<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek: The New Enterprise Revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Name</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-167672</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-167672</guid>
		<description>HAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond R Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-134946</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond R Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-134946</guid>
		<description>This ship shouldn&#039;t be in the movie since it doesn&#039;t fit the story line. Pike was the original Captain of the Enterprise which has always been a Constitution Class Starship which is the same as the original tv series from the 1960&#039;s. JJ needs to take a Star Trek history lesson and not let his wild imagination run too wild. As Mr. Spock would say, He&#039;s too emotional and the new design looks too illogical. The new design fits great for a future Enterprise but not one from the past where this story is supposed to take place. It&#039;s illogical because it&#039;s like a historian rewriting history by placing a jet with the Wright Brothers at Kitty Hawk. 
JJ isn&#039;t the only producer to change things around in movies. Why can&#039;t movie makers leave well enough alone by keeping things the way they were? Whether or not certain people like the original Enterprise, the fact is, &quot;The Constitution Class&quot; starship made its debut on television and made television history. The Enterprise was changed in the movies; but, these movies took place in the future- not the past which this new one is supposed to have taken place. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ship shouldn&#039;t be in the movie since it doesn&#039;t fit the story line. Pike was the original Captain of the Enterprise which has always been a Constitution Class Starship which is the same as the original tv series from the 1960&#039;s. JJ needs to take a Star Trek history lesson and not let his wild imagination run too wild. As Mr. Spock would say, He&#039;s too emotional and the new design looks too illogical. The new design fits great for a future Enterprise but not one from the past where this story is supposed to take place. It&#039;s illogical because it&#039;s like a historian rewriting history by placing a jet with the Wright Brothers at Kitty Hawk.<br />
JJ isn&#039;t the only producer to change things around in movies. Why can&#039;t movie makers leave well enough alone by keeping things the way they were? Whether or not certain people like the original Enterprise, the fact is, &quot;The Constitution Class&quot; starship made its debut on television and made television history. The Enterprise was changed in the movies; but, these movies took place in the future- not the past which this new one is supposed to have taken place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond R Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-210053</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond R Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-210053</guid>
		<description>This ship shouldn&#039;t be in the movie since it doesn&#039;t fit the story line. Pike was the original Captain of the Enterprise which has always been a Constitution Class Starship which is the same as the original tv series from the 1960&#039;s. JJ needs to take a Star Trek history lesson and not let his wild imagination run too wild. As Mr. Spock would say, He&#039;s too emotional and the new design looks too illogical. The new design fits great for a future Enterprise but not one from the past where this story is supposed to take place. It&#039;s illogical because it&#039;s like a historian rewriting history by placing a jet with the Wright Brothers at Kitty Hawk. 
JJ isn&#039;t the only producer to change things around in movies. Why can&#039;t movie makers leave well enough alone by keeping things the way they were? Whether or not certain people like the original Enterprise, the fact is, &quot;The Constitution Class&quot; starship made its debut on television and made television history. The Enterprise was changed in the movies; but, these movies took place in the future- not the past which this new one is supposed to have taken place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ship shouldn&#039;t be in the movie since it doesn&#039;t fit the story line. Pike was the original Captain of the Enterprise which has always been a Constitution Class Starship which is the same as the original tv series from the 1960&#039;s. JJ needs to take a Star Trek history lesson and not let his wild imagination run too wild. As Mr. Spock would say, He&#039;s too emotional and the new design looks too illogical. The new design fits great for a future Enterprise but not one from the past where this story is supposed to take place. It&#039;s illogical because it&#039;s like a historian rewriting history by placing a jet with the Wright Brothers at Kitty Hawk.<br />
JJ isn&#039;t the only producer to change things around in movies. Why can&#039;t movie makers leave well enough alone by keeping things the way they were? Whether or not certain people like the original Enterprise, the fact is, &quot;The Constitution Class&quot; starship made its debut on television and made television history. The Enterprise was changed in the movies; but, these movies took place in the future- not the past which this new one is supposed to have taken place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merc</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-128294</link>
		<dc:creator>Merc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-128294</guid>
		<description>I agree totally! the biggest problem with this new design are the nacelles. They&#039;re WAY too bulky for the rest of the ship. If they were more like the Enterprise A, the ship as a whole would retain it&#039;s sleek look. The rest of the ship&#039;s design I can live with. I just hope it looks better on film than the pictures.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree totally! the biggest problem with this new design are the nacelles. They&#039;re WAY too bulky for the rest of the ship. If they were more like the Enterprise A, the ship as a whole would retain it&#039;s sleek look. The rest of the ship&#039;s design I can live with. I just hope it looks better on film than the pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merc</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-210052</link>
		<dc:creator>Merc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-210052</guid>
		<description>I agree totally! the biggest problem with this new design are the nacelles. They&#039;re WAY too bulky for the rest of the ship. If they were more like the Enterprise A, the ship as a whole would retain it&#039;s sleek look. The rest of the ship&#039;s design I can live with. I just hope it looks better on film than the pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree totally! the biggest problem with this new design are the nacelles. They&#039;re WAY too bulky for the rest of the ship. If they were more like the Enterprise A, the ship as a whole would retain it&#039;s sleek look. The rest of the ship&#039;s design I can live with. I just hope it looks better on film than the pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio_Gioia</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-127671</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio_Gioia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-127671</guid>
