<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shatner May End Up in Star Trek XI, Says Screenwriter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: watchfamilyguy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-2#comment-173803</link>
		<dc:creator>watchfamilyguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-173803</guid>
		<description>Ok, well written, but the guy above me lol.  Ok, I forgot what I was going to say</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, well written, but the guy above me lol.  Ok, I forgot what I was going to say</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-2#comment-83700</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-83700</guid>
		<description>&#039;Davids&#039; - &quot;because..it S P O I L E D the ending/and or main plot twist for me…Isn’t that how you classify a spoiler?&quot;

Tough doo doo! It&#039;s your own STUPID fault for not having watched a movie that&#039;s been around nearly a whole generation. What are you? The world&#039;s busiest man? You obviously aint no Trekkie, so being a casual layman of the series, I doubt it really matters that much to you. So stop being such an attention seeker, it&#039;s not OUR fault Mummy never dished enough love out!

Back to the topic. However they do it, Canon out of the window or not, get the Shatman in this film! He&#039;s Kirk....he is GOD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Davids&#8217; &#8211; &#8220;because..it S P O I L E D the ending/and or main plot twist for me…Isn’t that how you classify a spoiler?&#8221;</p>
<p>Tough doo doo! It&#8217;s your own STUPID fault for not having watched a movie that&#8217;s been around nearly a whole generation. What are you? The world&#8217;s busiest man? You obviously aint no Trekkie, so being a casual layman of the series, I doubt it really matters that much to you. So stop being such an attention seeker, it&#8217;s not OUR fault Mummy never dished enough love out!</p>
<p>Back to the topic. However they do it, Canon out of the window or not, get the Shatman in this film! He&#8217;s Kirk&#8230;.he is GOD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-2#comment-183826</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-183826</guid>
		<description>&#039;Davids&#039; - &quot;because..it S P O I L E D the ending/and or main plot twist for meâ€¦Isnâ€™t that how you classify a spoiler?&quot;

Tough doo doo! It&#039;s your own STUPID fault for not having watched a movie that&#039;s been around nearly a whole generation. What are you? The world&#039;s busiest man? You obviously aint no Trekkie, so being a casual layman of the series, I doubt it really matters that much to you. So stop being such an attention seeker, it&#039;s not OUR fault Mummy never dished enough love out!

