Commentary Track

50 Best Book to Film Adaptations

Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.com) on April 26, 2006

Here is a cool link that keeps with the “blog” nature of our site. Jason Kottke, master of all that is blog, has posted a list of the “50 Best Book to Film Adaptations” ever. It is his adaptation of a list written by Mark Brown of The Guardian. Here is a small snippet of the list, if you would like to see the rest click on the link above and see for yourself:

1. [BM] 1984
2. [BM] Alice in Wonderland
3. [M] American Psycho
4. Breakfast at Tiffany’s
5. Brighton Rock
6. Catch 22
7. [BM] Charlie & the Chocolate Factory
8. [M] A Clockwork Orange
9. [BM] Close Range (inc Brokeback Mountain)
10. The Day of the Triffids

This raises an interesting and eternal question for all movie fans: What is your favorite Book to Film Adaptation? Or maybe, what is your Top 5? My personal list would look something like this:

1. Jurassic Park
2. Lord of the Rings (any of the 3)
3. The Godfather
4. The Princess Bride
5. The Wizard of Oz

What does your list look like?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,


| MovieBlips: vote it up! | Read more articles by Neil Miller

Related Reading:

  • No Related Post

Discover More:
Commentary Track


22 Comments

Tara says:

I totally agree with The Godfather pick since I’ve read that one.

I’d also say that Gone with the Wind did a great job bringing that huge book to life but yeah it did leave out the fact that she had two other children with her first two husbands. Other than that though I think it was a great adaptation and followed the narrative and characters well.

Hmm how about the first Harry Potter too, that was the only HP film that stayed closer to the book.


Brian says:

I’d have to say my favs are A Clockwork Orange, and American Psycho…the movies didn’t shy away from the controversy that the books created, and became extremely controversial themselves…not to mention they were good movies


Brian says:

Oh, and Sin City was an amzing translation from graphic novel to screen


The big O says:

The Learning Tree was great due to the fact that the author made the movie, so I’d have to argue it for being #1 simply for that reason. Also kind of a nod to the author and director, R.I.P. Gordon Parks.


Dani says:

I really suck as an English major considering I haven’t read and of those books except half of Catch-22 and Heart of Darkness, but I haven’t seen their movie adaptions. My favorite movie on that list is Fight Club, though I’ve never gotten around to reading the book. Maybe I should…and American Psycho was one creepy ass movie. I should read that book too.


Brian says:

American Psycho the novel isn’t actually creepy at all, and if you pay close attention to the the movie, the plot is laced with humor. The film or book weren’t really meant to be creepy or horrific, the story is a satirical look at the 80’s. The book is awesome and the movie follows it very well if you look deep enough.


The big O says:

“My favorite movie on that list is Fight Club” See what I mean, of course it is, it is a fake ass situation that makes white guys look ultra cool by not including anyone of color. Like in my post about that lucky # crap, the reason you liked fight club is because it was fake if it was real some black, hispanic, or asian dude would have knoccked either of those clown the fuck out during the first fight scene. If you don’t believe me GO WATCH BOXING, K2, OR ANY MARTIAL ARTS TOURNAMENT IN THE WORLD.


Brian says:

Chuck Norris’ tears cure cancer…too bad he’s never cried


Neil says:

“it is a fake ass situation that makes white guys look ultra cool by not including anyone of color.”

It’s a movie… It is supposed to be a “fake ass situation.”

And why does every movie have to include a black person? Not every movie has to include a white person… I mean, here is a social experiment for you, Big O: why is it that in every movie about slavery (Roots, Amistad, etc.) is every white person made out to be the most evil scum of history…? Not every white person owned slaves.

I guess my point is twofold:

1. Not every white person is a racist.
2. Not every movie is made with intentions to suppress the amount of black actors in it.


The big O says:

In Amistad the main white person was President John Adams. Not evil scum of the earth in my book. I know not every white person is racist, anyone who thinks that is retarded. But alot of the big players in Hllywood definatly seem to be. As to your second point I didn’t say that they do maybe you should reread my post. As a parent it sure gets tiresome going to all these whitewashed kids movies have you seen the preview for ‘Hoot’ it’s like that MadTV skit about Dawsons Creek called ‘Pretty white kids with problems’. My point is proved constantly I mean look at People magazines most beautiful people in america, see anything missing???? Look at the cover of the new Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue, notice anything missing?? As for your “fake as situation being that way due to a movie” that movie wasn’t on planet Krroozyyyk was it?? No, it was on earth and it wasn’t a fantasy flick either so why not put people of color in it?? I’ll tell you why because you can only make a fighting movie where the white guy wins if you either, a.) make it before people of color were allowed to box (like that contender crap) or b.) completely leave people of color out of the movie. We all saw ‘the longest yard’ and we all knew that Sandler’s team would only win if ……….., I won’t even say it you know what goes there. Please, I’m trying to be completely honest and objective here can you do me a favor by not kidding yourself??

“Not every movie has to include a white person” true, but can you name a single hollywood movie that doesn’t???? Good luck.

Roots is about slavery, slave owners are the scum of the earth, I’m not sure what you were trying to prove there. Rosewood, Malcolm X, Mississippi Burning and other such movies are historical pieces if you don’t like the things that people used to do, then that is an amazing reason for you to take it upon yourself to never let it happen again. If you thinkl this is an argument that you can win, then more power to you but I think the evidence is so stacked in my favor that your task is heculean. Again, Good luck. I’m not a racist, I’m mixed myself so there are whites in my family and I love and cherish everyone of them, but I do take every opportunity to educate them on reality. Thanks for listenin, no hard feelings on this side and I hope that it is the same on yours.


