Will Scott Pilgrim’s Cinematic Fight Scenes Be Animated?

Posted by Rob Hunter (rob@filmschoolrejects.com) on February 4, 2009

wrightpilgrim-1

One of the more anticipated films due out next year is Edgar Wright’s Scott Pilgrim vs. The World.  Based on an ongoing comic book series by Brian Lee O’Malley, the movie stars Michael Cera as the title character forced to battle the seven evil ex-boyfriends of the girl he loves (Mary Elizabeth Winstead).  It’s easy to picture Cera slacking off, moping around, and pining for the girl… but can anyone actually see him fighting?  An interesting possibility has arisen that may make that question moot.  Cera may not need to break a sweat at all.

The photo above is from Wright’s MySpace blog where he posts a picture a day.  Many of them have had to do with the new film (and many others seem to focus on coffee cups…) including pics of cast members, scripts, and various Toronto locales. Granted, the picture could be just about anything.  Animatic storyboarding?  Opening credit sequence?  Or perhaps, just maybe, could it be test animation for one of the film’s many fight sequences?  Hmm?  Consider the evidence.

1) Co-star Brandon Routh recently spoke with Collider and revealed the movie is a mix of “real people and drawn animation” which admittedly isn’t saying much, but I don’t see him saying that if the animation was relegated strictly to the credit sequence.  There are no animated characters in the film, and there’s no reason to believe the actors are playing against animated backdrops like in the “classic” Cool World.

2) Look at the picture above!  Cera’s coif is unmistakable in the silhouette on the left!

3) Seriously, try for just one second to imagine Cera throwing a punch or a kick.  Do you see his gangly, uncoordinated arms connecting with anything aside from the banana stand wall?

Well?  Thoughts?  (I never said I had a lot of evidence…)  The movie could easily pop into a live action/animated mash-up each time Pilgrim goes head to head with an ex.  It makes stylistic sense based on the film’s source material, it helps the film stand out from other comic adaptations, and it keeps Cera from having to break a sweat.  Everybody wins.

This is just a theory, and a hare-brained one at that. True or not though, this movie is guaranteed to be awesome.


Read more articles by Rob Hunter

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Mal Reynolds
    I hope this movie fails. I love scott pilgrim with all my heart (issue 5 out today!) but nothing fills me with more rage than the idea of michael cera standing in scotts shoes. Scott Pilgrim is out going, funny, a loud mouth, and a fighter and a lover, Michael Cera plays one character in every movie, a pussy, shy, indy rock wuss who gives everyone who doesnt shop at main stream clothing stores a bad name. This film is a horrible idea and Michael Cera is horrible person, i dont blame him for making bank but dont piss on things I love dude.
  • I love Scott Pilgrim,too - but I'm not super angry about Michael Cera being cast. He seems like the obvious choice for people who don't really understand the character, and he's a hot commodity, so it makes sense.

    I have faith in Wright, but you made your point really well.
  • Deadcowporn
    Not to nitpick (lies), but wouldn't it be Book 5? And yes, Cera does play the exact same character in everything. But wouldn't a mad-scientist type genius of Wright's caliber be able to elevate anyone into seeming like a demi-god?
  • Hair-brained theory or not, it's a damn good idea.
  • Cera's typecast. Seth Rogen's typecast. I swear, you could take the character they play in one film and you'd mistake him to be playing the same guy in every other film. Name, living situation, the whole she-bang.

    You know that Jason Statham cameo in Collateral? That's what Rogen and Cera have befallen - they show face and you assume, "Hey, he's the pot-smoking guy who got that hot chick pregnant before, or possibly after, he did that thing with the porno with the other kinda hot chick and THAT might have been before or after he was a dumb-shit cop and had a bitch of a wife who wouldn't let him hang out with Matt Dillon."

    I'm just ranting now. But it's unintentional continuity, their being typecast. Why can't we keep the same Colonel Rhodes when they're giving Seth Rogen the "cute, lovable, dumb-ass" role in every friggin comedy post 2000?
blog comments powered by Disqus