The Hollywood Offensive: Islamic Group Offended by Alan Ball’s ‘Towelhead’

Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.com) on August 26, 2008

It has almost come to the point where I could turn this into a regular weekly column, where I single handedly track down all of the activist groups who are needlessly offended by the “art” of mainstream film and set them straight with a simple dose logic. This time we will travel a little wide of the mainstream, to an indie film from a big name director that is getting some attention from the Los Angeles chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. The film in question is American Beauty writer Alan Ball’s Towelhead, a drama about a young Arab-American girl (Summer Bishil) who struggles with sexual obsession as she goes to live with her very strict father (Peter Macdissi), who just so happens to live next to a bigoted, kid-touching Army reservist (Aaron Eckhart).

The CAIR-LA asked via a press release yesterday that Warner Bros., who is distributing the film under their now-defunct Warner Independent Pictures label, to change the title of the film before its September 12 release. In the statement, CAIR-LA Executive Director Hussam Ayloush said in part:

“The title…is of great concern to us, since the word is commonly used in a derogatory manner against people of the Muslim faith or Arab origin…We have no desire to inhibit the creative process or your right to produce any film you wish. However, I ask you to take the above concerns into consideration and examine the social implications of releasing the film under its current title, ‘Towelhead.’”

Now, unlike the issue over the word “retard” related to the recently released Ben Stiller film Tropic Thunder, this one seems to be a bit more straight forward. In fact, once again we see a group who does have the right to be offended, as anyone would. The term “towelhead” is a very derogatory term; I don’t think anyone would argue that. The problem is that once again we are dealing with the right of the artist, in this case Alan Ball, to create art and deliver it uncensored. It has nothing to do with the fact that the film’s title has significant relevance to its message, one that displays many of the struggles that young American Muslims face every day in our country, and more to do with Alan Ball’s right to call his movie whatever he so chooses.

Of course, we are talking about the title of the movie, which is significantly more prominent than a piece of the film’s plot, but either way, having seen the movie it is clear that this film’s intent is not to offend those of the Islamic faith or of Muslim decent, but to paint a picture of the bigotry that exists in America. Then again, I wouldn’t expect anyone petitioning a studio against a film to actually see the film in question — that would be too much to ask.

I suppose the ultimate reason that the studio, who released a statement later saying that while they regret any offense there will be no change made to the title, is that we are mere weeks away from the film’s release. And though Towelhead isn’t getting as much buzz as say, Tropic Thunder, we can safely assume that plenty of money has already been spent on marketing, money that would have to be re-spent should they bow to the requests of CAIR-LA. As well, we are talking about a film that has already been retitled from Nothing is Private, which is the title it held when it debuted at the Toronto Film Festival in 2007, to Towelhead for its second debut at Sundance in January of ‘08. At this point, whether they want to or not, Warner Bros. has to stick with Alan Ball’s title.

As well, I bring up the issue of timing because it seems to be a constant theme with these feats of anti-Hollywood activism. These groups seem to be standing up to studios and their films in the last moments before a film is unleashed to the public. Most likely, it is this way because groups are counting on the weeks leading up to release as the period which will generate the most publicity for their cause. The problem is that such motives are painfully obvious to the rest of us — we knew about a movie called Towelhead back in January. Heck, I wrote a review of it from Sundance. Where was CAIR-LA then? If these groups really expect to have changes made based on the “social implications” of releasing movies with offensive elements, perhaps they should get on their soapboxes a little earlier.

Previously: Sundance Review: ‘Towelhead’ is Uncomfortable to Watch, But Fantastic

Also Related: Ben Stiller, Paramount Learn That You Never Go Full Retard

Also, view the trailer for Towelhead below:


Read more articles by Neil Miller

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Nevernude
    hmmm looks very good. also, anything with aaron eckhart in it..you can't go bad.
  • Uma B.
    ^^
    I second this. <3 Aaron.
  • Saw it at Sundance, VERY uncomfortable to watch but excellent.

    And CAIR? Give me a break... they're a front for radical Islam as far as I'm concerned.

    Vic
  • Johnny Boy
    "The film in question is American Beauty director
    Alan Ball’s Towelhead..." Actually Sam Mendes
    directed American Beauty, NOT Alan Ball, as you
    mention in the article.

    Also, the reason why these groups don't make a
    big deal about offensive material in films earlier is
    because they simply don't learn of these until the
    film is marketed to the general public. you said
    you wrote a review of it from Sundance. Do you
    think groups like this go to Sundance?
  • @Johnny Boy

    Shit.. I do that all the time. Writer, writer, writer... Damn you, Alan Ball!
  • @Johnny Boy

    Also, to answer your question. No, they definitely don't go to Sundance. What I am saying is that if they want to complain, they should start paying more attention. There is no way to affect change in film if they are coming about right before the film goes into theaters... They aren't helping their own causes.
  • Actually, CAIR did ask to see the film and part of this was to discuss with Warner the issues behind the scenes. After much discussion, it was a matter of principle and if people access the actual press release they will notice that no where is CAIR impinging on the right of the artist to express. What CAIR points out is that a movie title should not use derogatory or racists slurs to bring in audiences. I believe there is mutual agreement between CAIR, Mr. Ball and the Warner that the term is quite explosive, where CAIR differs is this idea that the movie title was changed twice, once to take into account that the term is offensive and then again back to the title of the book, which indicated some sort of PR move rather then artistic practice.

    I would say personally, the fact that there is a discussion and Americans as a whole understand that Muslims, Arabs and even South Asians view this term on par with the N-word, or the G-word or any other derogatory, racist term a message is sent that these words do not bring value to any conversation.
  • JMoney
    I don't see this as the same as the Tropic Thunder uproar. IN Tropic Thunder, the word "retard" was used in the movie, the characters were using it in a bad way, that is artistic freedom, if a character is an idiot and doesn't understand mentally challenged people then he would use the term.

    This however seems like a blatant marketing ploy. How else to draw people in than to use a racial term as the title of your movie. Build contraversy and get people to come see your movie just for that reason. Which may in fact be an excellent movie and a great commentary on muslim intolerance in America. but you shouldn't have to use that term in order to promote your movie. Imagine the uproar if someone wanted to name their movie the N-word? Oh wait, that happened with Nas' CD, and we saw what happened with that
  • Johnny Boy
    JMoney makes a good point.
  • Damn you and your good points, JMoney!

    Now here's a fun list of all the film that have the word 'nigger' in the title:

    Offensive!

    As you can see - they were either made a long time ago, were so low-key no one saw them or were a dramatic short made a few years ago. But even the filmmakers who made "The N Word" were smart to enough not to shoot themselves in the foot by using the actual word as their title. It's good for shock value, but not for establishing credibility.
blog comments powered by Disqus