Star Trek Trailer Gets Smacked Around By Some Real Science

Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.com) on December 18, 2008

trek-trailer-science

Ever since the release of the first full-length trailer for J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek, hardcore science fiction geeks have had one thing on their minds: what in the heck (they don’t swear) is up with that young Kirk jumping from a car scene? Some of us wondered about the scene’s relevance and/or place in a Star Trek movie. We got the point, Kirk is supposed to be a badass on the edge like Maverick from Top Gun (complete with his own long dusty road motorcycle ride), we just didn’t know why it needed to be told in such a blatantly silly way. Others, such as author Adam Weiner, took up the mantle of science and set out to explore the plausibility of such a stunt.

In his incredibly complex calculations, all of which can be seen over at PopSci.com, Weiner figured that it would take 877 lbs. of force to stop little Kirk at his estimated velocity. That means… well, I will let him explain it:

So what does all of this mean? It means that since the only thing(s) slowing him down are his fingers digging into the ground, James T. Kirk will have to exert a force of almost 900 pounds with those fingers to stop from being flung over the precipice.

You have to love the detail oriented nature of so many science fiction buffs. It has me wondering whether or not a commercially viable director such as J.J. Abrams knew what he was getting into when he took on Star Trek; its not just about story, not just about special effects, these fans are looking for their fiction to have deep roots in science. This, in my personal opinion, is what makes the world of science fiction so much fun.

For more demystifications from Adam Weiner, you can check out his book Don’t Try This At Home!: The Physics of Hollywood Movies.

[via /Film]


Read more articles by Neil Miller

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Who fucking cares? Lets get a good story and be happy with some spectacle, fuck being correct. Lets have some fun with this movie
  • Well, why are physics geeks trying to ruin a SCI-FI movie trailer?!?

    I mean, if they want to do it correctly, they need to add in the fact that Kirk's velocity and acceleration is three-dimensional!
  • k(Black)
    Did they do the same for the Dark Knight or IronMan? hmmmm?
  • Adam Weiner did the same thing when I showed him the video of me eating seven ice cream cones in under 15 minutes.

    He still enjoyed the video, though.
  • JayJayCAW
    are fucking kidding me? bringing science to a fictional movie......oh yea these guys are ever so smart
  • xXArCBiRDXx
    Alright look, they forgot two big problems. One, young Kirk is sliding on dirt. That's called friction Mr Weiner. It tends to slow thing some what. Since the car was thrown in reverse it lost momentum. Since it was throwen sideways it lost its smooth roll. Two, he is not exerting 900 pounds into clawing the dirt. He is hanging. He has to hold his own body wait, save for a brief jolt as he comes to rest. We get it. It's extreme. ITS A MOVIE! I looked Mr Weiner up via linkedIn.com. His experience? Service industry, Construction and now Real estate. Very good find Weiner your Math seems to check out
  • wRotyFod
    Haha! He's fuckin' right! I check the dudes background! Win! Please screenshot this!
  • So you are contesting the equation because the person who posted it is not a physics professor or a talking head on TV.

    Get a clue guys, the measure of a persons intelligence is not the job they hold, look at 90% of the people in politics. Einstein was a patent clerk.
  • PolarOPosite34
    um i think he is contesting the equation because its wrong. the fact he has no physics or higher math degree is, i agree, amusing
  • Charles Carmichael
    Apparently, despite appearances, Kirk was a bit of a portly kid. That stopped him from going over the edge.
blog comments powered by Disqus