Commentary Track: Is Anyone Safe When Variety Fires Anne Thompson?

Posted by Brian C. Gibson (brian@filmschoolrejects.com) on January 26, 2009

Thompson on Hollywood

For many film journalists, today was a return to normalcy. Most film journalists, much like our own intrepid editor Neil Miller, braved the parties, open bars and blogger fights to give us our amazing Sundance coverage. Today though would be sure to bring back the cruel reality of the daily work grind. For Anne Thompson though, today was the day she would be dismissed from Variety.

Anne Thompson was the Deputy Editor of Variety.com. She has been involved in a number of prestigious publications such as The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Observer. She has contributed for a couple other publications that have historically not been so kind to the online community – The Hollywood Reporter and Variety. She found a place in my heart though, with her blog Thompson on Hollywood. It was her willingness to embrace the future of journalism that has earned her so much respect in the internet realm.

She has had a great impact on the journalism community, not just by showing some of us the way but also showing some of the old school dogs some new tricks. When most big outlets fail to mention online outlets, Thompson goes out of her way to make sure the little guys are known. She gives notice to the online outlets, and pays respect on a regular basis. That is more than you can say for most other “legitimate journalists.” She is the bridge between the old way and the new way. Thompson’s ever-growing legacy will be validated by her professionalism, insight and voice in the community. This has already become enough of a love letter though, I digress.

What is to fear though, is the impact that this has for the future. What does it mean that one of the most insightful figures in the film community is silenced by the largest publication in said community? By removing someone who is a champion of online journalism, does it signal the end for Variety’s gamble on the internet? Can we expect a faux-Thompson in exchange? Does this mean that Variety holds no stock in the internet? Or is this simply just a casualty of the economy?

This argument is not completely in vain though, because as Thompson has stated on her own blog that Thompson on Hollywood will continue to be. Said no better than the woman herself,

“What will continue is the Thompson on Hollywood blog. Variety and I are in talks about continuing to host the blog, but I am also fielding other interest.”

Though she is not gone forever, her absense from the ranks of Variety is both frustrating and frightening for someone in the film journalism community. Not that I would ever put myself in the same ranks as Anne Thompson, but she is someone whom I have come to respect and admire greatly. Enough with my psuedo-love letter, but I’d seriously love to sit in on one of her classes. I will be looking forward to what she still has in store, because as she said “Stay tuned. The blog isn’t going anywhere”


Read more articles by Brian C. Gibson

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • I read her column everyday and was shocked by the news today. Hopefully she'll find another good paying writing gig soon..
  • you see this all over the media world.. it's cheaper to pay new grads and bloggers per story than retain full-time journalists. it might be the future of the industry, but it's a sad day for the future of journalism
  • I have no doubt that she'll land on her feet. She's an incredible journalist, and she'll probably keep her audience even without Variety behind her.

    Anne, buy a URL for $7 and go to town.
  • Mathieu Lalonde
    BTW, speaking of internet journalism...

    "Is Variety signaling that their done with the internet by firing the journalist who has championed it the most?"

    You must yave meant: "that they're done with(...)"

    right? ;-)
  • No, he didn't mean that. He's unaware of the difference.
  • thank you, I have never heard of sarcasm before either :) . It never amazes me, how many people love to point out grammatical/spelling errors...
  • That typo was intentional. To keep sticklers engaged in the article.
  • 790
    Variety sucks!
blog comments powered by Disqus