Back to the topic. However they do it, Canon out of the window or not, get the Shatman in this film! He&#039;s Kirk....he is GOD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Davids&#8217; &#8211; &#8220;because..it S P O I L E D the ending/and or main plot twist for meâ€¦Isnâ€™t that how you classify a spoiler?&#8221;</p>
<p>Tough doo doo! It&#8217;s your own STUPID fault for not having watched a movie that&#8217;s been around nearly a whole generation. What are you? The world&#8217;s busiest man? You obviously aint no Trekkie, so being a casual layman of the series, I doubt it really matters that much to you. So stop being such an attention seeker, it&#8217;s not OUR fault Mummy never dished enough love out!</p>
<p>Back to the topic. However they do it, Canon out of the window or not, get the Shatman in this film! He&#8217;s Kirk&#8230;.he is GOD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-2#comment-81975</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-81975</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I guess I got off track with the subject.  For my 2 cents... if they&#039;re trying to &quot;re-imagine&quot; the original Trek, then I don&#039;t think that any of the original actors should be involved, at least not playing in their original roles.  Take notes from &quot;Battlestar Galactica&quot;.  They did a FANTASTIC job when they started over.  But, with that said, they also didn&#039;t have almost 40 years of &quot;canon&quot; to deal with.  It&#039;s a double edged sword with Trek.  There&#039;s now so much &quot;canon&quot; out there that it&#039;s hard not to contradict what&#039;s already been established, even though several episodes/movies do just that.  I&#039;m willing to see what Abrams does with it.  Hopefully Paramount will actually spend money on this one and give us a FEATURE FILM and not another television episode in the guise of a movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I guess I got off track with the subject.  For my 2 cents&#8230; if they&#8217;re trying to &#8220;re-imagine&#8221; the original Trek, then I don&#8217;t think that any of the original actors should be involved, at least not playing in their original roles.  Take notes from &#8220;Battlestar Galactica&#8221;.  They did a FANTASTIC job when they started over.  But, with that said, they also didn&#8217;t have almost 40 years of &#8220;canon&#8221; to deal with.  It&#8217;s a double edged sword with Trek.  There&#8217;s now so much &#8220;canon&#8221; out there that it&#8217;s hard not to contradict what&#8217;s already been established, even though several episodes/movies do just that.  I&#8217;m willing to see what Abrams does with it.  Hopefully Paramount will actually spend money on this one and give us a FEATURE FILM and not another television episode in the guise of a movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-2#comment-183825</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-183825</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I guess I got off track with the subject.  For my 2 cents... if they&#039;re trying to &quot;re-imagine&quot; the original Trek, then I don&#039;t think that any of the original actors should be involved, at least not playing in their original roles.  Take notes from &quot;Battlestar Galactica&quot;.  They did a FANTASTIC job when they started over.  But, with that said, they also didn&#039;t have almost 40 years of &quot;canon&quot; to deal with.  It&#039;s a double edged sword with Trek.  There&#039;s now so much &quot;canon&quot; out there that it&#039;s hard not to contradict what&#039;s already been established, even though several episodes/movies do just that.  I&#039;m willing to see what Abrams does with it.  