Twilight: New Moon Photos Expose Dakota Fanning’s Creepy Eyes

Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.com) on August 28, 2009

new-moon-header

If there’s one thing I think we all wanted today, it was some brand new photos from the upcoming tween vampire lovefest Twilight: New Moon. And if I could’ve asked the gods of movie preview assets, I would have asked for some with Dakota Fanning and her creepy red eyes. The new Twilight star appears for the first time as Jane, a crazy red-eyed vampire chick. Our Twilight-reading commenters can fill in the rest for us.

Also up are some photos of the Voturi, the royal vampire family from Italy. They are peacekeeping vampires, one of the oldest vamp clans, but also a very violent tribe. From where I’m sitting, they look like creepy porcelain dolls. Except for Michael Sheen, he looks like Tony Blair with a mullet. Anyway, let’s do some introductions to them and some other New Moon characters, shall we?

Twilight: New Moon hits theaters November 20, 2009.

Jane (Dakota Fanning)

new-moon-Jane

Alec (Cameron Bright)

new-moon-Alec

Aro (Michael Sheen)

new-moon-Aro

Caius (Jamie Campbell Bower)

new-moon-Caius

Marcus (Christopher Heyerdahl)

new-moon-Marcus

Marcus, Cauis, Alec

new-moon-Marcus, Cauis, Alec

Demetri (Charlie Bewley) and Alice (Ashley Greene)

new-moon-Demetri, Alice


Read more articles by Neil Miller

« Previous Article | Next Article »

Related Topics:

Movie News, Photo Gallery, , , , , , , ,

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • In the first picture, it looks as though Robert Pattinson is checking out Dakota's ass. Come on man, she's too young.

    Also, I can imagine Marcus bombing a stand-up routine in the pose he's in. Maybe if he had a cocktail in one hand...
  • Ok, not to just be someone on the "I hate Twilight bandwagon" (because I don't hate it, never saw it) but are these supposed to make us laugh? I mean, what the fuck year is it? These fuckers look like they just got off the boat from Transylvania. Who are the costumers on this show, Ed Ware and Vera West? You see, that's funny because they were the costumers for 1931's Dracula, starring Bela Lugosi. Because these motherfucking vampires are stereotypes.
  • rmamoran
    your a fucking idiot read the books before you talk and youll know exactly whats going on fucking moron
  • One second I'm having trouble understanding you. Let me run that sentence through the grammar machine. bebobeeboobopbooop.

    "You're a fucking idiot, read the books before you talk and you'll know exactly what's going on, fucking moron."

    There, now that is a complete sentence. Let me read it. Hmm. Oh dear! How crass.

    I don't care if it's in the book, the bible, or the way that she bangs she bangs, those costumes are ridiculous and whoever came up with them, be it the author or the film costume designer, should feel bad. Lookin' all like Count Chocula up in this muaafuucka
  • Yeah, they're pretty ugly. I read the books because I had to experience the train-wreck first-hand, before the movies. For the record, they aren't very good, but then again I did finish the series so I guess they're like bad crack.

    But anyway, these vampires are supposed to be kind of old-school and they live under some city in Italy and sort of "police" the rest of the vampires in the world. So kind of like a vampire Vatican, I guess, and also vaguely like a Russian mafia, as far as I can tell.

    So maybe their outfits are supposed to be a play on the sorts of things a vampire Pope would wear and that's why they look so outdated.

    These aren't exactly great movies though, so I don't expect much from the costume department. For one thing, the vampire baseball scene in the first movie is lame enough when you're reading it and imagining it, but I don't recall them ALL WEARING BASEBALL UNIFORMS in the book. Seriously, when I saw the clip of that for the first time, I laughed so hard I cried. If they had uniforms in the book, I blocked that crap out. So lame.
  • bellablows
    Thank you!!! I had the same exact reaction, so reading your comment, I conclude, we're right. What year is this, who the hell is the costume designer, who plopped those bad Hammer Studios 60s/70s wigs on those actors. They look so awkward because they're clueless as how to pose dressed in bad Halloween costumes from a vintage shop in Dayton, Ohio. Honestly, did they work on the costume design for about five minutes, then think, we're done.
    I'm one of those folks who had never heard of the books and I promised my assistant I'd watch Twilight. Love that potential gang rape scene. So beautifully realized, not a cheap lurid device at all. Great to present what is predominantly a teenaged female audience with images of the threat of gang rape and in the end what is a subservient Bella. Abstinence is one thing, it's retro and fresh, what is not retro fresh is female subservience, Bella ends that first film like a 50s housewife. Ick, that young women are identifying with her.
  • infinity1
    I ahve read all the books and own the movie and cannot wait for november for the realease, my age ? 14 no 17 no 25 no 40 no 50 no 57 yes. What I love about the books is it's a love story. You cannot put an age on this. I hope she decides to come out with another book for the twighlight series. Bought the book the host could not get past the first ten pages.Also the charecters choosen for both movies are wonderful. keep up the good work
  • A poorly written love story.
  • samantha101
    your crazy...obviously you have no sense of romance whatsoever!!the intimacy and sexual tension between edward cullen and isabella swan is breathtaking!!its enough to make any woman analyze her own relationship and feel deprived!so i guess we at least that have read your idiotic comment are able to see quite clearly...that you are not so great with the women.
  • You're absolutely correct. I'm not so great with women and I have no sense of romance because I have yet to come across someone who has a complete and unhealthy obsession with me. I need to get on that. Pronto.
blog comments powered by Disqus