<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex Sells: How Kevin Smith&#8217;s Porno Went Mainstream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: porno</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-152734</link>
		<dc:creator>porno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-152734</guid>
		<description>Wow. You are so awesome. Nas?l senin kadar be awesome bir duygu? Herkes senin gibi olmal?! ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. You are so awesome. Nas?l senin kadar be awesome bir duygu? Herkes senin gibi olmal?! &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porno</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-149712</link>
		<dc:creator>porno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-149712</guid>
		<description>Wow. You are so awesome. Nas?l senin kadar be awesome bir duygu? Herkes senin gibi olmal?! ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. You are so awesome. Nas?l senin kadar be awesome bir duygu? Herkes senin gibi olmal?! &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porno</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-121454</link>
		<dc:creator>porno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 01:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-121454</guid>
		<description>Wow. You are so awesome. How does it feel to be as awesome as you? Everyone must like you!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. You are so awesome. How does it feel to be as awesome as you? Everyone must like you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porno</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-207762</link>
		<dc:creator>porno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 01:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-207762</guid>
		<description>Wow. You are so awesome. How does it feel to be as awesome as you? Everyone must like you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. You are so awesome. How does it feel to be as awesome as you? Everyone must like you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff R Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-116288</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff R Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-116288</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I think it is a BRILLIANT maneuver on Kevin Smith&#039;s part. (And the Weinstien Company.) If I recall correctly, his last couple of films have done either terrible (Jersey Girl) or moderately well. (Clerks 2) Worse still, no one really cared either way. (His films are not $100 Million dollar flicks.)

Kevin Smith may be many things, but stupid is not one of them. (I&#039;m a fan by the way, before anyone thinks differently.) Invariably he knew (As well as the Weinstein Company I&#039;m sure.) that just having the name porno in the title would cause an uproar. That uproar would generate more publicity that any generated in a conventional sense. 

Let&#039;s face it, &quot;regular&quot; movie goers are not flocking to Kevin Smith films. They never have and most folks will just look down at him as a &quot;half rate&quot; amatuer film maker who is clever with dialog, but otherwise not worth the celluloid his movies are printed on.  (Again, I&#039;m a fan and not only see his movies in the theaters but purchase the DVDs folks. I personally LIKE Kevin Smith films so no hate mail.)

Leaving in the name porno and making a stink about the film will get more folks into the theaters, or at least paying attention, than otherwise would have happened. If this film is as good as it&#039;s supposed to be, the extra &quot;notice&quot; generated will equal more money at the box office and perhaps Kevin Smith&#039;s first film that breaks major dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I think it is a BRILLIANT maneuver on Kevin Smith&#8217;s part. (And the Weinstien Company.) If I recall correctly, his last couple of films have done either terrible (Jersey Girl) or moderately well. (Clerks 2) Worse still, no one really cared either way. (His films are not $100 Million dollar flicks.)</p>
<p>Kevin Smith may be many things, but stupid is not one of them. (I&#8217;m a fan by the way, before anyone thinks differently.) Invariably he knew (As well as the Weinstein Company I&#8217;m sure.) that just having the name porno in the title would cause an uproar. That uproar would generate more publicity that any generated in a conventional sense. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, &#8220;regular&#8221; movie goers are not flocking to Kevin Smith films. They never have and most folks will just look down at him as a &#8220;half rate&#8221; amatuer film maker who is clever with dialog, but otherwise not worth the celluloid his movies are printed on.  (Again, I&#8217;m a fan and not only see his movies in the theaters but purchase the DVDs folks. I personally LIKE Kevin Smith films so no hate mail.)</p>
<p>Leaving in the name porno and making a stink about the film will get more folks into the theaters, or at least paying attention, than otherwise would have happened. If this film is as good as it&#8217;s supposed to be, the extra &#8220;notice&#8221; generated will equal more money at the box office and perhaps Kevin Smith&#8217;s first film that breaks major dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djjeffhall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-207761</link>
		<dc:creator>djjeffhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-207761</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I think it is a BRILLIANT maneuver on Kevin Smith&#039;s part. (And the Weinstien Company.) If I recall correctly, his last couple of films have done either terrible (Jersey Girl) or moderately well. (Clerks 2) Worse still, no one really cared either way. (His films are not $100 Million dollar flicks.)

