The Black Cat in Spider-Man 4: The Web’s Mystery of the Week

Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.com) on November 11, 2009

blackcat-header

Someone on the inside is talking, and they’re talking about Spider-Man 4. Perhaps on purpose, the folks inside Sony Pictures are drumming up some chatter this week here on the movie blogosphere with news from the development of their next web-slinging adventure. And leave it to us to be last on the block to hear this ice cream truck ‘o fun as it rounds the corner.

Allow me to break this down for you:

- On November 9, the folks at Mania.com reported that the villain for Spider-Man 4 would be Felicia Hardy, known as the sexy cat-burglar The Black Cat. They even go one step further to say that The Notebook star Rachel McAdams is at the top of the studio’s list, and is about to be cast.

- A day before that, The Observer published a guest article by actress Romola Garai, who had to put herself “on tape” for a role in the pic, but did not specify the part for which she’s auditioning. Several other bloggers have connected the dots, saying that Garai could be testing for Black Cat, but nothing is certain. I would almost mark this item as irrelevant for the time being.

- Yesteday (November 10), the gents at Hey You Guys wrote their own “huge exclusive” on the matter, spurring further speculation about the McAdams rumor. According to their report, McAdams isn’t the only actress in the running. There are others, but they don’t know who. They do know however, that her story goes like so: “she is the daughter of the new editor of The Daily Bugle, a man who is also referred to as ‘a viper’. She falls in love with Peter Parker, and uncovers his true identity. Her father then dies, and Hardy becomes a threat to Peter Parker (presumably as The Black Cat).”

The storyline proposed in the Hey You Guys article seems to fit with the general feel of Raimi’s Spider-Man series, with one exception. Their scoop says that The Black Cat’s father is the new editor of The Daily Bugle — which would mean that Raimi is throwing out J. Jonah Jameson, and as such, tossing out the lifeblood of the first three films — J.K. Simmons. That, I don’t support.

Beyond that, none of this is official. It is all speculative, and should be treated as such. There’s a reasonable chance that The Black Cat’s storyline is in Spider-Man 4 and that Rachel McAdams is on a list of names somewhere at Sony, but no i’s have been dotted, and no t’s have been crossed on the contracts yet. And until then, we’re in wait and see mode.

That said, I support the inclusion of The Black Cat based on costume design above. For those not following, please consult the image above.


Read more articles by Neil Miller

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • FraveLuciferquez
    Dismiss as rumor. [My inner-outer fanboy is not liking this rumor. Go back to the Bruce Campbell-as-Mysterio/other rumor, please, world.
  • montimer
    We didn't publish it as a 'HUGE Exclusive', it was a 'HUG Exclusive', as in 'Hey U Guys Exclusive'. Even I check my headlines for spelling.
  • edwardzarnawski
    Peter and Mary-Jane just got back together at the end of the abomination that was Spider-man 3. Why put another strain on their relathionship with another love interest in the mix. It has already been done. Also they wasted Gwen Stacey in part 3, I would hate to see them waste The Black Cat on a dumb, repetative plot-line like this. As far as Rachel McAdams being in the running for the part, that sounds good. I would still like to see The Lizard play a major role. Dr. Connors has been in the background of three films now and I think it is time that his character finally transformed. There is no reason that they couldn't have The Lizard, Bruce Campbell's unknown character and Felicia Hardy in the film. As long as they don't rush thing and just set up the other characters for a run in the next film(s).
  • spiderfreddie
    mJ & peter did not get back at the end of 3 it was extremeley vague they were just hugging and agreeing to be friends
  • edwardzarnawski
    He still ends up with MJ. Why not build on that relationship rather than
    have him put more of a strain on it with Felicia Hardy? With all that has
    gone on in the first three movies they would be closer now. I know that in
    the comics there is a constant strain on their relationship, but they are
    still together. If MJ is his true love like she is in the comics, I don't
    think that he would be trying to stray. In the comics he and the Black
    Cat/Felicia Hardy had a romance, but it was while MJ and Peter weren't
    together. If they are going to keep tearing MJ and Peter apart then when are
    they going to come together?
  • Christopher_M
    I believe Romola Garai tested for the role of Debra Whitman another love interest of Parker's who worked and went to Empire State University...there was a connection between her, Peter Parker, Felicia Hardy, Micheal Morbius and Dr. Curt Connors....
  • edwardzarnawski
    That scenario could work. I just hope that the story dosen't become too conveluded. Maybe the undisclosed role that Bruce Campbell is in will be Morbius! A long shot, but with the recent vampire fad it may be feasable. Raimi could also get into his horror roota little bit with that plot also. I just hope that he sticks to simple, classic villains like Electro, Mysterio or Kraven for this one. A character that all of the comic fans can instantly be interested in. We saw in the third film that it dosen't matter how cool a villain is (VENOM), if you stick with a classic (GREEN GOBLIN, DOC OCK, SANDMAN), you can have a fun, engaging movie.
  • Aleric
    Once again it sounds like they are trying to stuff the bag too full so that none of the villians get any time on screen to build up their prescence. The Dark Knight showed that by focusing on one villian at a time pays off in the end. Didn't they learn this from SpiderMan 3?
blog comments powered by Disqus