Movie News
What are the Criteria for “Woman of the Year” again?
Posted by Cole Abaius (cole.abaius@filmschoolrejects.com) on November 16, 2007

We can all breathe easy now that Maxim has finally come out with their Woman of the Year for 2008. I know what you’re thinking. How can a person be chosen for a year that hasn’t happened yet?
Because it’s Maxim, and the frat boys reading it are probably still too hung over from Peach Schnapps to realize that it’s not already 2009.
Meanwhile, Cinematical seems less than enthusiastic about Sarah Michelle Gellar’s gracing the cover. But if there’s any question as to why she was picked, despite the lackluster list of projects she has waiting in the wings, the answer is as simple as the people with subscriptions to Maxim.
She’s hot. As a friend pointed out to me, magazines were waiting on her to appear in ANY movie just for the excuse to get her in front of the camera. Not only do I have to agree, but I’m definitely not complaining. Congratulations, Buffy!
Check out her entire photoshoot below, courtesy of Maxim Online.









|
| Read more articles by Cole Abaius






3 Comments
November 16th, 2007 at 5:59 pm
Requirements: Be Boner Inducing
Sarah Michelle Gellar: Qualified
November 16th, 2007 at 6:01 pm
Oh, Fure. You always did have a way with words.
November 17th, 2007 at 1:09 am
What is this 1998 again? What’s she doing on the cover?