A Lesson Learned: Fans Want Familiarity

Posted by Adam Sweeney (adam@filmschoolrejects.com) on March 10, 2009 Share

lesson-watchmen

In our continued effort to understand the American moviegoer’s psyche, we uncover a diamond of truth revealed to us this weekend during the Watchmen premiere. At the expense of throwing away originality, we love stories that we already know.

Zack Snyder’s adaptation of the greatest graphic novel of all-time has received the most polarizing set of reviews we have ever seen. Some critics are calling him a visionary, others a hack that choked the life out of Alan Moore’s work of art. All you needed to know of what many moviegoers wanted from the film can be explained by a brief story regarding a screening I was at this weekend.

With about twenty minutes left in the film, ten or so people stood up and walked out. A few of them started booing, oddly enough to about half of the crowd’s delight. Those who hated the film might explain this reaction by pointing to the flaws of the film, which there certainly were more than a few. But I have never seen that many people walk out of a theater on an opening weekend, not even during awful films like Mission to Mars or Blair Witch 2.

The reaction from some people after the film was similar. One girl said that the film was “not full of enough action for a comic book film,” which leads me to my point. Watchmen is a victim of expectations set before it in a genre that only recently tried to break the mold. As popular as Alan Moore’s work is, there were plenty of people who went to see the film without a clue of what it was about. They watched the trailer and saw a superhero film, only to be disappointed to find a movie that was focused on the human flaws of characters that try to fly too close to the Sun. The average fan won’t likely admit it, but they wanted more Fantastic Four and less of a thinker’s film. They wanted something they knew.

Even Zack Snyder himself is guilty of attaching himself to works that have a previous fanbase. Dawn of the Dead? Remake. 300? Has a cult following. And we already discussed Watchmen. Snyder grasped tightly to a double-edged sword when choosing to do Watchmen. If he stuck to the original artwork and dialogue, he wasn’t breathing any life into the story. If he strayed from Moore’s vision, he was a bastard that couldn’t stay on the path ingeniously laid before him. So what did we get? The middle. It’s a case of Hollywood playing it safe, which again makes our case.

Any opponent of this opinion needs to only look at the top films of each year since 2000. Here’s a quick rundown of the champions of familiarity.

2000 - The Grinch (Adaptation of a classic Dr. Seuss book)
2001Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone (Top-selling children’s book)
2002Spider-man (One of the 4 most famous comic book titles around)
2003Return of the King (Adaptation of Tolkien classic novel)
2004Shrek 2 (A sequel and reason for Eddie Murphy to make an ass of himself)
2005Revenge of the Sith (Star Wars’ final film effort to bridge the Skywalker story)
2006Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest (More of Johnny Depp in eyeliner)
2008The Dark Knight (Christopher Nolan exorcises the demons of the Ghost of Schumacher’s Past)

Every single leader has a fanbase built to sell tickets. This tells us that while American film lovers like to pretend they want new stories, new characters and new reasons to go out to the movies, they are – in reality – in love with what they know. It makes sense. We may be free thinkers but we are still animals. The herd mentality is honestly the only way I can explain why people continue to go see Tyler Perry in those pathetic Madea Goes to films. That and the fact that we love cross-dressers, which we discussed last week in A Lesson Learned.

The sad truth is that Hollywood isn’t going to stop their own version of recycling any time soon. We’ve already seen a My Bloody Valentine and Friday the 13th remake in the past two months. This week we are treated to a re-wrapping of Last House on the Left. In this economy, they are going to play it as close to the chest as possible. They can do that by spoon-feeding us the same stories that we’ve already seen, and the worst part of it all is that we will go running back into theatres to watch. Until we elevate truly groundbreaking films to the top of the theatrical totem pole, Hollywood will continue to sing the same song. If past is prologue then it appears we will continue to hum along.

Related Posts with Thumbnails


Read more articles by Adam Sweeney

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • James Bradford
    I find all of the articles and comments referencing 300 rather funny. The central conceit being that somehow Watchmen and 300 were similar books and thus would be similar movies with similar fan bases, audiences and draws.

    This is nonsense.