Neil says:

Absolutely no hard feelings, Big O. And this isn’t really an argument that I am trying to “win.” I don’t know if this is an argument at all, but rather a discussion.

I think you make very interesting points about how Hollywood is run, and you are correct (to a point) about how Hollywood is filtered through a racially tinted lens.

But I think that sometimes you are very quick to crucify any film with an all-white cast, especially one set in “reality,” such as Fight Club or Slevin. I don’t know if that’s fair. There are places in America where you don’t meet to many black people, just as there are parts of America where you don’t see many white people. So I don’t know if it is always a racially based decision when it comes to casting, they may just be playing to the environment in which the film is set. Agree?


The big O says:

Yeah I agree to an extent. I just think that in america in 2006 no one should have to go to the movies and come out like “well, what about me???”. It’s acting that means anyone can act like anyone else and if it was fair already than I’d have no problem with anyone playing anyone else. You may find this hard to believe due to my other posts but Eli Wallach did an amazing job playing a mexican in the Good, the Bad and The Ugly and also in The Magnificent Seven, in case you didn’t realize, he’s a Jewish cat, but he’s a great actor. So if an elementary school can have the Pevensies as one white kid, one black kid, one hispanic kid, and one asian kid, I think hollywood can too. I broke my heart taking my son to that movie and having to explain to him why the absense of brown people, because kids have the sweetest most innocent look on their face when they ask you things like that, and I couldn’t help but feel like I’m tainting his view by trying to explain our exclusion. You’re right I like the term discussion better.


Neil says:

It is sad, I won’t argue with you there.

But then again, unfortunately neither of us is making the decisions. All we can do is watch, and criticize… Which if you haven’t noticed, is my favorite thing to do… ;)


The big O says:

yeah, mine too. :) Probably why I like the site.


Neil says:

I’m glad you like it… Keep those “discussions” coming.


Dani says:

Ummmm…I like Fight Club because of the psychology of the narrator and all of his neurotic one liners, not because I’m thrilled about the fact there are no actors of color. The narrator could have been played by Chris Rock or John Leguizamo for all I care, but then inevitably someone would have been like “Why do black/latino/asian people gotta play crazy characters?” That has nothing to do with anything at all.

Minorities are severely underepresented in Hollywood, and when they are cast, it’s in stereotypical roles. However, I’m not going to dislike a movie just because all of the main characters are white, unless it’s a movie by the KKK in which case the movie can burn in hell. It would be nice to see more minorities in starring roles, but only if it is done naturally and not accompanied by a plethora of hype because then it just kills the mojo of the movie, in my opinion…like when everyone was hyped about seeing Halle Berry’s boobs in Swordfish. They didn’t have to focus on making it a fantastic movie because they knew they’d sell tickets on Berry’s boobies alone. I just wish people would be cast based on their skills and not the color of their skin so nobody would make a big deal about it. (Idealistic naiviete, I know, but a girl can dream, can’t she?)


Neil says:

Well said, Dani…


The big O says:

“However, I’m not going to dislike a movie just because all of the main characters are white” I understand that, and I agree with Neil, well said. However, maybe your attitude would change if you went to see a movie like the Narnia one with a group of brown children and had to field questions like the one I mentioned my son asking. It is easy to seperate yourself from something that doesn’t directly affect you.

“I just wish people would be cast based on their skills and not the color of their skin so nobody would make a big deal about it. (Idealistic naiviete, I know, but a girl can dream, can’t she?) ”
By all means dream away, but, it is just that, a dream and a naive one at that, white people outnumber everyone else like 8 to 1, so there needs to be an effort made to include people of color in the movies that hollywood is expecting us to purchase admission to. And yes even if it means taking a role from an actor that may be more qualified, those are the sacrifices that must be made to promote EQUALITY. When the numbers are so stacked in one sides favor, then yes others need to be included at the expense of the “majority” ( i put that in quotations due to the fact that it only applies in this country, and maybe Europe and Russia too).

It was real nice when I got out of high school and was applying to Washington, I got in because of my mind, but I will not deny that my skin color had alot to do with it. I’m sure there was a white applicant with the same or better grades, I took his/her spot, and I didn’t lose 1 second of sleep over it and shed not a tear. The way that my people were treated as recently as 40yrs ago lets me sleep so damn good at night, as I think it is more than deserved, shit, I’m still waiting for my 40 acres, they can keep the mule.


The big O says:

Here’s an experiment for you, go watch a “black” movie or television show, do you see white people in every single one??? Now go and see a “white” movie or television show, is there a black person in every single one??? I’ve seen friends, NO black people ever (although I could only stomach about 5mins, but I have girlfriends that watch and they’ve told me that that and shows like it and will and grace are just total odes to caucasians, lol).


Daniel says:

I don’t know how he could have forgotten to put Lord of the Rings on that list. Or is it too obvious?


Cole.Abaius says:

I look at the last ten years of film making as a decade to cheer for joy at how far we’ve come in including racial diversity, and then immediately heave a sigh for how much father we still have to go.

As far as the main topic - and leave it to book readers to start having an intelligent discussion on this site! - I would add The Shining and Silence of the Lambs. And a ton of Bond films. And I’ll go ahead and say Watchmen even though it’s not out because I will love it no matter what.


Michele’s Movie Center » 50 Best Book-to-Film adaptions says:

[...] read more | digg story [...]


Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!