Should ‘Rome’ Go From HBO to Big Screen?

Posted by Robin Ruinsky (robin@filmschoolrejects.com) on December 1, 2008

Rome

Rome. Now there was a television series! HBO knocked it out of the ballpark with its lavish take on ancient Rome in those crazy days of the ascendancy of Julius Caesar, the battles between Mark Antony and Octavian, the man who would be Augustus during the glory days of Rome.

All of this was told using two fictional characters, Lucius Vorenus, Kevin McKidd and Titus Pullo, Ray Stevenson. Brothers in arms in the Roman Legion, their stories were woven into the storylines as they became witnesses to history.

The cast included Cirian Hinds, James Purefoy, Lindsay Duncan and Max Pirkis turning in a chilling performance as a steely young Octavian.

It had it all! War, sex, gore, political intrigue! There was a punk, funky Cleopatra. Not to mention an unusual number of shots of that taboo of taboos in film, the penis. So many that an article was written about the difficulty the cinematographer had in filming the phallus or would that be phalli?

But Rome didn’t just succeed by breaking some taboos. Rome was one of the best series HBO produced with great scripts and lavish sets. Sets that HBO had destroyed when they foolishly balked at the cost of the series and prematurely killed it.

Instead of letting the series run for its allotted five years they got cold feet because of the expense and canceled it in year two. Now instead of the glories of Rome on Sundays, we have True Blood. No comment.

HBO now says they realize they were hasty in canceling Rome. That’s nice but it doesn’t change the fact that all that great history went to waste. Think of how all those emperors would feel to know HBO left them to languish in history books instead of giving them some screen time.

But now there’s a glimmer of hope. A reason for Rome fans to take heart. The word is that Bruno Heller, who is the creator of Rome wants to wrap things up in a feature film version of the series.

When last we left Rome,  Vorenus was dead, but Heller sees a way out of that little dilemma saying that we never saw his body on the pyre. Could this mean there could be a resurrection?

If Sex and the City could be revived in all its cotton candy designer clothes empty headed glory, then come on people, let’s give Rome a chance on the big screen.

If not, then all I can say is et tu HBO?

Source: Hollywood Reporter


Read more articles by Robin Ruinsky

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Aleric
    Even though I didn't have HBO I found a way to see the series because it was that good. BUT, leave it to HBO to cut it's own throat like it always does and kill a series that could have earned them millions in on going revenue.

    It's called multi year contracts that the stars sign to lock them into a fair wage and that everyone could live with. Bottom line though unless they can make it cheap and sell it high they will always sacrifice quality.
  • YES!!!!!!
  • Carrotman
    Great article, and I excited at the idea but i have one little problem. Lucius Vorenus and Titus Pullo weren't fictional characters. Those names were taken from Caesars own diaries. They are the only two common soldiers he ever mentions by name.
  • You're right! There really was a Lucius Vorenus and a Titus Pullo. I liked the way they were used in Rome to act as witnesses to history which in truth they were in real life.
blog comments powered by Disqus