Remake of John Carpenter’s The Thing is Actually… a Prequel?

Posted by Rob Hunter (rob@filmschoolrejects.com) on September 15, 2008

It’s been common and unfortunate knowledge for a few years that a remake of John Carpenter’s classic, The Thing, was in development somewhere in Hollywood. Fans were outraged by the idea, which of course, is ironic as Carpenter’s movie is itself a remake of Howard Hawk’s The Thing From Another World. Since that initial announcement there’s been nothing new to report. Until now.

The folks over at Latino Review recently spoke with Marc Abraham, the director of the upcoming film Flash of Genius. More importantly, Abraham also happens to be the producer on The Thing reboot, to be written by Battlestar Galactica’s Ronald Moore. Asked if his new film would be a sequel or a remake, he replied “This is more of a prequel than a sequel… It’s going to take place in the same time frame. These are the events leading up to the 1982 film.”

So what exactly are the events leading up to the opening of The Thing? I ask rhetorically since anyone who’s seen the movie already knows. Some nutty Norwegians find an alien spacecraft buried in the Antarctic ice alongside the alien itself. They cut it from its frozen berth, bring it back to their station, it wakes up, kills most of the Nordic scientists, takes the shape of a dog, and runs off across the snowy tundra with the survivors in hot pursuit. Carpenter’s film picks things up there and follows the alien’s integration into the small population of a U.S. Antarctic research station. The team’s numbers dwindle, as one by one the shape-shifting alien (as well as fear, paranoia, and craziness) whittles them down to two. But are they both human?

Some questions. Also rhetorical. Do we need a whole movie to show us what The Thing already told us? Will the dialog be in Norwegian since that’s the language spoken by the guys chasing the dog in the beginning of the movie? Will the Nordic researchers all be played by hot, young actors and actresses similar to what happened with the remake of Carpenter’s The Fog? Will the effects consist mainly of CGI as opposed to the incredible (and still effective 26 years later) practical effects of Rob Bottin? Will the prequel reach even an iota of the paranoia and dread on display in Carpenter’s film?

And will it be as cool as this music video for French techno duo Zombie Zombie? It’s stop-motion fun featuring GI Joe vs. The Thing, and while the whole thing is pretty cool, the action starts around the four-minute mark for those of you with limited patience.


Read more articles by Rob Hunter

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • T
    Carpenter's Thing is a masterpiece - the perfect blend of horror, sci-fi and monster flick. It manages to be both incredibly gory and psychologically chilling as the alien takes over man after man. The cast are fantastic, the setting is so creepy and claustrophobic and the usual minimal score adds to the might of its suspense. No remake, prequel, sequel, whatever will match the greatness of this film. Just LEAVE IT ALONE!

    T
  • Chris
    If Bottin is back doing the effects, I might get a little more excited. But as of now, there's really no need for this.
  • David
    Really though, this movie got under my skin and made me freak out. Its a scary thought to place it in the middle of nowhere, too.
  • Why not do another movie of 'The Thing'!? If it doesn't turn out as brilliant as Carpenter's... it will not hurt the old classic in anyway. Rob Zombies remake of Halloween didn't hurt the original and it certainly didn't change my view of the original. Entertainment is what it is, just entertainment. If it sucks... I'm out $8 and a slight feeling of disappointment, but the producers and investors are out much more and feel much worse about it. I have never understood people that do not direct, act, produce or invest in a movies pre-budget as to why they wouldn't like to see another sequel of an original film. In any case I'm looking forward to it :)
blog comments powered by Disqus