Comments on: Go Crazy: David Slade Will Direct Third Twilight Film

By: RobertFure

RobertFure — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:29:35 +0000

30 Days of Night bored me. No one I saw it with liked it. Hard Candy wasn't all that good either. Directing wise it was fine I guess, but story wise I thought the ending blew. I don't give a shit about Twilight though, so who cares. If they want it to become good, they need to cast Daniel Craig as Edward (or whatever) and have it be directed by Martin Campbell and replace vampires with spies.

By: RobertFure

RobertFure — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:29:00 +0000

By: Chille

Chille — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:53:21 +0000

Ok I'm skeptical please explain what's so deep about it.

By: Chille

Chille — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:53:00 +0000

Ok I'm skeptical please explain what's so deep about it.

By: BoB

BoB — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:07:00 +0000

Great! Now we all can gets headaches with all the shaky-cam-ness.

Perfect choice. NOT!

By: BoB

BoB — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:07:00 +0000

Great! Now we all can gets headaches with all the shaky-cam-ness.

Perfect choice. NOT!

By: David G

David G — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:52:28 +0000

Plus, if Slade really is at the helm of Eclipse, it wouldn't be bad idea to film the third and fourth installments together. Or at least one right after the other. But then again, maybe this is Summit's new trend for these kinds of movies. To follow the trend, a la Harry Potter!

By: David G

David G — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:52:00 +0000

By: David G

David G — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:44:48 +0000

You know its bad when they have to pick another director for the next one, while the second is still being filmed! Ha! At least I know not to go into New Moon with high hopes. : D

By: David G

David G — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:44:00 +0000

You know its bad when they have to pick another director for the next one, while the second is still being filmed! Ha! At least I know not to go into New Moon with high hopes. : D

By: Vlad

Vlad — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:46:33 +0000

You can't polish a piece of crap. Watching the first Twilight film, I could tell that they tried to fix the glaring problems from the book, but they still wound up with a boring, boring film which consisted mostly of the two leads making sexy faces at each other. These director choices for the sequels are interesting, to say in the least. My guess is they chose this guy because of the huge evil vampires vs. good vampires/werewolves "battle" in Eclipse.

By: Vlad

Vlad — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:46:00 +0000

By: Jenny

Jenny — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:40:15 +0000

I think Summit is finally seeing that this franchise isn't about teenage girls. There is a lot more depth to the Twilight Saga than most realize. It is a rich and vast story, that happens to take place starting in high school. David Slade is a great choice for this saga as it matures.

By: Jenny

Jenny — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:40:00 +0000

By: blckmanjew

blckmanjew — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:06:00 +0000

hey

By: Rob_Hunter

Rob_Hunter — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:32:19 +0000

30 Days of Night is a fantastic vampire movie: But the things that make it awesome will never make it into a Twilight movie: Still: He's probably the best of the directors they've had so far.

By: Rob_Hunter

Rob_Hunter — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:32:00 +0000

30 Days of Night is a fantastic vampire movie: But the things that make it awesome will never make it into a Twilight movie: Still: He's probably the best of the directors they've had so far.