Comments on: Quantum of Solace: Shortest Bond Movie, Sexiest CD Cover

By: Jasmine Walker

Jasmine Walker — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:30:17 +0000

And will: OO7 Drive through the Quantum 16

By: Jasmine Walker

Jasmine Walker — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:30:00 +0000

And will: OO7 Drive through the Quantum 16

By: Mos

Mos — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:28:27 +0000

desperado poster minus the flames. nuff said

By: Mos

Mos — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:28:00 +0000

desperado poster minus the flames. nuff said

By: max

max — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:32:51 +0000

I do wish it was longer but then again i trust that if this bond follows the exellent
storyline that was put forth in casino royale then this will be a great bond film.
esspecially after seeing the trailers.

By: max

max — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:32:00 +0000

By: Robert Fure

Robert Fure — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:26:57 +0000

@Cole + Rob (=kissing in a tree)
Yes, Bond married in OHMSS, but his wife, Tracy, was killed on their wedding day. This messes up his head pretty bad.

Later, he also marries Kissy Suzuki in “You Only Live Twice,” though that was part of his cover. That being said, he still got her pregnant. There are some differences about their relationship between book and movie – in literature, their relationship isn’t really expounded too much upon. In film, he lives with her for several months.

By: Robert Fure

Robert Fure — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:26:00 +0000

@Cole + Rob (=kissing in a tree)
Yes, Bond married in OHMSS, but his wife, Tracy, was killed on their wedding day. This messes up his head pretty bad.

By: Rob Hunter

Rob Hunter — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:13:15 +0000

@ Cole… On Her Majesty’s Secret Service maybe?

By: Rob Hunter

Rob Hunter — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:13:00 +0000

@ Cole… On Her Majesty’s Secret Service maybe?

By: Cole Abaius

Cole Abaius — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:51:03 +0000

I’m on board for however the filmmakers want to rock this one. Casino inspires a lot of confidence.

And Fure…Bond has only been married if you count Never Say Never Again as being in the canon. Which it’s not. Because it sucks and was a paltry remake of Thunderball, anyway.

By: Cole Abaius

Cole Abaius — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:51:00 +0000

I’m on board for however the filmmakers want to rock this one. Casino inspires a lot of confidence.

And Fure…Bond has only been married if you count Never Say Never Again as being in the canon. Which it’s not. Because it sucks and was a paltry remake of Thunderball, anyway.

By: Robert Fure

Robert Fure — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:50:37 +0000

The movie should be 106 minutes long. Why make it longer? If the director accomplished his story in 106 minutes, why on this green earth would you ever want to pad it out with nothing? Yes, a good 2hour movie is a good 2hours, but a good 1:46hr movie is a good movie too. Could be better. Tighter pacing.

Casino Royale was great, but it did drag on about 15 minutes too long. It could have been tighter.

@Smuf
It was really an origin story, describing how he becomes the cold agent we’ve always known. And Bond has been in love before, he was even married.

By: Robert Fure

Robert Fure — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:50:00 +0000

Casino Royale was great, but it did drag on about 15 minutes too long. It could have been tighter.

@Smuf
It was really an origin story, describing how he becomes the cold agent we’ve always known. And Bond has been in love before, he was even married.

By: Smurf

Smurf — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:36:56 +0000

This is pretty accurate I think. Casino Royale was a good thriller but it does seem like they don’t give a crap about the Bond persona. I mean in the last movie he was all lovey dovey and wanted to go be with his girlfriend for ever and ever. Looks like in this movie he’s going to be too cool for school because his girlfriend’s dead.

By: Smurf

Smurf — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:36:00 +0000

By: Alericc

Alericc — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:34:55 +0000

I have to agree that it troubles me to see they have shortened the movie. I don’t mind sitting for 2 hours when there is a good movie playing. I also don’t mind them taking out the catch phrase, but something smells fishy.

Are we certain there wasn’t pressure from the studio to shorten the film and thus cut scenes we will have to wait to see in the extended version, ala Lord of the Rings?

By: Alericc

Alericc — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:34:00 +0000

Are we certain there wasn’t pressure from the studio to shorten the film and thus cut scenes we will have to wait to see in the extended version, ala Lord of the Rings?

By: Nevernude

Nevernude — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:40:08 +0000

I don’t think Bond’s martini is neither shaken nor stirred. In fact, i don’t think he gives a damn.

By: Nevernude

Nevernude — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:40:00 +0000

I don’t think Bond’s martini is neither shaken nor stirred. In fact, i don’t think he gives a damn.