		<description>when i look at the new computer scenes in the original series released last year i loved the show even more the enterprise never looked better . They could add the enterprise A details but should have kept the original design! They also should have asked the fans opinions of what they wanted before their concept of the Enterprise! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when i look at the new computer scenes in the original series released last year i loved the show even more the enterprise never looked better . They could add the enterprise A details but should have kept the original design! They also should have asked the fans opinions of what they wanted before their concept of the Enterprise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio_Gioia</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-210051</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio_Gioia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-210051</guid>
		<description>when i look at the new computer scenes in the original series released last year i loved the show even more the enterprise never looked better . They could add the enterprise A details but should have kept the original design! They also should have asked the fans opinions of what they wanted before their concept of the Enterprise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when i look at the new computer scenes in the original series released last year i loved the show even more the enterprise never looked better . They could add the enterprise A details but should have kept the original design! They also should have asked the fans opinions of what they wanted before their concept of the Enterprise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mondell </title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-120136</link>
		<dc:creator>Mondell </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-120136</guid>
		<description>I am a Star Trek Fan. They should of kept the Enterprise the same.  I like the Constitution class ship and even the refit class. This ship here is something else. Not the orginal Enterprise. Maybe the Enterprise-F. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Star Trek Fan. They should of kept the Enterprise the same.  I like the Constitution class ship and even the refit class. This ship here is something else. Not the orginal Enterprise. Maybe the Enterprise-F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mondell</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-210050</link>
		<dc:creator>Mondell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-210050</guid>
		<description>I am a Star Trek Fan. They should of kept the Enterprise the same.  I like the Constitution class ship and even the refit class. This ship here is something else. Not the orginal Enterprise. Maybe the Enterprise-F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Star Trek Fan. They should of kept the Enterprise the same.  I like the Constitution class ship and even the refit class. This ship here is something else. Not the orginal Enterprise. Maybe the Enterprise-F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALK950</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-119797</link>
		<dc:creator>ALK950</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-119797</guid>
		<description>I have lost all hope for this movie. If they wanted to do something new and original, they should have gone back to when the Enterprise (NCC-1701) was first built in SanFransisco yards ORBITING earth (not on it). And they should have captain Robert April taking the helm for the ships first 5 year mission. That would be something to see. We would have gotten a look at the Enterprise fresh out of drydock on her maiden voyage with her first captain on a brand new voyage. We would all get something new out of something old. Instead we got what..... a floating peice of space garbage that leaves everyones hopes for the franchise uncetain. What boggles my mind is that they thought the ship needed updating... but the uniforms are the same... What the heck were they smoking?!?!?  I don&#039;t think i want to even see this film, and i&#039;ve loved star trek scince i was in 5th grade. I&#039;m almost 30 now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have lost all hope for this movie. If they wanted to do something new and original, they should have gone back to when the Enterprise (NCC-1701) was first built in SanFransisco yards ORBITING earth (not on it). And they should have captain Robert April taking the helm for the ships first 5 year mission. That would be something to see. We would have gotten a look at the Enterprise fresh out of drydock on her maiden voyage with her first captain on a brand new voyage. We would all get something new out of something old. Instead we got what&#8230;.. a floating peice of space garbage that leaves everyones hopes for the franchise uncetain. What boggles my mind is that they thought the ship needed updating&#8230; but the uniforms are the same&#8230; What the heck were they smoking?!?!?  I don&#8217;t think i want to even see this film, and i&#8217;ve loved star trek scince i was in 5th grade. I&#8217;m almost 30 now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALK950</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-210049</link>
		<dc:creator>ALK950</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-210049</guid>
		<description>I have lost all hope for this movie. If they wanted to do something new and original, they should have gone back to when the Enterprise (NCC-1701) was first built in SanFransisco yards ORBITING earth (not on it). And they should have captain Robert April taking the helm for the ships first 5 year mission. That would be something to see. We would have gotten a look at the Enterprise fresh out of drydock on her maiden voyage with her first captain on a brand new voyage. We would all get something new out of something old. Instead we got what..... a floating peice of space garbage that leaves everyones hopes for the franchise uncetain. What boggles my mind is that they thought the ship needed updating... but the uniforms are the same... What the heck were they smoking?!?!?  I don&#039;t think i want to even see this film, and i&#039;ve loved star trek scince i was in 5th grade. I&#039;m almost 30 now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have lost all hope for this movie. If they wanted to do something new and original, they should have gone back to when the Enterprise (NCC-1701) was first built in SanFransisco yards ORBITING earth (not on it). And they should have captain Robert April taking the helm for the ships first 5 year mission. That would be something to see. We would have gotten a look at the Enterprise fresh out of drydock on her maiden voyage with her first captain on a brand new voyage. We would all get something new out of something old. Instead we got what&#8230;.. a floating peice of space garbage that leaves everyones hopes for the franchise uncetain. What boggles my mind is that they thought the ship needed updating&#8230; but the uniforms are the same&#8230; What the heck were they smoking?!?!?  I don&#8217;t think i want to even see this film, and i&#8217;ve loved star trek scince i was in 5th grade. I&#8217;m almost 30 now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Hand</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-119443</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Hand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-119443</guid>
		<description>Seems like 75% of the FSR front page today is all James Bond and Star Trek.  Which pretty much means THIS IS THE BEST SITE EVER!

