<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will &#8216;Mission: Impossible 4&#8242; Self Destruct In 2011?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hart444</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-159864</link>
		<dc:creator>hart444</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-159864</guid>
		<description>Abrams should direct MI4.  That fucker was off the chain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abrams should direct MI4.  That fucker was off the chain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobHunter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-159865</link>
		<dc:creator>RobHunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-159865</guid>
		<description>Hmm, interesting comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, interesting comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balls Deep in Film</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-153311</link>
		<dc:creator>Balls Deep in Film</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-153311</guid>
		<description>Only on the internet can you read people&#039;s opinions of other people&#039;s opinions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Way to go, Rob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only on the internet can you read people&#39;s opinions of other people&#39;s opinions.</p>
<p>Way to go, Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobHunter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-143917</link>
		<dc:creator>RobHunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-143917</guid>
		<description>Hmm, interesting comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, interesting comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balls Deep in Film</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-143915</link>
		<dc:creator>Balls Deep in Film</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-143915</guid>
		<description>Only on the internet can you read people&#039;s opinions of other people&#039;s opinions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Way to go, Rob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only on the internet can you read people&#39;s opinions of other people&#39;s opinions.</p>
<p>Way to go, Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-143893</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-143893</guid>
		<description>Solid movies all around. I&#039;m game for another. What&#039;s wrong with 2? It wasn&#039;t 1, it didn&#039;t try to be like 1. Balls to the wall action film. If you can&#039;t tune in and chill out while stuff blows up for two hours then you completely missed the point of the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solid movies all around. I&#39;m game for another. What&#39;s wrong with 2? It wasn&#39;t 1, it didn&#39;t try to be like 1. Balls to the wall action film. If you can&#39;t tune in and chill out while stuff blows up for two hours then you completely missed the point of the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-228504</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-228504</guid>
		<description>Solid movies all around. I&#039;m game for another. What&#039;s wrong with 2? It wasn&#039;t 1, it didn&#039;t try to be like 1. Balls to the wall action film. If you can&#039;t tune in and chill out while stuff blows up for two hours then you completely missed the point of the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solid movies all around. I&#039;m game for another. What&#039;s wrong with 2? It wasn&#039;t 1, it didn&#039;t try to be like 1. Balls to the wall action film. If you can&#039;t tune in and chill out while stuff blows up for two hours then you completely missed the point of the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertFure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-143892</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertFure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-143892</guid>
		<description>Part 1 - Ok.&lt;br&gt;Part 2 - Shit.&lt;br&gt;Part 3 - Awesome.&lt;br&gt;Part 4 - Count me in.  Tom Cruise is awesome.  People who hate Tom Cruise are idiots.  He is MAVERICK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part 1 &#8211; Ok.<br />Part 2 &#8211; Shit.<br />Part 3 &#8211; Awesome.<br />Part 4 &#8211; Count me in.  Tom Cruise is awesome.  People who hate Tom Cruise are idiots.  He is MAVERICK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertFure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-228503</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertFure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-228503</guid>
		<description>Part 1 - Ok.Part 2 - Shit.Part 3 - Awesome.Part 4 - Count me in.  Tom Cruise is awesome.  People who hate Tom Cruise are idiots.  He is MAVERICK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part 1 &#8211; Ok.Part 2 &#8211; Shit.Part 3 &#8211; Awesome.Part 4 &#8211; Count me in.  Tom Cruise is awesome.  People who hate Tom Cruise are idiots.  He is MAVERICK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-143860</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-143860</guid>
		<description>If you are a fan of the original &quot;Mission: Impossible&quot; television series, then all three films are severely disappointing. The only film which came vaguely close to evoking the old television show was the first film by Brian de Palma. The last two films are nothing more than generic action movies starring Tom Cruise. The original television show was NOT an action series. It focused on clever plots and constant suspense.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a fan of the original &quot;Mission: Impossible&quot; television series, then all three films are severely disappointing. The only film which came vaguely close to evoking the old television show was the first film by Brian de Palma. The last two films are nothing more than generic action movies starring Tom Cruise. The original television show was NOT an action series. It focused on clever plots and constant suspense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-228502</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-228502</guid>
		<description>If you are a fan of the original &quot;Mission: Impossible&quot; television series, then all three films are severely disappointing. The only film which came vaguely close to evoking the old television show was the first film by Brian de Palma. The last two films are nothing more than generic action movies starring Tom Cruise. The original television show was NOT an action series. It focused on clever plots and constant suspense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a fan of the original &quot;Mission: Impossible&quot; television series, then all three films are severely disappointing. The only film which came vaguely close to evoking the old television show was the first film by Brian de Palma. The last two films are nothing more than generic action movies starring Tom Cruise. The original television show was NOT an action series. It focused on clever plots and constant suspense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reebee7</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-143859</link>
		<dc:creator>Reebee7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-143859</guid>
		<description>I liked the third a lot, but it felt like a fitting end. He&#039;s married, happy, retired (I guess they left that open).  I don&#039;t think i want to see him be brought back in, again... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the third a lot, but it felt like a fitting end. He&#039;s married, happy, retired (I guess they left that open).  I don&#039;t think i want to see him be brought back in, again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reebee7</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-228501</link>
		<dc:creator>Reebee7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-228501</guid>
		<description>I liked the third a lot, but it felt like a fitting end. He&#039;s married, happy, retired (I guess they left that open).  I don&#039;t think i want to see him be brought back in, again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the third a lot, but it felt like a fitting end. He&#039;s married, happy, retired (I guess they left that open).  I don&#039;t think i want to see him be brought back in, again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-143854</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-143854</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think M:I 3 is the best of the three!  
Additionally M:i:3  was a box-office disappointment, compared with the second film&#039;s worldwide gross of $545 million and the original film&#039;s take of $452 million </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think M:I 3 is the best of the three!<br />
Additionally M:i:3  was a box-office disappointment, compared with the second film&#039;s worldwide gross of $545 million and the original film&#039;s take of $452 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-228499</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-228499</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think M:I 3 is the best of the three!  
Additionally M:i:3  was a box-office disappointment, compared with the second film&#039;s worldwide gross of $545 million and the original film&#039;s take of $452 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think M:I 3 is the best of the three!<br />
Additionally M:i:3  was a box-office disappointment, compared with the second film&#039;s worldwide gross of $545 million and the original film&#039;s take of $452 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJL</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-143856</link>
		<dc:creator>TJL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-143856</guid>
		<description>With every M.I film Cruise&#039;s love interest gets younger. 
What teenager are they going to pair him up with this time? 
Is Dakota Fanning available? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With every M.I film Cruise&#039;s love interest gets younger.<br />
What teenager are they going to pair him up with this time?<br />
Is Dakota Fanning available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJL</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-228500</link>
		<dc:creator>TJL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-228500</guid>
		<description>With every M.I film Cruise&#039;s love interest gets younger. 
What teenager are they going to pair him up with this time? 
Is Dakota Fanning available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With every M.I film Cruise&#039;s love interest gets younger.<br />
What teenager are they going to pair him up with this time?<br />
Is Dakota Fanning available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-143846</link>
		<dc:creator>Random-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-143846</guid>
		<description>Im interested only because I want to find out what they were stealing in MI3. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im interested only because I want to find out what they were stealing in MI3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/will-mission-impossible-4-self-destruct-in-2011.php/comment-page-1#comment-228498</link>
		<dc:creator>Random-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=45752#comment-228498</guid>
		<description>Im interested only because I want to find out what they were stealing in MI3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im interested only because I want to find out what they were stealing in MI3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 572/578 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-14 00:10:21 -->
