<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Reject Report Summer Box Office Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys Paine</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-138626</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys Paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-138626</guid>
		<description>1. Hair-pot  - mainly because of the fan-base and it&#039;s been bumped down to a PG rating. -380 mil 
2. Transformers - just because it&#039;s a big-ass action movie, and it&#039;s the right time for a big-ass sequel. -350 mil 
3. Terminator - made a shit-load back then, now it&#039;s got Christian Bale and a PG-13 rating. -300 mil 
4. Wolverine - I think this will be around Terminator in terms of success, just because it&#039;s x-men -290 mil 
5. Star Trek - JJ Abrams hasn&#039;t really been part of an unsuccessful film/series, and the buzz is good, and the anticipation is high -280 mil 
 
all the rest: Angels and Demons - 250 mil, Up - 230 mil, Ice Age- 230 mil, Night at the Museum- 210 mil, Funny People- 150 mil, Bruno - 80 mil, Public Enemies -80 mil,  Year One -80 mil, Pelham 123 - 60 mil, G.I. Joe -55 mil, Inglorious Basterds -40 mil </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Hair-pot  &#8211; mainly because of the fan-base and it&#039;s been bumped down to a PG rating. -380 mil<br />
2. Transformers &#8211; just because it&#039;s a big-ass action movie, and it&#039;s the right time for a big-ass sequel. -350 mil<br />
3. Terminator &#8211; made a shit-load back then, now it&#039;s got Christian Bale and a PG-13 rating. -300 mil<br />
4. Wolverine &#8211; I think this will be around Terminator in terms of success, just because it&#039;s x-men -290 mil<br />
5. Star Trek &#8211; JJ Abrams hasn&#039;t really been part of an unsuccessful film/series, and the buzz is good, and the anticipation is high -280 mil </p>
<p>all the rest: Angels and Demons &#8211; 250 mil, Up &#8211; 230 mil, Ice Age- 230 mil, Night at the Museum- 210 mil, Funny People- 150 mil, Bruno &#8211; 80 mil, Public Enemies -80 mil,  Year One -80 mil, Pelham 123 &#8211; 60 mil, G.I. Joe -55 mil, Inglorious Basterds -40 mil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys Paine</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-224340</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys Paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-224340</guid>
		<description>1. Hair-pot  - mainly because of the fan-base and it&#039;s been bumped down to a PG rating. -380 mil 
2. Transformers - just because it&#039;s a big-ass action movie, and it&#039;s the right time for a big-ass sequel. -350 mil 
3. Terminator - made a shit-load back then, now it&#039;s got Christian Bale and a PG-13 rating. -300 mil 
4. Wolverine - I think this will be around Terminator in terms of success, just because it&#039;s x-men -290 mil 
5. Star Trek - JJ Abrams hasn&#039;t really been part of an unsuccessful film/series, and the buzz is good, and the anticipation is high -280 mil 
 