I am such a geek.  I really don&#039;t deserve to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like 75% of the FSR front page today is all James Bond and Star Trek.  Which pretty much means THIS IS THE BEST SITE EVER!</p>
<p>I am such a geek.  I really don&#8217;t deserve to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Hand</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-210048</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Hand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-210048</guid>
		<description>Seems like 75% of the FSR front page today is all James Bond and Star Trek.  Which pretty much means THIS IS THE BEST SITE EVER!

I am such a geek.  I really don&#039;t deserve to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like 75% of the FSR front page today is all James Bond and Star Trek.  Which pretty much means THIS IS THE BEST SITE EVER!</p>
<p>I am such a geek.  I really don&#8217;t deserve to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff R Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-119436</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff R Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-119436</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that the ship looks sharp. However, it isn&#039;t the effects I&#039;m worried about on this film. It&#039;s the, &quot;CW version of Trek for the tween crowd,&quot; vibe that I&#039;m worried about.

I&#039;m still hoping for the best and expecting the worst......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that the ship looks sharp. However, it isn&#8217;t the effects I&#8217;m worried about on this film. It&#8217;s the, &#8220;CW version of Trek for the tween crowd,&#8221; vibe that I&#8217;m worried about.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still hoping for the best and expecting the worst&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djjeffhall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-210047</link>
		<dc:creator>djjeffhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-210047</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that the ship looks sharp. However, it isn&#039;t the effects I&#039;m worried about on this film. It&#039;s the, &quot;CW version of Trek for the tween crowd,&quot; vibe that I&#039;m worried about.

