Tom Cruise Gets Picky About Next Project to the Tune of Millions

Posted by Dr. Cole Abaius (cole.abaius@filmschoolrejects.com) on April 22, 2009

tomcruise2_1024

Oh, Tom Cruise. I’ve run out of jokes about you because all of the good ones have been picked clean to the bone. And yet, I feel uneasy writing something straightforward about you – especially considering the possible narcissistic nature of this recent news.

It’s pretty clear that Cruise is a major blockbuster star, able to headline even an awful sci-fi remake on name alone, but it’s not often that we get word of the level of investment that studios are willing to go to in order to get their hands on the potential Cruise gold mine.

Variety is reporting that studios are jockeying seriously to get Tom Cruise on board with their projects – going far enough to set up script doctors getting as much as $250,000 a week to work alongside the actor to mold the perfect next flick. Or at least one that will most interest the icon.

Although a few in-development films are out of the running (the romantic comedy Lost for Words at Universal, and drama The 28th Amendment from Orci and Kurtzman over at Warners), there are still several out there earning writers some major bank just to have the shot at Cruise starring:

  • Dreamworks has Motorcade, a drama directed by Len Wiseman
  • Spyglass has The Tourist, a remake co-starring Charlize Theron
  • Fox has Wichita, an action comedy co-starring Cameron Diaz
  • MGM has The Matarese Circle, directed by David Cronenberg and co-starring Denzel Washington

There’s two ways to take a story like this. The first, that studios are investing the right amount of money to entice a major star into their camp, and that Cruise is doing due diligence in making a quality film. The second, that the star is exploiting his popularity in order to squeeze a ton of unnecessary money out of process for ego points (or out of the kindness of his heart and fervent support of the writers’ plight in Hollywood).

Guessing either way would be pure speculation, but either way, we’ll be seeing one of those films coming down the pipe with Cruise’s mug painted all over the marketing campaign.

What do you think?


Read more articles by Dr. Cole Abaius

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • This is a silly and misguided post. I haven't read the Variety article, but I can virtually guarantee that it's all buzz generated by Cruise's publicists in order to make him sound desirable again.
  • Is your problem that the information is false? Because if it is, there's a larger problem, but if it's not, then the situation is what it is regardless of why it was fed out into the news cycle.
  • Tom Cruise is awesome. He's still bankable. I want to see him in "Wichita." Tom Cruise + Action + Comedy = Me in a Seat and Snakes on a Plane.
  • srsly
    Tom Cruise is:

    - a great actor for the "popcorn movie" genre
    - a financially, rock solid, bankable asset from a studio/practical standpoint
    - a completely deluded nut job who from a sociological standpoint, should not be in possession of money, influence, or popularity.

    He is still only relevant today because he still makes people gobs of money. Darwinian Social Evolution would have eaten him for breakfast shortly after the flip out with Matt Lauer if he wasn't a cash cow. The fact that he is still popular is as much a condemnation of America as it is Tom Cruise. (And yes - i am an American and witness daily the stupidity of about 90% of our population.)

    Pointing out that there are 2 interpretations (integrity to actor and script or just milking it for points) is an interesting issue to bring up but completely moot to speculate on. We will never really know when there are so many hands on a machine this giant and it's also entirely possible it's not just one or the either but both at the same time (which in life is usually the case).

    I still watch Top Gun but I haven't seen a new movie of his since War of the Worlds (and that was only because i'm a H.G. Wells' fan) because i refuse to financially support him and his insanity.
blog comments powered by Disqus