Kevin Smith may be many things, but stupid is not one of them. (I&#039;m a fan by the way, before anyone thinks differently.) Invariably he knew (As well as the Weinstein Company I&#039;m sure.) that just having the name porno in the title would cause an uproar. That uproar would generate more publicity that any generated in a conventional sense. 

Let&#039;s face it, &quot;regular&quot; movie goers are not flocking to Kevin Smith films. They never have and most folks will just look down at him as a &quot;half rate&quot; amatuer film maker who is clever with dialog, but otherwise not worth the celluloid his movies are printed on.  (Again, I&#039;m a fan and not only see his movies in the theaters but purchase the DVDs folks. I personally LIKE Kevin Smith films so no hate mail.)

Leaving in the name porno and making a stink about the film will get more folks into the theaters, or at least paying attention, than otherwise would have happened. If this film is as good as it&#039;s supposed to be, the extra &quot;notice&quot; generated will equal more money at the box office and perhaps Kevin Smith&#039;s first film that breaks major dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I think it is a BRILLIANT maneuver on Kevin Smith&#8217;s part. (And the Weinstien Company.) If I recall correctly, his last couple of films have done either terrible (Jersey Girl) or moderately well. (Clerks 2) Worse still, no one really cared either way. (His films are not $100 Million dollar flicks.)</p>
<p>Kevin Smith may be many things, but stupid is not one of them. (I&#8217;m a fan by the way, before anyone thinks differently.) Invariably he knew (As well as the Weinstein Company I&#8217;m sure.) that just having the name porno in the title would cause an uproar. That uproar would generate more publicity that any generated in a conventional sense. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, &#8220;regular&#8221; movie goers are not flocking to Kevin Smith films. They never have and most folks will just look down at him as a &#8220;half rate&#8221; amatuer film maker who is clever with dialog, but otherwise not worth the celluloid his movies are printed on.  (Again, I&#8217;m a fan and not only see his movies in the theaters but purchase the DVDs folks. I personally LIKE Kevin Smith films so no hate mail.)</p>
<p>Leaving in the name porno and making a stink about the film will get more folks into the theaters, or at least paying attention, than otherwise would have happened. If this film is as good as it&#8217;s supposed to be, the extra &#8220;notice&#8221; generated will equal more money at the box office and perhaps Kevin Smith&#8217;s first film that breaks major dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-116275</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-116275</guid>
		<description>While I agree that the Weinstein Company has done a clever job working around their 
difficulties, I still cannot fully understand how certain places have a problem with the word 
&quot;Porno&quot; in the title of this movie, but just four years ago I&#039;m sure, the same groups had no 
problem with and in fact were all agog about a film with the word &quot;Focker&quot; in the title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that the Weinstein Company has done a clever job working around their<br />
difficulties, I still cannot fully understand how certain places have a problem with the word<br />
&#8220;Porno&#8221; in the title of this movie, but just four years ago I&#8217;m sure, the same groups had no<br />
problem with and in fact were all agog about a film with the word &#8220;Focker&#8221; in the title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-207760</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-207760</guid>
		<description>While I agree that the Weinstein Company has done a clever job working around their 
difficulties, I still cannot fully understand how certain places have a problem with the word 
&quot;Porno&quot; in the title of this movie, but just four years ago I&#039;m sure, the same groups had no 
problem with and in fact were all agog about a film with the word &quot;Focker&quot; in the title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that the Weinstein Company has done a clever job working around their<br />
difficulties, I still cannot fully understand how certain places have a problem with the word<br />
&#8220;Porno&#8221; in the title of this movie, but just four years ago I&#8217;m sure, the same groups had no<br />
problem with and in fact were all agog about a film with the word &#8220;Focker&#8221; in the title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atomic Popcorn</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-116247</link>
		<dc:creator>Atomic Popcorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-116247</guid>
		<description>Great article Neil, well thought out and some great questions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Neil, well thought out and some great questions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atomic Popcorn</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-207759</link>
		<dc:creator>Atomic Popcorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-207759</guid>
		<description>Great article Neil, well thought out and some great questions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Neil, well thought out and some great questions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-116154</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-116154</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t see is why they just don&#039;t disguise the title into something more &quot;tasteful&quot;. &#039;Zack and Miri Make a Contemporary Adult Film&#039; for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t see is why they just don&#8217;t disguise the title into something more &#8220;tasteful&#8221;. &#8216;Zack and Miri Make a Contemporary Adult Film&#8217; for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-207758</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-207758</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t see is why they just don&#039;t disguise the title into something more &quot;tasteful&quot;. &#039;Zack and Miri Make a Contemporary Adult Film&#039; for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t see is why they just don&#8217;t disguise the title into something more &#8220;tasteful&#8221;. &#8216;Zack and Miri Make a Contemporary Adult Film&#8217; for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-116146</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-116146</guid>
		<description>I definitely think that regardless of the &quot;censorship&quot; of the film in the media, this would have done well in theaters. Seth Rogen and Kevin Smith? Comedy fans rejoice! Etc Etc. I can&#039;t speak on anywhere but Canada, but we don&#039;t have the same problems, so it may be comparable to look at the domestic office here to the US office. 

