What are the Criteria for “Woman of the Year” again?

Posted by Dr. Cole Abaius (cole.abaius@filmschoolrejects.com) on November 16, 2007

We can all breathe easy now that Maxim has finally come out with their Woman of the Year for 2008. I know what you’re thinking. How can a person be chosen for a year that hasn’t happened yet?

Because it’s Maxim, and the frat boys reading it are probably still too hung over from Peach Schnapps to realize that it’s not already 2009.

Meanwhile, Cinematical seems less than enthusiastic about Sarah Michelle Gellar’s gracing the cover. But if there’s any question as to why she was picked, despite the lackluster list of projects she has waiting in the wings, the answer is as simple as the people with subscriptions to Maxim.

She’s hot. As a friend pointed out to me, magazines were waiting on her to appear in ANY movie just for the excuse to get her in front of the camera. Not only do I have to agree, but I’m definitely not complaining. Congratulations, Buffy!

Check out her entire photoshoot below, courtesy of Maxim Online.


| MovieBlips: vote it up! | Read more articles by Dr. Cole Abaius

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Requirements: Be Boner Inducing

    Sarah Michelle Gellar: Qualified
  • Oh, Fure. You always did have a way with words.
  • What is this 1998 again? What's she doing on the cover?
blog comments powered by Disqus