This may be a coincidence, but at the very least, there is a noticeable correlation between the trend and the start of the Iraq War."

    I agree with some of the previous comments, like how it's more a matter of everything finally coming together all at once (the technology, Marvel getting out of bankruptcy and getting some movies made, the source material being recognized as not just being kid's stuff, etc.), all just in the last few years. The superhero movie explosion isn't going to continue because of the war or anything relating to it, nor would it have stopped if the mission really WAS accomplished a half a decade ago.
blog comments powered by Disqus