Comments on: WB Wins Superman Legal Battle, Must Start Next Movie by 2011

By: r4 revolution

r4 revolution — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:45:55 +0000

I have a feeling that DC is going to appeal this decision, citing the amount of time needed to develop and release a movie of the magnitude of Superman films. I wouldn't be surprised if they won the appeal and got an extra year to get things done. I have to agree with Keith, we don't need FOX anywhere NEAR Superman. The big problem in all this is money, and I think if DC gets some big cash kickback from WB the problem might be solved until 2013.

By: Sean Hedges

Sean Hedges — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:23:24 +0000

Place do not rush it!!!! The quality of this film is key. I would love to see a new Superman film come out, but it has to flow with the original Christopher reeve movies. new story, new problems, When i was asking around people want to see more of the Kyrptonian back ground not just the fortress of solitude but

By: Robert

Robert — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:47:42 +0000

I cant belive it. Superman is my favorite comicbook hero. Now he is dead.

By: Cole_Abaius

Cole_Abaius — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:10:22 +0000

The real question is when Warners is going to make a movie about Reject Man. The realer question is why we haven't gotten sued for copyright infringement.

Because clearly Reject Man is based off of Sponge Bob Squarepants.

By: John W

John W — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:07:43 +0000

So does this set a precedent for comic creations? Batman? Wonder Woman? The entire Marvel Universe?

By: Laughner

Laughner — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:21:23 +0000

My prediction: no more Superman movies.

It just doesn't make sense from WB's standpoint. Nowadays the box office performance of big event movies tends to be tied to audience perception of the predecessor. It's why Batman Begins made barely $200 million and The Dark Knight made over $500 million — both were extremely well received films, but the former had the albatross of Batman & Robin hanging over its shoulders, while the latter was able to capitalize on the good will the predecessor had finally brought to the film franchise. If a Superman movie in 2013 was exceptionally well made, it would probably have more of an impact on the box-office success of the sequel, which WB would no longer own. They could do a lower budget ($100 million or so) sequel with the same cast as the 2006 movie (sans Spacey) and hope for the best, but in that case the movie probably wouldn't make much more than $100 million under a best case scenario, so what would be the point?

By: random man

random man — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:01:33 +0000

This is good news. We will get one last WB Superman movie (probably with Brandon Routh for time saving reasons) that features other members of the Justice League (and I'm hoping would have Batman in it although that would probably mean that WB is shooting itself in the foot and it would be some hammy actor instead of Bale) and completely different version of Superman in the future (if WB dont get the rights back).

Now I'm hoping that WB don't get the rights back because they just haven't milked his super-titties right over the years (another reason the Siegel heirs might not sell it back to them).

P.S. I (heart) brackets.

By: Josh Radde

Josh Radde — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:11:42 +0000

They “Won” in the sense that they didn't have a “Sweetheart” deal with DC, which is what Siegel's camp was suing about. If it could be proven that WB made special arrangements with DC, then it would mean that they could be “hiding” money from the Siegel/Schuster's. The judge said that what Warner pays DC for rights is pretty good, based on what, say, Fox pays to Marvel for X-Men. That's pretty much the jist.

By: Gabriel Ramirez

Gabriel Ramirez — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:14:28 +0000

Oh man, what if within the next decade we had FOX’s Superman?!

By: Sebastian Zavala

Sebastian Zavala — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:32:33 +0000

Well, in any case, a Pixar's Superman would definitely be pure awesomeness.

By: d0x

d0x — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:30:20 +0000

That wouldnt work. Nolan's Batman has worked so well because its based in the real world. If you throw in a guy who can fly everything they worked for in the past 2 movies gets tossed out the window.

By: random man

random man — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:01:33 +0000

By: random man

random man — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:01:33 +0000

By: Josh_Radde

Josh_Radde — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:11:42 +0000

By: Josh Radde

Josh Radde — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:11:42 +0000