Hopefully Paramount will actually spend money on this one and give us a FEATURE FILM and not another television episode in the guise of a movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I guess I got off track with the subject.  For my 2 cents&#8230; if they&#8217;re trying to &#8220;re-imagine&#8221; the original Trek, then I don&#8217;t think that any of the original actors should be involved, at least not playing in their original roles.  Take notes from &#8220;Battlestar Galactica&#8221;.  They did a FANTASTIC job when they started over.  But, with that said, they also didn&#8217;t have almost 40 years of &#8220;canon&#8221; to deal with.  It&#8217;s a double edged sword with Trek.  There&#8217;s now so much &#8220;canon&#8221; out there that it&#8217;s hard not to contradict what&#8217;s already been established, even though several episodes/movies do just that.  I&#8217;m willing to see what Abrams does with it.  Hopefully Paramount will actually spend money on this one and give us a FEATURE FILM and not another television episode in the guise of a movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-2#comment-81974</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-81974</guid>
		<description>LOL!!  Loved all of the &quot;spoilers&quot;, and yes, dude, &quot;Generations&quot; was released in theaters a LONG time ago.  I think it might have even been released on BETA tape!  Yah, it&#039;s THAT old.  Lol.  And...

*  The boat sinks
*  Boomer is a Cylon (I could list the others, but figure that I should be careful since the pilot is only 4 years old... someone might bitch...)
*  She&#039;s a replicant
*  The kid sees him because he&#039;s dead
*  They&#039;re on Earth  (This one can cover &quot;Planet of the Apes&quot; (original) as well as that flop &quot;The Village&quot;)
*  V&#039;Ger is Voyager 6
*  Khan dies
*  So does Spock
*  But relax, he comes back in the next flick
*  They destroy the ring
*  The rebels win
*  Voyager gets home
*  Data dies (but relax, he can come back as B-4)
*  Thelma &amp; Louise go off of the cliff
*  She&#039;s a dude
*  They&#039;re not flashbacks, he&#039;s dying.  (&quot;Jacob&#039;s Ladder&quot;)
*  Yes, there really is a Santa Claus....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!!  Loved all of the &#8220;spoilers&#8221;, and yes, dude, &#8220;Generations&#8221; was released in theaters a LONG time ago.  I think it might have even been released on BETA tape!  Yah, it&#8217;s THAT old.  Lol.  And&#8230;</p>
<p>*  The boat sinks<br />
*  Boomer is a Cylon (I could list the others, but figure that I should be careful since the pilot is only 4 years old&#8230; someone might bitch&#8230;)<br />
*  She&#8217;s a replicant<br />
*  The kid sees him because he&#8217;s dead<br />
*  They&#8217;re on Earth  (This one can cover &#8220;Planet of the Apes&#8221; (original) as well as that flop &#8220;The Village&#8221;)<br />
*  V&#8217;Ger is Voyager 6<br />
*  Khan dies<br />
*  So does Spock<br />
*  But relax, he comes back in the next flick<br />
*  They destroy the ring<br />
*  The rebels win<br />
*  Voyager gets home<br />
*  Data dies (but relax, he can come back as B-4)<br />
*  Thelma &amp; Louise go off of the cliff<br />
*  She&#8217;s a dude<br />
*  They&#8217;re not flashbacks, he&#8217;s dying.  (&#8220;Jacob&#8217;s Ladder&#8221;)<br />
*  Yes, there really is a Santa Claus&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-2#comment-183824</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-183824</guid>
		<description>LOL!!  Loved all of the &quot;spoilers&quot;, and yes, dude, &quot;Generations&quot; was released in theaters a LONG time ago.  I think it might have even been released on BETA tape!  Yah, it&#039;s THAT old.  Lol.  And...

