Quantum of Solace: Shortest Bond Movie, Sexiest CD Cover

Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.com) on September 23, 2008

Daniel Craig as James Bond

As November 14th continues to inch closer and closer — quite literally — by the day, the one man that is one almost every movie fan’s mind is Bond, James Bond. I know that I, personally, am more excited to see Bond return to the big screen in Quantum of Solace than I am about any other movie from here until the end of the year. According to early reports, this Bond is going to be the bloodiest, the most intense and the most visually exciting of the entire 22 film series. And if it comes through on those claims, those will just be more marks on the belt, because as various news stories have proven today, this Bond is unique in a lot of ways — some potentially good and some potentially bad.

First up is the revelation that at 106 minutes, Quantum of Solace is to be the shortest of all the Bond films, the first in the series to clock in at less than two hours since 1997’s Tomorrow Never Dies. For fans, this could spell a sigh of relief, especially considering the fact that 2006’s Casino Royale was the longest Bond film in history, clocking in at an almost gruesome 144 minutes. But as Quantum director Marc Forster explained to Cinematical, this new film skips all of the Bond-brooding and reflection:

“…you know, like in the middle of Casino [Royale] they had a very long card game which, which was, was … and in this movie it’s shorter and doesn’t have that type of card game where you sort of reflect more because the story didn’t require it. So the movie is, you know, a little over an hour and forty minutes, so it’s much of a more compact emotional intense journey than Casino, which, I think, had more reflective moments maybe.”

Fair enough, I will take the phrase “more compact emotional intense journey” as Forster eluding to more action, and that’s a good thing.

As well, the kids over at MI6 have uncovered the cover to the film’s CD Soundtrack, the top half of which can be seen below. You can see all of it by giving it a click.

Quantum of Solace Soundtrack Cover

I will admit that while I was impressed with the beats put together by Jack White on the new theme, entitled “Another Way to Die,” I was not a fan of the vocal mix between White and Alicia Keys. The song, to say the least, was a let-down — hopefully the rest of the soundtrack doesn’t follow suit.

And finally, according to British outlet The Independent, the 106 minute runtime of Quantum of Solace will leave no room for Bond to drop his signature catchphrase, “Bond, James Bond.” As Marc Forster explains, it wasn’t an intentional slight against the Bond lineage, but a matter of feasibility:

“There was a ‘Bond, James Bond’ in the script. There are several places where we shot it as well, but it never worked as we hoped. I just felt we should cut it out, and [producers] Barbara Broccoli and Michael Wilson agreed, and Daniel agreed, too. It’s nice to be open-minded about the Bond formula. You can always go back to them later on.”

Will this upset the 007 fan community, one which has roots all over the world? According to Ajay Chowdhury, editor of Kiss Kiss Bang Bang magazine (via CommanderBond.net), that’s doubtful:

“The producers have been mixing and matching the famous Bond tropes—such as the theme song and the gun-barrel sequence,’ he said. ‘But this time there is a theme song by Jack White and Alicia Keys. If this line of script is not in there it’s not going to undo the foundations of Bond. The fans didn’t miss Moneypenny or Q. Bond is the only British character with worldwide resonance now, apart from Harry Potter. The producers are paying more attention to psychology and relationships, as well as adventure. Quantum of Solace picks up from Casino Royale, which was a really good thriller first and a good Bond movie second.”

I would have to agree with Chowdhury’s assessment — it seems that Bond fans are a bit more civilized and open minded than say, Star Wars fans. Though, I believe Star Wars fans have plenty of reasons to be upset — Bond fans have 21, going on 22 films in the franchise. They’ve seen ups and downs, rights and wrongs over the course of the past 40+ years of films. And I’d say that they would be more than willing to sacrifice one classic Bond trope for the current upswing in quality. And don’t worry fans, as you can see from the picture to the right, Bond still drinks his Vodka Martinis — which we can assume is shaken, not stirred.


Read more articles by Neil Miller

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Ryan O'Brien
    106 minutes! NO!!! GRRR... I want to be in a theater at least two hours for what tickets cost
    nowadays! Also they should have the "Bond, James Bond" line. Every other film, including
    Casino Royale did! Still, although the card game could have been a bit shorter, I'd much
    prefer 'Q of S' to be longer than 106!
  • Nevernude
    I don't think Bond's martini is neither shaken nor stirred. In fact, i don't think he gives a damn.
  • Alericc
    I have to agree that it troubles me to see they have shortened the movie. I don't mind sitting for 2 hours when there is a good movie playing. I also don't mind them taking out the catch phrase, but something smells fishy.

    Are we certain there wasn't pressure from the studio to shorten the film and thus cut scenes we will have to wait to see in the extended version, ala Lord of the Rings?
  • Smurf
    This is pretty accurate I think. Casino Royale was a good thriller but it does seem like they don't give a crap about the Bond persona. I mean in the last movie he was all lovey dovey and wanted to go be with his girlfriend for ever and ever. Looks like in this movie he's going to be too cool for school because his girlfriend's dead.
  • The movie should be 106 minutes long. Why make it longer? If the director accomplished his story in 106 minutes, why on this green earth would you ever want to pad it out with nothing? Yes, a good 2hour movie is a good 2hours, but a good 1:46hr movie is a good movie too. Could be better. Tighter pacing.

    Casino Royale was great, but it did drag on about 15 minutes too long. It could have been tighter.

    @Smuf
    It was really an origin story, describing how he becomes the cold agent we've always known. And Bond has been in love before, he was even married.
  • I'm on board for however the filmmakers want to rock this one. Casino inspires a lot of confidence.

    And Fure...Bond has only been married if you count Never Say Never Again as being in the canon. Which it's not. Because it sucks and was a paltry remake of Thunderball, anyway.
  • @ Cole... On Her Majesty's Secret Service maybe?
  • @Cole + Rob (=kissing in a tree)
    Yes, Bond married in OHMSS, but his wife, Tracy, was killed on their wedding day. This messes up his head pretty bad.

    Later, he also marries Kissy Suzuki in "You Only Live Twice," though that was part of his cover. That being said, he still got her pregnant. There are some differences about their relationship between book and movie - in literature, their relationship isn't really expounded too much upon. In film, he lives with her for several months.
  • max
    I do wish it was longer but then again i trust that if this bond follows the exellent
    storyline that was put forth in casino royale then this will be a great bond film.
    esspecially after seeing the trailers.
  • Mos
    desperado poster minus the flames. nuff said
blog comments powered by Disqus