all the rest: Angels and Demons - 250 mil, Up - 230 mil, Ice Age- 230 mil, Night at the Museum- 210 mil, Funny People- 150 mil, Bruno - 80 mil, Public Enemies -80 mil,  Year One -80 mil, Pelham 123 - 60 mil, G.I. Joe -55 mil, Inglorious Basterds -40 mil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Hair-pot  &#8211; mainly because of the fan-base and it&#039;s been bumped down to a PG rating. -380 mil<br />
2. Transformers &#8211; just because it&#039;s a big-ass action movie, and it&#039;s the right time for a big-ass sequel. -350 mil<br />
3. Terminator &#8211; made a shit-load back then, now it&#039;s got Christian Bale and a PG-13 rating. -300 mil<br />
4. Wolverine &#8211; I think this will be around Terminator in terms of success, just because it&#039;s x-men -290 mil<br />
5. Star Trek &#8211; JJ Abrams hasn&#039;t really been part of an unsuccessful film/series, and the buzz is good, and the anticipation is high -280 mil </p>
<p>all the rest: Angels and Demons &#8211; 250 mil, Up &#8211; 230 mil, Ice Age- 230 mil, Night at the Museum- 210 mil, Funny People- 150 mil, Bruno &#8211; 80 mil, Public Enemies -80 mil,  Year One -80 mil, Pelham 123 &#8211; 60 mil, G.I. Joe -55 mil, Inglorious Basterds -40 mil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shotgun ben</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-138610</link>
		<dc:creator>shotgun ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-138610</guid>
		<description>For the future, can you make these lists? It makes it easier to email to my short-attention spanned friends.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the future, can you make these lists? It makes it easier to email to my short-attention spanned friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shotgun ben</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-224339</link>
		<dc:creator>shotgun ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-224339</guid>
		<description>For the future, can you make these lists? It makes it easier to email to my short-attention spanned friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the future, can you make these lists? It makes it easier to email to my short-attention spanned friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dumbledead</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-138557</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumbledead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-138557</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested to see whether or not your prediction that Star Trek does better than Terminator will come true. I&#039;m going to disagree, since I think the Terminator franchise is more well known, whereas I think up until now the Star Trek franchise has always been catering to the Treckies, and ostracizing everyone else. Who knows, maybe this reboot will pull a Batman Begins on everyone. I groaned when I saw Harry Potter at the top spot, because you&#039;re probably right, and that&#039;s exactly why it was pushed back to the same release date as last year&#039;s Dark Knight. Here&#039;s to hoping Revenge of the Fallen keeps Potter out of the top spot. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m interested to see whether or not your prediction that Star Trek does better than Terminator will come true. I&#039;m going to disagree, since I think the Terminator franchise is more well known, whereas I think up until now the Star Trek franchise has always been catering to the Treckies, and ostracizing everyone else. Who knows, maybe this reboot will pull a Batman Begins on everyone. I groaned when I saw Harry Potter at the top spot, because you&#039;re probably right, and that&#039;s exactly why it was pushed back to the same release date as last year&#039;s Dark Knight. Here&#039;s to hoping Revenge of the Fallen keeps Potter out of the top spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dumbledead</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-224338</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumbledead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-224338</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested to see whether or not your prediction that Star Trek does better than Terminator will come true. I&#039;m going to disagree, since I think the Terminator franchise is more well known, whereas I think up until now the Star Trek franchise has always been catering to the Treckies, and ostracizing everyone else. Who knows, maybe this reboot will pull a Batman Begins on everyone. I groaned when I saw Harry Potter at the top spot, because you&#039;re probably right, and that&#039;s exactly why it was pushed back to the same release date as last year&#039;s Dark Knight. Here&#039;s to hoping Revenge of the Fallen keeps Potter out of the top spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m interested to see whether or not your prediction that Star Trek does better than Terminator will come true. I&#039;m going to disagree, since I think the Terminator franchise is more well known, whereas I think up until now the Star Trek franchise has always been catering to the Treckies, and ostracizing everyone else. Who knows, maybe this reboot will pull a Batman Begins on everyone. I groaned when I saw Harry Potter at the top spot, because you&#039;re probably right, and that&#039;s exactly why it was pushed back to the same release date as last year&#039;s Dark Knight. Here&#039;s to hoping Revenge of the Fallen keeps Potter out of the top spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isamu</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-138449</link>
		<dc:creator>Isamu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-138449</guid>
		<description>Every one of those movies are good, so we don&#039;t know yet which one will be a summer box office for sure when they come out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every one of those movies are good, so we don&#39;t know yet which one will be a summer box office for sure when they come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isamu</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-224335</link>
		<dc:creator>Isamu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-224335</guid>
		<description>Every one of those movies are good, so we don&#039;t know yet which one will be a summer box office for sure when they come out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every one of those movies are good, so we don&#039;t know yet which one will be a summer box office for sure when they come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack41</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-138482</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack41</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-138482</guid>
		<description>Terminator AT LEAST $300 million. Funny people $150 million. And Up will destroy Ice Age</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terminator AT LEAST $300 million. Funny people $150 million. And Up will destroy Ice Age</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack41</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-224337</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack41</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-224337</guid>
		<description>Terminator AT LEAST $300 million. Funny people $150 million. And Up will destroy Ice Age</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terminator AT LEAST $300 million. Funny people $150 million. And Up will destroy Ice Age</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyIII</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-138463</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-138463</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s always a crap shoot. Great list, but I think you might be underestimating Public Enemies. People loves some Johnny Depp, and if it&#039;s even decent, it could be a good action alternative to people who know that something like Transformers 2 will be just as insulting as the first one. Blah blah, eye candy, blah blah.  
 
Kind of a depressing summer if you ask me. Too many things I&#039;m almost sure are going to get messed up...ala Salvation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#039;s always a crap shoot. Great list, but I think you might be underestimating Public Enemies. People loves some Johnny Depp, and if it&#039;s even decent, it could be a good action alternative to people who know that something like Transformers 2 will be just as insulting as the first one. Blah blah, eye candy, blah blah.  </p>
<p>Kind of a depressing summer if you ask me. Too many things I&#039;m almost sure are going to get messed up&#8230;ala Salvation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyIII</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-224336</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-224336</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s always a crap shoot. Great list, but I think you might be underestimating Public Enemies. People loves some Johnny Depp, and if it&#039;s even decent, it could be a good action alternative to people who know that something like Transformers 2 will be just as insulting as the first one. Blah blah, eye candy, blah blah.  
 
Kind of a depressing summer if you ask me. Too many things I&#039;m almost sure are going to get messed up...ala Salvation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#039;s always a crap shoot. Great list, but I think you might be underestimating Public Enemies. People loves some Johnny Depp, and if it&#039;s even decent, it could be a good action alternative to people who know that something like Transformers 2 will be just as insulting as the first one. Blah blah, eye candy, blah blah.  </p>
<p>Kind of a depressing summer if you ask me. Too many things I&#039;m almost sure are going to get messed up&#8230;ala Salvation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis Jefferson</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-138448</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis Jefferson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-138448</guid>
		<description>I think Year One is going to completely underperform, possibly as much as Observe and Report. I&#039;ve seen the Year One trailer a few times, and it doesn&#039;t seem to have anything original from either of its leads. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Year One is going to completely underperform, possibly as much as Observe and Report. I&#039;ve seen the Year One trailer a few times, and it doesn&#039;t seem to have anything original from either of its leads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis Jefferson</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/the-reject-report-summer-box-office-preview.php/comment-page-1#comment-224334</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis Jefferson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40874#comment-224334</guid>
		<description>I think Year One is going to completely underperform, possibly as much as Observe and Report. I&#039;ve seen the Year One trailer a few times, and it doesn&#039;t seem to have anything original from either of its leads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Year One is going to completely underperform, possibly as much as Observe and Report. I&#039;ve seen the Year One trailer a few times, and it doesn&#039;t seem to have anything original from either of its leads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 468/474 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 22:56:54 -->