*  The boat sinks
*  Boomer is a Cylon (I could list the others, but figure that I should be careful since the pilot is only 4 years old... someone might bitch...)
*  She&#039;s a replicant
*  The kid sees him because he&#039;s dead
*  They&#039;re on Earth  (This one can cover &quot;Planet of the Apes&quot; (original) as well as that flop &quot;The Village&quot;)
*  V&#039;Ger is Voyager 6
*  Khan dies
*  So does Spock
*  But relax, he comes back in the next flick
*  They destroy the ring
*  The rebels win
*  Voyager gets home
*  Data dies (but relax, he can come back as B-4)
*  Thelma &amp; Louise go off of the cliff
*  She&#039;s a dude
*  They&#039;re not flashbacks, he&#039;s dying.  (&quot;Jacob&#039;s Ladder&quot;)
*  Yes, there really is a Santa Claus....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!!  Loved all of the &#8220;spoilers&#8221;, and yes, dude, &#8220;Generations&#8221; was released in theaters a LONG time ago.  I think it might have even been released on BETA tape!  Yah, it&#8217;s THAT old.  Lol.  And&#8230;</p>
<p>*  The boat sinks<br />
*  Boomer is a Cylon (I could list the others, but figure that I should be careful since the pilot is only 4 years old&#8230; someone might bitch&#8230;)<br />
*  She&#8217;s a replicant<br />
*  The kid sees him because he&#8217;s dead<br />
*  They&#8217;re on Earth  (This one can cover &#8220;Planet of the Apes&#8221; (original) as well as that flop &#8220;The Village&#8221;)<br />
*  V&#8217;Ger is Voyager 6<br />
*  Khan dies<br />
*  So does Spock<br />
*  But relax, he comes back in the next flick<br />
*  They destroy the ring<br />
*  The rebels win<br />
*  Voyager gets home<br />
*  Data dies (but relax, he can come back as B-4)<br />
*  Thelma &amp; Louise go off of the cliff<br />
*  She&#8217;s a dude<br />
*  They&#8217;re not flashbacks, he&#8217;s dying.  (&#8220;Jacob&#8217;s Ladder&#8221;)<br />
*  Yes, there really is a Santa Claus&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-2#comment-81662</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-81662</guid>
		<description>shatner should come back as young kirk&#039;s father or grandfather.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shatner should come back as young kirk&#8217;s father or grandfather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-2#comment-183823</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-183823</guid>
		<description>shatner should come back as young kirk&#039;s father or grandfather.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shatner should come back as young kirk&#8217;s father or grandfather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jczubach</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-2#comment-81608</link>
		<dc:creator>jczubach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-81608</guid>
		<description>i think a little bit of growing up may be in order here. Jeez Loueez, why are all of you &#039;so-called&#039; banging on one another.  Definitely screwing with the Prime Directive.  And Heck, I&#039;m not even a Trekkie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think a little bit of growing up may be in order here. Jeez Loueez, why are all of you &#8216;so-called&#8217; banging on one another.  Definitely screwing with the Prime Directive.  And Heck, I&#8217;m not even a Trekkie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jczubach</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-1#comment-183822</link>
		<dc:creator>jczubach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-183822</guid>
		<description>i think a little bit of growing up may be in order here. Jeez Loueez, why are all of you &#039;so-called&#039; banging on one another.  Definitely screwing with the Prime Directive.  And Heck, I&#039;m not even a Trekkie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think a little bit of growing up may be in order here. Jeez Loueez, why are all of you &#8216;so-called&#8217; banging on one another.  Definitely screwing with the Prime Directive.  And Heck, I&#8217;m not even a Trekkie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sc@r</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-1#comment-81607</link>
		<dc:creator>Sc@r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-81607</guid>
		<description>wow u guys spoiled some pretty good movies in there LOL, crying game,usual suspects and fight club,i love the double spoiler bc it makes it sick, luke kissed his sister in it haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow u guys spoiled some pretty good movies in there LOL, crying game,usual suspects and fight club,i love the double spoiler bc it makes it sick, luke kissed his sister in it haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sc@r</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-1#comment-183821</link>
		<dc:creator>Sc@r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-183821</guid>
		<description>wow u guys spoiled some pretty good movies in there LOL, crying game,usual suspects and fight club,i love the double spoiler bc it makes it sick, luke kissed his sister in it haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow u guys spoiled some pretty good movies in there LOL, crying game,usual suspects and fight club,i love the double spoiler bc it makes it sick, luke kissed his sister in it haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiteJr</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-1#comment-81592</link>
		<dc:creator>BiteJr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-81592</guid>
		<description>How could no one mention that Kevin Spacey IS Kaiser Soze!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could no one mention that Kevin Spacey IS Kaiser Soze!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiteJr</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-1#comment-183820</link>
		<dc:creator>BiteJr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-183820</guid>
		<description>How could no one mention that Kevin Spacey IS Kaiser Soze!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could no one mention that Kevin Spacey IS Kaiser Soze!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Payback</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-1#comment-81582</link>
		<dc:creator>Payback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-81582</guid>
		<description>Lovin-it: M.A.S.H. spoilers FTW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovin-it: M.A.S.H. spoilers FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Payback</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-1#comment-183819</link>
		<dc:creator>Payback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-183819</guid>
		<description>Lovin-it: M.A.S.H. spoilers FTW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovin-it: M.A.S.H. spoilers FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigwave</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-1#comment-81565</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigwave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-81565</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a sled.  There! I just saved you two boring boobless hours! - Peter Griffin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a sled.  There! I just saved you two boring boobless hours! &#8211; Peter Griffin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigwave</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-1#comment-183818</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigwave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-183818</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a sled.  There! I just saved you two boring boobless hours! - Peter Griffin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a sled.  There! I just saved you two boring boobless hours! &#8211; Peter Griffin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JQ</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php/comment-page-1#comment-81552</link>
		<dc:creator>JQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/shatner-may-be-in-star-trek-xi-after-all.php#comment-81552</guid>
		<description>It would be pretty easy to have Kirk in the film. They could make a very short frame tale whereby Kirk and Spock are having a flashback. They could even leave out the explanation and make it funny.

Spock: &quot;Aren&#039;t you supposed to be dead, Admiral?&quot;

Kirk: &quot;We&#039;ll talk about that later. Remember the time ...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be pretty easy to have Kirk in the film. They could make a very short frame tale whereby Kirk and Spock are having a flashback. They could even leave out the explanation and make it funny.</p>
<p>Spock: &#8220;Aren&#8217;t you supposed to be dead, Admiral?&#8221;</p>
<p>Kirk: &#8220;We&#8217;ll talk about that later. Remember the time &#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 592/598 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 17:38:28 -->