    300 is the kind of book that Hollywood should be adapting, its basically an awesome storyboard with the scripting already inserted. 300 is not a deep character piece using super-heroes to meditate on the duality of mankind staring into the abyss, its about 300 tough dudes kicking some ass.

    Its not difficult to judge which one will be a huge draw. 300 and Sin City are very cinematic in book form, and for the most part exist as a whole on the plot level without delving into the philosophical places that Hollywood films abhor (outside of award season).

    Watchmen, however, does not. As has been stated many times in the past few weeks the plot is really secondary to what it evokes in the characters and in the reader itself. This is something that is difficult to translate via celluloid-- especially to an audience who (fans aside) are expecting "slow-motion superhero action" .

    For me I guess that means I still am unsure of how I feel about this movie, so as said before me, I guess I'll wait for the directors cut.
  • Jeff
    Familiarity is not necessarily a bad thing though. Heck, even playing the "I am not part of the herd" card is pretty much being part of the herd these days. I did not care for the Watchman Novel so I am not feeling an urge to rush and go see it in theaters.

    Curious about the movie though??? Yeah sure

    The fact for many (and its not a bad thing) we want our "Good guys" and we want them to be THAT GUY. It seems like almost every "Good guy" these days has to die even if its a remake (3:10 to Yuma) or they have to wear a black hat and have some serious "Issue" which in my opinion is REALLY getting lame. Yeah...Ok I get it.

    Once again Adam a great article, if I go see Watchman I will give you a call or something. Pat might be seeing it tonight. (I warned him about "blue man junk" lol
  • Agreed, you could tell who had read the comics by those that were shocked at seeing a big blue naked guy. The response at my local theater was positive, some were confused it wasn't a "Super Hero' film but no one left early or booed. I would have told them to shut the hell up if they had, not that I was a big fan of the book, but the fact that it stuck to the source material impressed me.
  • I agree that Watchmen should have been an HBO mini-series...on the other hand we have yet to see the director's cut along with the version that has Black Freighter added to it...you never know it could be a different experience when viewing those other versions...
  • I think that's a good point that you bring up. When did every sequel automatically have to be as good as the predecessor? If the first film is quality, that creates quite a bit of pressure for the following projects, especially if there are seven more of them (Deathly Hallows being cut into two.). Haha.
  • I absolutely loved LOTR: Return of the King, but I think this mentality is why it won every Oscar for which it was nominated. Not that it didn't deserve them, but it just would not have gotten the attention it did if it hadn't been part of a series. But at the same time, the "more of the same" mindset means that we expect (or at least hope that) sequels will be at least as good as their predecessors. I've lamented about Harry Potter sequels on this board before, but they're perfect examples. They come from a book series, so we already have high expectations. The first movie was an excellent translation, so that raised our hopes even higher. Second movie, third movie... not quite as good, but still pretty decent. Fourth movie... much too short, subplot threads went nowhere. Fifth movie... every kid actor forgot how to act (which I firmly believe was the director's fault). It's as if WB has decided we'll watch every last movie no matter how bad it is... like ERoBB said, they EXPECT us to be lemmings and watch whatever crap they throw at us. And gods forgive me, when it comes to Harry Potter, I probably will. lol
  • he didn't want to alienate the fans...and wanted to respect Moore's vision...like you said it's a double edged sword...people have been saying this for years it's a graphic novel that really works best as a comic rather than a movie...it's going to gain that cult status because we're more than likely going to be flooded with the same ol' cookie cutter superhero movies from now on...it was nice to see a film try to break the superhero archetypes...good, bad or just ok the film was a different take on the genre...
  • I enjoyed the film, for sure. I don't want it to seem like I don't. At the same time, I don't think the film from a directing perspective was risky. I am happy Snyder stuck to the script. Did he do it at the sake of letting the film itself breathe? I think so. I would still say it was about as good as you could make Watchmen, which should have been a mini-series, in my opinion.
  • Filmmaking isn't an exact science. If nobody thought Watchmen was going to make a lot of money, why are there so many articles saying that it is shocking that it didn't outperform 300?
  • The editor HAS FIXED IT.
blog comments powered by Disqus