I&#039;m still hoping for the best and expecting the worst......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that the ship looks sharp. However, it isn&#8217;t the effects I&#8217;m worried about on this film. It&#8217;s the, &#8220;CW version of Trek for the tween crowd,&#8221; vibe that I&#8217;m worried about.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still hoping for the best and expecting the worst&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-119271</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-119271</guid>
		<description>to answer dave&#039;s questions

1 Yes it should 

and 2 I do believe anyone related to any trek previous to this is been removed from any creative position for this film.

I have no hope</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to answer dave&#8217;s questions</p>
<p>1 Yes it should </p>
<p>and 2 I do believe anyone related to any trek previous to this is been removed from any creative position for this film.</p>
<p>I have no hope</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-210046</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-210046</guid>
		<description>to answer dave&#039;s questions

1 Yes it should 

and 2 I do believe anyone related to any trek previous to this is been removed from any creative position for this film.

I have no hope</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to answer dave&#8217;s questions</p>
<p>1 Yes it should </p>
<p>and 2 I do believe anyone related to any trek previous to this is been removed from any creative position for this film.</p>
<p>I have no hope</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-119270</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-119270</guid>
		<description>um, 2 questions

1) this being a &quot;prequel&quot; when pike had the ship and then kirk takes command, shouldn&#039;t the ship look oh I don&#039;t know something like the constitution class that we all grew up with during that time and not a kit bash from the one from the 80&#039;s movie and something else?

2) wtf did they fire the ship designers that work on star trek or something? 

this is just as bad if not worse design then the upside down akira class ship that they used in the enterprise series. no body learns from past mistakes. I hope there is a story because right now I&#039;m not feeling like 25 bucks to see this one when it hits the theaters next spring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um, 2 questions</p>
<p>1) this being a &#8220;prequel&#8221; when pike had the ship and then kirk takes command, shouldn&#8217;t the ship look oh I don&#8217;t know something like the constitution class that we all grew up with during that time and not a kit bash from the one from the 80&#8242;s movie and something else?</p>
<p>2) wtf did they fire the ship designers that work on star trek or something? </p>
<p>this is just as bad if not worse design then the upside down akira class ship that they used in the enterprise series. no body learns from past mistakes. I hope there is a story because right now I&#8217;m not feeling like 25 bucks to see this one when it hits the theaters next spring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-210045</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-210045</guid>
		<description>um, 2 questions

1) this being a &quot;prequel&quot; when pike had the ship and then kirk takes command, shouldn&#039;t the ship look oh I don&#039;t know something like the constitution class that we all grew up with during that time and not a kit bash from the one from the 80&#039;s movie and something else?

2) wtf did they fire the ship designers that work on star trek or something? 

this is just as bad if not worse design then the upside down akira class ship that they used in the enterprise series. no body learns from past mistakes. I hope there is a story because right now I&#039;m not feeling like 25 bucks to see this one when it hits the theaters next spring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um, 2 questions</p>
<p>1) this being a &#8220;prequel&#8221; when pike had the ship and then kirk takes command, shouldn&#8217;t the ship look oh I don&#8217;t know something like the constitution class that we all grew up with during that time and not a kit bash from the one from the 80&#8242;s movie and something else?</p>
<p>2) wtf did they fire the ship designers that work on star trek or something? </p>
<p>this is just as bad if not worse design then the upside down akira class ship that they used in the enterprise series. no body learns from past mistakes. I hope there is a story because right now I&#8217;m not feeling like 25 bucks to see this one when it hits the theaters next spring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScreenRant.com</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/star-trek-the-new-enterprise-revealed.php/comment-page-1#comment-119265</link>
		<dc:creator>ScreenRant.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=22442#comment-119265</guid>
		<description>Looks. Like. Crap.

Why: http://screenrant.com/new-star-trek-movie-uss-enterprise-vic-4205/

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks. Like. Crap.</p>
<p>Why: <a href="http://screenrant.com/new-star-trek-movie-uss-enterprise-vic-4205/" rel="nofollow">http://screenrant.com/new-star-trek-movie-uss-enterprise-vic-4205/</a></p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 593/603 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 16:59:33 -->