Anyway, I think that its going to benefit from the &quot;censorship&quot; because now when people see it or whatever, they can all giggle and feel like they&#039;re &quot;rebelling&quot;. They&#039;re going to go see it regardless of what mainstream media says, damn it!

Of course, the movie will then succeed because it&#039;s fucking hilarious, but it&#039;s important to get people in the door first.

Also, those halloween &#039;costumes&#039; are awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely think that regardless of the &#8220;censorship&#8221; of the film in the media, this would have done well in theaters. Seth Rogen and Kevin Smith? Comedy fans rejoice! Etc Etc. I can&#8217;t speak on anywhere but Canada, but we don&#8217;t have the same problems, so it may be comparable to look at the domestic office here to the US office. </p>
<p>Anyway, I think that its going to benefit from the &#8220;censorship&#8221; because now when people see it or whatever, they can all giggle and feel like they&#8217;re &#8220;rebelling&#8221;. They&#8217;re going to go see it regardless of what mainstream media says, damn it!</p>
<p>Of course, the movie will then succeed because it&#8217;s fucking hilarious, but it&#8217;s important to get people in the door first.</p>
<p>Also, those halloween &#8216;costumes&#8217; are awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/sex-sells-how-kevin-smiths-porno-went-mainstream.php/comment-page-1#comment-207757</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=19876#comment-207757</guid>
		<description>I definitely think that regardless of the &quot;censorship&quot; of the film in the media, this would have done well in theaters. Seth Rogen and Kevin Smith? Comedy fans rejoice! Etc Etc. I can&#039;t speak on anywhere but Canada, but we don&#039;t have the same problems, so it may be comparable to look at the domestic office here to the US office. 

Anyway, I think that its going to benefit from the &quot;censorship&quot; because now when people see it or whatever, they can all giggle and feel like they&#039;re &quot;rebelling&quot;. They&#039;re going to go see it regardless of what mainstream media says, damn it!

Of course, the movie will then succeed because it&#039;s fucking hilarious, but it&#039;s important to get people in the door first.

Also, those halloween &#039;costumes&#039; are awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely think that regardless of the &#8220;censorship&#8221; of the film in the media, this would have done well in theaters. Seth Rogen and Kevin Smith? Comedy fans rejoice! Etc Etc. I can&#8217;t speak on anywhere but Canada, but we don&#8217;t have the same problems, so it may be comparable to look at the domestic office here to the US office. </p>
<p>Anyway, I think that its going to benefit from the &#8220;censorship&#8221; because now when people see it or whatever, they can all giggle and feel like they&#8217;re &#8220;rebelling&#8221;. They&#8217;re going to go see it regardless of what mainstream media says, damn it!</p>
<p>Of course, the movie will then succeed because it&#8217;s fucking hilarious, but it&#8217;s important to get people in the door first.</p>
<p>Also, those halloween &#8216;costumes&#8217; are awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 468/468 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 23:27:51 -->
