Will ‘Mission: Impossible 4′ Self Destruct In 2011?

Posted by Rob Hunter (rob@filmschoolrejects.com) on June 18, 2009

abrams-cruise-impossible

Few people thought it would happen (and even fewer want it to) but it looks like Paramount has greenlit a fourth Mission: Impossible film with Tom Cruise.  Per Variety, Cruise and J.J. Abrams will be co-producing the sequel with a possible 2011 release date.  There’s no word on a director yet, but odds are Abrams will pass on the gig in favor of the follow-up to this summer’s blockbuster Star Trek reboot.

Opinions on the first three films vary but can be summed up as follows… blind love for Brian DePalma’s part one, intense hatred for John Woo’s part two, and general indifference to Abrams’ part three.  This saddens me because it reveals just how out of synch most movie-goers are.  In reality, the first Mission: Impossible movie sucked and the affection for it can only be chalked up to nostalgia or faulty memories.  Come on people, that helicopter in the tunnel sequence was ridiculous and poorly realized effects-wise.  M:I 2 is lambasted mercilessly, and while it could never be mistaken for being a smart movie it’s still an absolute orgy of action, stunts, and doves.  And finally M:I 3 is probably the best of the three thanks to an interesting villain, an emotional core, and some grounded directing from Abrams.

Are you interested or excited about a fourth M:I film?  Who should direct it?


Read more articles by Rob Hunter

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Random-Man
    Im interested only because I want to find out what they were stealing in MI3.
  • TJL
    With every M.I film Cruise's love interest gets younger.
    What teenager are they going to pair him up with this time?
    Is Dakota Fanning available?
  • Ricky
    I don't think M:I 3 is the best of the three!
    Additionally M:i:3 was a box-office disappointment, compared with the second film's worldwide gross of $545 million and the original film's take of $452 million
  • I liked the third a lot, but it felt like a fitting end. He's married, happy, retired (I guess they left that open). I don't think i want to see him be brought back in, again...
  • Guy
    If you are a fan of the original "Mission: Impossible" television series, then all three films are severely disappointing. The only film which came vaguely close to evoking the old television show was the first film by Brian de Palma. The last two films are nothing more than generic action movies starring Tom Cruise. The original television show was NOT an action series. It focused on clever plots and constant suspense.
  • RobertFure
    Part 1 - Ok.
    Part 2 - Shit.
    Part 3 - Awesome.
    Part 4 - Count me in. Tom Cruise is awesome. People who hate Tom Cruise are idiots. He is MAVERICK.
  • Part 1 - Ok.
    Part 2 - Shit.
    Part 3 - Awesome.
    Part 4 - Count me in. Tom Cruise is awesome. People who hate Tom Cruise are idiots. He is MAVERICK.
  • Nick
    Solid movies all around. I'm game for another. What's wrong with 2? It wasn't 1, it didn't try to be like 1. Balls to the wall action film. If you can't tune in and chill out while stuff blows up for two hours then you completely missed the point of the movie.
  • Nick
    Solid movies all around. I'm game for another. What's wrong with 2? It wasn't 1, it didn't try to be like 1. Balls to the wall action film. If you can't tune in and chill out while stuff blows up for two hours then you completely missed the point of the movie.
  • Only on the internet can you read people's opinions of other people's opinions.

    Way to go, Rob.
blog comments powered by Disqus