The Batman Movie You Didn’t Know About

Posted by Dr. Cole Abaius (cole.abaius@filmschoolrejects.com) on July 13, 2008

Every Sunday, Film School Rejects presents a movie that was made before you were born and tells you why you should like it. This week, Old Ass Movies presents:

Batman (1943)

As a rule, my original concept for Old Ass Movies was to spotlight films that were made before 1960. It’s fairly arbitrary – like most things around here – but I wanted to stick to it. So, when we were gearing up for The Dark Knight, and often-dictator-like Editor Neil Miller wanted me to do this feature on the camp-tastic 1966 version of Batman starring Adam West that we all know and love, I didn’t want to.

Don’t get me wrong. I use shark-repellent on a daily basis, but Adam West’s Batman seemed too “new” to be an Old Ass Movie.

So instead, I decided to head all the way back to the beginning, to the very first time that the Dark Knight found himself shining gloriously on the silver screen.

If it was even possible to get campier, back when superheroes donned cartoonishly padded costumes and racial slurs were the norm, Batman found Bruce Wayne (Lewis Wilson) jauntily masquerading in the fight against evil doctors, low-budget zombies, and ridiculous plot-lines. The bulk of the plot involves Batman and Robin’s (Douglas Croft) fight against the diabolical Dr. Daka (J. Carrol Naish), a Japanese scientist and master of espionage. His master-plan involves setting up shop in Gotham City and turning the best scientific minds into brain-washed zombies that will help him secure the chemical components needed for an atomic super-weapon. World domination. The usual.

You should be warned that this movie (a serial to be more accurate – 15 episodes stringing together to create a story that’s over four hours long) isn’t something you’ll want to watch for its own merit. The sets are laughable, the writing is terrible, and each episode is essentially the same story told in a different location and with Bats fighting a different number of henchmen. It’s something to make you cringe at our cinematic history or to revel in how far we’ve come.

You should also be warned that it’s really racist. As in, really, really racist. Ethnic slurs about the Japanese are thrown around like Bat-a-rangs, and the standard message is that the government was correct in tossing every Japanese-American indiscriminately into internment camps. It can be a bit startling to hear that sort of thing used so naturally and casually,

But if you think it didn’t have an impact on the superhero genre or on the Batman story itself, you’re completely mistaken.

This is the first time we see the Batcave – a dark lair where Batman controls his crimefighting from a stylish, antique oak desk. Until this point, the Alfred of the comic was obese and drove Bruce and Dick around even when they were in costume as Batman and Robin. The comic actually adopted the look of actor William Austin who played Alfred in the movie – thin, witty and mustachioed.

So it does have some internally redeeming features. If nothing else, Batman 1943 is another evolutionary step in a long journey that has created one of the most humanly complex superheroes to date, and it can’t be overlooked simply because it was an early, awkward step.

It’s melodramatic, made on a dime, and despite what the narrator says about Batman’s “somber costume” striking “terror to the heart of many swaggering denizens of the Underworld,” it’s more likely that they would have been subdued by how laughable lycra stretched over pillows looks on a full-grown man.

Nevertheless, it’s worth the effort to check out, especially if you consider yourself a true Bat-fan.


| MovieBlips: vote it up! | Read more articles by Dr. Cole Abaius

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Officer Murphy
    ...for some reason you really didnt sell me on this flick
  • Well, if you thought this one was bad, check out the 1949 Batman serial. Bats wearing boxers - visible under his tights - and holds hands with Robin in a scene that would send Dr. Wertham into apoplexy. Stately Wayne Manor is a one story with aluminum siding in the heart of the suburbs - but the Batcave remains as large and foreboding as ever.

    The actor playing Bats performs his stage combat revealing training straight out of the Gotham ballet. On the upside, there's tons of footage of mid 1940s sedans.
  • Hank M.
    They didn't have 'lycra' back then, old chum, it was more likely a woollen suit.
  • filmbandit
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_(film)

    why don't you learn something about the place serials had in pop culture before telling a bunch of uninformed and context-compromised readers how stupid the batman serial is.
  • "The Douche"
    I knew of this, in fact, I own the VHS with this on it...good times.
  • John Thomas
    LOL, you got some really good picks for sure on that article! Well done.

    JT
  • nickolas66
    This is actually the birth of the camp-tastic '66 Batman. Hugh Hefner would gather friends to watch, heckle, and laugh at this old serial... which lead to the idea for the tounge-in-cheek TV show.
  • randomreader
    Before going too far off the deep end about the anti-Japanese commentary in the serial, try to remember that it was _1943_, the middle of WWII, and only a bit before that the Japanese had launched a sneak attack on Hawaii (look up pearl harbor attack, it'll be all over google) and people were afraid of an invasion of the west coast of the U.S. I think people can be forgiven for any racist commentary given the times.
  • @ randomreader

    No, thank you. I won't give a pass to racism simply because it was based on fear. Aren't most morally deplorable things?

    The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941. The state of hysteria at the time in the US was disgusting, and under the microscope of history we can see how wrong our response to our own citizens was - we've even issued formal apologies and money to Japanese-Americans that were placed in internment camps.

    I don't think the racism in Batman is malicious, though. It's just ignorant.

    Much like assuming I'd have to google to know what Pearl Harbor is.

    Back to fun movie stuff now? Awesome.
  • Oh, and Hank M. - good call on the Lycra. I doubt that the filmmakers had the budget to build a time machine and head for 1959 when Lycra was invented to grab some.

    I'll check into it, but you're probably right about it being wool. Thanks for the tip!
blog comments powered by Disqus